Open access
Open access
Powered by Google Translator Translator

Nutrition (all articles)

Phase 3 RCT: Resmetirom Significantly Improves NASH Resolution and Liver Fibrosis

16 Nov, 2024 | 13:56h | UTC

Background: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a progressive liver disease with no approved treatments. It significantly increases the risk of liver-related complications, especially in patients with type 2 diabetes. Resmetirom, a thyroid hormone receptor beta-selective agonist, is being investigated for its potential to treat NASH and liver fibrosis.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of resmetirom in resolving NASH and improving fibrosis in adults with biopsy-confirmed NASH and fibrosis stages F1B to F3.

Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial randomized 966 adults with NASH to receive once-daily resmetirom (80 mg or 100 mg) or placebo for 52 weeks. Primary endpoints included (1) NASH resolution with no fibrosis worsening and (2) fibrosis improvement by at least one stage without NAFLD activity score worsening. Secondary outcomes included changes in lipid profiles and liver biomarkers.

Results: At 52 weeks, NASH resolution occurred in 25.9% of patients receiving 80 mg and 29.9% receiving 100 mg of resmetirom, compared with 9.7% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both doses vs. placebo). Fibrosis improved by at least one stage in 24.2% (80 mg) and 25.9% (100 mg) of resmetirom-treated patients versus 14.2% for placebo (P<0.001). LDL cholesterol reductions were −13.6% (80 mg) and −16.3% (100 mg) at 24 weeks versus 0.1% for placebo (P<0.001). Improvements were also noted in triglycerides, liver enzymes, and imaging biomarkers. Adverse events, primarily mild gastrointestinal symptoms, were more frequent with resmetirom. Serious adverse events were similar across groups (10.9%–12.7%).

Conclusions: Resmetirom significantly improved NASH resolution and fibrosis compared to placebo, demonstrating its potential as a treatment for NASH with liver fibrosis.

Implications for Practice: Resmetirom offers a promising treatment option for NASH, potentially altering the disease course and improving outcomes. Clinicians should monitor for regulatory approval and long-term safety data.

Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include robust biopsy-confirmed endpoints and a large sample size. Limitations include short follow-up and lack of clinical-outcome data.

Future Research: Long-term studies are needed to assess durability, safety, and effects on clinical outcomes like cirrhosis and liver-related mortality.

Reference: Harrison SA, Bedossa P, Guy CD, et al. A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Resmetirom in NASH with Liver Fibrosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2024;390(6):497-509. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2309000

 


Review: Frailty in Older Adults

10 Nov, 2024 | 18:03h | UTC

Introduction: Frailty is a state of decreased physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes, becoming more prevalent with age. This review by Kim and Rockwood outlines definitions, biological mechanisms, measurement, and management of frailty in older adults, aiming to guide clinical practice.

Key Recommendations:

  1. Definitions of Frailty: Clinicians should recognize two predominant concepts: the Fried frailty phenotype, defining frailty as a clinical syndrome with features like exhaustion, weakness, slowness, inactivity, and weight loss; and the deficit-accumulation model, quantifying frailty based on accumulated health deficits.
  2. Biology of Frailty: Understanding biological mechanisms—such as chronic inflammation, cellular senescence, mitochondrial dysfunction, deregulated nutrient sensing, and hormonal changes—is essential for identifying modifiable risk factors and developing targeted interventions.
  3. Measurement of Frailty: Utilize validated assessment tools appropriate to the clinical context. The Fried frailty phenotype and the deficit-accumulation frailty index are widely used; brief screening tools and performance measures like gait speed can be practical, especially in acute care settings.
  4. Management and Interventions for Frailty: Management should focus on increasing physiological reserve through multicomponent interventions. Exercise (aerobic and resistance training), combined with nutritional support, comprehensive geriatric assessment, and medication optimization, has been shown to ameliorate frailty and improve mobility, strength, and daily functioning.
  5. Frailty Screening Before Stressful Treatments: In high-risk clinical contexts such as oncology and surgery, pre-treatment frailty assessment can guide decision-making, personalize care plans, and improve outcomes by reducing treatment-related adverse effects.
  6. Evidence Gaps and Future Directions: More research is needed on effective strategies for frailty identification, interventions to prevent or reverse frailty, and the cost-effectiveness of frailty-guided care models, particularly in primary care settings.

Conclusion: Incorporating frailty assessment into clinical practice enables personalized, holistic care that aligns with older patients’ health goals and needs. Interventions targeting frailty can enhance physiological reserve, reduce vulnerability to stressors, and improve clinical outcomes. Further research is essential to optimize frailty management strategies and fully realize the benefits of frailty-guided care in our aging society.

Reference: Kim DH, Rockwood K. Frailty in Older Adults. New England Journal of Medicine. 2024;391(6):538-548. DOI:http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2301292

 


RCT: Vitamin K2 Reduces Nocturnal Leg Cramps in Older Adults

28 Oct, 2024 | 18:59h | UTC

Background Nocturnal leg cramps (NLCs) affect 50% to 60% of adults, causing significant discomfort, sleep disturbances, and reduced quality of life. Current treatments lack robust evidence for efficacy and safety, with quinine no longer recommended due to severe adverse effects. Vitamin K2 has shown promise in reducing muscle cramps in dialysis patients, suggesting potential benefits for managing NLCs.

Objective To evaluate whether vitamin K2 supplementation reduces the frequency, duration, and severity of nocturnal leg cramps in older adults compared with placebo.

Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted in China from September 2022 to December 2023, 199 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 years or older with at least two episodes of NLCs over a two-week screening period were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive daily oral vitamin K2 (menaquinone-7, 180 μg) or placebo for eight weeks. The primary outcome was the mean number of NLCs per week. Secondary outcomes included cramp duration and severity, measured on a 1 to 10 analog scale.

Results Of the 199 participants (mean age 72.3 ± 5.5 years; 54.3% female), 103 received vitamin K2 and 96 received placebo. Baseline weekly cramp frequency was similar between groups (vitamin K2: 2.60 ± 0.81; placebo: 2.71 ± 0.80). Over eight weeks, the vitamin K2 group experienced a significant reduction in mean weekly cramps to 0.96 ± 1.41, while the placebo group increased to 3.63 ± 2.20 (between-group difference: −2.67; 95% CI, −2.86 to −2.49; P < .001). The vitamin K2 group also showed greater reductions in cramp severity (mean decrease of 2.55 ± 2.12 points vs 1.24 ± 1.16 points in placebo) and duration (mean decrease of 0.90 ± 0.88 minutes vs 0.32 ± 0.78 minutes in placebo). No adverse events related to vitamin K2 were reported.

Conclusions Vitamin K2 supplementation significantly reduced the frequency, severity, and duration of nocturnal leg cramps in older adults, demonstrating both efficacy and safety.

Implications for Practice Vitamin K2 may offer an effective and safe therapeutic option for managing NLCs in older individuals, addressing a significant unmet clinical need in primary care.

Study Strengths and Limitations Strengths include the randomized, double-blind design and focus on an older population; limitations involve the relatively mild symptoms of participants and lack of assessment of quality of life or sleep improvements.

Future Research Further studies should assess the impact of vitamin K2 on sleep quality and quality of life in patients with more severe NLCs and explore the underlying mechanisms of its muscle-relaxing effects.

Reference Tan J, Zhu R, Li Y, et al. Vitamin K2 in Managing Nocturnal Leg Cramps: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Internal Medicine. Published online October 28, 2024. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5726


RCT: Low-Dose Amitriptyline Effective as Second-Line Treatment for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

20 Oct, 2024 | 15:56h | UTC

Background: Most patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are managed in primary care. When first-line therapies—such as dietary changes and antispasmodic drugs—are ineffective, the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends considering low-dose tricyclic antidepressants as second-line treatment. However, their effectiveness in primary care is uncertain, and they are infrequently prescribed in this setting.

Objective: To determine whether titrated low-dose amitriptyline is effective as a second-line treatment for IBS in primary care.

Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (ATLANTIS) conducted at 55 general practices in England, 463 adults aged 18 years or older with Rome IV IBS and ongoing symptoms despite first-line therapies were randomized 1:1 to receive low-dose oral amitriptyline (10 mg once daily) or placebo for 6 months. Dose titration over 3 weeks up to 30 mg once daily was allowed according to symptoms and tolerability. The primary outcome was the IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included subjective global assessment (SGA) of relief of IBS symptoms, adequate relief for at least 50% of weeks, and adverse events.

Results: Among 463 participants (mean age 48.5 years; 68% female), low-dose amitriptyline was superior to placebo at 6 months, with a significant mean difference in IBS-SSS score between groups (–27.0; 95% CI, –46.9 to –7.1; P = .0079). More participants reported relief of IBS symptoms with amitriptyline compared to placebo (61% vs 45%; odds ratio [OR] 1.78; 95% CI, 1.19–2.66; P = .0050). Adequate relief of IBS symptoms for at least 50% of weeks was higher with amitriptyline (41% vs 30%; OR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.20–2.03; P = .0008). Adverse events were more frequent with amitriptyline, mainly related to anticholinergic effects such as dry mouth (54%) and drowsiness (53%), but most were mild. Withdrawals due to adverse events were slightly higher with amitriptyline (13% vs 9%).

Conclusions: Low-dose amitriptyline was superior to placebo as a second-line treatment for IBS in primary care and was safe and well tolerated.

Implications for Practice: General practitioners should consider prescribing low-dose amitriptyline to patients with IBS whose symptoms do not improve with first-line therapies, providing appropriate support for patient-led dose titration.

Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the large sample size, primary care setting, and extended treatment duration. Limitations involve underrepresentation of patients with IBS with constipation, potential unblinding due to side effects, and a predominantly White participant population.

Future Research: Further trials assessing amitriptyline as a first-line therapy for IBS in primary care and studies on long-term outcomes are recommended.

Reference: Ford AC, Wright-Hughes A, Alderson SL, et al. Amitriptyline at Low-Dose and Titrated for Irritable Bowel Syndrome as Second-Line Treatment in Primary Care (ATLANTIS): a Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial. Lancet. 2023; DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01523-4

 


RCT: Milk Elimination Diet Comparable to Four-Food Elimination in Pediatric EoE

20 Oct, 2024 | 15:04h | UTC

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated condition characterized by eosinophil infiltration of the esophageal mucosa, leading to symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and dysphagia in children. While elimination of six common food allergens is effective, this approach is highly restrictive and may adversely affect quality of life (QoL). Less restrictive diets could potentially balance efficacy with improved QoL.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of a one-food elimination diet excluding milk (1FED) versus a four-food elimination diet excluding milk, egg, wheat, and soy (4FED) in treating pediatric EoE.

Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, nonblinded trial conducted at ten sites in the United States, 63 children aged 6 to 17 years with histologically active and symptomatic EoE were randomized 1:1 to either 1FED (n = 38) or 4FED (n = 25) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was symptom improvement measured by the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score (PEESS). Secondary endpoints included the proportion achieving histologic remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field), changes in histologic features (histology scoring system), endoscopic severity (endoscopic reference score), transcriptome profiling (EoE diagnostic panel), QoL scores, and predictors of remission.

Results: Out of 63 participants, 51 completed the study (1FED, n = 34; 4FED, n = 17). The 4FED group showed a greater improvement in mean PEESS scores compared to the 1FED group (−25.0 vs. −14.5; P = .04). However, histologic remission rates were similar between 4FED and 1FED (41% vs. 44%; P = 1.00). Changes in the histology scoring system (−0.25 vs. −0.29; P = .77), endoscopic reference score (−1.10 vs. −0.58; P = .47), and QoL scores were comparable between groups. The withdrawal rate was higher in the 4FED group compared to the 1FED group (32% vs. 11%; P = .0496).

Conclusions: While the 4FED moderately improved symptoms more than the 1FED, both diets resulted in similar histologic, endoscopic, QoL, and transcriptomic outcomes. Given its comparable effectiveness, better tolerability, and simplicity, the 1FED is a reasonable first-choice therapy for pediatric EoE.

Implications for Practice: Eliminating cow’s milk alone may be preferable as initial dietary therapy for children with EoE due to its simplicity and similar efficacy compared to more restrictive diets. Clinicians should consider starting with a milk elimination diet before progressing to more restrictive elimination diets if necessary.

Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of the study include its randomized, multicenter design; standardized treatment instructions; and use of validated symptom and QoL instruments. Limitations include early termination due to low enrollment, a higher withdrawal rate in the 4FED group, nonblinded interventions, and potential bias from participant expectations.

Future Research: Further large-scale, randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and to identify biomarkers that predict response to dietary therapy in pediatric EoE.

Reference: Kliewer KL, Abonia JP, Aceves SS, et al. (2024) One-food versus 4-food elimination diet for pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis: A multisite randomized trial. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2024.08.023

 


Phase 2 RCT: Ponsegromab Shows Promise for the Treatment of Cancer Cachexia

23 Sep, 2024 | 21:48h | UTC

Background: Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by weight loss, muscle wasting, and reduced quality of life. Elevated levels of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), a cytokine, have been associated with cachexia. Ponsegromab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits GDF-15, has shown potential in reversing cachexia in early studies by improving weight, appetite, and physical activity. This phase 2, randomized, double-blind trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ponsegromab in patients with cancer cachexia and elevated GDF-15 levels.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of ponsegromab on body weight, cachexia symptoms, appetite, physical activity, and safety in cancer cachexia patients with elevated GDF-15 levels.

Methods: In this 12-week study, 187 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, or colorectal cancer and elevated GDF-15 levels (≥1500 pg/mL) were randomized into four groups: ponsegromab 100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, or placebo, administered subcutaneously every four weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in body weight from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcomes included appetite and cachexia symptoms, physical activity measured via digital devices, and safety. The trial also included exploratory endpoints like changes in skeletal muscle mass.

Results:
At 12 weeks, patients treated with ponsegromab showed significant weight gain compared to placebo. The median weight gain differences were 1.22 kg in the 100-mg group, 1.92 kg in the 200-mg group, and 2.81 kg in the 400-mg group. Significant improvements in appetite and cachexia symptoms were observed in the 400-mg group compared to placebo. Physical activity, measured by nonsedentary time, also increased by 72 minutes per day in the 400-mg group. Adverse events were reported by 70% of ponsegromab patients and 80% of placebo patients. Serious adverse events occurred at similar rates across groups, but none were deemed related to treatment. No significant safety concerns were identified.

Conclusions: Ponsegromab effectively increased body weight and improved cachexia symptoms in patients with cancer cachexia and elevated GDF-15 levels, supporting GDF-15’s role as a key driver of cachexia. The findings suggest that ponsegromab may be a promising therapeutic option for managing cancer cachexia, with a favorable safety profile.

Implications for Practice: Ponsegromab could represent a targeted therapy for cancer cachexia, addressing weight loss, appetite, and physical function. Clinicians may consider its use for patients with advanced cancers experiencing cachexia, particularly those with elevated GDF-15 levels.

Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of the study include its randomized, double-blind design and the use of objective measures such as digital physical activity tracking. Limitations include the relatively short trial duration, and missing physical activity data for some patients. Additionally, the efficacy of ponsegromab across different baseline levels of GDF-15 requires further investigation.

Future Research: Larger and longer-term trials are necessary to confirm the therapeutic benefit of ponsegromab in cancer cachexia. Future research should explore its impact on survival and assess whether GDF-15 inhibition benefits other conditions associated with elevated GDF-15, such as heart failure and chronic kidney disease.

Reference: Groarke, J. D., et al. (2024). Ponsegromab for the Treatment of Cancer Cachexia. New England Journal of Medicine. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2409515

 


RCT: Liraglutide for Children Aged 6 to <12 Years with Obesity

14 Sep, 2024 | 19:40h | UTC

Summary:

A recent phase 3a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine examined the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in children aged 6 to less than 12 years with obesity. Currently, no medications are approved for treating nonmonogenic, nonsyndromic obesity in this age group, making this study particularly noteworthy.

Methods:

  • Participants: 82 children with obesity (BMI ≥95th percentile for age and sex).
  • Design: Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (up to 3.0 mg) or placebo, alongside lifestyle interventions, over a 56-week treatment period, followed by a 26-week follow-up.
  • Primary Endpoint: Percentage change in BMI from baseline to week 56.
  • Secondary Endpoints: Percentage change in body weight and the proportion achieving a ≥5% reduction in BMI.

Results:

  • BMI Reduction: At week 56, the liraglutide group experienced a mean BMI reduction of –5.8%, compared to a +1.6% increase in the placebo group. The estimated difference was –7.4 percentage points (95% CI, –11.6 to –3.2; P<0.001).
  • Body Weight: Mean body weight increased by 1.6% in the liraglutide group versus 10.0% in the placebo group, a difference of –8.4 percentage points (95% CI, –13.4 to –3.3; P=0.001).
  • BMI Reduction ≥5%: Achieved by 46% of participants in the liraglutide group versus 9% in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio, 6.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 28.8; P=0.02).
  • Adverse Events: Reported in 89% of the liraglutide group and 88% of the placebo group. Gastrointestinal events were more common with liraglutide (80% vs. 54%).

Discussion:

While the study suggests that liraglutide can lead to a statistically significant reduction in BMI among children aged 6 to less than 12 years with obesity, several considerations should temper our enthusiasm:

  1. Sample Size and Diversity: The trial included only 82 participants, with a predominantly White population (72%), which may limit the generalizability of the findings to broader, more diverse populations.
  2. Duration and Long-Term Effects: The study spanned 56 weeks, with a 26-week follow-up. The long-term efficacy and safety of liraglutide in this age group remain uncertain, particularly concerning growth, development, and potential rebound weight gain after discontinuation.
  3. Clinical Significance: Although the reduction in BMI was statistically significant, the clinical significance—especially regarding long-term health outcomes and obesity-related comorbidities—is less clear. Obesity is a chronic and relapsing condition, and a modest reduction in BMI may not translate into substantial health benefits without sustained intervention.
  4. Adverse Events: The high incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events raises questions about the tolerability of liraglutide in young children. Managing these side effects in a pediatric population can be challenging and may affect adherence.
  5. Lack of Consensus on BMI Reduction: There’s no international consensus on what constitutes a clinically meaningful BMI reduction in children, complicating the interpretation of the results.

Conclusion:

This trial provides preliminary evidence that liraglutide, combined with lifestyle interventions, may help reduce BMI in children under 12 with obesity. However, given the limitations—including small sample size, short duration, and safety concerns—it’s prudent to approach these findings with cautious optimism. More extensive studies with longer follow-up periods and more diverse populations are necessary to fully assess the long-term efficacy and safety of liraglutide in this vulnerable age group.

Takeaway:

While liraglutide shows promise as an adjunct therapy for pediatric obesity, it’s essential to weigh the benefits against the potential risks and uncertainties. Clinicians should continue to prioritize established lifestyle interventions and consider pharmacotherapy on a case-by-case basis, pending further evidence.

Reference: Fox CK., et al (2024). Liraglutide for Children 6 to <12 Years of Age with Obesity – A Randomized Trial. N Engl J Med. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2407379

 


News Release: SCOFF Trial Confirms Fasting Not Necessary Before Cardiac Catheterisation Procedures

7 Sep, 2024 | 10:10h | UTC

1 September 2024 – London, United Kingdom – New findings from the SCOFF trial, presented at ESC Congress 2024, suggest that fasting prior to minimally invasive cardiac catheterisation procedures under conscious sedation does not increase the risk of complications. The trial supports reconsidering current guidelines on pre-procedural fasting.

Key Points for Physicians:

– No increased complications: The SCOFF trial found no significant difference in adverse outcomes, such as aspiration pneumonia or hypoglycemia, between patients who fasted and those who ate normally before cardiac catheterisation.

– Improved patient satisfaction: Patients who did not fast reported higher satisfaction, with fewer complaints of discomfort and hunger.

– Potential guideline change: These findings, in line with previous studies like CHOW-NOW and TONIC, challenge the necessity of fasting before such procedures.

The trial’s lead investigator, Dr. David Ferreira (John Hunter Hospital, Australia), emphasized that avoiding fasting may improve patient experience without increasing risks, making it time to reconsider fasting guidelines for these procedures.

Study Overview:

– Trial design: Prospective, randomized, open-label, with blinded endpoint assessment.

– Participants: 716 patients undergoing coronary angiography, coronary intervention, or cardiac implantable electronic device procedures.

– Primary endpoint: Composite of hypotension, aspiration pneumonia, hyperglycemia, and hypoglycemia, showing a lower event rate in the non-fasting group (12.0%) compared to the fasting group (19.1%).

These results are likely to influence future clinical practice, providing greater flexibility for both patients and healthcare systems.

Source: https://www.escardio.org/The-ESC/Press-Office/Press-releases/SCOFF-trial-confirms-that-fasting-is-not-needed-before-cath-lab-procedures

 


Systematic Review: Nasogastric Feeding Increases Diarrhea and Pain Compared to Nasojejunal Feeding in Acute Pancreatitis – BMC Gastroenterol

18 Aug, 2024 | 19:23h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the safety and efficacy of nasogastric (NG) versus nasojejunal (NJ) feeding initiated within 48 hours of hospital admission in patients with moderate to severe acute pancreatitis. The analysis included four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 217 patients.

Main Findings: The review found no significant difference in mortality between NG and NJ feeding groups. However, NG feeding was associated with a higher incidence of diarrhea (RR 2.75, P = 0.02) and pain (RR 2.91, P = 0.002). The risk of infection was also higher in the NG group (6.67% vs. 3.33%, P = 0.027). No significant differences were observed in the need for surgical intervention, the requirement for parenteral nutrition, or the success rates of feeding procedures.

Implications for Practice: The findings suggest that while NG feeding does not increase mortality in acute pancreatitis, it is associated with higher rates of certain complications, particularly diarrhea and pain. Clinicians should consider these risks when choosing a feeding strategy for patients with acute pancreatitis, especially within the critical early 48-hour period post-admission.

Reference: Wang M, Shi H, Chen Q, Su B, Dong X, Shi H, Xu S. (2024). Comparative safety assessment of nasogastric versus nasojejunal feeding initiated within 48 hours post-admission versus unrestricted timing in moderate or severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterology, 24(207), 1-11. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03290-z.

 


Meta-Analysis: Long-Term Low-Carbohydrate Diets Improve Dyslipidemia but Not Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes – J Diabetes Investig

17 Aug, 2024 | 19:14h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of long-term low-carbohydrate diets (LCD) on glycemic control and other metabolic parameters in adults with type 2 diabetes. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 524 participants were included, with intervention durations ranging from 12 to 24 months.

Main Findings: The meta-analysis found no significant difference in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels between participants on long-term LCD and those on control diets (SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.11, P = 0.32). Similarly, there were no significant differences in weight loss, blood pressure, or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. However, LCDs were associated with a significant increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (SMD 0.22, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.41, P = 0.02) and a decrease in triglyceride levels (SMD -0.19; 95% CI -0.37 to -0.02; P = 0.03).

Implications for Practice: While long-term LCDs do not appear to improve glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes, they may be beneficial for managing dyslipidemia, specifically by increasing HDL cholesterol and reducing triglycerides. These findings suggest that LCDs could be considered as part of a strategy for addressing cardiovascular risk factors in this population, but they should not be relied upon for glycemic management.

Reference: Ichikawa, T., Okada, H., Hironaka, J., Nakajima, H., Okamura, T., Majima, S., … & Fukui, M. (2024). Efficacy of long‐term low carbohydrate diets for patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Diabetes Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.14271.

 


RCT: Dietary Acid Reduction with Fruits and Vegetables Slows CKD Progression and Lowers CVD Risk in Hypertensive Patients – Am J Med

17 Aug, 2024 | 15:49h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This five-year randomized control trial included 153 hypertensive patients with macroalbuminuria and normal kidney function. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a diet rich in base-producing fruits and vegetables, oral sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), or Usual Care. The primary objective was to assess the effects of dietary acid reduction on chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.

Main Findings: The study found that both fruits and vegetables and NaHCO3 slowed CKD progression compared to Usual Care, with significantly higher estimated glomerular filtration rates in the intervention groups. However, only the fruits and vegetables group showed significant reductions in systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and body mass index, leading to greater improvements in CVD risk indices.

Implications for Practice: The results support using fruits and vegetables as a foundational treatment for hypertension to reduce CKD progression and lower CVD risk, potentially with reduced reliance on pharmacological interventions.

Reference: Goraya, N., Madias, N. E., Simoni, J., Kahlon, M., Aksan, N., & Wesson, D. E. (2024). Kidney and Cardiovascular Protection Using Dietary Acid Reduction in Primary Hypertension: A Five-Year, Interventional, Randomized, Control Trial. The American Journal of Medicine, 000(000), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.06.006.

 


RCT: Eliminating Fasting Before Contrast-Enhanced CT in Outpatients Reduces Nausea and Vomiting Without Increasing Acute Adverse Reactions – Insights Imaging

11 Aug, 2024 | 13:41h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This single-center, randomized clinical trial was conducted in Spain with 1,103 adult outpatients undergoing non-emergency contrast-enhanced CT scans. Patients were randomized into two groups: one group fasted for at least 6 hours (control), while the other group had no food restrictions (intervention). The primary aim was to assess whether eliminating fasting affects the incidence of acute adverse reactions (AARs), such as nausea and vomiting.

Main Findings: The study found no significant difference in the overall incidence of acute adverse reactions between the fasting and non-fasting groups (3.21% vs. 2.30%; p = 0.36). However, the non-fasting group had a significantly lower incidence of nausea and vomiting (0.92% vs. 2.86%; p = 0.02). Multivariate logistic regression identified fasting, age, allergies, neurological diseases, and contrast media concentration as independent risk factors for nausea and vomiting.

Implications for Practice: The findings suggest that the traditional practice of fasting before contrast-enhanced CT scans is unnecessary and may increase the risk of nausea and vomiting. Therefore, unrestricted food intake should be allowed for most contrast-enhanced CT exams, reserving fasting only for specific imaging procedures.

Reference: Zitan Saidi et al. (2024). Fasting before contrast-enhanced CT and the incidence of acute adverse reactions: a single-center randomized clinical trial. Insights into Imaging, 15(195). DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01767-9.

 


Systematic Review: Uncertain Impact of Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy on Key Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes – Cochrane Database Syst Rev

11 Aug, 2024 | 12:42h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This Cochrane systematic review evaluates the effects of vitamin D supplementation alone or in combination with calcium and other vitamins/minerals during pregnancy. The analysis included 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 2,313 pregnant women. The review excluded 20 studies from previous versions due to trustworthiness concerns and incorporated one new study.

Main Findings: The evidence regarding vitamin D supplementation alone was very uncertain for its impact on pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm birth, and nephritic syndrome. There is low-certainty evidence suggesting that vitamin D may reduce the risk of severe postpartum hemorrhage and low birthweight, though the possibility of increased risk cannot be excluded. Supplementation with vitamin D plus calcium showed very uncertain effects on preterm birth and low birthweight, with no conclusive data on pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, or maternal adverse events. The combination of vitamin D, calcium, and other vitamins/minerals also yielded very uncertain evidence for all outcomes examined.

Implications for Practice: The current evidence does not provide strong support for routine vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy due to the low and very uncertain evidence on key outcomes. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to better understand the effects, particularly concerning maternal adverse events and neonatal health.

Reference: Palacios, C., Kostiuk, L. L., Cuthbert, A., & Weeks, J. (2024). Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7(7), CD008873. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008873.pub5.

 


Consensus Recommendations: Cardiovascular Risks in People With Narcolepsy – J Am Hear Assoc

10 Aug, 2024 | 21:48h | UTC

Introduction: The Journal of the American Heart Association recently published a consensus guideline by a panel of sleep and cardiology experts to address the heightened cardiovascular risks in individuals with narcolepsy. Given the increased prevalence of hypertension and cardiometabolic comorbidities in this population, the panel developed recommendations aimed at mitigating these risks.

Key Points:

1 – Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Narcolepsy:

– Individuals with narcolepsy, both Type 1 (NT1) and Type 2 (NT2), exhibit higher rates of cardiovascular and cardiometabolic diseases, such as hypertension, obesity, and diabetes, compared to the general population.

– The association of narcolepsy with conditions like obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and restless legs syndrome further elevates cardiovascular risk.

2 – Monitoring and Early Detection:

– Clinicians should annually monitor blood pressure, weight, and waist circumference in patients with narcolepsy, even in the absence of existing cardiovascular disease.

– Screening for lipid levels and hemoglobin A1c is recommended, especially in patients with risk factors like hypertension, obesity, and diabetes.

3 – Lifestyle and Therapeutic Interventions:

– Patients should be educated about the link between narcolepsy and cardiovascular disease. Emphasis should be placed on maintaining optimal sleep duration, regular exercise, healthy eating, and reducing sodium intake.

– The American Heart Association’s “Life’s Essential 8” guidelines should be followed to enhance overall cardiovascular health.

4 – Medication Management:

– Narcolepsy medications, particularly stimulants and sodium oxybate, can increase cardiovascular risk. Clinicians should consider the patient’s cardiovascular profile when prescribing these treatments and explore alternatives with lower cardiovascular impact if necessary.

5 – Sodium Reduction:

– High sodium intake, from both diet and certain narcolepsy medications, is associated with increased blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. Patients should be advised to reduce sodium intake, and clinicians should consider prescribing lower-sodium alternatives when possible.

Conclusion: These expert consensus recommendations underscore the importance of proactive cardiovascular risk management in patients with narcolepsy. By implementing these guidelines, clinicians can help mitigate the long-term cardiovascular risks associated with this chronic sleep disorder.

Guideline Reference: Kwon Y, Gami AS, Javaheri S, et al. Cardiovascular Risks in People With Narcolepsy: Expert Panel Consensus Recommendations. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2024;13. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035168. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.035168.

 


Erythritol Ingestion Increases Platelet Reactivity and Thrombosis Potential in Healthy Adults – Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol

10 Aug, 2024 | 21:11h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This interventional study evaluated the effects of erythritol versus glucose on platelet reactivity and thrombosis potential in 20 healthy volunteers, with 10 participants in each group. Researchers measured erythritol plasma levels and assessed platelet function through aggregometry and granule marker analysis both before and after ingestion of 30 g of erythritol or glucose.

Main Findings: Erythritol ingestion resulted in a more than 1000-fold increase in plasma erythritol concentration and significantly enhanced stimulus-dependent platelet aggregation and release of serotonin and CXCL4, markers of platelet activation. In contrast, glucose ingestion did not significantly alter platelet reactivity or granule marker release, highlighting erythritol’s unique pro-thrombotic effects.

Implications for Practice: These findings raise concerns regarding the safety of erythritol as a non-nutritive sweetener, particularly its potential to enhance thrombosis risk. The results suggest a need to reevaluate erythritol’s safety status and consider its impact on cardiovascular health in regulatory guidelines.

Reference: Witkowski, M., Wilcox, J., Province, V., Wang, Z., Nemet, I., Tang, W. H. W., & Hazen, S. L. (2024). Ingestion of the non-nutritive sweetener erythritol, but not glucose, enhances platelet reactivity and thrombosis potential in healthy volunteers. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.321019

 


New Guidelines Recommend Against Routine Vitamin D Testing and Treatment for Healthy Adults – J Clin Endocrinol Metab

4 Aug, 2024 | 19:19h | UTC

Introduction: The Endocrine Society has developed new clinical practice guidelines focused on the use of vitamin D for the prevention of various diseases. These guidelines were created by a multidisciplinary panel, including experts in adult and pediatric endocrinology, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, nutrition, and epidemiology.

Key Points:

1 – Empiric Vitamin D Supplementation in Children and Adolescents:

– Recommended to prevent nutritional rickets.

– May lower the risk of respiratory tract infections.

– Dosage in trials ranged from 300 to 2000 IU daily, with an average of about 1200 IU per day.

2 – Empiric Vitamin D Supplementation or Testing in Adults Under 75:

– Not recommended for generally healthy adults without specific indications.

3 – Empiric Vitamin D Supplementation in Adults Over 75:

– Suggested due to its potential to lower the risk of mortality.

– Treatment should be empirical, no testing recommended if there are no established indications for testing (e.g., hypocalcemia).

– Recommended daily rather than intermittent high doses. Dosage in clinical trials ranged from 400 to 3333 IU daily equivalent.

4 – Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy:

– Suggested to lower the risk of preeclampsia, intrauterine mortality, preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age birth, and neonatal mortality.

– Empiric supplementation recommended without routine 25(OH)D testing unless there are established indications for testing.

– Dosages in trials ranged from 600 to 5000 IU daily equivalent, with an average of about 2500 IU per day.

5 – Vitamin D and High-Risk Prediabetes:

– Suggested to reduce the progression to diabetes.

– In clinical trials, vitamin D dosages ranged from 842 to 7543 IU daily. The estimated weighted average was approximately 3500 IU per day.

6 – Routine 25(OH)D Testing:

– Not recommended for the general population, including those with obesity or dark complexion.

– No clear evidence defining optimal target levels for disease prevention.

Conclusion: These guidelines emphasize the importance of targeted vitamin D supplementation for specific age groups and conditions, while advising against routine testing for vitamin D levels in the general population. Empiric supplementation is considered beneficial, particularly in children, pregnant women, and older adults, and is feasible, cost-effective, and generally acceptable.

Guideline Reference: Demay, M. B., et al. (2024). Vitamin D for the Prevention of Disease: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 109, 1907-1947. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae290


RCT: Effects of combined time-restricted eating and high-intensity functional training on body composition and cardiometabolic health in women with obesity – PLOS One

7 May, 2024 | 15:28h | UTC

This randomized clinical trial investigated the effects of time-restricted eating (TRE) and high-intensity functional training (HIFT), both separately and in combination, on body composition and cardiometabolic health in inactive women with obesity. Sixty-four participants were assigned to three groups: TRE alone, HIFT alone, and both TRE and HIFT (TRE-HIFT). Over 12 weeks, the TRE-HIFT group showed the most significant improvements in waist and hip circumference, fat mass, total cholesterol, triglyceride levels, insulin sensitivity, and blood glucose levels compared to the other groups. Weight and BMI reductions were also more substantial in the TRE-HIFT group than in the HIFT-only group. Furthermore, while all groups exhibited improvements, those combining both interventions experienced more pronounced changes in cardiometabolic parameters, suggesting the potential of integrated lifestyle interventions for enhancing health outcomes in this population.

 

Reference (link to free full-text):

Ranya Ameur et al. (2024). Unlocking the power of synergy: High-intensity functional training and early time-restricted eating for transformative changes in body composition and cardiometabolic health in inactive women with obesity. PLOS ONE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301369

 


M-A: Effects of long-term salt substitution on cardiovascular mortality and events – Ann Intern Med

5 May, 2024 | 15:10h | UTC

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the impact of long-term salt substitution on cardiovascular outcomes by analyzing data from 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary investigation focused on mortality, major cardiovascular events (MACE), and adverse events with a study period of six months or longer. Key findings include a potential reduction in all-cause mortality (rate ratio [RR] of 0.88) and cardiovascular mortality (RR of 0.83), based on low-certainty evidence from studies predominantly conducted in China or Taiwan among older adults or those at higher cardiovascular risk. Results also indicated a slight reduction in MACE (RR of 0.85) with very low certainty. Evidence suggests no significant increase in serious adverse events. Limitations include the dominance of a single large RCT and limited generalizability of results to Western populations. The study concludes that while salt substitution could reduce mortality, the effects on cardiovascular events remain uncertain, with more robust evidence needed for broader demographic applicability.

 

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Hannah Greenwood et al. (2024). Long-Term Effect of Salt Substitution for Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, Volume 178, Pages 23-31. DOI: 10.7326/M23-2626.

 


RCT: Free Access to Water vs. Fasting Pre-Cesarean Reduces Vomiting and Increases Maternal Satisfaction

25 Mar, 2024 | 11:17h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This randomized controlled trial was carried out at the Obstetric Unit, Universiti Malaya Medical Center from October 2020 to May 2022. A total of 504 women scheduled for planned cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomized into two groups: 252 were allowed free access to water up until being called to the operating theater, and 252 were required to fast from midnight before the procedure. The study primarily aimed to evaluate the effects of these preoperative oral intake policies on perioperative vomiting and maternal satisfaction.

Main Findings: The results demonstrated significant benefits for the group with free access to water. Specifically, perioperative vomiting was observed in 3.6% of women with water access compared to 9.5% of those fasting, indicating a relative risk reduction. Maternal satisfaction scores were notably higher in the water access group, with median scores of 9 versus 5 for the fasting group. Additional findings included lower reports of thirst, fewer instances of preoperative intravenous hydration, reduced ketone presence in urine, and a lower average number of vasopressor doses needed. Significantly, 95.2% of participants in the water access group would recommend their regimen to a friend, compared to only 39.7% in the fasting group.

Implications for Practice: Allowing free access to water up until the time of surgery for women scheduled for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia significantly reduces the risk of perioperative vomiting and improves maternal satisfaction, without adversely affecting post-cesarean recovery or neonatal outcomes. These findings support revising current preoperative fasting guidelines to improve patient experience and potentially enhance clinical outcomes.

Reference: Ng, Y. L., Segaran, S., Yim, C. C. W., Lim, B. K., Hamdan, M., Gan, F., & Tan, P. C. (2024). Preoperative free access to water compared to fasting for planned cesarean under spinal anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S0002-9378(24)00447-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.018.


Cohort Study | Vegetarian diet linked to elevated hip fracture risk; BMI plays a partial role

9 Aug, 2023 | 15:16h | UTC

Risk of hip fracture in meat-eaters, pescatarians, and vegetarians: a prospective cohort study of 413,914 UK Biobank participants – BMC Medicine

 


ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients

7 Aug, 2023 | 14:52h | UTC

ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients – Clinical Nutrition

 


Meta-analysis | Even low levels of alcohol consumption may increase blood pressure

2 Aug, 2023 | 14:07h | UTC

Alcohol Intake and Blood Pressure Levels: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Nonexperimental Cohort Studies – Hypertension

News Release: Routinely drinking alcohol may raise blood pressure even in adults without hypertension – AHA Newsroom

 


RCT | Maternal egg intake in early neonatal period does not impact infant egg allergy risk

2 Aug, 2023 | 13:47h | UTC

Effect of Maternal Egg Intake During the Early Neonatal Period and Risk of Infant Egg Allergy at 12 Months Among Breastfeeding Mothers: A Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Network Open

See also: Visual Abstract

 


ESPEN Updated Guideline | Clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit

1 Aug, 2023 | 14:27h | UTC

ESPEN practical and partially revised guideline: Clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit – Clinical Nutrition

 


Review | Vegetarian and vegan diets: benefits and drawbacks

1 Aug, 2023 | 14:11h | UTC

Vegetarian and vegan diets: benefits and drawbacks – European Heart Journal (free for a limited period)

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Stay Updated in Your Specialty

Telegram Channels
Free

WhatsApp alerts 10-day free trial

No spam, just news.