Open access
Open access
Powered by Google Translator Translator

Oncology – Urological

RCT: Impact of single PSA screening invitation on 15-year prostate cancer mortality – JAMA

25 May, 2024 | 19:01h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This study is a secondary analysis of the Cluster Randomized Trial of PSA Testing for Prostate Cancer (CAP), which focused on the long-term effects of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening on prostate cancer mortality. It involved 415,357 men aged 50 to 69 years from 573 primary care practices across England and Wales. Participants were randomized to either receive a single invitation for a PSA screening or to a control group receiving standard practice without invitation. The follow-up period concluded on March 31, 2021, after a median duration of 15 years.

Main Findings: The intervention group, which received one PSA screening invitation, showed a prostate cancer mortality rate of 0.69% compared to 0.78% in the control group, translating to a rate ratio of 0.92 and demonstrating a statistically significant but modest reduction in death from prostate cancer. Additionally, the screening led to increased detection rates of low-grade and localized prostate cancer. However, there were no significant differences in detection of more advanced cancer stages between the two groups. All-cause mortality rates were similar across both groups.

Implications for Practice: While the introduction of a single PSA screening invitation was associated with a slight decrease in prostate cancer mortality over 15 years, the absolute reduction was small. These findings suggest that while PSA screening can detect cancer earlier, its impact on long-term survival is limited and should be weighed against the potential for overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Future strategies in prostate cancer screening might need to focus more on risk stratification and personalized screening approaches to maximize benefits and minimize unnecessary interventions.

 

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Martin RM et al. (2024). Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and 15-Year Prostate Cancer Mortality: A Secondary Analysis of the CAP Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 331(17), 1460-1470. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.4011

 


AUA/ASCO/SUO Updated guidelines for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer

1 May, 2024 | 21:40h | UTC

The 2024 update to the muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) guidelines provides a risk-assessed framework for the treatment of this high-risk patient group, which constitutes about 25% of all bladder cancer diagnoses. These guidelines, revised through the AUA amendment process, integrate new research findings from May 2020 to November 2023, involving a rigorous review of 3739 abstracts and 46 full-text articles. Key updates include refined protocols for neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, radical cystectomy, and multi-modal bladder-preserving therapies. Recommendations are categorized based on evidence strength, ranging from high to low, and are supplemented by clinical principles and expert opinions in areas lacking robust data. This structured approach aims to enhance clinical outcomes by updating practitioners on optimal management strategies and emphasizing the need for ongoing research to refine these recommendations.

 

Reference (link to free full-text):

Holzbeierlein et al. (2024). Treatment of Non-Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/ASCO/SUO GUIDELINE (2017; Amended 2020, 2024). Journal of Urology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003981

 


Meta-Analysis: Efficacy of MRI in prostate cancer screening for reducing unnecessary biopsies

28 Apr, 2024 | 20:13h | UTC

This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of incorporating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into prostate cancer screening pathways, compared to prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–only screening strategies. Analyzing data from 80,114 men across 12 studies, the findings demonstrate that MRI-based screening, particularly when using a sequential approach and a PI-RADS score ≥3 cutoff for biopsy, significantly increases the odds of detecting clinically significant prostate cancers (OR, 4.15) while reducing unnecessary biopsies (OR, 0.28) and detection of clinically insignificant cancers (OR, 0.34). Implementing a higher PI-RADS score of ≥4 further decreased the detection of insignificant cancers and biopsies performed, without impacting the detection rate of significant cancers. These results support the integration of MRI into screening programs to enhance diagnostic precision and reduce patient harm.

 

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Tamás Fazekas et al. (2024). Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening:  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Oncol, Published online April 5, 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0734

 


The Lancet Commission: Global projections and recommendations for managing the increasing burden of prostate cancer

27 Apr, 2024 | 18:42h | UTC

The Lancet Commission’s report on prostate cancer highlights the expected doubling of annual cases from 1.4 million in 2020 to 2.9 million by 2040, driven by demographic changes and increased life expectancy. This comprehensive analysis divides the issue into epidemiology, diagnostics, management of localized and advanced disease, emphasizing disparities between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Key findings indicate that late diagnoses are common, particularly in LMICs, leading to worse outcomes. The Commission advocates for significant changes in the diagnostic pathways and increased use of current technologies tailored to available resources to improve outcomes. Education and awareness programs are recommended to facilitate early detection and shift the treatment paradigm from palliative to curative, focusing on surgery and radiotherapy. Without decisive action, the global mortality from prostate cancer is set to rise, highlighting the need for urgent interventions across all countries, with a special focus on underserved populations.

 

Reference:

James, N.D., Tannock, I., N’Dow, J., Feng, F., Gillessen, S., Ali, S.A., et al. (2024). The Lancet Commission on prostate cancer: planning for the surge in cases. The Lancet, 404(10052), 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00651-2.


RCT | No significant recurrence-free survival improvement with everolimus post-renal carcinoma surgery

3 Aug, 2023 | 13:17h | UTC

Adjuvant everolimus after surgery for renal cell carcinoma (EVEREST): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial – The Lancet (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

 


M-A | High-volume disease, T stage 4 show largest docetaxel benefit in prostate cancer

2 Aug, 2023 | 13:51h | UTC

Which patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer benefit from docetaxel: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials – The Lancet Oncology

Commentaries:

Meta-analysis of the Addition of Docetaxel to ADT in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer – The ASCO Post

Disease Volume and T Stage Affect Docetaxel/ADT Efficacy in Prostate Cancer – Cancer Network

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Single-arm study | Pembrolizumab plus Lenvatinib shows potential as first-line treatment for advanced non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

17 Jul, 2023 | 13:33h | UTC

Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib as first-line therapy for advanced non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-B61): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial – The Lancet Oncology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

 


RCT | Brachytherapy alone sufficient for intermediate-risk prostate cancer, no FFP improvement with additional EBRT

7 Jul, 2023 | 16:06h | UTC

Effect of Brachytherapy With External Beam Radiation Therapy Versus Brachytherapy Alone for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: NRG Oncology RTOG 0232 Randomized Clinical Trial – Journal of Clinical Oncology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

News Release: Addition of EBRT to brachytherapy did not improve outcomes for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer, brachytherapy alone remains standard of care – NRG Oncology

 


M-A | Increased risk of cognitive toxic effects and fatigue in prostate cancer treatment with second-generation antiandrogens

16 Jun, 2023 | 14:00h | UTC

Association of Second-generation Antiandrogens With Cognitive and Functional Toxic Effects in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis – JAMA Oncology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentary: Second-Generation Antiandrogens and Cognitive and Functional Toxicity in Patients With Prostate Cancer – The ASCO Post

 


RCT | Talazoparib plus enzalutamide prolongs radiographic PFS vs. enzalutamide alone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

14 Jun, 2023 | 14:29h | UTC

Talazoparib plus enzalutamide in men with first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TALAPRO-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial – The Lancet (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

News Release: Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide Improves rPFS Over Placebo Plus Enzalutamide in First-Line Treatment for Patients with mCRPC – ESMO

 


Review | Screening for prostate cancer: evidence, ongoing trials, policies and knowledge gaps

13 Jun, 2023 | 13:52h | UTC

Screening for prostate cancer: evidence, ongoing trials, policies and knowledge gaps – BMJ Oncology

 


RCT | Atezolizumab and cabozantinib combo fails to outperform cabozantinib alone in renal cell carcinoma

7 Jun, 2023 | 13:54h | UTC

Atezolizumab plus cabozantinib versus cabozantinib monotherapy for patients with renal cell carcinoma after progression with previous immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment (CONTACT-03): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial – The Lancet (free registration required)

 

Commentary from the author on Twitter (thread – click for more)

 


M-A | Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy

6 Jun, 2023 | 14:11h | UTC

Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials – European Urology

 

Commentary from the author on Twitter (thread – click for more)

 


SR | Management of lymph node–positive penile cancer

24 May, 2023 | 13:03h | UTC

Management of Lymph Node–positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review – European Urology

 


Epidemiology of bladder cancer in 2023: a systematic review of risk factors

22 May, 2023 | 13:23h | UTC

Epidemiology of Bladder Cancer in 2023: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors – European Urology

 


RCT | Cabozantinib addition to nivolumab and ipilimumab extends progression-free survival in renal-cell carcinoma

18 May, 2023 | 13:38h | UTC

Cabozantinib plus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Renal-Cell Carcinoma – New England Journal of Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentary: Cabozantinib in Renal-Cell Carcinoma – NEJM Resident 360

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


M-A | First‐line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma

12 May, 2023 | 13:33h | UTC

First‐line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis – Cochrane Library

Summary: Initial treatment for adults with advanced kidney cancer (renal cell carcinoma) – Cochrane Library

 


A review of modern imaging landscape for prostate cancer: a comprehensive clinical guide

9 May, 2023 | 14:34h | UTC

A Review of Modern Imaging Landscape for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Clinical Guide – Journal of Clinical Medicine

 


RCT | Long-term survival benefit with abiraterone plus ADT in metastatic PC, but no advantage with enzalutamide association

8 May, 2023 | 13:02h | UTC

Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone with or without enzalutamide for patients with metastatic prostate cancer starting androgen deprivation therapy: final results from two randomised phase 3 trials of the STAMPEDE platform protocol – The Lancet Oncology

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


21-y clinical trial update | Effects of a PSA–based screening on morbidity and mortality of prostate cancer

5 May, 2023 | 14:56h | UTC

A Detailed Evaluation of the Effect of Prostate-specific Antigen–based Screening on Morbidity and Mortality of Prostate Cancer: 21-year Follow-up Results of the Rotterdam Section of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer – European Urology

 


AUA/SUO Guideline | Part I – Early detection of prostate cancer: prostate cancer screening

2 May, 2023 | 13:49h | UTC

Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline Part I: Prostate Cancer Screening – The Journal of Urology

See also: Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline Part II: Considerations for a Prostate Biopsy – The Journal of Urology

 


AUA/SUO Guideline | Part II – Early detection of prostate cancer: considerations for a prostate biopsy

2 May, 2023 | 13:47h | UTC

Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline Part II: Considerations for a Prostate Biopsy – The Journal of Urology

See also: Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline Part I: Prostate Cancer Screening – The Journal of Urology

 


AUA/SUO Guideline | Diagnosis and management of non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma

2 May, 2023 | 13:44h | UTC

Diagnosis and Management of Non-Metastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: AUA/SUO Guideline – The Journal of Urology

 


AUA/SUO Guideline | Updates to Advanced Prostate Cancer

2 May, 2023 | 13:46h | UTC

Updates to Advanced Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline (2023) – The Journal of Urology

 


Clinical trial 2y update | Avelumab first-line maintenance for advanced urothelial carcinoma

2 May, 2023 | 13:30h | UTC

Avelumab First-Line Maintenance for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Results From the JAVELIN Bladder 100 Trial After ≥2 Years of Follow-Up – Journal of Clinical Oncology

Original Article: Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma – New England Journal of Medicine

 


Stay Updated in Your Specialty

Telegram Channels
Free

WhatsApp alerts 10-day free trial

No spam, just news.