GI Surgery – Stomach and Duodenum
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers for Foregut Disorders
14 Jan, 2025 | 11:20h | UTCIntroduction: This summary presents the key points of a recently published American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update that reviews the role of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) in managing acid-related foregut disorders. P-CABs offer a unique mechanism of action compared with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine_2-receptor antagonists, potentially delivering more rapid and prolonged acid suppression. The aim of this review is to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance on P-CAB use in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, and peptic ulcer disease (PUD), clarifying their benefits, limitations, and potential place in therapy.
Key Recommendations:
- Overall Use of P-CABs: Clinicians should generally avoid using P-CABs as first-line therapy for acid-related conditions unless there is proven clinical superiority over PPIs. Factors such as higher costs, more limited availability, and less comprehensive long-term safety data often outweigh the advantages of P-CABs, particularly for milder disease.
- Cost-Effectiveness: Current U.S. costs for P-CABs may not justify routine first-line use, even if modest clinical benefits exist compared with double-dose PPIs. Long-term data on cost-effectiveness and safety remain limited.
- Nonerosive GERD: P-CABs are not recommended as initial treatment for heartburn without endoscopic findings (uninvestigated GERD) or nonerosive reflux disease. Clinicians may consider P-CABs for patients who have confirmed acid-related reflux and show inadequate response to twice-daily PPI therapy.
- On-Demand Therapy: Rapid onset of P-CABs suggests potential utility in on-demand regimens for patients previously responsive to acid suppression. While limited data show efficacy compared to placebo, further trials against PPIs and histamine_2-receptor antagonists are needed before making firm recommendations.
- Mild Erosive Esophagitis (LA Grade A/B): For Los Angeles classification (LA) grade A/B erosive esophagitis (EE), standard PPIs remain first-line treatment. P-CABs may be an option for patients whose esophagitis persists despite optimal PPI therapy, but initial evidence does not support routine, front-line use.
- Severe Erosive Esophagitis (LA Grade C/D): In more advanced EE, P-CABs can be considered for healing and maintenance, as some data suggest superior efficacy compared with standard-dose PPI. However, the lack of comparative trials with high-dose PPIs and the higher cost of P-CABs complicate their routine use as first-line therapy in severe disease.
- HP Eradication: P-CAB–based regimens for H pylori treatment often show higher or noninferior cure rates compared with PPI-based therapies, particularly in the presence of clarithromycin resistance. The more potent and prolonged acid suppression may enhance antibiotic efficacy, supporting the use of P-CABs in most patients with HP infection.
- Peptic Ulcer Disease Treatment and Prophylaxis: Current evidence indicates that P-CABs are noninferior to PPIs for ulcer healing and prevention of recurrent ulcers in patients requiring aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, in light of their higher cost and similar clinical outcomes, P-CABs should not replace PPIs as first-line therapy unless patients fail PPI regimens.
- Ulcer Bleeding: Although data are preliminary, P-CABs may be useful following endoscopic hemostasis in high-risk ulcer bleeding. Their rapid and potent acid suppression suggests they could match or exceed high-dose PPI efficacy, but more robust comparative trials are needed.
Conclusion: Potassium-competitive acid blockers represent a valuable therapeutic option in selected patients who do not respond adequately to traditional PPIs or who have complex acid-related conditions (such as severe erosive esophagitis or antibiotic-resistant H pylori). While their more rapid onset of action and prolonged effect can be advantageous, the limited availability of long-term safety data, cost considerations, and lack of substantial clinical superiority over standard or double-dose PPIs in many indications currently limit widespread adoption. Further investigations are needed to establish cost-effectiveness, clarify safety profiles, and identify specific patient populations most likely to benefit from P-CABs.
Reference: Patel A, Laine L, Moayyedi P, Wu J. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Integrating Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Into Clinical Practice: Expert Review. Gastroenterology. 2024;167(6):1228–1238. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.06.038
RCT: Avoiding Prophylactic Drain Increases Postoperative Invasive Procedures After Gastrectomy
25 Dec, 2024 | 12:47h | UTCBackground: Prophylactic abdominal drainage following gastrectomy for gastric cancer has been debated for decades. While some Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines discourage routine drains, many surgeons still advocate their use to detect and manage intra-abdominal collections before they become severe. Previous trials were small and underpowered, thus failing to provide robust evidence regarding the real need for prophylactic drains.
Objective: To determine whether omitting a prophylactic drain in gastric cancer surgery leads to a higher likelihood of postoperative invasive procedures (reoperation or percutaneous drainage) within 30 days.
Methods: In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, 404 patients from 11 Italian centers were randomly assigned to either prophylactic drain placement or no drain at the end of subtotal or total gastrectomy. Both academic and community hospitals participated. The primary composite outcome was the rate of reoperation or percutaneous drainage within 30 postoperative days, analyzed via a modified intention-to-treat approach. Secondary endpoints included overall morbidity, anastomotic leaks, length of hospital stay, and 90-day mortality. A parallel invited commentary addressed methodological and clinical perspectives.
Results: Among the 390 patients who underwent resection, 196 had a prophylactic drain and 194 did not. By postoperative day 30, 7.7% of patients in the drain group required reoperation or percutaneous drainage, compared with 15% in the no-drain group. This statistically significant difference was driven by a higher reoperation rate in patients without drains. Both groups had similar anastomotic leak rates (approximately 4% overall). However, patients without prophylactic drains had a higher in-hospital mortality (4.6% vs 0.5%) and were more likely to require escalation of care. There were few drain-related complications, indicating a low risk associated with drain placement. Length of hospital stay and readmission rates were comparable between groups.
Conclusions: Omitting prophylactic drains in gastrectomy was associated with an increased need for postoperative invasive interventions, particularly reoperations. While prior guidelines have recommended against routine drain placement, these findings challenge that stance for total and even subtotal gastrectomies. Surgeons may wish to revisit existing protocols, especially in facilities with fewer resources or lower patient volumes, given the potential reduction in reoperation risk associated with prophylactic drainage.
Implications for Practice: Clinicians should carefully balance possible benefits (earlier detection of fluid collections and reduced reoperations) against potential drawbacks of drain usage. Routine placement may be reconsidered, at least in higher-risk cases or in institutions less equipped for complex salvage procedures.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Key strengths include its robust sample size and standardized criteria for complications. Limitations involve the unblinded nature of postoperative management and the lack of drain fluid amylase measurements to guide removal protocols. Additionally, differentiating total from subtotal gastrectomies might refine selection criteria for prophylactic drainage.
Future Research: Further studies could focus on stratified risk profiles for total vs subtotal gastrectomy and on biomarkers in drain fluid to identify subgroups most likely to benefit from prophylactic drainage.
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Screening and Surveillance in High-Risk US Populations for Gastric Cancer: Expert Review
25 Dec, 2024 | 11:02h | UTCIntroduction:
This American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update provides guidance on primary and secondary prevention strategies for gastric cancer (GC) among high-risk groups in the United States. GC disproportionately affects racial and ethnic minorities, certain first-generation immigrants from countries with elevated GC incidence, and individuals with specific hereditary syndromes or family histories of GC. Given ongoing disparities in diagnosis and outcomes, this document outlines best practices for recognizing at-risk individuals, performing high-quality endoscopic screening, and establishing surveillance protocols for gastric precancerous conditions.
Key Recommendations:
- Identify High-Risk Groups: Consider screening among first-generation immigrants from high-incidence regions, people with a family history of GC in a first-degree relative, individuals with hereditary gastrointestinal syndromes, and patients with multiple risk factors (eg, chronic Helicobacter pylori infection, smoking, diets high in salt and processed meats).
- Preferred Screening Modality: Upper endoscopy is considered the best method for detecting precancerous lesions (atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia) and early malignancies. It allows direct visualization of the gastric mucosa, systematic biopsy, and accurate histologic staging.
- High-Quality Endoscopic Examination: Essential elements include high-definition endoscopes, optimal mucosal cleansing and insufflation, adequate inspection time, systematic photodocumentation, and biopsy protocols (such as the updated Sydney System) to detect and characterize precancerous changes or early cancer.
- H. pylori Eradication: Opportunistic screening for H. pylori and its eradication are key adjunctive measures in preventing GC development. Family-based testing—screening adult household members of H. pylori–positive individuals—may further reduce reinfection rates and disease progression.
- Systematic Biopsy Protocols: When atrophic gastritis or intestinal metaplasia is suspected, obtain at least five biopsies (antrum/incisura and corpus in separate containers). Any suspicious lesion should be sampled independently.
- Recognition of Metaplasia and Dysplasia: Endoscopists should be trained to accurately identify visual patterns associated with gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) and dysplasia. Artificial intelligence may hold promise, but current data are insufficient to recommend routine use.
- Risk Stratification and Surveillance Intervals: Patients with confirmed GIM or dysplasia, especially those with severe or extensive metaplasia, may require follow-up endoscopy every three years. Individuals with multiple risk factors or severe metaplastic changes could benefit from shorter intervals.
- Management of Dysplasia and Early GC: All dysplasia should be reviewed by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist. Visible high-grade dysplasia or early GC lesions generally warrant endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at specialized centers to achieve en bloc, R0 resection and enable accurate pathology.
- Post-Resection Surveillance: Individuals with successfully resected dysplasia or early cancer need ongoing endoscopic surveillance to detect metachronous lesions. Surveillance intervals vary depending on pathology results and patient-level factors.
- De-Escalation of Screening: Discontinue screening or surveillance when the patient is no longer fit for potential endoscopic or surgical treatment.
- Equity and Sustainability: To reduce GC mortality, it is crucial to address modifiable risk factors, enhance patient access to endoscopy and skilled practitioners, and integrate research advances, especially in noninvasive biomarker development and improved endoscopic technologies.
Conclusion:
An effective US-based GC screening and surveillance program requires robust preprocedural identification of high-risk individuals, intraprocedural adherence to quality endoscopy standards, and consistent postprocedural follow-up to ensure equitable access to treatment. By refining these clinical practices and prioritizing research, meaningful reductions in GC incidence and mortality can be achieved, ultimately improving patient outcomes and addressing healthcare disparities.
Reference:
Shah SC, Wang AY, Wallace MB, Hwang JH. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Screening and Surveillance in Individuals at Increased Risk for Gastric Cancer in the United States: Expert Review. Gastroenterology. Published online December 23, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.11.001
RCT: H. pylori Screening Added to Fecal Immunochemical Testing Did Not Reduce Gastric Cancer Incidence or Mortality
4 Oct, 2024 | 11:00h | UTCBackground: Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, particularly in East Asia. Helicobacter pylori infection is a well-established risk factor for gastric cancer development. While eradication therapy may prevent gastric cancer, the effectiveness of community-based H. pylori screening on gastric cancer incidence and mortality remains uncertain.
Objective: To determine whether adding H. pylori stool antigen (HPSA) testing to fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening reduces gastric cancer incidence and mortality compared to FIT screening alone.
Methods: In a pragmatic randomized clinical trial conducted in Changhua County, Taiwan (2014–2018), 152,503 residents aged 50 to 69 years eligible for biennial FIT screening were randomized to receive an invitation for HPSA testing plus FIT (n = 63,508) or FIT alone (n = 88,995). Participants in the HPSA + FIT group with positive HPSA results were offered antibiotic eradication therapy. Primary outcomes were gastric cancer incidence and mortality, assessed via national cancer and death registries.
Results: Participation rates were higher in the HPSA + FIT group (49.6%) than in the FIT-alone group (35.7%). In the HPSA + FIT group, 38.5% tested positive for HPSA, and 71.4% of these received antibiotic treatment, achieving a 91.9% eradication rate. Over a median follow-up of approximately 5 years, gastric cancer incidence did not differ significantly between the HPSA + FIT and FIT-alone groups (0.032% vs 0.037%; mean difference –0.005%; 95% CI, –0.013% to 0.003%; P = .23). Gastric cancer mortality rates were also similar (0.015% vs 0.013%; mean difference 0.002%; 95% CI, –0.004% to 0.007%; P = .57). Adjusted analyses accounting for participation rates, follow-up duration, and baseline characteristics showed a lower gastric cancer incidence in the HPSA + FIT group (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63–0.98; P = .04), but no difference in mortality (RR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.73–1.40; P = .91). Adverse effects from antibiotics were mild, with abdominal pain or diarrhea occurring in 2.1%.
Conclusions: An invitation to HPSA testing combined with FIT did not significantly reduce gastric cancer incidence or mortality compared to FIT alone over a median follow-up of about 5 years. Adjusted analyses suggest a potential reduction in gastric cancer incidence but not mortality when accounting for participation rates and follow-up duration.
Implications for Practice: Adding H. pylori screening to existing FIT programs may not significantly reduce gastric cancer incidence or mortality in the short term, possibly due to low participation rates, incomplete eradication, and limited follow-up. Clinicians should consider these factors when implementing community-based H. pylori screening and weigh the benefits against resource utilization and patient adherence.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include a large sample size and integration of HPSA testing into an existing FIT screening infrastructure. Limitations encompass differences in participation rates and baseline characteristics between groups, a relatively short follow-up period, and only 71.4% of HPSA-positive participants receiving eradication therapy, which may have reduced the ability to detect significant effects.
Future Research: Longer-term studies with higher participation and eradication rates are needed to assess the long-term benefits of H. pylori screening on gastric cancer incidence and mortality. Research should explore strategies to improve screening uptake and treatment adherence.
Randomized Noninferiority Trial: Oral Vonoprazan Noninferior to IV Proton Pump Inhibitors in Preventing Rebleeding of High-Risk Peptic Ulcers – Gastroenterology
18 Aug, 2024 | 18:32h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial was conducted in Thailand across six centers, including both university and community hospitals. A total of 194 patients with high-risk peptic ulcer (PU) bleeding who had achieved successful endoscopic hemostasis were randomized to receive either vonoprazan or intravenous proton pump inhibitors (PPI). The study aimed to compare the efficacy of vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, with that of high-dose PPIs in preventing rebleeding.
Main Findings: The trial found that the 30-day rebleeding rate in the vonoprazan group was 7.1%, compared to 10.4% in the PPI group. This demonstrated noninferiority of vonoprazan within a 10% margin (risk difference: -3.3%, 95% CI: -11.2 to 4.7; P < .001). The 3-day and 7-day rebleeding rates were also noninferior. Secondary outcomes, including mortality rates, the need for rescue therapy, blood transfusion requirements, and length of hospital stay, were comparable between the two groups. Adverse events were similar in both groups.
Implications for Practice: Vonoprazan presents a viable alternative to intravenous PPIs for preventing rebleeding in patients with high-risk PU after endoscopic hemostasis. The availability of vonoprazan in oral form could potentially reduce hospital stays. However, further studies in multiethnic populations are needed to confirm these findings and assess the cost-effectiveness of vonoprazan in this setting.
Network Meta-Analysis: Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Chemotherapy Equally Improve Survival in Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma – JAMA Netw Open
17 Aug, 2024 | 19:21h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This network meta-analysis included 17 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with a total of 2,549 patients, predominantly male (86.5%), with a mean age of 61 years. The study compared the effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy, and surgery alone on overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction (AEG).
Main Findings: Both preoperative CRT plus surgery (HR, 0.75) and preoperative/perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery (HR, 0.78) significantly improved overall survival compared to surgery alone. Disease-free survival was similarly prolonged with both treatments. No significant difference was observed between CRT and chemotherapy in overall survival, though CRT was associated with higher postoperative morbidity.
Implications for Practice: The findings suggest that both preoperative CRT and preoperative/perioperative chemotherapy are effective in extending survival in AEG patients, with no clear superiority of one approach over the other. Clinicians can consider either modality based on patient-specific factors, although the increased morbidity associated with CRT warrants careful consideration.
RCT: Pantoprazole Reduces GI Bleeding in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients – N Engl J Med
3 Aug, 2024 | 18:57h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This international, randomized, double-blind trial involved 4,821 critically ill adults undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation across 68 intensive care units (ICUs). Participants were assigned to receive either intravenous pantoprazole (40 mg daily) or a matching placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of clinically significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding within 90 days, and the primary safety outcome was mortality from any cause within the same period.
Main Findings: The trial found that upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 1.0% of patients treated with pantoprazole compared to 3.5% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.47; P<0.001). Mortality at 90 days was 29.1% in the pantoprazole group and 30.9% in the placebo group, showing no significant difference (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.04; P=0.25). There were no significant differences in the rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia or Clostridioides difficile infection between the groups.
Implications for Practice: The study demonstrates that pantoprazole significantly reduces the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation without affecting overall mortality. This suggests that pantoprazole can be considered a safe and effective option for stress ulcer prophylaxis in this high-risk population, potentially improving patient outcomes in the ICU.
Post hoc analysis: Laparoscopic spleen-preserving hilar lymphadenectomy may improve 5-year survival in advanced proximal gastric cancer without greater curvature invasion – JAMA Surg
25 May, 2024 | 19:43h | UTCThis study presents the results of a post hoc secondary analysis from the Fuges-02 randomized clinical trial, investigating the effects of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) with and without spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSPSHL) in 536 patients with resectable advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC) lacking greater curvature invasion. Conducted from January 2015 to October 2018 with a minimum follow-up of five years, the study reported a significantly improved 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of 63.9% in the LTG with LSPSHL group compared to 55.1% in the LTG alone group. The overall survival (OS) also favored the LSPSHL group at 66.2% versus 57.4% in the LTG group. Furthermore, the recurrence rate was lower in the LSPSHL group, with a notable reduction in recurrence at the No. 10 lymph node area, indicating a protective benefit from the addition of LSPSHL. The findings suggest a potential therapeutic advantage of incorporating LSPSHL in surgical protocols for APGC without greater curvature invasion, warranting further investigation through multicenter studies.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
RCT | Hemostatic powder provides better control of gastrointestinal tumor bleeding than standard endoscopic treatment
20 Jun, 2023 | 12:39h | UTCHemostatic powder vs. standard endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal tumor bleeding: A multicenter randomized trial – Gastroenterology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)
Review | Hereditary colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer
18 May, 2023 | 13:43h | UTCHereditary colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer: comprehensive review – BJS Open
Commentary on Twitter
Have a🔎at our latest comprehensive review covering all u need to know📜about hereditary 🧬colorectal, gastric & pancreatic🦀! https://t.co/y1LL0DNRiy@Adductor @DrRABurkhart #SoMe4Surgery #StepUp4CRC #SurgEd #MedTwitter @BJSAcademy @BJSurgery @juliomayol @young_bjs Great read! pic.twitter.com/JmmOmMBydO
— BJS Open (@BjsOpen) May 11, 2023
Review | Helicobacter pylori infection
2 May, 2023 | 13:37h | UTCHelicobacter pylori infection – Nature Reviews Disease Primers (if the link is paywalled, try this one)
Commentary on Twitter
A Primer published by @DiseasePrimers summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of Helicobacter pylori infection, and discusses patient quality of life and open research questions. https://t.co/WawWpSGBU9 pic.twitter.com/ghFTbyp0ln
— Nature Portfolio (@NaturePortfolio) April 24, 2023
Cohort Study | Cancer surveillance as an alternative to prophylactic total gastrectomy in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer
17 Apr, 2023 | 12:57h | UTCCancer surveillance as an alternative to prophylactic total gastrectomy in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: a prospective cohort study – The Lancet Oncology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)
Commentary: Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients at Risk for Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer – The ASCO Post
RCT | Over-the-scope clips show lower rebleeding rates in nonvariceal GI bleeding
6 Apr, 2023 | 12:57h | UTCComparison of Over-the-Scope Clips to Standard Endoscopic Treatment as the Initial Treatment in Patients With Bleeding From a Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Cause: A Randomized Controlled Trial – Annals of Internal Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)
Commentaries:
Over-the-Scope Clip Beneficial for Nonvariceal Upper GI Bleeding – HealthDay
Commentary on Twitter
A new RCT found that over-the-scope-clips may be more effective than standard treatment for some patients with nonvariceal upper #GastrointestinalBleeding: https://t.co/GWG70CWmlt pic.twitter.com/Foq2qQZTEc
— Annals of Int Med (@AnnalsofIM) March 7, 2023
Brief Review | What every gastroenterologist should know about gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors
4 Apr, 2023 | 13:29h | UTC
Gastric Cancer: the combined impact of H. pylori infection and pathogenic gene variants
3 Apr, 2023 | 13:51h | UTCHelicobacter pylori, Homologous-Recombination Genes, and Gastric Cancer – New England Journal of Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)
Commentary: H. Pylori Infection Negatively Modifies Genetically Increased Risk for Gastric Cancer – Physician’s Weekly
Commentary on Twitter
Infection with Helicobacter pylori is known to confer a risk of gastric cancer. In this study, persons who carried certain genetic variants and were infected with H. pylori had an excess risk of gastric cancer. https://t.co/jIcUiYu14G#genetics pic.twitter.com/jY4H1Mq6dO
— NEJM (@NEJM) March 29, 2023
Guidelines for Gastric Cancer | An evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach
22 Mar, 2023 | 13:33h | UTC
RCT | Comparable 5-year relapse-free survival for laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer
22 Mar, 2023 | 13:27h | UTCSummary: The JLSSG0901 randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the 5-year survival outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer.
The study involved 507 patients from 37 institutes in Japan. The primary endpoint was 5-year relapse-free survival. The results showed that the 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 73.9% and 75.7% for the ODG and LADG groups, respectively, confirming the noninferiority of LADG, and no significant differences were observed in severe postoperative complications between the two groups.
The study concluded that LADG with D2 lymph node dissection, when performed by qualified surgeons, was proven noninferior to ODG, and could become a standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer.
Article: Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopy-Assisted vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: The JLSSG0901 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Surgery (link to abstract – $ for full-text)
Related:
Commentary on Twitter
Study results provide robust evidence suggesting that laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer may be an appropriate treatment approach when performed by skilled surgeons. https://t.co/Dvnzk5YI9u pic.twitter.com/GDCdT4DJhp
— JAMA Surgery (@JAMASurgery) March 15, 2023
M-A | Laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer
15 Mar, 2023 | 14:52h | UTCRelated:
Review | Analysis of deprescription strategies of proton pump inhibitors in primary care
7 Mar, 2023 | 12:42h | UTCRelated:
Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors – Australian Journal of General Practice
Review | Platelet aggregation inhibitors and anticoagulants in gastroenterological and visceral surgical procedures
1 Mar, 2023 | 14:03h | UTC
Guideline | Diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori
24 Feb, 2023 | 13:53h | UTCRelated:
RCT | Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction vs. total gastrectomy in upper-third early gastric cancer
23 Feb, 2023 | 13:29h | UTCSummary: This randomized trial examined whether laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DTR) is a superior surgical treatment compared to laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for patients with early gastric cancer (GC) in the upper third of the stomach. The study found that LPG-DTR resulted in significantly decreased amounts of vitamin B12 supplementation, but no significant difference in hemoglobin change compared to LTG. The study also found no difference in complication rates or overall and disease-free survival rates between the two groups. The study suggests that LPG-DTR may be a function-preserving procedure for the treatment of patients with upper-third early GC.
Commentary on Twitter
RCT: Proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction had an advantage of less vitamin B12 supplementation than total gastrectomy similar complication rates and survival in patients with upper third early gastric cancer. https://t.co/tdAktJxkpL pic.twitter.com/5miUbb9Ia6
— JAMA Network Open (@JAMANetworkOpen) February 15, 2023
M-A | Efficacy and safety of drugs for gastroparesis
17 Feb, 2023 | 13:05h | UTCCommentaries:
Review finds only two efficacious medications to treat gastroparesis – ACP Gastroenterology
Two drug classes appear effective for gastroparesis treatment – MDedge
Commentary from the author on Twitter (thread – click for more)
Our latest (and definitely last!) paper of 2022 is now published online in @AGA_Gastro and is a network meta-analysis of drugs in gastroparesis:https://t.co/kpz8nH6ekT
— Alexander Ford (@alex_ford12399) December 26, 2022
Complications of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: recognition, assessment and management
7 Feb, 2023 | 13:41h | UTC
Review | Prevention and management of minor complications in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
7 Feb, 2023 | 13:39h | UTC