Open access
Open access
Powered by Google Translator Translator

GI Surgery – Stomach and Duodenum

RCT: H. pylori Screening Added to Fecal Immunochemical Testing Did Not Reduce Gastric Cancer Incidence or Mortality

4 Oct, 2024 | 11:00h | UTC

Background: Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, particularly in East Asia. Helicobacter pylori infection is a well-established risk factor for gastric cancer development. While eradication therapy may prevent gastric cancer, the effectiveness of community-based H. pylori screening on gastric cancer incidence and mortality remains uncertain.

Objective: To determine whether adding H. pylori stool antigen (HPSA) testing to fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening reduces gastric cancer incidence and mortality compared to FIT screening alone.

Methods: In a pragmatic randomized clinical trial conducted in Changhua County, Taiwan (2014–2018), 152,503 residents aged 50 to 69 years eligible for biennial FIT screening were randomized to receive an invitation for HPSA testing plus FIT (n = 63,508) or FIT alone (n = 88,995). Participants in the HPSA + FIT group with positive HPSA results were offered antibiotic eradication therapy. Primary outcomes were gastric cancer incidence and mortality, assessed via national cancer and death registries.

Results: Participation rates were higher in the HPSA + FIT group (49.6%) than in the FIT-alone group (35.7%). In the HPSA + FIT group, 38.5% tested positive for HPSA, and 71.4% of these received antibiotic treatment, achieving a 91.9% eradication rate. Over a median follow-up of approximately 5 years, gastric cancer incidence did not differ significantly between the HPSA + FIT and FIT-alone groups (0.032% vs 0.037%; mean difference –0.005%; 95% CI, –0.013% to 0.003%; P = .23). Gastric cancer mortality rates were also similar (0.015% vs 0.013%; mean difference 0.002%; 95% CI, –0.004% to 0.007%; P = .57). Adjusted analyses accounting for participation rates, follow-up duration, and baseline characteristics showed a lower gastric cancer incidence in the HPSA + FIT group (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63–0.98; P = .04), but no difference in mortality (RR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.73–1.40; P = .91). Adverse effects from antibiotics were mild, with abdominal pain or diarrhea occurring in 2.1%.

Conclusions: An invitation to HPSA testing combined with FIT did not significantly reduce gastric cancer incidence or mortality compared to FIT alone over a median follow-up of about 5 years. Adjusted analyses suggest a potential reduction in gastric cancer incidence but not mortality when accounting for participation rates and follow-up duration.

Implications for Practice: Adding H. pylori screening to existing FIT programs may not significantly reduce gastric cancer incidence or mortality in the short term, possibly due to low participation rates, incomplete eradication, and limited follow-up. Clinicians should consider these factors when implementing community-based H. pylori screening and weigh the benefits against resource utilization and patient adherence.

Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include a large sample size and integration of HPSA testing into an existing FIT screening infrastructure. Limitations encompass differences in participation rates and baseline characteristics between groups, a relatively short follow-up period, and only 71.4% of HPSA-positive participants receiving eradication therapy, which may have reduced the ability to detect significant effects.

Future Research: Longer-term studies with higher participation and eradication rates are needed to assess the long-term benefits of H. pylori screening on gastric cancer incidence and mortality. Research should explore strategies to improve screening uptake and treatment adherence.

Reference: Lee Y-C, et al. (2024) Screening for Helicobacter pylori to Prevent Gastric Cancer: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.14887

 


Randomized Noninferiority Trial: Oral Vonoprazan Noninferior to IV Proton Pump Inhibitors in Preventing Rebleeding of High-Risk Peptic Ulcers – Gastroenterology

18 Aug, 2024 | 18:32h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial was conducted in Thailand across six centers, including both university and community hospitals. A total of 194 patients with high-risk peptic ulcer (PU) bleeding who had achieved successful endoscopic hemostasis were randomized to receive either vonoprazan or intravenous proton pump inhibitors (PPI). The study aimed to compare the efficacy of vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, with that of high-dose PPIs in preventing rebleeding.

Main Findings: The trial found that the 30-day rebleeding rate in the vonoprazan group was 7.1%, compared to 10.4% in the PPI group. This demonstrated noninferiority of vonoprazan within a 10% margin (risk difference: -3.3%, 95% CI: -11.2 to 4.7; P < .001). The 3-day and 7-day rebleeding rates were also noninferior. Secondary outcomes, including mortality rates, the need for rescue therapy, blood transfusion requirements, and length of hospital stay, were comparable between the two groups. Adverse events were similar in both groups.

Implications for Practice: Vonoprazan presents a viable alternative to intravenous PPIs for preventing rebleeding in patients with high-risk PU after endoscopic hemostasis. The availability of vonoprazan in oral form could potentially reduce hospital stays. However, further studies in multiethnic populations are needed to confirm these findings and assess the cost-effectiveness of vonoprazan in this setting.

Reference: Geeratragool T, Kaosombatwattana U, Boonchote A, et al. (2024). Comparison of Vonoprazan Versus Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor for Prevention of High-Risk Peptic Ulcers Rebleeding After Successful Endoscopic Hemostasis: A Multicenter Randomized Noninferiority Trial. Gastroenterology, -(-), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.03.036.

 


Network Meta-Analysis: Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Chemotherapy Equally Improve Survival in Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma – JAMA Netw Open

17 Aug, 2024 | 19:21h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This network meta-analysis included 17 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with a total of 2,549 patients, predominantly male (86.5%), with a mean age of 61 years. The study compared the effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy, and surgery alone on overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction (AEG).

Main Findings: Both preoperative CRT plus surgery (HR, 0.75) and preoperative/perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery (HR, 0.78) significantly improved overall survival compared to surgery alone. Disease-free survival was similarly prolonged with both treatments. No significant difference was observed between CRT and chemotherapy in overall survival, though CRT was associated with higher postoperative morbidity.

Implications for Practice: The findings suggest that both preoperative CRT and preoperative/perioperative chemotherapy are effective in extending survival in AEG patients, with no clear superiority of one approach over the other. Clinicians can consider either modality based on patient-specific factors, although the increased morbidity associated with CRT warrants careful consideration.

Reference: Ronellenfitsch U, Friedrichs J, Barbier E, et al. (2024). Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy vs Chemotherapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Network Meta-Analysis. JAMA Network Open, 7(8), e2425581. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25581.

 


RCT: Pantoprazole Reduces GI Bleeding in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients – N Engl J Med

3 Aug, 2024 | 18:57h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This international, randomized, double-blind trial involved 4,821 critically ill adults undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation across 68 intensive care units (ICUs). Participants were assigned to receive either intravenous pantoprazole (40 mg daily) or a matching placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of clinically significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding within 90 days, and the primary safety outcome was mortality from any cause within the same period.

Main Findings: The trial found that upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 1.0% of patients treated with pantoprazole compared to 3.5% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.47; P<0.001). Mortality at 90 days was 29.1% in the pantoprazole group and 30.9% in the placebo group, showing no significant difference (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.04; P=0.25). There were no significant differences in the rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia or Clostridioides difficile infection between the groups.

Implications for Practice: The study demonstrates that pantoprazole significantly reduces the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation without affecting overall mortality. This suggests that pantoprazole can be considered a safe and effective option for stress ulcer prophylaxis in this high-risk population, potentially improving patient outcomes in the ICU.

Reference: Cook D, Deane A, Lauzier F, et al. (2024). Stress ulcer prophylaxis during invasive mechanical ventilation. New England Journal of Medicine, 391(1), 9-20. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2404245.


Post hoc analysis: Laparoscopic spleen-preserving hilar lymphadenectomy may improve 5-year survival in advanced proximal gastric cancer without greater curvature invasion – JAMA Surg

25 May, 2024 | 19:43h | UTC

This study presents the results of a post hoc secondary analysis from the Fuges-02 randomized clinical trial, investigating the effects of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) with and without spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSPSHL) in 536 patients with resectable advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC) lacking greater curvature invasion. Conducted from January 2015 to October 2018 with a minimum follow-up of five years, the study reported a significantly improved 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of 63.9% in the LTG with LSPSHL group compared to 55.1% in the LTG alone group. The overall survival (OS) also favored the LSPSHL group at 66.2% versus 57.4% in the LTG group. Furthermore, the recurrence rate was lower in the LSPSHL group, with a notable reduction in recurrence at the No. 10 lymph node area, indicating a protective benefit from the addition of LSPSHL. The findings suggest a potential therapeutic advantage of incorporating LSPSHL in surgical protocols for APGC without greater curvature invasion, warranting further investigation through multicenter studies.

 

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Jian-xian Lin et al. (2024). Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Hilar Lymphadenectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Without Greater Curvature Invasion. JAMA Surg, Published online May 1, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1023

 


RCT | Hemostatic powder provides better control of gastrointestinal tumor bleeding than standard endoscopic treatment

20 Jun, 2023 | 12:39h | UTC

Hemostatic powder vs. standard endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal tumor bleeding: A multicenter randomized trial – Gastroenterology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

 


Review | Hereditary colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer

18 May, 2023 | 13:43h | UTC

Hereditary colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer: comprehensive review – BJS Open

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Review | Helicobacter pylori infection

2 May, 2023 | 13:37h | UTC

Helicobacter pylori infection – Nature Reviews Disease Primers (if the link is paywalled, try this one)

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Cohort Study | Cancer surveillance as an alternative to prophylactic total gastrectomy in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer

17 Apr, 2023 | 12:57h | UTC

Cancer surveillance as an alternative to prophylactic total gastrectomy in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: a prospective cohort study – The Lancet Oncology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentary: Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients at Risk for Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer – The ASCO Post

 


RCT | Over-the-scope clips show lower rebleeding rates in nonvariceal GI bleeding

6 Apr, 2023 | 12:57h | UTC

Comparison of Over-the-Scope Clips to Standard Endoscopic Treatment as the Initial Treatment in Patients With Bleeding From a Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Cause: A Randomized Controlled Trial – Annals of Internal Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentaries:

Over-the-Scope Clip Beneficial for Nonvariceal Upper GI Bleeding – HealthDay

Over-the-scope clips superior to standard treatment of nonvariceal upper GI bleeding – Physician’s Weekly

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Brief Review | What every gastroenterologist should know about gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

4 Apr, 2023 | 13:29h | UTC

What Every Gastroenterologist Should Know About Gastrointestinal NETs – American Journal of Gastroenterology

 


Gastric Cancer: the combined impact of H. pylori infection and pathogenic gene variants

3 Apr, 2023 | 13:51h | UTC

Helicobacter pylori, Homologous-Recombination Genes, and Gastric Cancer – New England Journal of Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

News Release: Helicobacter Pylori Infection Modifies the Risk of Gastric Cancer Associated with Germline Pathogenic Variants in Homologous Recombination Genes – ESMO

Commentary: H. Pylori Infection Negatively Modifies Genetically Increased Risk for Gastric Cancer – Physician’s Weekly

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Guidelines for Gastric Cancer | An evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach

22 Mar, 2023 | 13:33h | UTC

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach – Journal of Gastric Cancer

 


RCT | Comparable 5-year relapse-free survival for laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer

22 Mar, 2023 | 13:27h | UTC

Summary: The JLSSG0901 randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the 5-year survival outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer.

The study involved 507 patients from 37 institutes in Japan. The primary endpoint was 5-year relapse-free survival. The results showed that the 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 73.9% and 75.7% for the ODG and LADG groups, respectively, confirming the noninferiority of LADG, and no significant differences were observed in severe postoperative complications between the two groups.

The study concluded that LADG with D2 lymph node dissection, when performed by qualified surgeons, was proven noninferior to ODG, and could become a standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Article: Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopy-Assisted vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: The JLSSG0901 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Surgery (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Related:

Laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – Frontiers in Surgery

Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes of the KLASS-02 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Surgery

Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – World Journal of Surgical Oncology

Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis – Surgery

Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Five-Year Outcomes From the CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Surgery

Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial – Journal of Clinical Oncology

Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic vs Open Total Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The CLASS02 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Oncology

Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial – The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Oncology

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


M-A | Laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer

15 Mar, 2023 | 14:52h | UTC

Laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – Frontiers in Surgery

Related:

Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes of the KLASS-02 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Surgery

Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – World Journal of Surgical Oncology

Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis – Surgery

Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Five-Year Outcomes From the CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Surgery

Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial – Journal of Clinical Oncology

Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic vs Open Total Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The CLASS02 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Oncology

Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial – The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Oncology

 


Review | Analysis of deprescription strategies of proton pump inhibitors in primary care

7 Mar, 2023 | 12:42h | UTC

Analysis of deprescription strategies of proton pump inhibitors in primary care: a narrative review – Primary Health Care Research & Development

Related:

Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors – Australian Journal of General Practice

AGA Clinical Practice Update on De-Prescribing of Proton Pump Inhibitors: Expert Review – Gastroenterology

 


Review | Platelet aggregation inhibitors and anticoagulants in gastroenterological and visceral surgical procedures

1 Mar, 2023 | 14:03h | UTC

Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors and Anticoagulants in Gastroenterological and Visceral Surgical Procedures – Deutsches Ärzteblatt international

Related: Management of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing elective invasive procedures. Proposals from the French Working Group on perioperative haemostasis (GIHP) and the French Study Group on thrombosis and haemostasis (GFHT). In collaboration with the French Society for Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR)

 


Guideline | Diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori

24 Feb, 2023 | 13:53h | UTC

Helicobacter pylori World Gastroenterology Organization Global Guideline – Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

Related:

AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Management of Refractory Helicobacter pylori Infection: Expert Review – Gastroenterology

Evidence based guidelines for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in Korea 2020 – The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine

Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: Guidelines of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE) and the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SIED) – Digestive and Liver Disease

 


RCT | Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction vs. total gastrectomy in upper-third early gastric cancer

23 Feb, 2023 | 13:29h | UTC

Summary: This randomized trial examined whether laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DTR) is a superior surgical treatment compared to laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for patients with early gastric cancer (GC) in the upper third of the stomach. The study found that LPG-DTR resulted in significantly decreased amounts of vitamin B12 supplementation, but no significant difference in hemoglobin change compared to LTG. The study also found no difference in complication rates or overall and disease-free survival rates between the two groups. The study suggests that LPG-DTR may be a function-preserving procedure for the treatment of patients with upper-third early GC.

Article: Effect of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction vs Total Gastrectomy on Hemoglobin Level and Vitamin B12 Supplementation in Upper-Third Early Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Network Open

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


M-A | Efficacy and safety of drugs for gastroparesis

17 Feb, 2023 | 13:05h | UTC

Efficacy and Safety of Drugs for Gastroparesis: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis – Gastroenterology

Commentaries:

Review finds only two efficacious medications to treat gastroparesis – ACP Gastroenterology

Two drug classes appear effective for gastroparesis treatment – MDedge

 

Commentary from the author on Twitter (thread – click for more)

 


Complications of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: recognition, assessment and management

7 Feb, 2023 | 13:41h | UTC

Complications of diagnostic upper Gastrointestinal endoscopy: common and rare – recognition, assessment and management – BMJ Open Gastroenterology

 


Review | Prevention and management of minor complications in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

7 Feb, 2023 | 13:39h | UTC

Prevention and management of minor complications in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy – BMJ Open Gastroenterology

 


Rates of antimicrobial resistance in Helicobacter pylori isolates across the US and Europe

6 Feb, 2023 | 13:12h | UTC

Rates of Antimicrobial Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Isolates From Clinical Trial Patients Across the US and Europe – The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Commentary: Time to ditch clarithromycin for H. pylori? – MDedge

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


M-A | Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer

2 Feb, 2023 | 14:36h | UTC

Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – World Journal of Surgical Oncology

 


M-A | Proximal gastrectomy with double-tract-reconstruction vs. total gastrectomy in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer patients

27 Jan, 2023 | 11:54h | UTC

Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing proximal gastrectomy with double-tract-reconstruction and total gastrectomy in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer patients: Still no sufficient evidence for clinical decision-making – Surgery

 


Stay Updated in Your Specialty

Telegram Channels
Free

WhatsApp alerts 10-day free trial

No spam, just news.