Open access
Open access
Powered by Google Translator Translator

Infectious Diseases (all articles)

M-A: Reduced risk of infective endocarditis following dental procedures with antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk individuals

26 Apr, 2024 | 12:07h | UTC

Study Design and Population:

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of infective endocarditis following invasive dental procedures. Researchers analyzed data from 1,152,345 cases sourced from PubMed, Cochrane-CENTRAL, Scopus, and other databases up to May 2023. The study included various research designs, such as case-control, cohort, and time-trend studies, assessing the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis across different risk groups.

 

Main Findings:

The meta-analysis revealed that antibiotic prophylaxis significantly lowers the risk of infective endocarditis among individuals at high risk (pooled relative risk, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29-0.57), with consistent findings across studies of good quality. However, the effectiveness of prophylaxis in individuals at moderate or low/unknown risk remains unsupported by sufficient evidence. Time-trend studies provided mixed results, with some indicating no change or an increase in infective endocarditis incidence post-guideline changes in 2007.

 

Implications for Practice:

The findings support the continued use of antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk individuals undergoing invasive dental procedures, aligning with current guidelines from the American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology. The lack of clear benefits in moderate and low-risk groups suggests a need for further research to optimize prophylaxis guidelines and ensure effective risk stratification in clinical practice.

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Sperotto, F. et al. (2024). Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Infective Endocarditis Incidence Following Invasive Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Cardiol, Published online April 6, 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0873


RCT: Lack of significant effect of Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir–ritonavir) on symptom alleviation in Covid-19

26 Apr, 2024 | 11:49h | UTC

Study Design and Population:

This phase 2–3 randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy of nirmatrelvir in combination with ritonavir for treating mild-to-moderate Covid-19 in adults. Participants, both vaccinated and unvaccinated, were enrolled based on their risk factors for severe Covid-19. The study included 1296 adults who had confirmed Covid-19 with symptom onset within the past 5 days. They were randomly assigned to receive either nirmatrelvir–ritonavir or placebo every 12 hours for 5 days.

 

Main Findings:

The primary endpoint was the time to sustained alleviation of all targeted Covid-19 signs and symptoms. Results showed that the median time to alleviation was 12 days for the treatment group and 13 days for the placebo group, a difference that was not statistically significant (P=0.60). Hospitalizations and deaths were slightly lower in the treatment group (0.8%) compared to the placebo group (1.6%), but this difference was also not statistically significant. Adverse events were similar across both groups, with dysgeusia and diarrhea being the most common in the treatment group.

 

Implications for Practice:

The findings indicate that nirmatrelvir–ritonavir treatment does not significantly reduce the time to symptom alleviation for Covid-19 compared to placebo among vaccinated or unvaccinated adults. These results suggest that further research is needed to explore the potential benefits of this treatment in specific subpopulations or in combination with other interventions.

 

Reference (free full-text):

Reference: Hammond J. et al. (2024). Nirmatrelvir for Vaccinated or Unvaccinated Adult Outpatients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med, 390(13), 1186-1195. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2309003


FDA approves antibiotic Zevtera (ceftobiprole medocaril sodium) for three indications

26 Apr, 2024 | 11:39h | UTC

The FDA has granted approval for Zevtera (ceftobiprole medocaril sodium), an antibiotic formulated for injection, targeting three key bacterial infections. This includes treatment for adults with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (SAB) with or without right-sided infective endocarditis, acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in both adults and pediatric patients aged three months to under 18 years.

The approval follows rigorous clinical trials demonstrating Zevtera’s efficacy. In a multicenter study for SAB, Zevtera achieved a 69.8% success rate, slightly outperforming the comparator drug. For ABSSSI, Zevtera showed a 91.3% early clinical response, and for CABP, it had a clinical cure rate of 76.4% in adults. Pediatric efficacy for CABP was extrapolated from adult data and supported by a smaller pediatric trial.

Common side effects include anemia, nausea, and increased liver enzyme levels, with specific reactions varying by infection treated. Contraindications include severe hypersensitivity to ceftobiprole or other cephalosporins. Zevtera also carries warnings about potential hypersensitivity reactions, central nervous system effects, and Clostridioides difficile-associated diarrhea.

This approval, supported by Priority Review and Fast Track designations, offers a new treatment option for clinicians managing these serious infections.

Source: FDA NEWS RELEASE: FDA Approves New Antibiotic for Three Different Uses


Cohort Study: Inappropriate pneumonia diagnoses and associated risks in 17,290 hospitalized adults

26 Apr, 2024 | 11:25h | UTC

Study Design and Population:

This prospective cohort study analyzed medical records and patient interactions from July 2017 to March 2020 across 48 Michigan hospitals. A total of 17,290 adults admitted for general care were retrospectively assessed for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treatment, focusing on those who received antibiotics within the first two days of hospitalization.

 

Main Findings:

The study identified that 12.0% of the patients were inappropriately diagnosed with CAP. Key risk factors for misdiagnosis included older age, presence of dementia, and altered mental status at presentation. Among those misdiagnosed, 87.6% underwent a full course of antibiotics, which did not significantly change the 30-day risk of mortality, readmission, emergency visits, or Clostridioides difficile infections compared to brief treatment but was associated with higher antibiotic-related adverse events.

 

Implications for Practice:

The findings underscore the prevalence of inappropriate pneumonia diagnosis among hospitalized adults, especially in older patients with specific geriatric conditions. This study highlights the potential harms of unnecessary antibiotic use, suggesting a need for improved diagnostic accuracy and treatment decision-making in hospital settings to mitigate adverse outcomes.

 

Reference (free full-text):

Gupta, A. B. et al. (2024). Inappropriate Diagnosis of Pneumonia Among Hospitalized Adults. JAMA Intern Med. Published online March 25, 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0077.


RCT: Clarithromycin improves early clinical and inflammatory responses in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia patients

23 Mar, 2024 | 20:25h | UTC

Study Design and Population: The ACCESS trial was a phase 3, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in 18 Greek hospitals, involving adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia who displayed systemic inflammatory response syndrome, had a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 or more, and procalcitonin levels of 0.25 ng/mL or more. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either standard of care with intravenous cephalosporins or β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations plus oral clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily for 7 days) or placebo. The trial aimed to evaluate the impact of clarithromycin on early clinical and inflammatory responses.

Main Findings: Among 278 participants allocated to clarithromycin (n=139) or placebo (n=139), the primary composite endpoint—indicating early clinical response and inflammatory burden reduction within 72 hours—was met by 68% of patients in the clarithromycin group compared to 38% in the placebo group, showcasing a significant difference (29.6%, odds ratio 3.40, p<0.0001). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were slightly lower in the clarithromycin group than in the placebo group, although not statistically significant.

Implications for Practice: The addition of clarithromycin to the standard of care for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia significantly improves early clinical response and reduces inflammatory burden, potentially through modulation of the immune response. These results support the use of clarithromycin alongside β-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, highlighting its role in enhancing patient outcomes by targeting early clinical and inflammatory indicators.

Reference

Prof Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, MD et al. (2024). Clarithromycin for early anti-inflammatory responses in community-acquired pneumonia in Greece (ACCESS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, Volume(Issue), Pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00412-5. Access the study here: Link


RCT: Lower oxygenation target improves days alive without life support in severe COVID-19 hypoxemia

21 Mar, 2024 | 13:46h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This multicenter randomized clinical trial investigated the impact of different oxygenation targets on the survival of adult patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia in the ICU. Conducted across 11 European ICUs from August 2020 to March 2023, the study involved 726 patients requiring at least 10 L/min of oxygen or mechanical ventilation. Participants were randomly assigned to receive an oxygenation target of either 60 mm Hg (lower oxygenation group, n=365) or 90 mm Hg (higher oxygenation group, n=361) for up to 90 days.

Main Findings: The primary outcome was the number of days alive without life support at 90 days post-intervention. Patients in the lower oxygenation group achieved a median of 80.0 days alive without life support compared to 72.0 days in the higher oxygenation group, a difference that was statistically significant (P=0.009). Although there was a slight reduction in mortality at 90 days in the lower oxygenation group (30.2% vs 34.7% in the higher group), this was not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed in the proportion of patients with serious adverse events or the number of days alive and out of hospital.

Implications for Practice: Targeting a lower Pao2 of 60 mm Hg in ICU patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia appears to increase the days alive without life support compared to a higher target of 90 mm Hg, without increasing serious adverse events. This finding suggests that a lower oxygenation target could be more beneficial for this patient population, potentially guiding clinical practice in managing oxygen therapy for severe COVID-19 cases.

Reference

Reference: Nielsen FM et al. (2024). Randomized Clinical Trial: Effect of Oxygenation Targets on Survival Without Life Support in COVID-19 Patients with Severe Hypoxemia. JAMA, Published online March 19, 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.2934. Access the study here: [Link]


RCT: Propafenone leads to quicker sinus rhythm restoration than amiodarone in supraventricular arrhythmias related to septic shock

1 Oct, 2023 | 15:19h | UTC

Study Design & Population: The research was a two-center, prospective, controlled parallel-group, double-blind trial involving 209 septic shock patients who had new-onset supraventricular arrhythmia and a left ventricular ejection fraction above 35%. Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous propafenone (70 mg bolus followed by 400–840 mg/24 h) or amiodarone (300 mg bolus followed by 600–1800 mg/24 h).

Main Findings: The primary outcomes focused on the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm 24 hours post-infusion, time to the first sinus rhythm restoration, and arrhythmia recurrence rates. No significant difference was observed in 24-hour sinus rhythm rates between the propafenone (72.8%) and amiodarone (67.3%) groups (p=0.4). Time to the first rhythm restoration was significantly shorter for the propafenone group (median 3.7 hours) compared to the amiodarone group (median 7.3 hours, p=0.02). Recurrence of arrhythmia was notably lower in the propafenone group (52%) than in the amiodarone group (76%, p<0.001). In the subgroup of patients with a dilated left atrium, amiodarone appeared to be more effective.

Implications & Limitations: The study suggests that while propafenone doesn’t offer better rhythm control at 24 hours compared to amiodarone, it does provide faster cardioversion and fewer arrhythmia recurrences, especially in patients with a non-dilated left atrium. No significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes, such as ICU or long-term mortality, between propafenone and amiodarone in the trial. Limitations include potential underpowering of the study and the inability to fully account for the impact of multiple covariates involved in the complex therapy of septic shock.

Article: Balik, M., Maly, M., Brozek, T. et al. Propafenone versus amiodarone for supraventricular arrhythmias in septic shock: a randomised controlled trial. Intensive Care Med (2023)

 

Commentary on Twitter:

 


M-A | Most dengue infections are asymptomatic and could significantly contribute to the transmission of the disease

9 Aug, 2023 | 15:21h | UTC

Global prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections – a systematic review and meta-analysis – International Journal of Infectious Diseases

 


Review | Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning: Potential resources for the infection clinician

9 Aug, 2023 | 15:18h | UTC

Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning: Potential resources for the infection clinician – Journal of Infection

 


M-A | Percutaneous catheter drainage superior to needle aspiration for liver abscess treatment success

9 Aug, 2023 | 15:12h | UTC

Percutaneous catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration for liver abscess: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis – BMJ Open

 


Multinational Study | No correlation between Covid-19 and onset of type 1 diabetes in children

8 Aug, 2023 | 13:32h | UTC

SARS-CoV-2 — No Increased Islet Autoimmunity or Type 1 Diabetes in Teens – New England Journal of Medicine

 


M-A | The global prevalence of human fascioliasis

8 Aug, 2023 | 13:10h | UTC

The global prevalence of human fascioliasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis – Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease

 


Perspective | Cardiac device infection: removing barriers to timely and adequate treatment

4 Aug, 2023 | 11:54h | UTC

Cardiac device infection: removing barriers to timely and adequate treatment – European Heart Journal

 


Position Paper | Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in skin surgery

3 Aug, 2023 | 13:39h | UTC

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in skin surgery – Position paper of the Antibiotic Stewardship working group of the German Society for Dermatologic Surgery (DGDC) – Journal of the German Society of Dermatology

Part 1: Procedure- and patient-related risk factors

Part 2: Special indications and situations

 


RCT | Early oral antibiotic switch in low-risk neutropenic sepsis shows mixed results

3 Aug, 2023 | 13:15h | UTC

Early switch to oral antibiotic therapy in patients with low risk neutropenic sepsis (EASI-SWITCH): A randomized non-inferiority trial – Clinical Microbiology and Infection

 


Consensus Paper | Diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis in adults

1 Aug, 2023 | 14:34h | UTC

Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Infective Endocarditis in Adults: A WikiGuidelines Group Consensus Statement – JAMA Network Open

 


Opinion | Bad science needs to be called out: the medical profession loses trust when bad studies are used to promote policy

1 Aug, 2023 | 14:29h | UTC

Bad Science Needs to Be Called Out – Sensible Medicine

Related: Did Republicans die more during the pandemic bc they didn’t get the vax? – By Dr. Vinay Prassad

Original Study: Excess Death Rates for Republican and Democratic Registered Voters in Florida and Ohio During the COVID-19 Pandemic – JAMA Internal Medicine

 


Critical Appraisal | Did Republicans die more during the pandemic bc they didn’t get the vax?

1 Aug, 2023 | 14:28h | UTC

Did Republicans die more during the pandemic bc they didn’t get the vax? – By Dr. Vinay Prassad

Related: Bad Science Needs to Be Called Out – Sensible Medicine

Original Study: Excess Death Rates for Republican and Democratic Registered Voters in Florida and Ohio During the COVID-19 Pandemic – JAMA Internal Medicine

 


M-A | Updated evidence supports incisional negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infection prevention

1 Aug, 2023 | 14:15h | UTC

Incisional negative pressure wound therapy for the prevention of surgical site infection: an up-to-date meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis – eClinicalMedicine

 


Opinion Video | Critical analysis of the data behind Covid-19 booster shots

31 Jul, 2023 | 14:40h | UTC

“FLAWED Booster data was used by FDA for Mass Vax Campaign & We PROVE it in our new PAPER” – YouTube Video by Dr Vinay Prassad

Original Publication: Correspondence | Potential “healthy vaccinee bias” in a study of BNT162b2 vaccine against Covid-19

 


RCT | Bictegravir regimen noninferior to dolutegravir regimen in HIV-1, HBV co-infection treatment

31 Jul, 2023 | 14:00h | UTC

Bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 and hepatitis B coinfection (ALLIANCE): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial – The Lancet HIV (free registration required)

 


RCT | Limited antibiotic efficacy in children with sinusitis lacking nasopharyngeal pathogens

27 Jul, 2023 | 13:08h | UTC

Identifying Children Likely to Benefit From Antibiotics for Acute Sinusitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA (free for a limited period)

Editorial: Acute Bacterial Sinusitis: Limitations of Test-Based Treatment – JAMA (free for a limited period)

News Release: Bacterial testing in kids with sinusitis could slash antibiotic use – University of Pittsburgh

Commentary: Trial suggests bacterial test could reduce antibiotics in kids with sinusitis – CIDRAP

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Cohort Study | 9.9% of patients acquire C. difficile carriage in healthcare facilities, most do not develop clinical infection

27 Jul, 2023 | 13:01h | UTC

Natural History of Clostridioides difficile Colonization and Infection Following New Acquisition of Carriage in Healthcare Settings: A Prospective Cohort Study – Clinical Infectious Diseases

 


RCT | Pitavastatin effective in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in HIV-infected individuals

26 Jul, 2023 | 13:35h | UTC

Pitavastatin to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease in HIV Infection – New England Journal of Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentaries:

Pitavastatin lowers risk of cardiovascular events in people living with HIV – Aidsmap

Statins reduce cardiovascular risk in people living with HIV, new global study finds – STAT

Pitavastatin Cuts MACE in HIV-Infected Patients: REPRIEVE – TCTMD

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Mitigating neurological, cognitive, and psychiatric sequelae of COVID-19-related critical illness

26 Jul, 2023 | 13:28h | UTC

Mitigating neurological, cognitive, and psychiatric sequelae of COVID-19-related critical illness – The Lancet Respiratory Medicine

 


Stay Updated in Your Specialty

Telegram Channels
Free

WhatsApp alerts 10-day free trial

No spam, just news.