Open access
Open access
Powered by Google Translator Translator

Infectious Diseases (all articles)

Randomized Clinical Trial: Intravenous acetaminophen in critically ill sepsis patients shows no significant improvement in organ support-free days – JAMA

27 May, 2024 | 20:19h | UTC

Study Design and Population: The ASTER trial was a phase 2b randomized, double-blind, clinical trial conducted between October 2021 and April 2023 across 40 US academic hospitals. The study enrolled 447 adults with sepsis and respiratory or circulatory organ dysfunction within 36 hours of presentation in emergency departments or intensive care units. Participants were randomized to receive either 1 g of acetaminophen intravenously every 6 hours or a placebo for 5 days.

Main Findings: The primary endpoint, days alive and free of organ support (mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, and kidney replacement therapy) up to day 28, showed no significant difference between the acetaminophen group (20.2 days) and the placebo group (19.6 days). Secondary outcomes revealed that the acetaminophen group had significantly lower total, respiratory, and coagulation SOFA scores on days 2 through 4 and a lower rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome within 7 days (2.2% vs 8.5%). No significant interaction was observed between cell-free hemoglobin levels and acetaminophen.

Implications for Practice: While intravenous acetaminophen was safe, it did not significantly enhance the number of days alive and free of organ support in critically ill sepsis patients. The findings suggest that acetaminophen may not be effective in improving organ dysfunction outcomes in this patient population, although certain secondary benefits were noted. Further research might be necessary to explore these secondary findings and potential subgroups that could benefit from acetaminophen treatment.

 

Reference (free for a limited period):

Ware LB, Files DC, Fowler A, et al. (2024). Acetaminophen for Prevention and Treatment of Organ Dysfunction in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: The ASTER Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. Published online May 19, 2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.8772

 


Randomized Clinical Trial: Dequalinium chloride demonstrates noninferiority to metronidazole in treating bacterial vaginosis – JAMA Netw Open

25 May, 2024 | 19:55h | UTC

This randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy of dequalinium chloride compared to metronidazole for treating bacterial vaginosis in premenopausal women. Conducted across multiple centers from July 2021 to August 2022, the study involved 147 participants who were randomly assigned to receive either dequalinium chloride vaginal tablets or oral metronidazole. The primary outcome measured was the clinical cure rate shortly after treatment completion. Results showed that dequalinium chloride achieved a 92.8% cure rate, which was statistically noninferior to metronidazole’s 93.2% rate. Additionally, dequalinium chloride was better tolerated, with fewer adverse events reported compared to metronidazole. These findings suggest that dequalinium chloride is as effective as traditional antibiotic treatments for bacterial vaginosis and could be considered a viable non-antibiotic alternative due to its similar efficacy and enhanced tolerability.

 

Reference (link to free full-text):

Grzegorz Raba et al. (2024). Efficacy of Dequalinium Chloride vs Metronidazole for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open, 7(5), e248661. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8661

 


Phase 2 RCT: Preventive subcutaneous L9LS monoclonal antibody reduces malaria incidence by 66-70% in Malian children – N Engl J Med

7 May, 2024 | 15:31h | UTC

This phase 2 randomized clinical trial investigated the safety and efficacy of the monoclonal antibody L9LS in preventing Plasmodium falciparum infection and clinical malaria in children aged 6 to 10 years in Mali. The trial was structured in two parts: initial dose assessment in adults followed by a randomized, placebo-controlled test in children over a 6-month malaria season. A total of 225 children participated, divided equally among three groups to receive either 150 mg of L9LS, 300 mg of L9LS, or a placebo. Results demonstrated a significant reduction in the rate of P. falciparum infection—66% efficacy with the 150-mg dose and 70% efficacy with the 300-mg dose. Similarly, efficacy against clinical malaria was 67% with the 150-mg dose and 77% with the 300-mg dose. Both doses were well-tolerated with no safety concerns reported, underscoring the potential of L9LS as a preventative treatment against malaria in endemic regions.

 

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Kayentao, K. et al. (2024). Subcutaneous Administration of a Monoclonal Antibody to Prevent Malaria. N Engl J Med, 390(17), 1549-1559. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312775

 


RCT: No significant benefit of adjuvant prednisone for patients with cystic fibrosis with exacerbations unresponsive to antibiotics – Eur Respir J

6 May, 2024 | 06:32h | UTC

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the effectiveness of adjuvant oral prednisone in enhancing lung function recovery in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) experiencing pulmonary exacerbations (PExs) unresponsive to initial intravenous (IV) antibiotic treatment. The study involved 173 participants, with 76 not achieving more than 90% of their baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV1) by Day 7 of antibiotic treatment and subsequently randomized to receive either oral prednisone (1 mg·kg−1 twice daily, up to 60 mg/day) or placebo for an additional 7 days. Results showed that 50% of the prednisone group and 39% of the placebo group recovered over 90% of their baseline ppFEV1 by Day 14. However, the difference was not statistically significant (11% difference; 95% CI -11, 34%; p=0.34). Additionally, prednisone did not significantly prolong the time to the next exacerbation compared to placebo. This study concludes that adjuvant oral prednisone does not significantly improve lung function recovery or delay subsequent exacerbations in CF patients not responding to initial antibiotic therapy.

 

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Valerie Waters et al. (2024). A randomized trial of oral prednisone for cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbation treatment. European Respiratory Journal, DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02278-2023

 


RCT: Azithromycin fails to prevent moderate or severe chronic lung disease in preterm infants – Lancet Respir Med

6 May, 2024 | 06:28h | UTC

This randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of azithromycin in preventing chronic lung disease (CLD) in preterm infants born at less than 30 weeks’ gestation across 28 UK neonatal intensive care units. A total of 799 infants were randomized to receive either intravenous azithromycin or a placebo. The primary outcome measured was survival without moderate or severe CLD at 36 weeks postmenstrual age. Results showed no significant difference between the azithromycin group (42% survival without CLD) and the placebo group (45% survival without CLD), with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.84 (95% CI 0.55–1.29, p=0.43). Pulmonary Ureaplasma spp colonization did not affect the treatment outcome. Given the lack of efficacy and the presence of several serious adverse events in the azithromycin group, the study concluded that azithromycin should not be recommended for preventing CLD in this population.

 

Reference (link to free full-text):

John Lowe et al. (2024). Azithromycin therapy for prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity (AZTEC): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00079-1

 


SCCM/IDSA Updated guidelines for evaluating new fever in adult ICU patients – Crit Care Med

5 May, 2024 | 15:12h | UTC

The 2023 revision of the guidelines for assessing new-onset fever in adult ICU patients stresses rigorous diagnostic processes using the GRADE methodology. These guidelines, developed without industry funding, offer 12 recommendations and nine best-practice statements focused primarily on the accurate measurement of core body temperature and initial diagnostic evaluations geared towards identifying potential infectious causes. Central temperature monitoring is recommended when possible; otherwise, oral or rectal measurements are preferred. The utility of imaging studies and rapid diagnostic tests is highlighted, along with the selective use of biomarkers to guide the cessation of antimicrobial therapy. The guidelines underscore that most recommendations are based on weak evidence, thus highlighting the need for continued research in diagnostic methodologies and fever management in the ICU setting.

 

Reference (link to free full-text):

O’Grady NP, Alexander E, Alhazzani W, et al. (2023). Society of Critical Care Medicine and the Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines for Evaluating New Fever in Adult Patients in the ICU. Critical Care Medicine, 51(11), 1570-1586. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006022.

 


Systematic Review: Comparing antibiotic treatment vs. appendectomy for the initial treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis – Cochrane Library

4 May, 2024 | 13:09h | UTC

Study Design and Population:

This Cochrane review analyzed 13 randomized controlled trials involving 3,358 participants to compare the efficacy of antibiotic treatment versus appendectomy in managing uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The included studies predominantly involved adult participants and utilized broad-spectrum antibiotics, with interventions ranging from open to predominantly laparoscopic appendectomy. Data collection spanned from hospital admission to up to seven years, with studies conducted across various global regions, including Asia, Europe, and North America.

 

Main Findings:

The primary outcomes revealed that antibiotic treatment might slightly increase the risk of unsuccessful treatment with 76 additional unsuccessful cases per 1,000 individuals compared to surgery, though these results did not reach clinical significance. Antibiotics reduced wound infections but possibly increased the average hospital stay by half a day. About 30.7% of participants treated with antibiotics required an appendectomy within one year. Secondary outcomes showed very uncertain evidence on antibiotics’ effect on intra-abdominal abscess or reoperation rates, and a slight increase in negative appendectomy rates was observed.

 

Implications for Practice:

The findings suggest that while antibiotics could serve as an initial treatment to avoid surgery in two-thirds of cases annually, a significant portion may still require surgical intervention. This information is crucial for clinicians in making informed treatment decisions, particularly considering patient preferences and the risk of surgery. Further research is needed to explore long-term outcomes and identify patient subgroups that may benefit most from either treatment.

 

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Doleman B, Fonnes S, Lund JN, et al. (2024). Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (April 29), CD015038.pub2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015038.pub2.

 


Diagnostic Study: Enhanced prediction of TB progression with IGRAs compared to tuberculin skin test

27 Apr, 2024 | 18:53h | UTC

Study Design and Population:

This prospective diagnostic study analyzed the predictive accuracy of tuberculosis (TB) tests among 22,020 high-risk participants across 10 US sites from 2012 to 2020. Participants included individuals with close contacts to infectious TB cases, those born in or travelers to high-incidence countries, individuals living with HIV, or belonging to locally prevalent high-risk groups. Testing included two interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs), QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) and SPOT.TB (TSPOT), alongside the traditional tuberculin skin test (TST).

 

Main Findings:

The study found that both IGRAs, TSPOT and QFT-GIT, showed significantly superior positive predictive value (PPV) for predicting TB disease progression compared to the TST, with PPV ratios of 1.65 (95% CI, 1.35-2.02) and 1.47 (95% CI, 1.22-1.77) respectively. Additionally, when considering a positive TST result, further positive results from either IGRA significantly increased the PPV, emphasizing the enhanced predictive capability of IGRAs over TST alone.

 

Implications for Practice:

The superior predictive performance of Interferon-γ Release Assays (IGRAs) suggests they should be considered in clinical settings for high-risk populations, if available and feasible, to better identify individuals at increased risk of progressing to active tuberculosis (TB). This enhanced detection capability could guide more targeted preventive treatments, ultimately supporting global efforts toward TB elimination. Clinicians should assess the accessibility and cost-effectiveness of IGRAs to refine decision-making processes in TB prevention strategies, ensuring that the benefits of these advanced diagnostics are balanced against their costs.

 

Reference (free full-text):

Ayers, T. et al. (2024). Comparison of Tuberculin Skin Testing and Interferon-γ Release Assays in Predicting Tuberculosis Disease. JAMA Network Open, 7(4), e244769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4769.


WHO report on HIV drug resistance – Rising dolutegravir resistance and implications for global care standards

27 Apr, 2024 | 16:08h | UTC

The World Health Organization’s latest HIV Drug Resistance Report highlights both the effectiveness and emerging challenges with dolutegravir (DTG)-based therapies. While there is significant suppression of HIV viral loads in populations treated with DTG, data reveals increasing resistance levels, particularly among those with high viral loads and prior treatment experiences. The report calls for enhanced surveillance and management strategies to address these resistance patterns and maintain treatment efficacy. It also underscores the necessity of robust data systems and proactive healthcare policies to improve the overall quality of HIV treatment and prevent the transmission of resistant HIV strains, aligning with global efforts to combat antimicrobial resistance.

 

Source:

New report documents increase in HIV drug resistance to dolutegravir – World Health Organization


M-A: Reduced risk of infective endocarditis following dental procedures with antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk individuals

26 Apr, 2024 | 12:07h | UTC

Study Design and Population:

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of infective endocarditis following invasive dental procedures. Researchers analyzed data from 1,152,345 cases sourced from PubMed, Cochrane-CENTRAL, Scopus, and other databases up to May 2023. The study included various research designs, such as case-control, cohort, and time-trend studies, assessing the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis across different risk groups.

 

Main Findings:

The meta-analysis revealed that antibiotic prophylaxis significantly lowers the risk of infective endocarditis among individuals at high risk (pooled relative risk, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29-0.57), with consistent findings across studies of good quality. However, the effectiveness of prophylaxis in individuals at moderate or low/unknown risk remains unsupported by sufficient evidence. Time-trend studies provided mixed results, with some indicating no change or an increase in infective endocarditis incidence post-guideline changes in 2007.

 

Implications for Practice:

The findings support the continued use of antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk individuals undergoing invasive dental procedures, aligning with current guidelines from the American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology. The lack of clear benefits in moderate and low-risk groups suggests a need for further research to optimize prophylaxis guidelines and ensure effective risk stratification in clinical practice.

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Sperotto, F. et al. (2024). Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Infective Endocarditis Incidence Following Invasive Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Cardiol, Published online April 6, 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0873


RCT: Lack of significant effect of Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir–ritonavir) on symptom alleviation in Covid-19

26 Apr, 2024 | 11:49h | UTC

Study Design and Population:

This phase 2–3 randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy of nirmatrelvir in combination with ritonavir for treating mild-to-moderate Covid-19 in adults. Participants, both vaccinated and unvaccinated, were enrolled based on their risk factors for severe Covid-19. The study included 1296 adults who had confirmed Covid-19 with symptom onset within the past 5 days. They were randomly assigned to receive either nirmatrelvir–ritonavir or placebo every 12 hours for 5 days.

 

Main Findings:

The primary endpoint was the time to sustained alleviation of all targeted Covid-19 signs and symptoms. Results showed that the median time to alleviation was 12 days for the treatment group and 13 days for the placebo group, a difference that was not statistically significant (P=0.60). Hospitalizations and deaths were slightly lower in the treatment group (0.8%) compared to the placebo group (1.6%), but this difference was also not statistically significant. Adverse events were similar across both groups, with dysgeusia and diarrhea being the most common in the treatment group.

 

Implications for Practice:

The findings indicate that nirmatrelvir–ritonavir treatment does not significantly reduce the time to symptom alleviation for Covid-19 compared to placebo among vaccinated or unvaccinated adults. These results suggest that further research is needed to explore the potential benefits of this treatment in specific subpopulations or in combination with other interventions.

 

Reference (free full-text):

Reference: Hammond J. et al. (2024). Nirmatrelvir for Vaccinated or Unvaccinated Adult Outpatients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med, 390(13), 1186-1195. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2309003


FDA approves antibiotic Zevtera (ceftobiprole medocaril sodium) for three indications

26 Apr, 2024 | 11:39h | UTC

The FDA has granted approval for Zevtera (ceftobiprole medocaril sodium), an antibiotic formulated for injection, targeting three key bacterial infections. This includes treatment for adults with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (SAB) with or without right-sided infective endocarditis, acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in both adults and pediatric patients aged three months to under 18 years.

The approval follows rigorous clinical trials demonstrating Zevtera’s efficacy. In a multicenter study for SAB, Zevtera achieved a 69.8% success rate, slightly outperforming the comparator drug. For ABSSSI, Zevtera showed a 91.3% early clinical response, and for CABP, it had a clinical cure rate of 76.4% in adults. Pediatric efficacy for CABP was extrapolated from adult data and supported by a smaller pediatric trial.

Common side effects include anemia, nausea, and increased liver enzyme levels, with specific reactions varying by infection treated. Contraindications include severe hypersensitivity to ceftobiprole or other cephalosporins. Zevtera also carries warnings about potential hypersensitivity reactions, central nervous system effects, and Clostridioides difficile-associated diarrhea.

This approval, supported by Priority Review and Fast Track designations, offers a new treatment option for clinicians managing these serious infections.

Source: FDA NEWS RELEASE: FDA Approves New Antibiotic for Three Different Uses


Cohort Study: Inappropriate pneumonia diagnoses and associated risks in 17,290 hospitalized adults

26 Apr, 2024 | 11:25h | UTC

Study Design and Population:

This prospective cohort study analyzed medical records and patient interactions from July 2017 to March 2020 across 48 Michigan hospitals. A total of 17,290 adults admitted for general care were retrospectively assessed for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treatment, focusing on those who received antibiotics within the first two days of hospitalization.

 

Main Findings:

The study identified that 12.0% of the patients were inappropriately diagnosed with CAP. Key risk factors for misdiagnosis included older age, presence of dementia, and altered mental status at presentation. Among those misdiagnosed, 87.6% underwent a full course of antibiotics, which did not significantly change the 30-day risk of mortality, readmission, emergency visits, or Clostridioides difficile infections compared to brief treatment but was associated with higher antibiotic-related adverse events.

 

Implications for Practice:

The findings underscore the prevalence of inappropriate pneumonia diagnosis among hospitalized adults, especially in older patients with specific geriatric conditions. This study highlights the potential harms of unnecessary antibiotic use, suggesting a need for improved diagnostic accuracy and treatment decision-making in hospital settings to mitigate adverse outcomes.

 

Reference (free full-text):

Gupta, A. B. et al. (2024). Inappropriate Diagnosis of Pneumonia Among Hospitalized Adults. JAMA Intern Med. Published online March 25, 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0077.


RCT: Clarithromycin improves early clinical and inflammatory responses in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia patients

23 Mar, 2024 | 20:25h | UTC

Study Design and Population: The ACCESS trial was a phase 3, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in 18 Greek hospitals, involving adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia who displayed systemic inflammatory response syndrome, had a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 or more, and procalcitonin levels of 0.25 ng/mL or more. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either standard of care with intravenous cephalosporins or β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations plus oral clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily for 7 days) or placebo. The trial aimed to evaluate the impact of clarithromycin on early clinical and inflammatory responses.

Main Findings: Among 278 participants allocated to clarithromycin (n=139) or placebo (n=139), the primary composite endpoint—indicating early clinical response and inflammatory burden reduction within 72 hours—was met by 68% of patients in the clarithromycin group compared to 38% in the placebo group, showcasing a significant difference (29.6%, odds ratio 3.40, p<0.0001). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were slightly lower in the clarithromycin group than in the placebo group, although not statistically significant.

Implications for Practice: The addition of clarithromycin to the standard of care for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia significantly improves early clinical response and reduces inflammatory burden, potentially through modulation of the immune response. These results support the use of clarithromycin alongside β-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, highlighting its role in enhancing patient outcomes by targeting early clinical and inflammatory indicators.

Reference

Prof Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, MD et al. (2024). Clarithromycin for early anti-inflammatory responses in community-acquired pneumonia in Greece (ACCESS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, Volume(Issue), Pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00412-5. Access the study here: Link


RCT: Lower oxygenation target improves days alive without life support in severe COVID-19 hypoxemia

21 Mar, 2024 | 13:46h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This multicenter randomized clinical trial investigated the impact of different oxygenation targets on the survival of adult patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia in the ICU. Conducted across 11 European ICUs from August 2020 to March 2023, the study involved 726 patients requiring at least 10 L/min of oxygen or mechanical ventilation. Participants were randomly assigned to receive an oxygenation target of either 60 mm Hg (lower oxygenation group, n=365) or 90 mm Hg (higher oxygenation group, n=361) for up to 90 days.

Main Findings: The primary outcome was the number of days alive without life support at 90 days post-intervention. Patients in the lower oxygenation group achieved a median of 80.0 days alive without life support compared to 72.0 days in the higher oxygenation group, a difference that was statistically significant (P=0.009). Although there was a slight reduction in mortality at 90 days in the lower oxygenation group (30.2% vs 34.7% in the higher group), this was not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed in the proportion of patients with serious adverse events or the number of days alive and out of hospital.

Implications for Practice: Targeting a lower Pao2 of 60 mm Hg in ICU patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia appears to increase the days alive without life support compared to a higher target of 90 mm Hg, without increasing serious adverse events. This finding suggests that a lower oxygenation target could be more beneficial for this patient population, potentially guiding clinical practice in managing oxygen therapy for severe COVID-19 cases.

Reference

Reference: Nielsen FM et al. (2024). Randomized Clinical Trial: Effect of Oxygenation Targets on Survival Without Life Support in COVID-19 Patients with Severe Hypoxemia. JAMA, Published online March 19, 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.2934. Access the study here: [Link]


RCT: Propafenone leads to quicker sinus rhythm restoration than amiodarone in supraventricular arrhythmias related to septic shock

1 Oct, 2023 | 15:19h | UTC

Study Design & Population: The research was a two-center, prospective, controlled parallel-group, double-blind trial involving 209 septic shock patients who had new-onset supraventricular arrhythmia and a left ventricular ejection fraction above 35%. Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous propafenone (70 mg bolus followed by 400–840 mg/24 h) or amiodarone (300 mg bolus followed by 600–1800 mg/24 h).

Main Findings: The primary outcomes focused on the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm 24 hours post-infusion, time to the first sinus rhythm restoration, and arrhythmia recurrence rates. No significant difference was observed in 24-hour sinus rhythm rates between the propafenone (72.8%) and amiodarone (67.3%) groups (p=0.4). Time to the first rhythm restoration was significantly shorter for the propafenone group (median 3.7 hours) compared to the amiodarone group (median 7.3 hours, p=0.02). Recurrence of arrhythmia was notably lower in the propafenone group (52%) than in the amiodarone group (76%, p<0.001). In the subgroup of patients with a dilated left atrium, amiodarone appeared to be more effective.

Implications & Limitations: The study suggests that while propafenone doesn’t offer better rhythm control at 24 hours compared to amiodarone, it does provide faster cardioversion and fewer arrhythmia recurrences, especially in patients with a non-dilated left atrium. No significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes, such as ICU or long-term mortality, between propafenone and amiodarone in the trial. Limitations include potential underpowering of the study and the inability to fully account for the impact of multiple covariates involved in the complex therapy of septic shock.

Article: Balik, M., Maly, M., Brozek, T. et al. Propafenone versus amiodarone for supraventricular arrhythmias in septic shock: a randomised controlled trial. Intensive Care Med (2023)

 

Commentary on Twitter:

 


M-A | Most dengue infections are asymptomatic and could significantly contribute to the transmission of the disease

9 Aug, 2023 | 15:21h | UTC

Global prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections – a systematic review and meta-analysis – International Journal of Infectious Diseases

 


Review | Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning: Potential resources for the infection clinician

9 Aug, 2023 | 15:18h | UTC

Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning: Potential resources for the infection clinician – Journal of Infection

 


M-A | Percutaneous catheter drainage superior to needle aspiration for liver abscess treatment success

9 Aug, 2023 | 15:12h | UTC

Percutaneous catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration for liver abscess: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis – BMJ Open

 


Multinational Study | No correlation between Covid-19 and onset of type 1 diabetes in children

8 Aug, 2023 | 13:32h | UTC

SARS-CoV-2 — No Increased Islet Autoimmunity or Type 1 Diabetes in Teens – New England Journal of Medicine

 


M-A | The global prevalence of human fascioliasis

8 Aug, 2023 | 13:10h | UTC

The global prevalence of human fascioliasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis – Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease

 


Perspective | Cardiac device infection: removing barriers to timely and adequate treatment

4 Aug, 2023 | 11:54h | UTC

Cardiac device infection: removing barriers to timely and adequate treatment – European Heart Journal

 


Position Paper | Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in skin surgery

3 Aug, 2023 | 13:39h | UTC

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in skin surgery – Position paper of the Antibiotic Stewardship working group of the German Society for Dermatologic Surgery (DGDC) – Journal of the German Society of Dermatology

Part 1: Procedure- and patient-related risk factors

Part 2: Special indications and situations

 


RCT | Early oral antibiotic switch in low-risk neutropenic sepsis shows mixed results

3 Aug, 2023 | 13:15h | UTC

Early switch to oral antibiotic therapy in patients with low risk neutropenic sepsis (EASI-SWITCH): A randomized non-inferiority trial – Clinical Microbiology and Infection

 


Consensus Paper | Diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis in adults

1 Aug, 2023 | 14:34h | UTC

Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Infective Endocarditis in Adults: A WikiGuidelines Group Consensus Statement – JAMA Network Open

 


Stay Updated in Your Specialty

Telegram Channels
Free

WhatsApp alerts 10-day free trial

No spam, just news.