Interventional Cardiology | Links Medicus Content Curation & Alerts in Medicine

PCI vs. CABG in left main coronary disease patients with and without diabetes—a pooled analysis of 4 trials

22 Mar, 2024 | 11:41h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This research pooled individual patient data from four randomized clinical trials (SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, NOBLE, and EXCEL), comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 4393 patients with left main coronary artery disease. The trials included both patients with and without diabetes, allowing for a comparative analysis of outcomes based on the revascularization method and the presence of diabetes.

Main Findings: Patients with diabetes exhibited higher rates of 5-year mortality, spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization compared to those without diabetes. However, mortality rates following PCI vs. CABG were similar in diabetic (15.3% vs. 14.1%, respectively) and non-diabetic patients (9.7% vs. 8.9%, respectively). PCI was associated with a lower risk of stroke within the first year post-operation across all patients. Notably, diabetic patients underwent higher rates of spontaneous MI and repeat revascularization after PCI compared to CABG, with a more significant absolute excess risk observed beyond the first year compared to non-diabetic patients.

Implications for Practice: For patients with left main disease deemed suitable for either PCI or CABG, diabetes status significantly influences long-term outcomes, including death and cardiovascular events. While PCI offers a lower early risk of stroke, it is associated with increased risks of spontaneous MI and repeat revascularization, particularly in diabetic patients. These findings underscore the importance of considering patient-specific factors, such as diabetes status, in choosing between PCI and CABG for left main coronary artery disease revascularization.

Reference

Prakriti Gaba et al. (2024). Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Disease With or Without Diabetes: Findings From a Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials. Circulation, 0. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065571. Access the study here: Link

Meta-Analysis: No mortality benefit of early vs. delayed/selective coronary angiography in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without ST-elevation

21 Mar, 2024 | 11:40h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This article presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials comparing early/immediate versus delayed/selective coronary angiography (CAG) in 1512 patients who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) without ST-segment elevation. The population had a mean age of 67 years, with 26% female and 23% having a prior myocardial infarction. Follow-up duration was at least 30 days across included studies.

Main Findings: The analysis revealed no significant difference in the odds of all-cause death between early/immediate and delayed/selective CAG strategies (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% CI 0.91–1.38). Similar results were found for the composite outcome of all-cause death or neurological deficit (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.89–1.36). Subgroup analysis showed no significant effect modification based on age, initial cardiac rhythm, history of coronary artery disease, the presumed ischemic cause of arrest, or time to return of spontaneous circulation. Interestingly, a trend toward increased odds of death was observed in women receiving early CAG compared to men, although this finding approached but did not reach statistical significance.

Implications for Practice: The findings suggest that for OHCA patients without ST-segment elevation, an early/immediate CAG strategy does not confer a mortality benefit over a delayed/selective approach across major subgroups. Notably, the potential for increased mortality risk in women with early CAG warrants further investigation. Clinicians should consider these results when deciding on the timing of CAG in this patient population, keeping in mind the overall lack of mortality benefit and the nuanced differences among subgroups.

Reference: Fardin Hamidi et al. (2023). Early versus delayed coronary angiography in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and no ST-segment elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 113(561–569). Access the study here: [Link]

Reference

Stay Updated in Your Specialty