Open access
Open access
Powered by Google Translator Translator

Interventional Cardiology

ISCHEMIA Trial 2ry Analysis | Patients with CCD and daily/weekly angina seem to benefit most from complete revascularization

26 Jul, 2023 | 13:33h | UTC

Complete Revascularization and Angina-Related Health Status in the ISCHEMIA Trial – Journal of the American College of Cardiology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentaries:

Complete Revascularization and Angina-Related Health Status – American College of Cardiology

More Angina Relief With Complete Revascularization in Stable CAD: ISCHEMIA – TCTMD

Related/Original Articles:

Follow-up of the ISCHEMIA trial | Similar survival after invasive vs. conservative management of stable coronary disease.

ISCHEMIA Trial: Health-Status Outcomes with Initial Invasive vs. Conservative Care in Stable Coronary Disease

ISCHEMIA Trial: Initial Invasive vs. Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease

ISCHEMIA Trial: Health Status after Invasive or Conservative Care in Coronary and Advanced Kidney Disease

ISCHEMIA Trial: Management of Coronary Disease in Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease

 


Perspective | What does it mean to discover a coronary blockage?

26 Jul, 2023 | 13:31h | UTC

Chapter 1: What Does it Mean to Discover a Coronary Blockage? – By Dr John Mandrola

Chapter 2: On the meaning of a coronary blockage – By Dr John Mandrola

 


M-A | P2Y12 monotherapy after 1-3 months DAPT safely reduces bleeding in PCI patients with CAD and CKD

26 Jul, 2023 | 13:18h | UTC

P2y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 1–3 months dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Related:

De-escalation or abbreviation of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Consensus Statement from an international expert panel on coronary thrombosis – Nature Reviews Cardiology (if the link is paywalled, try this one)

RCT | 3-6 month DAPT noninferior to 12 month DAPT in patients undergoing PCI with third-generation DES

Short Duration of DAPT Versus De-Escalation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes – JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Long-term Effects of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 3-Year Follow-up of the SMART-CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Cardiology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA

Effect of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SMART-CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA

Comparison of Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1 to 2 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With 12 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The STOPDAPT-2 ACS Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Cardiology

Six months versus 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DAPT-STEMI): randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial – The BMJ

6-month versus 12-month or longer dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (SMART-DATE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial – The Lancet

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration Based on Ischemic and Bleeding Risks After Coronary Stenting – Journal of the American College of Cardiology

 


Consensus Paper | De-escalation or abbreviation of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes and PCI

24 Jul, 2023 | 13:08h | UTC

De-escalation or abbreviation of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Consensus Statement from an international expert panel on coronary thrombosis – Nature Reviews Cardiology (if the link is paywalled, try this one)

 


RCT | Half-dose Tenecteplase + later PCI if indicated seems to be viable option in older individuals when timely PCI is unavailable

21 Jul, 2023 | 13:36h | UTC

Half-Dose Tenecteplase or Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Older Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction in STREAM-2: A Randomized, Open-Label Trial – Circulation (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Review | Guiding the use of invasive cardiac interventions in patients with advanced malignancies

17 Jul, 2023 | 13:23h | UTC

Invasive Cardiac Interventions in Patients With Active, Advanced Solid and Hematologic Malignancies: A Conceptual Framework: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review – JACC: CardioOncology

 


Review | Functional coronary angiography for the assessment of the epicardial vessels and the microcirculation

27 Jun, 2023 | 13:33h | UTC

Functional coronary angiography for the assessment of the epicardial vessels and the microcirculation – EuroIntervention

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


M-A | Similar death rates in left main disease patients treated with PCI or CABG, both in patients with and without ACS

15 Jun, 2023 | 14:59h | UTC

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Left Main Disease in Patients With and Without Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials – JAMA Cardiology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentary: CABG and PCI Comparable in ACS Patients With Left Main CAD – TCTMD

 


Consensus Statement | Clinical quantitative coronary artery stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis imaging

13 Jun, 2023 | 13:49h | UTC

Clinical quantitative coronary artery stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis imaging: a Consensus Statement from the Quantitative Cardiovascular Imaging Study Group – Nature Reviews Cardiology (if the link is paywalled, try this one)

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Consensus Paper | Applied coronary physiology for planning and guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions

30 May, 2023 | 11:58h | UTC

Applied coronary physiology for planning and guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the European Society of Cardiology – EuroIntervention

 


Review | Bail-out techniques in percutaneous intervention for Ellis Grade III coronary perforation in left main distal bifurcation lesions

29 May, 2023 | 10:51h | UTC

Bail-Out Techniques in Percutaneous Intervention for Ellis Grade III Coronary Perforation in Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions – JSCAI

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


SCAI Consensus Statement | Management of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis

22 May, 2023 | 13:41h | UTC

SCAI Expert Consensus Statement on Management of In-Stent Restenosis and Stent Thrombosis – Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

News Release: Guidance on management of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis – Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions

 


Stent angioplasty in coronary artery anomalies with intramural course: when, why, how, with what results?

16 May, 2023 | 14:38h | UTC

Stent Angioplasty in Coronary Artery Anomalies With Intramural Course: When, Why, How, With What Results? – Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Review | Dilemmas in cardiology: when to recanalize a chronic total occlusion

12 May, 2023 | 13:19h | UTC

Dilemmas in cardiology: when to recanalize a chronic total occlusion – European Heart Journal Supplements

See all articles in the series here


M-A | PCI vs. CABG in non–ST-elevation coronary syndromes and multivessel disease

10 May, 2023 | 15:35h | UTC

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Non–ST-Elevation Coronary Syndromes and Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis – American Journal of Cardiology

 


Expert Panel | Appropriate use criteria for the management of aortic stenosis

5 May, 2023 | 15:22h | UTC

Appropriate Use Criteria for the Management of Aortic Stenosis: Insight From the Japanese Expert Panel – JACC: Asia

 


Contemporary percutaneous management of coronary calcification: current status and future directions

18 Apr, 2023 | 13:06h | UTC

Contemporary percutaneous management of coronary calcification: current status and future directions – OpenHeart

 


Single arm trial | Safety of metformin continuation in diabetic patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography

12 Apr, 2023 | 13:06h | UTC

Safety of metformin continuation in diabetic patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography: the NO-STOP single arm trial – Cardiovascular Diabetology

 


RCT | Routine invasive approach fails to benefit frail older adults with non–ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction

6 Apr, 2023 | 13:23h | UTC

Effect of Routine Invasive vs Conservative Strategy in Older Adults With Frailty and Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Internal Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentary: Routine invasive strategy not associated with improved outcomes in older adults with frailty and non-ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction – Physician’s Weekly

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Review | Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease

5 Apr, 2023 | 13:33h | UTC

Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease – EuroIntervention

 


SCAI/HRS Expert consensus statement on transcatheter left atrial appendage closure

31 Mar, 2023 | 13:44h | UTC

SCAI/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure – JSCAI

Key Points: Consensus Statement on Transcatheter LA Appendage Closure – American College of Cardiology

Commentaries:

SCAI/HRS Consensus Document Covers the Ins and Outs of LAAO – TCTMD

New SCAI/HRS Expert Consensus Statement Addresses Transcatheter LAAC – American College of Cardiology

 


RCT | 3-6 month DAPT noninferior to 12 month DAPT in patients undergoing PCI with third-generation DES

22 Mar, 2023 | 13:29h | UTC

Summary: In a randomized trial involving 2,013 patients across 37 centers in South Korea, researchers compared the effectiveness of 3-6 month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus 12 months of DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using third-generation drug-eluting stents.

The primary outcome was net adverse clinical events (NACE), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis, or major bleeding.

The study found that 3-6 month DAPT was non-inferior to 12-month DAPT for NACE (3.7% vs. 4.1%, respectively), with a consistent treatment effect across various subgroups. No significant differences were observed in target lesion failure or major bleeding between the two groups.

Despite these findings, further research is needed to generalize the results to other populations and to determine the ideal regimen for 3-6 month DAPT.

Article: Comparison Of 3-6 Month Versus 12 Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Intervention Using the Contemporary Drug-eluting Stents With Ultrathin Struts: The HOST-IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial – Circulation (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentary: Short DAPT Noninferior to 1 Year After Ultrathin DES PCI: HOST-IDEA – TCTMD

Related:

Short Duration of DAPT Versus De-Escalation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes – JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Long-term Effects of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 3-Year Follow-up of the SMART-CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Cardiology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA

Effect of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SMART-CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA

Comparison of Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1 to 2 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With 12 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The STOPDAPT-2 ACS Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Cardiology

Six months versus 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DAPT-STEMI): randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial – The BMJ

6-month versus 12-month or longer dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (SMART-DATE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial – The Lancet

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration Based on Ischemic and Bleeding Risks After Coronary Stenting – Journal of the American College of Cardiology

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


RCT | A 10-y comparison of paclitaxel-coated balloon, paclitaxel-eluting stent, and plain balloon angioplasty for DES in-stent restenosis

20 Mar, 2023 | 13:42h | UTC

Summary: The ISAR-DESIRE 3 trial aimed to compare the 10-year efficacy and safety of plain balloon (PB), paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB), and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR).

A total of 402 patients with DES-ISR were randomized to the different treatment groups: 134 patients to PB angioplasty (160 lesions), 137 patients to PCB angioplasty (172 lesions), and 131 patients to PES implantation (168 lesions).

PCB angioplasty and PES implantation had comparable 10-year results in the device-oriented composite endpoint including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, target lesion thrombosis, or target lesion revascularization, and significantly reduced the incidence of repeat target lesion revascularization compared to PB angioplasty alone. However, an excess of mortality within 5 years associated with PES warrants further investigation.

Article: Coronary artery restenosis treatment with plain balloon, drug-coated balloon, or drug-eluting stent: 10-year outcomes of the ISAR-DESIRE 3 trial – European Heart Journal (free for a limited period)

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Review | Transcatheter interventions for heart failure

17 Mar, 2023 | 12:44h | UTC

Transcatheter interventions for heart failure – EuroIntervention

 


RCT | Three-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients with aortic stenosis

14 Mar, 2023 | 13:47h | UTC

Three-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis – Journal of the American College of Cardiology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

News Release: Benefits of TAVR Remain Consistent in Patients at Low Surgical Risk at Three Years – American College of Cardiology

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Stay Updated in Your Specialty

Telegram Channels
Free

WhatsApp alerts 10-day free trial

No spam, just news.