Evidence-based Medicine
Review | Platform trials for anesthesia and perioperative medicine
29 May, 2023 | 10:45h | UTCRelated:
Platform trials: the future of medical research? – The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Perspective | Fake scientific papers are alarmingly common
24 May, 2023 | 13:18h | UTCFake scientific papers are alarmingly common – Science
Opinion Video | Questioning the reliability of nutrition science
23 May, 2023 | 13:02h | UTC
A humorous peek into HIV research papers: a quick guide
18 May, 2023 | 13:46h | UTCTypes of HIV Papers — A Quick Guide – HIV and Observations
Commentary on Twitter
In his latest HIV and ID Observations post, @PaulSaxMD presents a quick guide to the different types of HIV papers, comic style. https://t.co/RYW6MuubCd (H/T @xkcd) pic.twitter.com/Zlh7PJOh8o
— NEJM Journal Watch (@JWatch) May 16, 2023
Podcast | Interpreting the results of intention-to-treat, per-protocol, and as-treated analyses
12 May, 2023 | 13:39h | UTC
How to recognize a trustworthy clinical practice guideline
11 May, 2023 | 12:03h | UTC
Decentralized clinical trials: ethical opportunities and challenges
11 May, 2023 | 11:44h | UTCDecentralised clinical trials: ethical opportunities and challenges – The Lancet Digital Health
Related:
Decentralized clinical trials: Collaboration is needed to drive their adoption and impact – STAT
Video | Keeping up with the literature: special discussion of masking evidence
9 May, 2023 | 14:56h | UTCKeeping up with the literature | Special discussion of Masking Evidence
‘Too greedy’: mass walkout at global science journal over ‘unethical’ fees
8 May, 2023 | 13:19h | UTC‘Too greedy’: mass walkout at global science journal over ‘unethical’ fees – The Guardian
Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for SR and M-A
5 May, 2023 | 15:11h | UTC
Commentary on Twitter
Systematic reviews or meta-analyses of prediction model studies have unique challenges.
This article describes a new guideline to help ensure this type of reporting is complete, transparent, and accuratehttps://t.co/TkDcMAAjmB pic.twitter.com/Hnfhm0JMUv
— The BMJ (@bmj_latest) May 3, 2023
Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers
4 May, 2023 | 13:54h | UTCRelated:
ChatGPT et al? Not So Fast, Say Journal Editors – TCTMD
Chat GPT will change Medicine – Vinay Prasad’s Observations and Thoughts
The use of ChatGPT and other large language models in surgical science – BJS Open
ChatGPT vs. NCI: analyzing the quality of cancer information on myths and misconceptions
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & ChatGPT: De-Tether the Physician – Journal of Medical Systems (if the link is paywalled, try this one)
Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? – Critical Care
Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance
Perspective | ChatGPT-assisted diagnosis: is the future suddenly here?
Perspective | Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing
ChatGPT: Will It Transform the World of Health Care? – UCSF Department of Medicine
ChatGPT and the future of medical writing (ChatGPT itself wrote this paper)
ChatGPT: five priorities for research – Nature
The path forward for ChatGPT in academia – Lumo’s Newsletter
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author – Science
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature
Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists
Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of p-hacking strategies
3 May, 2023 | 15:30h | UTCBig little lies: a compendium and simulation of p-hacking strategies – Royal Society Open Science
Review | Leveraging electronic health records to streamline the conduct of cardiovascular clinical trials
3 May, 2023 | 15:10h | UTCLeveraging electronic health records to streamline the conduct of cardiovascular clinical trials – European Heart Journal (free for a limited period)
Video | Bayesian way
2 May, 2023 | 13:50h | UTC
CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomized trials
2 May, 2023 | 13:25h | UTC
Rapid reviews methods series | Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users
28 Apr, 2023 | 12:52h | UTC
Rapid reviews methods series | Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence
28 Apr, 2023 | 12:51h | UTC
Rapid reviews methods series | Guidance on literature search
28 Apr, 2023 | 12:49h | UTCRapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search – BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Rapid reviews methods series | Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment
28 Apr, 2023 | 12:48h | UTC
Perspective | N-of-1 trials in cancer drug development
26 Apr, 2023 | 14:06h | UTCN-of-1 Trials in Cancer Drug Development – Cancer Discovery
Commentary on Twitter
⭐️Just published in @AACR 's highest impact journal Cancer Discovery this week for your #FridayMotivation –> "N-of-1 Trials in Cancer Drug Development"
We propose N-of-1 trials as a departure from the traditional “drug-centric” model to a “patient-centric” model.
N-of-1 trials… pic.twitter.com/Set2jTpTBO— Vivek Subbiah, MD (@VivekSubbiah) April 21, 2023
Review | The importance of using placebo controls in nonpharmacological randomized trials
21 Apr, 2023 | 13:02h | UTCThe importance of using placebo controls in nonpharmacological randomised trials – Pain
Opinion | In-person schooling is essential even during periods of high transmission of COVID-19
18 Apr, 2023 | 13:36h | UTC
ChatGPT et al? Not so fast, say journal editors
11 Apr, 2023 | 14:36h | UTCChatGPT et al? Not So Fast, Say Journal Editors – TCTMD
Related:
AI-Generated Medical Advice—GPT and Beyond – JAMA (free for a limited period)
Chat GPT will change Medicine – Vinay Prasad’s Observations and Thoughts
The use of ChatGPT and other large language models in surgical science – BJS Open
ChatGPT vs. NCI: analyzing the quality of cancer information on myths and misconceptions
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & ChatGPT: De-Tether the Physician – Journal of Medical Systems (if the link is paywalled, try this one)
Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? – Critical Care
Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance
Perspective | ChatGPT-assisted diagnosis: is the future suddenly here?
Perspective | Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing
ChatGPT: Will It Transform the World of Health Care? – UCSF Department of Medicine
ChatGPT and the future of medical writing (ChatGPT itself wrote this paper)
ChatGPT: five priorities for research – Nature
The path forward for ChatGPT in academia – Lumo’s Newsletter
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author – Science
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature
Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists
Methodology and Design of Platform Trials | A meta-epidemiological study
31 Mar, 2023 | 13:22h | UTCRelated:
Platform trials: the future of medical research? – The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Platform Trials — Beware the Noncomparable Control Group – New England Journal of Medicine
Opinion | ChatGPT will change Medicine
30 Mar, 2023 | 14:22h | UTCChat GPT will change Medicine – Vinay Prasad’s Observations and Thoughts
Related:
The use of ChatGPT and other large language models in surgical science – BJS Open
ChatGPT vs. NCI: analyzing the quality of cancer information on myths and misconceptions
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & ChatGPT: De-Tether the Physician – Journal of Medical Systems (if the link is paywalled, try this one)
Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? – Critical Care
Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance
Perspective | ChatGPT-assisted diagnosis: is the future suddenly here?
Perspective | Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing
ChatGPT: Will It Transform the World of Health Care? – UCSF Department of Medicine
ChatGPT and the future of medical writing (ChatGPT itself wrote this paper)
ChatGPT: five priorities for research – Nature
The path forward for ChatGPT in academia – Lumo’s Newsletter
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author – Science
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature
Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists