JAMA guidance for authors, peer reviewers, and editors on use of AI, language models, and chatbots

Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots – JAMA

See also, just published: New recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: use of artificial intelligence – European Heart Journal

Related

Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers – npj Digital Medicine

ChatGPT et al? Not So Fast, Say Journal Editors – TCTMD

Chat GPT will change Medicine – Vinay Prasad’s Observations and Thoughts

ChatGPT has many uses. Experts explore what this means for healthcare and medical research – The Conversation

Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? – Critical Care

Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance

Perspective | Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing

ChatGPT and the future of medical writing (ChatGPT itself wrote this paper)

Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge – JAMA

ChatGPT is fun, but not an author – Science

Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature

ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature

Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists