General Surgery & Trauma
Meta-Analysis: ERAS Protocols Improve Recovery and Reduce Complications After Emergency Laparotomy – Am J Surg
18 Aug, 2024 | 19:32h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols compared to standard care (SC) in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. The analysis included six randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with a total of 509 patients.
Main Findings: The ERAS group showed a reduction in length of hospital stay (mean difference: -2.92 days) and quicker recovery milestones, such as time to ambulation (mean difference: -1.67 days) and first bowel opening (mean difference: -1.26 days). The ERAS protocols were also associated with lower rates of pulmonary complications (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43) and surgical site infections (OR: 0.33). Mortality rates were similar between the ERAS and SC groups.
Implications for Practice: These findings suggest that ERAS protocols may enhance recovery and reduce complications in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Implementation of these protocols could be beneficial in emergency surgical settings, where feasible.
Randomized Noninferiority Trial: Oral Vonoprazan Noninferior to IV Proton Pump Inhibitors in Preventing Rebleeding of High-Risk Peptic Ulcers – Gastroenterology
18 Aug, 2024 | 18:32h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial was conducted in Thailand across six centers, including both university and community hospitals. A total of 194 patients with high-risk peptic ulcer (PU) bleeding who had achieved successful endoscopic hemostasis were randomized to receive either vonoprazan or intravenous proton pump inhibitors (PPI). The study aimed to compare the efficacy of vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, with that of high-dose PPIs in preventing rebleeding.
Main Findings: The trial found that the 30-day rebleeding rate in the vonoprazan group was 7.1%, compared to 10.4% in the PPI group. This demonstrated noninferiority of vonoprazan within a 10% margin (risk difference: -3.3%, 95% CI: -11.2 to 4.7; P < .001). The 3-day and 7-day rebleeding rates were also noninferior. Secondary outcomes, including mortality rates, the need for rescue therapy, blood transfusion requirements, and length of hospital stay, were comparable between the two groups. Adverse events were similar in both groups.
Implications for Practice: Vonoprazan presents a viable alternative to intravenous PPIs for preventing rebleeding in patients with high-risk PU after endoscopic hemostasis. The availability of vonoprazan in oral form could potentially reduce hospital stays. However, further studies in multiethnic populations are needed to confirm these findings and assess the cost-effectiveness of vonoprazan in this setting.
Non-Inferiority Trial: Burr-Hole Drainage Without Irrigation Results in Higher Reoperation Rate in Chronic Subdural Hematoma – The Lancet
18 Aug, 2024 | 18:17h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This Finnish, nationwide, multicentre, randomised, controlled non-inferiority trial (FINISH) evaluated whether subdural irrigation during burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural haematoma could be omitted without compromising outcomes. The trial enrolled 589 adults (165 women, 424 men) requiring burr-hole drainage, randomly assigned to receive drainage with or without irrigation.
Main Findings: The study found a 6.0 percentage point higher reoperation rate within 6 months in the non-irrigation group (18.3%) compared to the irrigation group (12.6%). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes, including the proportion of patients with an unfavorable functional outcome (13.1% vs. 12.6%) or mortality (6.1% vs. 7.1%). Adverse events were comparable between the groups.
Implications for Practice: The trial results suggest that omitting subdural irrigation during burr-hole drainage increases the risk of reoperation, without improving functional outcomes or reducing mortality. The findings support the continued use of subdural irrigation in this procedure.
IDSA 2024 Guidelines for Managing Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections – Clin Infect Dis
10 Aug, 2024 | 22:10h | UTCIntroduction: The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has updated its clinical practice guidelines for managing complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant individuals. The update focuses on risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation, with recommendations grounded in systematic literature reviews and the GRADE approach for rating evidence.
Key Points:
1 – Risk Stratification:
– For adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections, the APACHE II score is recommended for risk stratification within 24 hours of hospital or ICU admission. The WSES Sepsis Severity Score is an acceptable alternative.
– No specific severity scoring system is recommended for pediatric patients.
2 – Diagnostic Imaging for Appendicitis:
– In non-pregnant adults, CT is suggested as the initial imaging modality for suspected acute appendicitis.
– For children, an abdominal ultrasound (US) is preferred initially, with MRI or CT recommended if the US is inconclusive.
– In pregnant individuals, US or MRI can be considered, with MRI suggested if initial US results are inconclusive.
3 – Imaging for Acute Cholecystitis and Cholangitis:
– For non-pregnant adults, US is recommended initially. If inconclusive, a CT scan is suggested.
– For pregnant individuals, US or MRI can be used, but the guidelines do not specify a preferred modality due to a knowledge gap.
4 – Blood Cultures:
– Blood cultures are recommended in adults and children with suspected intra-abdominal infections presenting with severe symptoms such as hypotension or tachypnea, especially when antibiotic-resistant organisms are a concern.
– Routine blood cultures are not recommended for patients without these risk factors.
5 – Intra-abdominal Fluid Cultures:
– In complicated intra-abdominal infections requiring source control procedures, obtaining intra-abdominal cultures is advised to guide antimicrobial therapy.
– In uncomplicated appendicitis cases, routine cultures are not recommended unless the patient is immunocompromised or complicated disease is suspected during surgery.
Conclusion: These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations to improve the management of complicated intra-abdominal infections, emphasizing appropriate risk stratification, targeted diagnostic imaging, and the selective use of cultures to guide therapy.
RCT: Liberal vs. Restrictive Transfusion Strategy Shows No Significant Difference in Neurologic Outcomes for Traumatic Brain Injury Patients – N Engl J Med
3 Aug, 2024 | 19:06h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This randomized clinical trial evaluated the effects of liberal versus restrictive red cell transfusion strategies in 742 adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and anemia. Participants were randomized to either a liberal transfusion strategy (initiated at hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL) or a restrictive strategy (initiated at hemoglobin ≤7 g/dL). The primary outcome was an unfavorable neurologic outcome at 6 months, assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended.
Main Findings: The study found that 68.4% of patients in the liberal-strategy group and 73.5% in the restrictive-strategy group experienced an unfavorable outcome (adjusted absolute difference of 5.4 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.9 to 13.7). No significant difference in mortality or depression was observed between the two groups. Although some functional independence and quality of life measures were better in the liberal group among survivors, venous thromboembolic events and acute respiratory distress syndrome rates were comparable.
Implications for Practice: The findings indicate that a liberal transfusion strategy does not significantly improve neurologic outcomes at 6 months in critically ill TBI patients compared to a restrictive strategy. Clinicians may consider maintaining a restrictive transfusion strategy, given the similar outcomes and potential for fewer transfusions. Further research is needed to explore specific subgroups that might benefit from different transfusion strategies.
RCT: Early minimally invasive surgery may improve outcomes in selected patients with intracerebral hemorrhage – N Engl J Med
25 May, 2024 | 18:58h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This multicenter randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy of early minimally invasive surgical removal of intracerebral hemorrhage compared to medical management alone. The trial enrolled 300 patients within 24 hours of symptom onset, who had either lobar or anterior basal ganglia hemorrhages, with hematoma volumes ranging from 30 to 80 ml. An adaptation rule was applied partway through the trial, resulting in the exclusive enrollment of patients with lobar hemorrhages after 175 patients were initially enrolled.
Main Findings: Patients in the surgery group achieved a significantly higher mean score on the utility-weighted modified Rankin scale at 180 days (0.458) compared to the control group (0.374), with a difference of 0.084 and a posterior probability of superiority of 0.981. Notably, the benefit of surgery was pronounced among patients with lobar hemorrhages (mean difference 0.127), whereas no benefit was observed in patients with anterior basal ganglia hemorrhages. Additionally, the surgery group experienced a lower 30-day mortality rate (9.3%) compared to the control group (18.0%).
Implications for Practice: The results suggest that early minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage, particularly for lobar hemorrhages, offers significant functional benefits over medical management alone. These findings support the selective use of this surgical approach in clinical settings, potentially leading to improved patient outcomes. Further studies could explore the differential impact of hemorrhage location on surgical outcomes to refine treatment guidelines.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Cluster Randomized Trial: Hyperangulated video laryngoscopy reduces intubation attempts in surgical patients – JAMA
11 May, 2024 | 13:39h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This cluster randomized multiple crossover clinical trial was conducted at a single U.S. academic hospital to compare the effectiveness of hyperangulated video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in reducing the number of intubation attempts during surgery. The study involved 7,736 adult patients, aged 18 years or older, undergoing elective or emergent cardiac, thoracic, or vascular surgical procedures that required single-lumen endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia. The trial randomized two sets of 11 operating rooms on a weekly basis to use either video laryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy for the initial intubation attempt from March 2021 to December 2022.
Main Findings: Hyperangulated video laryngoscopy significantly decreased the number of intubation attempts compared to direct laryngoscopy. Specifically, 1.7% of surgical procedures using video laryngoscopy required more than one intubation attempt versus 7.6% for direct laryngoscopy, with an estimated proportional odds ratio of 0.20 (95% CI, 0.14-0.28; P < .001). Furthermore, intubation failure was markedly lower with video laryngoscopy (0.27%) compared to direct laryngoscopy (4.0%). However, there was no significant difference in the rates of airway and dental injuries between the two methods.
Implications for Practice: The findings indicate that hyperangulated video laryngoscopy enhances initial intubation success and reduces the need for multiple intubation attempts in a variety of surgical settings. This suggests that video laryngoscopy could be considered a preferable technique for endotracheal intubation in the operating room, potentially improving patient outcomes and efficiency. Further research might explore the generalizability of these results to other medical centers and different patient populations.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Prospective Validation Study: High accuracy of PECARN rules in reducing unnecessary CT scans in pediatric blunt trauma – Lancet Child Adolesc Health
5 May, 2024 | 15:08h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This multicenter prospective validation study tested the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) prediction rules aimed at reducing unnecessary CT scans for children presenting with blunt abdominal or minor head trauma. Over a nearly five-year period, children and adolescents under 18 from six U.S. emergency departments in cities including Sacramento, Dallas, and Los Angeles were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, pre-existing neurological disorders, penetrating trauma, injuries older than 24 hours, prior CT or MRI scans, or suspicion of non-accidental trauma.
Main Findings:
A total of 7,542 children with blunt abdominal trauma and 19,999 with minor head trauma were enrolled. The intra-abdominal injury rule demonstrated a sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%, confirming its reliability in detecting injuries requiring acute intervention. For head traumas, the sensitivity varied slightly with age; 100% for children under 2 years and 98.8% for those aged 2 years and older, with an NPV of 100% in both groups. Only two cases in the older cohort were misclassified, neither requiring neurosurgery.
Implications for Practice:
The validation of PECARN rules with high sensitivity and NPV supports their use as a safe guideline to minimize unnecessary CT scans in pediatric trauma cases, thereby promoting efficient use of resources and reducing exposure to radiation in children. These results suggest that implementation of these rules should be considered in emergency pediatric care to improve outcomes and healthcare efficiency.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Systematic Review: Comparing antibiotic treatment vs. appendectomy for the initial treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis – Cochrane Library
4 May, 2024 | 13:09h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This Cochrane review analyzed 13 randomized controlled trials involving 3,358 participants to compare the efficacy of antibiotic treatment versus appendectomy in managing uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The included studies predominantly involved adult participants and utilized broad-spectrum antibiotics, with interventions ranging from open to predominantly laparoscopic appendectomy. Data collection spanned from hospital admission to up to seven years, with studies conducted across various global regions, including Asia, Europe, and North America.
Main Findings:
The primary outcomes revealed that antibiotic treatment might slightly increase the risk of unsuccessful treatment with 76 additional unsuccessful cases per 1,000 individuals compared to surgery, though these results did not reach clinical significance. Antibiotics reduced wound infections but possibly increased the average hospital stay by half a day. About 30.7% of participants treated with antibiotics required an appendectomy within one year. Secondary outcomes showed very uncertain evidence on antibiotics’ effect on intra-abdominal abscess or reoperation rates, and a slight increase in negative appendectomy rates was observed.
Implications for Practice:
The findings suggest that while antibiotics could serve as an initial treatment to avoid surgery in two-thirds of cases annually, a significant portion may still require surgical intervention. This information is crucial for clinicians in making informed treatment decisions, particularly considering patient preferences and the risk of surgery. Further research is needed to explore long-term outcomes and identify patient subgroups that may benefit most from either treatment.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
RCT: Serratus anterior plane block reduces pain and opioid use in rib fracture patients – JAMA Surgery
2 May, 2024 | 23:20h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This study was a multicenter, open-label, pragmatic randomized clinical trial conducted across eight emergency departments in New South Wales, Australia. The trial included 210 patients aged 16 years or older who had clinically suspected or radiologically confirmed rib fractures. Patients intubated, transferred for urgent surgical intervention, or with major concomitant nonthoracic injuries were excluded.
Main Findings:
In the trial, patients were randomized to receive either a serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) along with standard rib fracture management or standard care alone. The primary outcome was a composite pain score measured 4 hours post-enrollment. The SAPB group showed a significant increase in patients achieving the desired pain score reduction (41% in SAPB group vs. 19.6% in control; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.89, P = 0.001). Additionally, SAPB recipients had significantly lower opioid consumption at 24 hours compared to the control group.
Implications for Practice:
The trial’s results support the addition of a serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) to standard rib fracture management for providing effective early pain relief and reducing opioid use. However, it’s important to note that this study did not include a sham group, and patients were aware of whether they received the intervention. This lack of blinding could influence patient-reported outcomes due to placebo effects. Despite this limitation, the reduction in pain and opioid consumption suggests that SAPB is a beneficial component of care for patients with rib fractures.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Guideline | Closure of laparotomy in emergency settings
11 Aug, 2023 | 15:33h | UTC
RCT | Restrictive vs. liberal red blood cell transfusion strategy for critically injured patients
11 Aug, 2023 | 15:08h | UTC
Pictorial Review | Watch out for the early killers: imaging diagnosis of thoracic trauma
9 Aug, 2023 | 15:02h | UTCWatch Out for the Early Killers: Imaging Diagnosis of Thoracic Trauma – Korean Journal of Radiology
Review | Regional anesthesia in the emergency department outside the operating theatre
8 Aug, 2023 | 13:17h | UTC
Position Paper | Management of complicated diaphragmatic hernia in the acute setting
3 Aug, 2023 | 13:42h | UTC
BTS Clinical Statement on pleural procedures
31 Jul, 2023 | 14:42h | UTCBritish Thoracic Society Clinical Statement on pleural procedures – Thorax
Guideline | Source control in emergency general surgery
31 Jul, 2023 | 14:32h | UTC
Guideline Synopsis | Diagnosis and management of priapism
21 Jul, 2023 | 13:47h | UTCDiagnosis and Management of Priapism – JAMA (free for a limited period)
Original Guideline: The Diagnosis and Management of Recurrent Ischemic Priapism, Priapism in Sickle Cell Patients, and Non-Ischemic Priapism: An AUA/SMSNA Guideline – Journal of Urology
Changes to breast structure and function across a woman’s lifespan: implications for managing and modeling female breast injuries
19 Jul, 2023 | 14:29h | UTC
Cohort Study | Significant traumatic brain injury rates in e-scooter accidents in France
11 Jul, 2023 | 13:36h | UTC
AAP Policy Statement | Child pedestrian safety
10 Jul, 2023 | 13:44h | UTCChild Pedestrian Safety – Pediatrics
Technical Report: Epidemiology and Prevention of Child Pedestrian Injury – Pediatrics
News Release: Speed, technology, road design are key factors in reducing pedestrian injuries – AAP News
Position Statement | Prehospital hemorrhage control and treatment by clinicians
27 Jun, 2023 | 14:02h | UTC
Position Paper | Assessing and managing frailty in emergency laparotomy
27 Jun, 2023 | 13:45h | UTC
Special Series | Emergencies in vascular surgery
27 Jun, 2023 | 13:41h | UTCHomepage – Seminars in Vascular Surgery
Descending thoracic aortic emergencies: Past, present, and future
Acute management of mesenteric emergencies: Tailoring the solution to the problem
RCT | Dexmedetomidine administration shows promise in PTSD reduction for trauma surgery patients
23 Jun, 2023 | 13:30h | UTCSee also: Visual Abstract
