General Surgery & Trauma
RCT: Early Restrictive vs Liberal Oxygen Strategy in Severe Trauma – No Significant Outcome Difference
22 Dec, 2024 | 17:21h | UTCBackground: The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines recommend providing supplemental oxygen to severely injured patients in the early phase after trauma, although the evidence base is limited. Observational research suggests that liberal oxygen administration may raise the risk of death and respiratory complications. Therefore, the TRAUMOX2 trial examined whether an 8-hour restrictive oxygen strategy (targeting an SpO₂ of 94%) could improve outcomes compared with a liberal strategy (12–15 L/min or FiO₂ 0.6–1.0) initiated prehospital or upon trauma center admission.
Objective: To determine whether an early restrictive oxygen approach, as compared with a liberal approach, reduces the composite outcome of death and/or major respiratory complications (pneumonia or ARDS) within 30 days in severely injured adults.
Methods: This investigator-initiated, international, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with blunt or penetrating trauma requiring full trauma team activation and anticipated hospital stay of at least 24 hours. Randomization occurred either prehospital or upon trauma center arrival in a 1:1 ratio to restrictive (lowest dose of oxygen to maintain SpO₂ at 94%) versus liberal therapy (12–15 L/min via nonrebreather mask or FiO₂ 0.6–1.0). The intervention lasted 8 hours, with all other management per standard care. The primary outcome—death or major respiratory complications (pneumonia per CDC criteria or ARDS per the Berlin definition)—was evaluated by blinded assessors within 30 days. Statistical analyses employed logistic regression, adjusted for stratification variables.
Results: Among 1979 randomized patients, 1508 completed the study (median age, 50 years; Injury Severity Score [ISS], 14). The composite primary outcome occurred in 16.1% (118/733) of restrictive-group patients and 16.7% (121/724) of liberal-group patients (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.75–1.37; p=0.94). Mortality alone (8.6% vs 7.3%) and major respiratory complications alone (8.9% vs 10.8%) showed no significant differences between groups. Adverse and serious adverse events were similar, except atelectasis was less frequent in the restrictive group (27.6% vs 34.7%).
Conclusions: In severely injured trauma patients, an 8-hour restrictive oxygen strategy did not significantly reduce death or major respiratory complications compared with a liberal strategy. Both approaches produced similar 30-day outcomes. Nevertheless, restricting oxygen may limit atelectasis and could be a reasonable alternative to giving high-flow oxygen to all trauma patients.
Implications for Practice: Clinicians may choose to target approximately 94% SpO₂ in the early trauma phase without compromising major outcomes. This approach potentially avoids the risks of hyperoxia, though no definitive survival benefit was identified. Pragmatic implementation of a conservative oxygen strategy seems feasible in diverse prehospital and hospital settings.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Notable strengths include multicenter design, randomized enrollment in prehospital and in-hospital settings, and blinded outcome assessment. Limitations include postrandomization exclusions of patients with minor injuries, a relatively short intervention period (8 hours), and an overall open-label design. These factors, along with lower-than-expected event rates, may have limited the power to detect differences in mortality. Commentary from https://bit.ly/bottomline_traumox2 also highlights that the median ISS of 14 indicates moderate rather than extremely severe trauma, possibly contributing to the modest event rates.
Future Research: Large-scale studies with extended intervention durations and targeted subgroups (e.g., severe traumatic brain injury) could clarify optimal oxygen thresholds in trauma care. Ongoing trials with larger sample sizes may better capture smaller but clinically meaningful differences in mortality or complications.
RCT: A Single Dose of Ceftriaxone Reduces Early Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Acute Brain Injury Patients
17 Dec, 2024 | 12:26h | UTCBackground: Patients with acute brain injury are at increased risk for early ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), which can worsen their clinical course. Although short-term antibiotic prophylaxis has been considered, its utility remains uncertain. This study evaluated whether a single early dose of ceftriaxone could reduce the incidence of early VAP in these patients.
Objective: To determine if a single 2-g intravenous dose of ceftriaxone administered within 12 hours of intubation reduces the incidence of early VAP (day 2 to day 7 of mechanical ventilation) in comatose adults (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤12) requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation after acute brain injury.
Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, assessor-masked superiority trial was conducted in nine ICUs across eight French university hospitals. Patients with acute brain injury from trauma, stroke, or subarachnoid hemorrhage who required at least 48 hours of mechanical ventilation were enrolled. Participants received either ceftriaxone 2 g or placebo once, early after endotracheal intubation. All patients received standard VAP prevention measures, but no selective oropharyngeal or digestive decontamination. The primary endpoint was the incidence of early VAP confirmed by blinded assessors using standard clinical, radiological, and microbiological criteria.
Results: Among 319 patients included in the analysis (162 ceftriaxone, 157 placebo), early VAP incidence was significantly lower with ceftriaxone (14%) compared to placebo (32%) (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.38–0.95]; p=0.030). Patients receiving ceftriaxone had fewer overall VAP episodes, fewer ventilator and antibiotic exposure days, shorter ICU and hospital stays, and reduced 28-day mortality (15% vs 25%). No significant increase in resistant organisms or adverse events attributable to ceftriaxone was observed.
Conclusions: A single early dose of ceftriaxone significantly reduced early VAP risk in acute brain injury patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. This prophylactic approach may improve clinical outcomes without evident safety concerns.
Implications for Practice: Incorporating a single early ceftriaxone dose into VAP prevention protocols for brain-injured patients could mitigate early respiratory infections and potentially enhance clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, clinicians should remain cautious, considering overall antibiotic stewardship and the need for further evidence on long-term microbial resistance patterns.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include a robust, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled design and blinded adjudication of VAP cases. Limitations include the lack of long-term assessment of the intestinal microbiota and antimicrobial resistance. Further investigation is required to confirm the safety profile regarding microbial ecology and to explore neurological outcomes in greater depth.
Future Research: Future studies should examine the long-term effects of this single-dose approach on resistance patterns, microbial flora, and functional neurological recovery.
RCT: Liberal vs Restrictive Transfusion Yields No Neurologic Outcome Benefit in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
16 Dec, 2024 | 11:26h | UTCBackground: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a critical neurologic condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. Anemia is common in this setting and may worsen cerebral oxygenation and outcomes. However, the impact of a liberal transfusion threshold compared with a restrictive approach on long-term neurologic outcomes has been uncertain.
Objective: To determine whether a liberal red blood cell transfusion strategy (transfusion at hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL) improves 12-month neurologic outcomes compared with a restrictive strategy (transfusion at hemoglobin ≤8 g/dL) in patients with aneurysmal SAH and anemia.
Methods: This was a multicenter, pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted at 23 specialized neurocritical care centers. Critically ill adults with a first-ever aneurysmal SAH and hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL within 10 days of admission were randomized to a liberal or restrictive transfusion strategy. The primary outcome was unfavorable neurologic outcome at 12 months, defined as a modified Rankin scale score ≥4. Secondary outcomes included the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), quality of life assessments, and imaging-based outcomes such as vasospasm and cerebral infarction. Outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation.
Results: Among 742 randomized patients, 725 were analyzed for the primary outcome. At 12 months, unfavorable neurologic outcome occurred in 33.5% of patients in the liberal group and 37.7% in the restrictive group (risk ratio 0.88; 95% CI, 0.72–1.09; p=0.22). There were no clinically meaningful differences in secondary outcomes. Mortality at 12 months was similar (approximately 27% in both arms). Radiographic vasospasm was more frequently detected in the restrictive group, though this did not translate into improved functional outcomes in the liberal arm. Adverse events and transfusion reactions were comparable between groups.
Conclusions: In patients with aneurysmal SAH and anemia, a liberal transfusion strategy did not lead to a significantly lower risk of unfavorable neurologic outcome at 12 months compared with a restrictive approach.
Implications for Practice: These findings suggest that routinely maintaining higher hemoglobin levels does not confer substantial long-term functional benefit. Clinicians may consider a more restrictive threshold (≤8 g/dL) to minimize unnecessary transfusions without compromising outcomes. Some skepticism toward adopting a more liberal transfusion policy is warranted given the lack of demonstrable benefit.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the randomized, multicenter design, blinded outcome assessment, and a 12-month follow-up. Limitations include potential unmeasured subtle benefits, the inability to blind clinical teams, and the challenge of capturing all aspects of functional recovery with current measurement tools. Further research may clarify if more tailored transfusion strategies can yield modest but meaningful improvements.
Future Research: Future studies should evaluate intermediate hemoglobin thresholds, develop more sensitive measures of functional and cognitive recovery, and consider individualized transfusion strategies based on specific patient factors and biomarkers of cerebral ischemia.
RCT: Adjunctive Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Reduces Reoperation in Subdural Hematoma
24 Nov, 2024 | 13:53h | UTCBackground: Subacute and chronic subdural hematomas are common neurosurgical conditions with a high recurrence rate after surgical evacuation, affecting 8% to 20% of patients. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is a minimally invasive procedure targeting the blood supply to these membranes. Preliminary studies suggest that adjunctive MMAE may reduce hematoma recurrence, but its impact on reoperation risk remains unclear.
Objective: To determine whether adjunctive MMAE reduces the risk of hematoma recurrence or progression leading to repeat surgery within 90 days compared to surgery alone in patients with symptomatic subacute or chronic subdural hematoma.
Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 400 patients aged 18 to 90 years with symptomatic subacute or chronic subdural hematoma requiring surgical evacuation were randomly assigned to receive either MMAE plus surgery (n=197) or surgery alone (n=203). The primary endpoint was hematoma recurrence or progression leading to repeat surgery within 90 days after the index treatment. The secondary endpoint was deterioration of neurologic function at 90 days, assessed using the modified Rankin Scale.
Results: Hematoma recurrence or progression requiring repeat surgery occurred in 8 patients (4.1%) in the MMAE plus surgery group versus 23 patients (11.3%) in the surgery-alone group (relative risk, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.80; P=0.008). Functional deterioration at 90 days was similar between groups (11.9% vs. 9.8%; risk difference, 2.1 percentage points; 95% CI, −4.8 to 8.9). Mortality at 90 days was 5.1% in the MMAE group and 3.0% in the control group. Serious adverse events related to the embolization occurred in 4 patients (2.0%), including disabling stroke in 2 patients.
Conclusions: Adjunctive MMAE combined with surgery significantly reduced the risk of hematoma recurrence or progression requiring reoperation within 90 days compared to surgery alone. However, there was no significant difference in neurologic functional deterioration, and the procedure was associated with procedural risks.
Implications for Practice: MMAE may be considered as an adjunct to surgical evacuation in patients with subacute or chronic subdural hematoma to reduce reoperation risk. Clinicians should carefully weigh the potential benefits against the risks of procedural complications, including stroke.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the randomized controlled design and multicenter approach, enhancing generalizability. Limitations involve the open-label design, introducing potential bias since the primary endpoint was based on surgeon judgment. A substantial loss to follow-up (13.2%) could affect results, and the study was not powered to detect differences in mortality or serious adverse events.
Future Research: Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to fully evaluate the safety and efficacy of MMAE, including long-term outcomes. Research should focus on optimizing patient selection and assessing the procedure’s impact on mortality and serious adverse events.
Cohort Study: High Rate of Preventable Adverse Events in Surgical Inpatients
16 Nov, 2024 | 17:29h | UTCBackground: Adverse events during hospital admissions, particularly in surgical settings, remain a significant cause of patient harm despite efforts to improve patient safety since the “To Err is Human” report. Advances in surgical techniques and patient care necessitate an updated assessment of the current state of perioperative safety.
Objective: To estimate the frequency, severity, and preventability of adverse events associated with perioperative care in surgical inpatients and to identify the settings and healthcare professionals involved.
Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted across 11 US hospitals in Massachusetts. A weighted random sample of 1,009 patients was selected from 64,121 adults admitted for surgery in 2018. Trained nurses reviewed electronic health records to identify adverse events, which were then adjudicated by physicians. Adverse events were classified by type, severity, preventability, setting, and professions involved.
Results: Adverse events occurred in 38.0% of patients (95% CI, 32.6–43.4%), with major adverse events in 15.9% (12.7–19.0%). Among 593 adverse events identified, 59.5% were potentially preventable, and 20.7% were definitely or probably preventable. The most common events were surgery-related (49.3%), adverse drug events (26.6%), healthcare-associated infections (12.4%), and patient care events (11.2%). Adverse events most frequently occurred in general care units (48.8%) and involved attending physicians (89.5%) and nurses (58.9%).
Conclusions: More than one-third of surgical inpatients experienced adverse events, with nearly half classified as major and most potentially preventable. These findings highlight the critical need for ongoing improvement in patient safety throughout perioperative care involving all healthcare professionals.
Implications for Practice: Healthcare providers should enhance patient safety protocols across all perioperative settings, not just in operating rooms. Emphasis should be placed on preventing surgery-related complications, adverse drug events, and healthcare-associated infections by fostering teamwork and continuous monitoring.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include a comprehensive review of medical records and systematic classification of adverse events by trained professionals. Limitations involve the study’s confinement to Massachusetts hospitals in 2018, potential variability in documentation practices, and limited sample size affecting generalizability and specialty-specific estimates.
Future Research: Further studies are needed to assess adverse event rates in diverse geographic locations and healthcare systems, explore effective interventions to reduce preventable harm, and evaluate long-term trends in surgical patient safety.
RCT: Liberal Transfusion Strategy Reduced Unfavorable Neurological Outcomes in Acute Brain Injury
12 Oct, 2024 | 11:01h | UTCBackground: Patients with acute brain injury frequently develop anemia, and the optimal hemoglobin threshold for red blood cell transfusion in this population remains uncertain. Previous studies have shown conflicting results regarding the benefits of liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies on neurological outcomes.
Objective: To determine whether a liberal transfusion strategy (hemoglobin threshold <9 g/dL) reduces the occurrence of unfavorable neurological outcomes at 180 days compared to a restrictive strategy (hemoglobin threshold <7 g/dL) in patients with acute brain injury.
Methods: The TRAIN trial, a multicenter, phase 3, randomized clinical trial, was conducted across 72 ICUs in 22 countries. It included patients with traumatic brain injury, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, or intracerebral hemorrhage, who had hemoglobin levels below 9 g/dL within the first 10 days post-injury. Participants were randomized to a liberal strategy (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin <9 g/dL) or a restrictive strategy (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin <7 g/dL), with primary outcomes measured by the occurrence of an unfavorable neurological outcome, defined by a Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score of 1-5 at 180 days.
Results: Among 820 patients who completed the trial (mean age 51 years; 45.9% women), 806 had data on the primary outcome (393 liberal, 413 restrictive). The liberal group received a median of 2 units of blood (IQR, 1–3), while the restrictive group received a median of 0 units (IQR, 0–1), with an absolute mean difference of 1.0 unit (95% CI, 0.87–1.12 units). At 180 days, 62.6% of patients in the liberal group had an unfavorable neurological outcome compared to 72.6% in the restrictive group (absolute difference –10.0%; 95% CI, –16.5% to –3.6%; adjusted relative risk 0.86; P = .002). The effect was consistent across prespecified subgroups. Cerebral ischemic events were lower in the liberal group (8.8% vs 13.5%; relative risk 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44–0.97). No significant differences were observed in 28-day survival or other secondary outcomes.
Conclusions: In patients with acute brain injury and anemia, a liberal transfusion strategy resulted in a lower rate of unfavorable neurological outcomes at 180 days compared to a restrictive strategy.
Implications for Practice: A liberal transfusion threshold of 9 g/dL may improve neurological outcomes in patients with acute brain injury by reducing cerebral ischemic events. Clinicians should consider adopting a higher hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in this population, weighing the benefits against potential risks associated with transfusions, such as infection or lung injury.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the large, multicenter international design and blinding of outcome assessors. Limitations involve the open-label nature, potential detection bias in assessing cerebral ischemic events, lack of standardized neuroprognostication, and incomplete assessment of concomitant interventions.
Future Research: Further studies are needed to confirm these findings in specific subgroups of acute brain injury, to explore optimal transfusion strategies, and to assess long-term outcomes and potential risks associated with liberal transfusion thresholds.
Summary: Perioperative Management of Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants
19 Sep, 2024 | 21:12h | UTCDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs)—including apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran—are increasingly used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treating venous thromboembolism. Effective perioperative management of DOACs is essential to minimize bleeding and thromboembolic risks during surgical and nonsurgical procedures. Below are practical recommendations focused on the perioperative management of patients taking DOACs, based on a recent JAMA review article.
Elective Surgical or Nonsurgical Procedures
Classify Bleeding Risk of Procedures:
- Minimal Risk:
- Minor dental procedures (e.g., cleaning, extractions)
- Minor dermatologic procedures (e.g., skin lesion removal)
- Cataract surgery
- Low to Moderate Risk:
- Endoscopic procedures without high-risk interventions
- Cholecystectomy
- Inguinal hernia repair
- High Risk:
- Major surgery (e.g., cancer surgery, joint replacement)
- Procedures involving neuraxial anesthesia
- Endoscopic procedures with high-risk interventions (e.g., large polyp removal)
DOAC Management Strategies:
- Minimal Bleeding Risk Procedures:
- Option 1: Continue DOACs without interruption.
- Option 2: For added safety, withhold the morning dose on the day of the procedure (especially for twice-daily DOACs like apixaban and dabigatran).
- Low to Moderate Bleeding Risk Procedures:
- Preoperative:
- Discontinue DOACs 1 day before the procedure.
- This allows approximately 2 half-lives for drug clearance.
- Postoperative:
- Resume DOACs 1 day after the procedure, ensuring adequate hemostasis.
- Preoperative:
- High Bleeding Risk Procedures:
- Preoperative:
- Discontinue DOACs 2 days before the procedure.
- This allows approximately 4-5 half-lives for drug clearance.
- Postoperative:
- Resume DOACs 2-3 days after the procedure, based on bleeding risk and hemostasis.
- Preoperative:
Evidence Supporting These Strategies:
- The PAUSE study demonstrated that standardized interruption protocols without heparin bridging result in low rates of:
- Thromboembolism: 0.2%–0.4%
- Major Bleeding: 1%–2%
Postoperative DOAC Resumption:
- Assess surgical-site hemostasis before resuming DOACs.
- Delay resumption if there is ongoing bleeding or concerns about hemostasis.
- For high bleeding risk procedures, consider a longer delay (2–3 days).
Perioperative Heparin Bridging:
- Not recommended for patients on DOACs.
- Bridging increases bleeding risk without reducing thromboembolism.
- DOACs have rapid offset and onset, making bridging unnecessary.
Special Considerations
Patients with Impaired Renal Function:
- For CrCl 30–50 mL/min:
- Dabigatran: Extend preoperative discontinuation by an additional day.
- For CrCl <30 mL/min:
- Dabigatran is contraindicated.
- For other DOACs, consider extending discontinuation to 3–4 days before surgery.
Patients Undergoing Neuraxial Anesthesia:
- Discontinue DOACs for 3 days (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) or 4 days (dabigatran) before the procedure.
- Minimizes risk of spinal or epidural hematoma.
Dental Procedures:
- Generally safe to continue DOACs.
- For added safety:
- Omit or delay the dose on the day of the procedure.
- Employ local hemostatic measures (e.g., tranexamic acid mouthwash).
Endoscopic Procedures:
- Low-risk procedures (e.g., diagnostic endoscopy without biopsy):
- Follow standard DOAC interruption for low to moderate bleeding risk.
- High-risk procedures (e.g., polypectomy of large polyps):
- Extend DOAC discontinuation by an additional day pre- and post-procedure.
Patients Unable to Resume Oral Medications Postoperatively:
- Use prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) until oral intake is possible.
- Avoid therapeutic-dose LMWH due to bleeding risk.
Emergent, Urgent, or Semiurgent Procedures
Risks:
- Higher bleeding risk: Up to 23%
- Thromboembolism risk: Up to 11%
Management Strategies:
- Assess Time Since Last DOAC Dose:
- If within 48 hours, consider that significant anticoagulant effect may persist.
- Laboratory Testing (if available):
- DOAC Level Testing:
- ≥50 ng/mL: Consider using reversal agents.
- <50 ng/mL: May proceed without reversal agents.
- DOAC Level Testing:
- Use of Reversal Agents:
- For Dabigatran:
- Idarucizumab (5 g IV)
- For Factor Xa Inhibitors (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban):
- Andexanet alfa (dosing based on last dose timing and amount)
- Prothrombin Complex Concentrates (PCCs): If andexanet alfa is unavailable or contraindicated.
- For Dabigatran:
- Proceeding Without Testing:
- If testing is unavailable and last DOAC dose was within 48 hours, consider reversal agents.
- If >48 hours since last dose, may proceed without reversal.
Considerations:
- Reversal agents are expensive and may carry thrombotic risks.
- Use should be judicious, weighing risks and benefits.
- Consult hematology or thrombosis experts when possible.
Key Takeaways
- Elective Procedures:
- Utilize standardized protocols based on procedural bleeding risk.
- Routine preoperative DOAC level testing is unnecessary.
- Avoid heparin bridging.
- Emergent/Urgent Procedures:
- Reversal agents may be appropriate when significant DOAC levels are present.
- Decision to use reversal agents should consider bleeding risk, time since last dose, and availability of DOAC level testing.
- Patient Communication:
- Ensure patients understand the plan for DOAC interruption and resumption.
- Provide clear instructions regarding timing and dosing.
- Interdisciplinary Coordination:
- Collaborate with surgical teams, anesthesiologists, and pharmacists.
- Use electronic medical records and clinical decision support tools to enhance communication.
Conclusion
By applying standardized perioperative management protocols, clinicians can effectively balance the risks of bleeding and thromboembolism in patients taking DOACs who require surgical or nonsurgical procedures. These strategies simplify decision-making, avoid unnecessary interventions like heparin bridging, and promote patient safety.
Meta-Analysis: ERAS Protocols Improve Recovery and Reduce Complications After Emergency Laparotomy – Am J Surg
18 Aug, 2024 | 19:32h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols compared to standard care (SC) in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. The analysis included six randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with a total of 509 patients.
Main Findings: The ERAS group showed a reduction in length of hospital stay (mean difference: -2.92 days) and quicker recovery milestones, such as time to ambulation (mean difference: -1.67 days) and first bowel opening (mean difference: -1.26 days). The ERAS protocols were also associated with lower rates of pulmonary complications (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43) and surgical site infections (OR: 0.33). Mortality rates were similar between the ERAS and SC groups.
Implications for Practice: These findings suggest that ERAS protocols may enhance recovery and reduce complications in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Implementation of these protocols could be beneficial in emergency surgical settings, where feasible.
Randomized Noninferiority Trial: Oral Vonoprazan Noninferior to IV Proton Pump Inhibitors in Preventing Rebleeding of High-Risk Peptic Ulcers – Gastroenterology
18 Aug, 2024 | 18:32h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial was conducted in Thailand across six centers, including both university and community hospitals. A total of 194 patients with high-risk peptic ulcer (PU) bleeding who had achieved successful endoscopic hemostasis were randomized to receive either vonoprazan or intravenous proton pump inhibitors (PPI). The study aimed to compare the efficacy of vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, with that of high-dose PPIs in preventing rebleeding.
Main Findings: The trial found that the 30-day rebleeding rate in the vonoprazan group was 7.1%, compared to 10.4% in the PPI group. This demonstrated noninferiority of vonoprazan within a 10% margin (risk difference: -3.3%, 95% CI: -11.2 to 4.7; P < .001). The 3-day and 7-day rebleeding rates were also noninferior. Secondary outcomes, including mortality rates, the need for rescue therapy, blood transfusion requirements, and length of hospital stay, were comparable between the two groups. Adverse events were similar in both groups.
Implications for Practice: Vonoprazan presents a viable alternative to intravenous PPIs for preventing rebleeding in patients with high-risk PU after endoscopic hemostasis. The availability of vonoprazan in oral form could potentially reduce hospital stays. However, further studies in multiethnic populations are needed to confirm these findings and assess the cost-effectiveness of vonoprazan in this setting.
Non-Inferiority Trial: Burr-Hole Drainage Without Irrigation Results in Higher Reoperation Rate in Chronic Subdural Hematoma – The Lancet
18 Aug, 2024 | 18:17h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This Finnish, nationwide, multicentre, randomised, controlled non-inferiority trial (FINISH) evaluated whether subdural irrigation during burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural haematoma could be omitted without compromising outcomes. The trial enrolled 589 adults (165 women, 424 men) requiring burr-hole drainage, randomly assigned to receive drainage with or without irrigation.
Main Findings: The study found a 6.0 percentage point higher reoperation rate within 6 months in the non-irrigation group (18.3%) compared to the irrigation group (12.6%). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes, including the proportion of patients with an unfavorable functional outcome (13.1% vs. 12.6%) or mortality (6.1% vs. 7.1%). Adverse events were comparable between the groups.
Implications for Practice: The trial results suggest that omitting subdural irrigation during burr-hole drainage increases the risk of reoperation, without improving functional outcomes or reducing mortality. The findings support the continued use of subdural irrigation in this procedure.
IDSA 2024 Guidelines for Managing Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections – Clin Infect Dis
10 Aug, 2024 | 22:10h | UTCIntroduction: The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has updated its clinical practice guidelines for managing complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant individuals. The update focuses on risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation, with recommendations grounded in systematic literature reviews and the GRADE approach for rating evidence.
Key Points:
1 – Risk Stratification:
– For adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections, the APACHE II score is recommended for risk stratification within 24 hours of hospital or ICU admission. The WSES Sepsis Severity Score is an acceptable alternative.
– No specific severity scoring system is recommended for pediatric patients.
2 – Diagnostic Imaging for Appendicitis:
– In non-pregnant adults, CT is suggested as the initial imaging modality for suspected acute appendicitis.
– For children, an abdominal ultrasound (US) is preferred initially, with MRI or CT recommended if the US is inconclusive.
– In pregnant individuals, US or MRI can be considered, with MRI suggested if initial US results are inconclusive.
3 – Imaging for Acute Cholecystitis and Cholangitis:
– For non-pregnant adults, US is recommended initially. If inconclusive, a CT scan is suggested.
– For pregnant individuals, US or MRI can be used, but the guidelines do not specify a preferred modality due to a knowledge gap.
4 – Blood Cultures:
– Blood cultures are recommended in adults and children with suspected intra-abdominal infections presenting with severe symptoms such as hypotension or tachypnea, especially when antibiotic-resistant organisms are a concern.
– Routine blood cultures are not recommended for patients without these risk factors.
5 – Intra-abdominal Fluid Cultures:
– In complicated intra-abdominal infections requiring source control procedures, obtaining intra-abdominal cultures is advised to guide antimicrobial therapy.
– In uncomplicated appendicitis cases, routine cultures are not recommended unless the patient is immunocompromised or complicated disease is suspected during surgery.
Conclusion: These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations to improve the management of complicated intra-abdominal infections, emphasizing appropriate risk stratification, targeted diagnostic imaging, and the selective use of cultures to guide therapy.
RCT: Liberal vs. Restrictive Transfusion Strategy Shows No Significant Difference in Neurologic Outcomes for Traumatic Brain Injury Patients – N Engl J Med
3 Aug, 2024 | 19:06h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This randomized clinical trial evaluated the effects of liberal versus restrictive red cell transfusion strategies in 742 adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and anemia. Participants were randomized to either a liberal transfusion strategy (initiated at hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL) or a restrictive strategy (initiated at hemoglobin ≤7 g/dL). The primary outcome was an unfavorable neurologic outcome at 6 months, assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended.
Main Findings: The study found that 68.4% of patients in the liberal-strategy group and 73.5% in the restrictive-strategy group experienced an unfavorable outcome (adjusted absolute difference of 5.4 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.9 to 13.7). No significant difference in mortality or depression was observed between the two groups. Although some functional independence and quality of life measures were better in the liberal group among survivors, venous thromboembolic events and acute respiratory distress syndrome rates were comparable.
Implications for Practice: The findings indicate that a liberal transfusion strategy does not significantly improve neurologic outcomes at 6 months in critically ill TBI patients compared to a restrictive strategy. Clinicians may consider maintaining a restrictive transfusion strategy, given the similar outcomes and potential for fewer transfusions. Further research is needed to explore specific subgroups that might benefit from different transfusion strategies.
RCT: Early minimally invasive surgery may improve outcomes in selected patients with intracerebral hemorrhage – N Engl J Med
25 May, 2024 | 18:58h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This multicenter randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy of early minimally invasive surgical removal of intracerebral hemorrhage compared to medical management alone. The trial enrolled 300 patients within 24 hours of symptom onset, who had either lobar or anterior basal ganglia hemorrhages, with hematoma volumes ranging from 30 to 80 ml. An adaptation rule was applied partway through the trial, resulting in the exclusive enrollment of patients with lobar hemorrhages after 175 patients were initially enrolled.
Main Findings: Patients in the surgery group achieved a significantly higher mean score on the utility-weighted modified Rankin scale at 180 days (0.458) compared to the control group (0.374), with a difference of 0.084 and a posterior probability of superiority of 0.981. Notably, the benefit of surgery was pronounced among patients with lobar hemorrhages (mean difference 0.127), whereas no benefit was observed in patients with anterior basal ganglia hemorrhages. Additionally, the surgery group experienced a lower 30-day mortality rate (9.3%) compared to the control group (18.0%).
Implications for Practice: The results suggest that early minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage, particularly for lobar hemorrhages, offers significant functional benefits over medical management alone. These findings support the selective use of this surgical approach in clinical settings, potentially leading to improved patient outcomes. Further studies could explore the differential impact of hemorrhage location on surgical outcomes to refine treatment guidelines.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Cluster Randomized Trial: Hyperangulated video laryngoscopy reduces intubation attempts in surgical patients – JAMA
11 May, 2024 | 13:39h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This cluster randomized multiple crossover clinical trial was conducted at a single U.S. academic hospital to compare the effectiveness of hyperangulated video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in reducing the number of intubation attempts during surgery. The study involved 7,736 adult patients, aged 18 years or older, undergoing elective or emergent cardiac, thoracic, or vascular surgical procedures that required single-lumen endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia. The trial randomized two sets of 11 operating rooms on a weekly basis to use either video laryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy for the initial intubation attempt from March 2021 to December 2022.
Main Findings: Hyperangulated video laryngoscopy significantly decreased the number of intubation attempts compared to direct laryngoscopy. Specifically, 1.7% of surgical procedures using video laryngoscopy required more than one intubation attempt versus 7.6% for direct laryngoscopy, with an estimated proportional odds ratio of 0.20 (95% CI, 0.14-0.28; P < .001). Furthermore, intubation failure was markedly lower with video laryngoscopy (0.27%) compared to direct laryngoscopy (4.0%). However, there was no significant difference in the rates of airway and dental injuries between the two methods.
Implications for Practice: The findings indicate that hyperangulated video laryngoscopy enhances initial intubation success and reduces the need for multiple intubation attempts in a variety of surgical settings. This suggests that video laryngoscopy could be considered a preferable technique for endotracheal intubation in the operating room, potentially improving patient outcomes and efficiency. Further research might explore the generalizability of these results to other medical centers and different patient populations.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Prospective Validation Study: High accuracy of PECARN rules in reducing unnecessary CT scans in pediatric blunt trauma – Lancet Child Adolesc Health
5 May, 2024 | 15:08h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This multicenter prospective validation study tested the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) prediction rules aimed at reducing unnecessary CT scans for children presenting with blunt abdominal or minor head trauma. Over a nearly five-year period, children and adolescents under 18 from six U.S. emergency departments in cities including Sacramento, Dallas, and Los Angeles were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, pre-existing neurological disorders, penetrating trauma, injuries older than 24 hours, prior CT or MRI scans, or suspicion of non-accidental trauma.
Main Findings:
A total of 7,542 children with blunt abdominal trauma and 19,999 with minor head trauma were enrolled. The intra-abdominal injury rule demonstrated a sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%, confirming its reliability in detecting injuries requiring acute intervention. For head traumas, the sensitivity varied slightly with age; 100% for children under 2 years and 98.8% for those aged 2 years and older, with an NPV of 100% in both groups. Only two cases in the older cohort were misclassified, neither requiring neurosurgery.
Implications for Practice:
The validation of PECARN rules with high sensitivity and NPV supports their use as a safe guideline to minimize unnecessary CT scans in pediatric trauma cases, thereby promoting efficient use of resources and reducing exposure to radiation in children. These results suggest that implementation of these rules should be considered in emergency pediatric care to improve outcomes and healthcare efficiency.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Systematic Review: Comparing antibiotic treatment vs. appendectomy for the initial treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis – Cochrane Library
4 May, 2024 | 13:09h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This Cochrane review analyzed 13 randomized controlled trials involving 3,358 participants to compare the efficacy of antibiotic treatment versus appendectomy in managing uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The included studies predominantly involved adult participants and utilized broad-spectrum antibiotics, with interventions ranging from open to predominantly laparoscopic appendectomy. Data collection spanned from hospital admission to up to seven years, with studies conducted across various global regions, including Asia, Europe, and North America.
Main Findings:
The primary outcomes revealed that antibiotic treatment might slightly increase the risk of unsuccessful treatment with 76 additional unsuccessful cases per 1,000 individuals compared to surgery, though these results did not reach clinical significance. Antibiotics reduced wound infections but possibly increased the average hospital stay by half a day. About 30.7% of participants treated with antibiotics required an appendectomy within one year. Secondary outcomes showed very uncertain evidence on antibiotics’ effect on intra-abdominal abscess or reoperation rates, and a slight increase in negative appendectomy rates was observed.
Implications for Practice:
The findings suggest that while antibiotics could serve as an initial treatment to avoid surgery in two-thirds of cases annually, a significant portion may still require surgical intervention. This information is crucial for clinicians in making informed treatment decisions, particularly considering patient preferences and the risk of surgery. Further research is needed to explore long-term outcomes and identify patient subgroups that may benefit most from either treatment.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
RCT: Serratus anterior plane block reduces pain and opioid use in rib fracture patients – JAMA Surgery
2 May, 2024 | 23:20h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This study was a multicenter, open-label, pragmatic randomized clinical trial conducted across eight emergency departments in New South Wales, Australia. The trial included 210 patients aged 16 years or older who had clinically suspected or radiologically confirmed rib fractures. Patients intubated, transferred for urgent surgical intervention, or with major concomitant nonthoracic injuries were excluded.
Main Findings:
In the trial, patients were randomized to receive either a serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) along with standard rib fracture management or standard care alone. The primary outcome was a composite pain score measured 4 hours post-enrollment. The SAPB group showed a significant increase in patients achieving the desired pain score reduction (41% in SAPB group vs. 19.6% in control; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.89, P = 0.001). Additionally, SAPB recipients had significantly lower opioid consumption at 24 hours compared to the control group.
Implications for Practice:
The trial’s results support the addition of a serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) to standard rib fracture management for providing effective early pain relief and reducing opioid use. However, it’s important to note that this study did not include a sham group, and patients were aware of whether they received the intervention. This lack of blinding could influence patient-reported outcomes due to placebo effects. Despite this limitation, the reduction in pain and opioid consumption suggests that SAPB is a beneficial component of care for patients with rib fractures.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Guideline | Closure of laparotomy in emergency settings
11 Aug, 2023 | 15:33h | UTC
RCT | Restrictive vs. liberal red blood cell transfusion strategy for critically injured patients
11 Aug, 2023 | 15:08h | UTC
Pictorial Review | Watch out for the early killers: imaging diagnosis of thoracic trauma
9 Aug, 2023 | 15:02h | UTCWatch Out for the Early Killers: Imaging Diagnosis of Thoracic Trauma – Korean Journal of Radiology
Review | Regional anesthesia in the emergency department outside the operating theatre
8 Aug, 2023 | 13:17h | UTC
Position Paper | Management of complicated diaphragmatic hernia in the acute setting
3 Aug, 2023 | 13:42h | UTC
BTS Clinical Statement on pleural procedures
31 Jul, 2023 | 14:42h | UTCBritish Thoracic Society Clinical Statement on pleural procedures – Thorax
Guideline | Source control in emergency general surgery
31 Jul, 2023 | 14:32h | UTC
Guideline Synopsis | Diagnosis and management of priapism
21 Jul, 2023 | 13:47h | UTCDiagnosis and Management of Priapism – JAMA (free for a limited period)
Original Guideline: The Diagnosis and Management of Recurrent Ischemic Priapism, Priapism in Sickle Cell Patients, and Non-Ischemic Priapism: An AUA/SMSNA Guideline – Journal of Urology