Diabetes
Meta-analysis reveals 24% prevalence of eating disorders among individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes – Eat Behav
11 May, 2024 | 13:41h | UTCThis systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the prevalence of eating disorder symptoms (EDS) in individuals aged 16 and older with insulin-dependent diabetes, covering both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The study involved an extensive search across several databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, culminating in the inclusion of 45 studies. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled prevalence of EDS at 24% (95% CI 0.21–0.28), with prevalence reaching 27% (95% CI 0.24–0.31) among studies using the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R), the most frequently utilized screening tool. Notably, the prevalence of EDS varied based on the screening tool used and was significantly associated with sex distribution; studies with a higher percentage of female participants (over 58%) reported a higher prevalence of EDS (30% vs. 18%, prevalence ratio 1.7). The study also highlighted a concerning prevalence of insulin omission, reported at 21% (95% CI 0.13–0.33). This analysis underscores the substantial occurrence of eating disorder symptoms among this patient population, emphasizing the need for tailored screening and interventions.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Systematic Review: Effects of ACE inhibitors and ARBs on kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic patients – Cochrane Library
4 May, 2024 | 13:32h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in managing cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in adults with diabetes and kidney disease. It included data from 109 randomized controlled trials totaling 28,341 participants, comparing the impact of ACEi and ARBs, either alone or in combination, against each other, placebo, or no treatment.
Main Findings:
The analysis revealed that ACEi may reduce the risk of kidney failure (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.94) but generally has little effect on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death compared to placebo, with low certainty of evidence. Similarly, ARBs showed potential in preventing kidney failure (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.94) and the progression from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria. The effects on cardiovascular outcomes remained uncertain and showed minimal difference compared to placebo or no treatment.
Implications for Practice:
While ACEi and ARBs may aid in preventing kidney failure in patients with diabetic kidney disease, their broader impacts on mortality and cardiovascular health remain uncertain. This underscores the necessity for further rigorous research to verify these findings and better determine the optimal therapeutic strategies. Clinicians should weigh these results against individual patient profiles considering the overall low certainty of the evidence.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
ACP Guidelines for the pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes in adults – Ann Intern Med
3 May, 2024 | 14:05h | UTCThe American College of Physicians (ACP) has issued an updated guideline focusing on the pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes. This guideline reviews the efficacy and safety of new medications, including GLP-1 agonists, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and others, emphasizing a systematic evaluation using the GRADE methodology. Key recommendations advise the integration of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists with metformin and lifestyle changes for better glycemic control and reduction in mortality and major cardiovascular events. Conversely, the use of DPP-4 inhibitors in similar therapeutic contexts is not recommended due to insufficient evidence of benefit. This guideline targets healthcare providers managing nonpregnant adults with type 2 diabetes.
Reference (link to free full-text):
ACP cost-effectiveness analysis: Newer antidiabetic medications in type 2 diabetes – Ann Intern Med
3 May, 2024 | 13:57h | UTCThis systematic review evaluates the cost-effectiveness of newer antidiabetic medications for type 2 diabetes from U.S. clinical and economic perspectives. Analyzing non-industry funded cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) using GRADE and Drummond criteria, the study identifies varying cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) values for medications such as GLP1a and SGLT2i. It concludes that while GLP1a and SGLT2i offer low value as primary therapies due to high costs, they may present intermediate value as adjunct treatments to metformin. The study highlights the methodological variability in CEAs and the influence of drug cost and effectiveness assumptions on outcomes. The results suggest cautious interpretation in clinical decision-making due to varied evidence quality and cost-effectiveness profiles among the reviewed medications.
Reference (link to free full-text):
ACP Meta-Analysis: Comparative efficacy of newer antidiabetic agents in type 2 diabetes management – Ann Intern Med
3 May, 2024 | 13:49h | UTCThis systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness and safety of modern antidiabetic drugs in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study analyzed 130 publications from 84 randomized controlled trials, using GRADE criteria for evidence assessment. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) agonists demonstrated significant reductions in all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events when compared to usual care, with SGLT2 inhibitors also showing benefits in reducing chronic kidney disease progression and hospitalizations due to heart failure. In contrast, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, insulin, and tirzepatide showed no significant mortality benefits. The study identified limitations including sparse direct drug comparisons and inadequate data for certain patient subgroups. Overall, SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 agonists were associated with fewer serious adverse events and severe hypoglycemia compared to insulin and sulfonylureas.
Reference (link to free full-text):
RCT: Semaglutide significantly improves symptoms and weight loss in HFpEF and type 2 diabetes patients
29 Apr, 2024 | 12:36h | UTCThis randomized clinical trial evaluated the effects of semaglutide on 616 patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and type 2 diabetes. Patients received weekly doses of 2.4 mg semaglutide or a placebo for 52 weeks. The study’s primary findings included a significant improvement in heart failure–related symptoms, as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score (average increase of 13.7 points in the semaglutide group versus 6.4 points in the placebo group). Additionally, semaglutide treatment resulted in a mean 9.8% reduction in body weight compared to 3.4% with placebo. Secondary outcomes also favored semaglutide, showing enhancements in 6-minute walk distance and reductions in C-reactive protein levels. Notably, semaglutide was associated with fewer serious adverse events compared to placebo.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
PCI vs. CABG in left main coronary disease patients with and without diabetes—a pooled analysis of 4 trials
22 Mar, 2024 | 11:41h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This research pooled individual patient data from four randomized clinical trials (SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, NOBLE, and EXCEL), comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 4393 patients with left main coronary artery disease. The trials included both patients with and without diabetes, allowing for a comparative analysis of outcomes based on the revascularization method and the presence of diabetes.
Main Findings: Patients with diabetes exhibited higher rates of 5-year mortality, spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization compared to those without diabetes. However, mortality rates following PCI vs. CABG were similar in diabetic (15.3% vs. 14.1%, respectively) and non-diabetic patients (9.7% vs. 8.9%, respectively). PCI was associated with a lower risk of stroke within the first year post-operation across all patients. Notably, diabetic patients underwent higher rates of spontaneous MI and repeat revascularization after PCI compared to CABG, with a more significant absolute excess risk observed beyond the first year compared to non-diabetic patients.
Implications for Practice: For patients with left main disease deemed suitable for either PCI or CABG, diabetes status significantly influences long-term outcomes, including death and cardiovascular events. While PCI offers a lower early risk of stroke, it is associated with increased risks of spontaneous MI and repeat revascularization, particularly in diabetic patients. These findings underscore the importance of considering patient-specific factors, such as diabetes status, in choosing between PCI and CABG for left main coronary artery disease revascularization.
Reference
Prakriti Gaba et al. (2024). Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Disease With or Without Diabetes: Findings From a Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials. Circulation, 0. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065571. Access the study here: Link
M-A: Cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients without diabetes
22 Mar, 2024 | 11:07h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This meta-analysis investigated the cardiovascular (CV) outcomes associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients without diabetes mellitus (DM). By systematically reviewing online databases, the authors identified and included six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in their analysis. These trials compared SGLT2i with placebo/control in a total of 12,984 participants, who were followed for an average duration of 17.7 months. The study population comprised mainly patients with heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease, or myocardial infarction, with a mean age of 64 years, where 72% were men and the mean hemoglobin A1C level was 5.7%.
Main Findings: The use of SGLT2i was associated with a significant reduction in composite CV death or hospitalization for HF, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 0.87, p < 0.0001), primarily due to a decrease in hospitalization for HF (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.81, p < 0.00001). No significant differences were observed in CV death, all-cause death, or major adverse CV events when comparing SGLT2i to placebo. Notably, serious adverse events were lower with the use of empagliflozin compared to placebo.
Implications for Practice: This meta-analysis highlights the significant CV benefits of SGLT2i treatment in reducing CV death or hospitalization for HF in patients without DM, compared with placebo. These findings suggest the potential for broader use of SGLT2i in populations without diabetes to improve cardiovascular outcomes.
Reference: Sahib Singh et al. (2024). Cardiovascular Outcomes With Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin in Patients Without Diabetes. The American Journal of Cardiology, Published: February 29, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.02.039. Access the study here: [Link]
RCT: No difference in ICU length of stay or 90-day mortality between tight and liberal glucose control
2 Oct, 2023 | 11:25h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This randomized controlled trial assessed the effects of tight versus liberal glucose control on the length of ICU stay in critically ill patients. A total of 9,230 patients were included, with 4,622 in the liberal-control group (insulin initiation when blood glucose levels exceeded 215 mg/dL) and 4,608 in the tight-control group (blood glucose targeted between 80 and 110 mg/dL). In both groups, parenteral nutrition was withheld during the first week of ICU admission. The primary endpoint was the duration of ICU stay, and 90-day mortality served as a key safety outcome.
Main Findings: No significant differences were observed in the primary endpoint, the length of ICU stay, between the two groups (hazard ratio 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.04; P=0.94). The 90-day mortality rates were also similar (10.1% in the liberal-control group vs. 10.5% in the tight-control group, P=0.51). Incidences of severe hypoglycemia were low and statistically similar in both groups (1.0% in the tight-control group vs. 0.7% in the liberal-control group). Secondary outcomes, including new infections and the duration of respiratory and hemodynamic support, showed no significant differences. However, lower incidences of severe acute kidney injury and cholestatic liver dysfunction were observed in the tight-control group.
Implications & Limitations: The study supports existing evidence that tight glucose control doesn’t provide substantial benefits in reducing ICU stay duration or mortality. This suggests that a more liberal approach to glucose control may be preferable in most ICU settings, especially to minimize hypoglycemia risk. Key limitations of the study include its narrow focus on the absence of early parenteral nutrition, which could limit generalizability, and the inability to blind caregivers to treatment assignments. Future research should investigate the impact of tight glucose control in various patient subgroups and under different nutritional conditions.
Presented at ASRS Meeting | Studies link GLP-1 agonists to progression of diabetic retinopathy
11 Aug, 2023 | 15:38h | UTCStudies link GLP-1 agonists to progression of diabetic retinopathy – MDedge
Multinational Study | No correlation between Covid-19 and onset of type 1 diabetes in children
8 Aug, 2023 | 13:32h | UTC
Cohort Study | Habitual calcium supplementation linked to higher CVD incidence and mortality in diabetics
8 Aug, 2023 | 13:24h | UTCAssociations of Habitual Calcium Supplementation With Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality in Individuals With and Without Diabetes – Diabetes Care (link to abstract – $ for full-text)
Commentary on Twitter
Habitual Ca supplementation was associated with higher risks of CVD in diabetics but not non-diabetics, suggesting that diabetics may need to be cautious about the long-term use of Ca supplements. @ADA_Pubs
Read Here➡️https://t.co/wUBy6KJhaw pic.twitter.com/6FXmwBwnMS
— Diabetes Care, a research journal of the ADA ? (@DiabetesCareADA) July 28, 2023
Do-it-yourself automated insulin delivery: a health-care practitioner user’s guide
7 Aug, 2023 | 14:44h | UTC
Review | Diabetes of the exocrine pancreas: implications for pharmacological management
7 Aug, 2023 | 14:25h | UTCDiabetes of the Exocrine Pancreas: Implications for Pharmacological Management – Drugs
Cohort Study | Exploring the potential impact of artificial sweeteners on type 2 diabetes risk
28 Jul, 2023 | 14:07h | UTC
Cohort Study | More data suggests SGLT-2 inhibitors could reduce gout flares
26 Jul, 2023 | 13:24h | UTCComparative Effectiveness of Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors for Recurrent Gout Flares and Gout-Primary Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations: A General Population Cohort Study – Annals of Internal Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)
Commentaries:
SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced gout flares in patients with diabetes, gout – ACP Internist
SGLT2i Use Linked to Reduced Risk for Flare in Adults With Gout, T2D – HealthDay
SGLT2 inhibitors linked with fewer gout flares in diabetes – MDedge
Guideline | Laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus
21 Jul, 2023 | 13:50h | UTCExecutive Summary: Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus – Diabetes Care
Review | Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy
20 Jul, 2023 | 10:53h | UTC
RCT | Metformin boosts effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention in individuals with impaired glucose regulation
13 Jul, 2023 | 13:07h | UTCSafety and effectiveness of metformin plus lifestyle intervention compared with lifestyle intervention alone in preventing progression to diabetes in a Chinese population with impaired glucose regulation: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial – The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)
Related Study: Reduction in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes with Lifestyle Intervention or Metformin – New England Journal of Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)
Single Arm Trial | Low-carbohydrate diet improves glycemic control in type 1 diabetes
13 Jul, 2023 | 13:04h | UTCRelated:
Management of Type 1 Diabetes With a Very Low–Carbohydrate Diet – Pediatrics (link to abstract – $ for full-text)
Lower carbohydrate diets for adults with type 2 diabetes – British Journal of Nutrition
Low carbohydrate diet: Insights from a general practice service in patients with type 2 diabetes
RCT | Weekly Tirzepatide outperforms placebo in weight management for type 2 diabetes patients
7 Jul, 2023 | 16:24h | UTCTirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity in people with type 2 diabetes (SURMOUNT-2): a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial – The Lancet (link to abstract – $ for full-text)
Commentary: Tirzepatide triumphs in significant weight reduction for people with type 2 diabetes – News Medical
Review | Cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes and kidney disease
7 Jul, 2023 | 16:13h | UTC
Review | Diabetes detection in women with gestational diabetes and polycystic ovarian syndrome
7 Jul, 2023 | 16:08h | UTCDiabetes detection in women with gestational diabetes and polycystic ovarian syndrome – The BMJ
ASA Consensus Guidance | Preoperative management of patients on GLP-1 agonists
5 Jul, 2023 | 01:17h | UTCCommentary: Anesthesiologists Say Ozempic, Wegovy Should Be Halted Prior to Surgery – HealthDay
RCT | Weekly insulin Icodec proves effective in glucose control in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes patients
3 Jul, 2023 | 14:32h | UTCSummary: The ONWARDS 3 randomized clinical trial studied the efficacy of once-weekly insulin icodec in comparison to once-daily insulin degludec for glucose control in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes patients. The double-masked, double-dummy trial was conducted from March 2021 to June 2022 across 92 sites in 11 countries, enrolling 588 adults with type 2 diabetes. The participants were randomly divided into two groups: 294 receiving once-weekly icodec and daily placebo, and 294 receiving daily degludec and weekly placebo.
The primary endpoint was the change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to week 26. Insulin icodec showed a noninferior HbA1c change from the baseline (-1.6 percentage points) compared to insulin degludec (-1.4 percentage points) and demonstrated confirmed statistical superiority. However, the trial showed a higher rate of combined level 2 (clinically significant) or level 3 (severe) hypoglycemic events in the insulin icodec group than in the insulin degludec group, despite the overall low rates in both groups. There was no significant difference in weight changes between the two groups.
The study concluded that once-weekly insulin icodec demonstrated superior HbA1c reduction compared to once-daily degludec after 26 weeks of treatment in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes patients. The convenience of once-weekly administration should be considered against the slightly higher absolute risk of hypoglycemia. The study’s limitations include its short duration (26 weeks) and a lack of data on sustained effects, patient-reported outcomes, and continuous glucose monitoring.
Article: Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec vs Once-Daily Insulin Degludec in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes: The ONWARDS 3 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA (link to abstract – $ for full-text)
See also: Visual Abstract
Related Study: Weekly Icodec versus Daily Glargine U100 in Type 2 Diabetes without Previous Insulin – New England Journal of Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)