Open access
Open access
Powered by Google Translator Translator

Anesthesiology (all articles)

Guidelines on the use of intravenous albumin in various clinical settings – CHEST

25 May, 2024 | 18:49h | UTC

The International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines provides comprehensive guidelines on the use of intravenous albumin across various clinical settings, including critical care, cardiovascular surgery, kidney replacement therapy, and complications of cirrhosis. The guideline emphasizes that there are few evidence-based indications supporting the routine use of albumin to improve patient outcomes. Key findings include:

 

1 – Critical Care: Limited recommendations for using albumin in adult, pediatric, and neonatal critical care, primarily advising against its routine use for volume replacement or managing hypoalbuminemia due to low or very low certainty of evidence.

2 – Cardiovascular Surgery: No recommendations for using albumin to prime cardiovascular bypass circuits or for volume replacement due to moderate to very low certainty of evidence.

3 – Kidney Replacement Therapy: Albumin is not suggested for preventing or managing intradialytic hypotension or improving ultrafiltration due to very low certainty of evidence.

4 – Cirrhosis Complications: Some conditional recommendations for using albumin in specific scenarios like large-volume paracentesis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to low certainty of evidence; however, it is generally not suggested for other complications of cirrhosis.

 

Overall, the guidelines advise a cautious approach to albumin use, highlighting the need for more robust evidence to support its broader application in clinical practice.

 

Reference (link to free full-text):

Callum J et al. (2024). Use of Intravenous Albumin: A Guideline From the International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines. CHEST, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.049.

 


RCT: Triple combination of paracetamol, ibuprofen, and dexamethasone reduces morphine use post-hip arthroplasty – Lancet Rheumatol

11 May, 2024 | 14:18h | UTC

Study Design and Population: The RECIPE trial was a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter study conducted across nine Danish hospitals to evaluate the effectiveness of non-opioid analgesic combinations in managing postoperative pain following total hip arthroplasty. A total of 1,060 adults scheduled for surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups, receiving combinations of paracetamol, ibuprofen, and dexamethasone. The study’s primary endpoint was the 24-hour intravenous morphine consumption, with a predefined minimal important difference set at 8 mg.

Main Findings: The trial results indicated significant reductions in 24-hour morphine consumption in the group receiving paracetamol, ibuprofen, and dexamethasone combined, compared to other groups, though none reached the minimal important difference. Specifically, this group consumed a median of 15 mg morphine, which was less than the other groups ranging from 16 mg to 24 mg. However, the differences did not meet the study’s threshold for a clinically important effect. Adverse events were lowest in the combined treatment group, suggesting a better safety profile primarily characterized by fewer incidents of nausea, vomiting, and dizziness.

Implications for Practice: The findings support the use of a combined regimen of paracetamol, ibuprofen, and dexamethasone for reducing morphine consumption post-total hip arthroplasty, which could be significant in clinical settings aiming to minimize opioid use. The improved safety profile also highlights the potential benefits of multimodal analgesia. Further research may explore the optimization of dosing schedules and long-term outcomes to enhance patient recovery and satisfaction.

 

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Steiness J et al. (2024). Non-opioid analgesic combinations following total hip arthroplasty (RECIPE): a randomised, placebo-controlled, blinded, multicentre trial. The Lancet Rheumatology, 6(4), e205-e215. DOI: 10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00020-1

 


Cluster Randomized Trial: Hyperangulated video laryngoscopy reduces intubation attempts in surgical patients – JAMA

11 May, 2024 | 13:39h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This cluster randomized multiple crossover clinical trial was conducted at a single U.S. academic hospital to compare the effectiveness of hyperangulated video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in reducing the number of intubation attempts during surgery. The study involved 7,736 adult patients, aged 18 years or older, undergoing elective or emergent cardiac, thoracic, or vascular surgical procedures that required single-lumen endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia. The trial randomized two sets of 11 operating rooms on a weekly basis to use either video laryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy for the initial intubation attempt from March 2021 to December 2022.

Main Findings: Hyperangulated video laryngoscopy significantly decreased the number of intubation attempts compared to direct laryngoscopy. Specifically, 1.7% of surgical procedures using video laryngoscopy required more than one intubation attempt versus 7.6% for direct laryngoscopy, with an estimated proportional odds ratio of 0.20 (95% CI, 0.14-0.28; P < .001). Furthermore, intubation failure was markedly lower with video laryngoscopy (0.27%) compared to direct laryngoscopy (4.0%). However, there was no significant difference in the rates of airway and dental injuries between the two methods.

Implications for Practice: The findings indicate that hyperangulated video laryngoscopy enhances initial intubation success and reduces the need for multiple intubation attempts in a variety of surgical settings. This suggests that video laryngoscopy could be considered a preferable technique for endotracheal intubation in the operating room, potentially improving patient outcomes and efficiency. Further research might explore the generalizability of these results to other medical centers and different patient populations.

 

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Ruetzler, K. et al. (2024). Cluster Randomized Trial: Hyperangulated Video Laryngoscopy Reduces Intubation Attempts in Surgical Patients. JAMA, 331(15), 1279-1286. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.0762

 


RCT: Video laryngoscopy improves first-attempt intubation success in neonates compared to direct laryngoscopy – N Engl J Med

11 May, 2024 | 13:37h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This single-center randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for urgent intubation in neonates. A total of 226 neonates requiring intubation either in the delivery room or neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were enrolled and stratified by gestational age into two groups: less than 32 weeks and 32 weeks or more. The study primarily focused on the success rate of the first intubation attempt, monitored through exhaled carbon dioxide detection.

Main Findings: The trial included 214 neonates, analyzing the success of intubation on the first attempt. Video laryngoscopy significantly outperformed direct laryngoscopy, achieving a first-attempt success rate of 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66 to 82) compared to 45% (95% CI, 35 to 54) in the direct laryngoscopy group. Moreover, the median number of attempts for successful intubation was lower in the video-laryngoscopy group (1 attempt, 95% CI, 1 to 1) versus the direct-laryngoscopy group (2 attempts, 95% CI, 1 to 2). Additionally, neonates in the video laryngoscopy group experienced higher median lowest oxygen saturations and heart rates during intubation.

Implications for Practice: The findings suggest that video laryngoscopy could be more effective than direct laryngoscopy for urgent neonatal intubation, particularly in increasing the likelihood of success on the first attempt. These results recommend reconsidering current intubation techniques in neonatal care settings to incorporate video laryngoscopy, potentially leading to safer and more efficient intubation processes in this vulnerable population.

 

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Geraghty, L.E. et al. (2024). Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Urgent Intubation of Newborn Infants. The New England Journal of Medicine. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2402785.

 


RCT: Serratus anterior plane block reduces pain and opioid use in rib fracture patients – JAMA Surgery

2 May, 2024 | 23:20h | UTC

Study Design and Population:
This study was a multicenter, open-label, pragmatic randomized clinical trial conducted across eight emergency departments in New South Wales, Australia. The trial included 210 patients aged 16 years or older who had clinically suspected or radiologically confirmed rib fractures. Patients intubated, transferred for urgent surgical intervention, or with major concomitant nonthoracic injuries were excluded.

 

Main Findings:
In the trial, patients were randomized to receive either a serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) along with standard rib fracture management or standard care alone. The primary outcome was a composite pain score measured 4 hours post-enrollment. The SAPB group showed a significant increase in patients achieving the desired pain score reduction (41% in SAPB group vs. 19.6% in control; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.89, P = 0.001). Additionally, SAPB recipients had significantly lower opioid consumption at 24 hours compared to the control group.

 

Implications for Practice:

The trial’s results support the addition of a serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) to standard rib fracture management for providing effective early pain relief and reducing opioid use. However, it’s important to note that this study did not include a sham group, and patients were aware of whether they received the intervention. This lack of blinding could influence patient-reported outcomes due to placebo effects. Despite this limitation, the reduction in pain and opioid consumption suggests that SAPB is a beneficial component of care for patients with rib fractures.

 

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Reference: Partyka, C. et al. (2024). Serratus Anterior Plane Blocks for Early Rib Fracture Pain Management The SABRE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. Published online May 1, 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0969

 


RCT: Free Access to Water vs. Fasting Pre-Cesarean Reduces Vomiting and Increases Maternal Satisfaction

25 Mar, 2024 | 11:17h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This randomized controlled trial was carried out at the Obstetric Unit, Universiti Malaya Medical Center from October 2020 to May 2022. A total of 504 women scheduled for planned cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomized into two groups: 252 were allowed free access to water up until being called to the operating theater, and 252 were required to fast from midnight before the procedure. The study primarily aimed to evaluate the effects of these preoperative oral intake policies on perioperative vomiting and maternal satisfaction.

Main Findings: The results demonstrated significant benefits for the group with free access to water. Specifically, perioperative vomiting was observed in 3.6% of women with water access compared to 9.5% of those fasting, indicating a relative risk reduction. Maternal satisfaction scores were notably higher in the water access group, with median scores of 9 versus 5 for the fasting group. Additional findings included lower reports of thirst, fewer instances of preoperative intravenous hydration, reduced ketone presence in urine, and a lower average number of vasopressor doses needed. Significantly, 95.2% of participants in the water access group would recommend their regimen to a friend, compared to only 39.7% in the fasting group.

Implications for Practice: Allowing free access to water up until the time of surgery for women scheduled for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia significantly reduces the risk of perioperative vomiting and improves maternal satisfaction, without adversely affecting post-cesarean recovery or neonatal outcomes. These findings support revising current preoperative fasting guidelines to improve patient experience and potentially enhance clinical outcomes.

Reference: Ng, Y. L., Segaran, S., Yim, C. C. W., Lim, B. K., Hamdan, M., Gan, F., & Tan, P. C. (2024). Preoperative free access to water compared to fasting for planned cesarean under spinal anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S0002-9378(24)00447-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.018.


Nested Case-Control Study: Increased risk of major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients with concomitant SSRI and oral anticoagulant use

23 Mar, 2024 | 20:48h | UTC

Study Design and Population

This nested case-control study investigated the association between the concomitant use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and oral anticoagulants (OACs) on the risk of major bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation. Conducted within the UK’s Clinical Practice Research Datalink, the study included 42,190 cases of major bleeding matched to 1,156,641 controls based on age, sex, cohort entry date, and follow-up duration. Patients initiating OACs between January 2, 1998, and March 29, 2021, were included, with risk-set sampling utilized for control selection.

Main Findings

The study found that concomitant use of SSRIs and OACs was associated with a 33% increased risk of major bleeding compared to OAC use alone, with the highest risk observed within the first 30 days of concurrent use. The increased risk was consistent across different ages, sexes, and patient histories, including those with chronic kidney disease or previous bleeding events. Notably, the elevated risk of bleeding extended up to 6 months of concomitant use but did not vary significantly with the potency of SSRIs or the type of OAC used (direct OACs or vitamin K antagonists).

Implications for Practice

These findings underscore the need for healthcare professionals to closely monitor patients with atrial fibrillation who are prescribed SSRIs in addition to OACs, particularly during the initial months of treatment. This study highlights the importance of managing bleeding risk factors and suggests reconsidering the necessity and duration of concomitant SSRI and OAC use. Future research should focus on strategies to mitigate this bleeding risk and explore alternative treatments for managing depression in patients requiring anticoagulation.

Reference

Rahman AA, Platt RW, Beradid S, et al. (2024). Concomitant Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors With Oral Anticoagulants and Risk of Major Bleeding. JAMA Netw Open, 7(3):e243208. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3208.


RCT: Lower oxygenation target improves days alive without life support in severe COVID-19 hypoxemia

21 Mar, 2024 | 13:46h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This multicenter randomized clinical trial investigated the impact of different oxygenation targets on the survival of adult patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia in the ICU. Conducted across 11 European ICUs from August 2020 to March 2023, the study involved 726 patients requiring at least 10 L/min of oxygen or mechanical ventilation. Participants were randomly assigned to receive an oxygenation target of either 60 mm Hg (lower oxygenation group, n=365) or 90 mm Hg (higher oxygenation group, n=361) for up to 90 days.

Main Findings: The primary outcome was the number of days alive without life support at 90 days post-intervention. Patients in the lower oxygenation group achieved a median of 80.0 days alive without life support compared to 72.0 days in the higher oxygenation group, a difference that was statistically significant (P=0.009). Although there was a slight reduction in mortality at 90 days in the lower oxygenation group (30.2% vs 34.7% in the higher group), this was not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed in the proportion of patients with serious adverse events or the number of days alive and out of hospital.

Implications for Practice: Targeting a lower Pao2 of 60 mm Hg in ICU patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia appears to increase the days alive without life support compared to a higher target of 90 mm Hg, without increasing serious adverse events. This finding suggests that a lower oxygenation target could be more beneficial for this patient population, potentially guiding clinical practice in managing oxygen therapy for severe COVID-19 cases.

Reference

Reference: Nielsen FM et al. (2024). Randomized Clinical Trial: Effect of Oxygenation Targets on Survival Without Life Support in COVID-19 Patients with Severe Hypoxemia. JAMA, Published online March 19, 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.2934. Access the study here: [Link]


RCT: Propafenone leads to quicker sinus rhythm restoration than amiodarone in supraventricular arrhythmias related to septic shock

1 Oct, 2023 | 15:19h | UTC

Study Design & Population: The research was a two-center, prospective, controlled parallel-group, double-blind trial involving 209 septic shock patients who had new-onset supraventricular arrhythmia and a left ventricular ejection fraction above 35%. Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous propafenone (70 mg bolus followed by 400–840 mg/24 h) or amiodarone (300 mg bolus followed by 600–1800 mg/24 h).

Main Findings: The primary outcomes focused on the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm 24 hours post-infusion, time to the first sinus rhythm restoration, and arrhythmia recurrence rates. No significant difference was observed in 24-hour sinus rhythm rates between the propafenone (72.8%) and amiodarone (67.3%) groups (p=0.4). Time to the first rhythm restoration was significantly shorter for the propafenone group (median 3.7 hours) compared to the amiodarone group (median 7.3 hours, p=0.02). Recurrence of arrhythmia was notably lower in the propafenone group (52%) than in the amiodarone group (76%, p<0.001). In the subgroup of patients with a dilated left atrium, amiodarone appeared to be more effective.

Implications & Limitations: The study suggests that while propafenone doesn’t offer better rhythm control at 24 hours compared to amiodarone, it does provide faster cardioversion and fewer arrhythmia recurrences, especially in patients with a non-dilated left atrium. No significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes, such as ICU or long-term mortality, between propafenone and amiodarone in the trial. Limitations include potential underpowering of the study and the inability to fully account for the impact of multiple covariates involved in the complex therapy of septic shock.

Article: Balik, M., Maly, M., Brozek, T. et al. Propafenone versus amiodarone for supraventricular arrhythmias in septic shock: a randomised controlled trial. Intensive Care Med (2023)

 

Commentary on Twitter:

 


RCT | Restrictive vs. liberal red blood cell transfusion strategy for critically injured patients

11 Aug, 2023 | 15:08h | UTC

The Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy for Critically Injured Patients (RESTRIC) trial: a cluster-randomized, crossover, non-inferiority multicenter trial of restrictive transfusion in trauma – Journal of Intensive Care

 


Review | Regional anesthesia in the emergency department outside the operating theatre

8 Aug, 2023 | 13:17h | UTC

Regional anesthesia in the emergency department outside the operating theatre – Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

 


Review | Local anesthetic adjuncts for peripheral nerve blockade

8 Aug, 2023 | 13:16h | UTC

Local anaesthetic adjuncts for peripheral nerve blockade – Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

 


M-A | Efficacy and safety of supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach for subclavian vein catheterization

7 Aug, 2023 | 14:49h | UTC

Efficacy and safety of supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach for subclavian vein catheterisation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials – Indian Journal of Anaesthesia

 


M-A | Supine vs. nonsupine endotracheal intubation

4 Aug, 2023 | 11:45h | UTC

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Supine vs. Nonsupine Endotracheal Intubation – Critical Care Research and Practice

 


RCT | Ferric derisomaltose plus tranexamic acid may reduce blood transfusion risk by 50% in hip surgery

3 Aug, 2023 | 13:18h | UTC

Ferric derisomaltose and tranexamic acid, combined or alone, for reducing blood transfusion in patients with hip fracture (the HiFIT trial): a multicentre, 2 × 2 factorial, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial – The Lancet Haematology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

 


International Study | Postoperative acute kidney injury affects one in five patients after major surgery

1 Aug, 2023 | 14:23h | UTC

Epidemiology of surgery associated acute kidney injury (EPIS-AKI): a prospective international observational multi-center clinical study – Intensive Care Medicine

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Review | Regional analgesia for acute pain relief after open thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

31 Jul, 2023 | 14:03h | UTC

Regional analgesia for acute pain relief after open thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery – BJA Education

 


Review | Perioperative iron deficiency anemia

31 Jul, 2023 | 14:02h | UTC

Perioperative iron deficiency anaemia – BJA Education

 


RCT | Combined pre-operative olanzapine regimen lowers postoperative nausea in high-risk cancer patients

24 Jul, 2023 | 12:49h | UTC

Olanzapine as an add-on, pre-operative anti-emetic drug for postoperative nausea or vomiting: a randomised controlled trial – Anaesthesia

 


ASA Consensus Guidance | Preoperative management of patients on GLP-1 agonists

5 Jul, 2023 | 01:17h | UTC

American Society of Anesthesiologists Consensus-Based Guidance on Preoperative Management of Patients (Adults and Children) on Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists – American Society of Anesthesiologists

Commentary: Anesthesiologists Say Ozempic, Wegovy Should Be Halted Prior to Surgery – HealthDay

 


M-A | Clinical tests for confirming tracheal intubation or excluding esophageal intubation

3 Jul, 2023 | 14:19h | UTC

Clinical tests for confirming tracheal intubation or excluding oesophageal intubation: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis – Anaesthesia

 


Consensus Statement 2023 Update | Timing of elective surgery and risk assessment after SARS-CoV-2 infection

30 Jun, 2023 | 15:00h | UTC

Timing of elective surgery and risk assessment after SARS-CoV-2 infection: 2023 update – Anaesthesia

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Development and validation of an international preoperative risk assessment model for postoperative delirium

30 Jun, 2023 | 14:43h | UTC

Development and validation of an international preoperative risk assessment model for postoperative delirium – Age and Ageing

 


M-A | Prophylactic intravenous tranexamic acid and thromboembolism in non-cardiac surgery

29 Jun, 2023 | 14:03h | UTC

Prophylactic intravenous tranexamic acid and thromboembolism in non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis – Anaesthesia

 


Review | Update on the management of patients with HIV infection in anesthesia and critical care

26 Jun, 2023 | 00:36h | UTC

Update on the management of patients with HIV infection in anaesthesia and critical care – BJA Education

 


Stay Updated in Your Specialty

Telegram Channels
Free

WhatsApp alerts 10-day free trial

No spam, just news.