Family Medicine
Cohort Study: Higher serious bleeding rates linked to diltiazem in elderly atrial fibrillation patients on anticoagulation
26 Apr, 2024 | 12:35h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 204,155 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. The study focused on new users of the anticoagulants apixaban or rivaroxaban who commenced treatment with either diltiazem or metoprolol between January 2012 and November 2020, with follow-up extending up to 365 days.
Main Findings:
Patients treated with diltiazem exhibited a significantly increased risk of serious bleeding, including bleeding-related hospitalization and death, compared to those treated with metoprolol. The hazard ratio (HR) for serious bleeding events was 1.21, with a rate difference (RD) of 10.6 per 1000 person-years. Notably, the risk escalated with diltiazem doses exceeding 120 mg/day, indicating a dose-response relationship. Secondary outcomes, such as ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, did not show significant differences between the treatment groups.
Implications for Practice:
The findings suggest that in older adults with atrial fibrillation treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban, diltiazem increases the risk of serious bleeding, especially at higher doses. These results underscore the importance of cautious medication management and might influence clinical decisions regarding the choice of ventricular rate control in this population.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Cohort Study: Increased fracture risk linked with initiation of antihypertensive medication in older veterans
26 Apr, 2024 | 12:29h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This retrospective cohort study evaluated the association between antihypertensive medication initiation and fracture risk among older long-term care nursing home residents within the Veterans Health Administration. Conducted from 2006 to 2019 with data analysis spanning 2021 to 2023, the study utilized target trial emulation techniques and included 29,648 residents. A 1:4 propensity score-matched method was employed to compare medication initiators with non-initiators.
Main Findings:
Out of the matched cohort of 64,710 residents, those who initiated antihypertensive medication showed a higher incidence of fractures (5.4 per 100 person-years) compared to controls (2.2 per 100 person-years). The adjusted hazard ratio for fractures was 2.42. Notably, higher risks were observed in subgroups with dementia or elevated blood pressure thresholds (systolic ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic ≥80 mm Hg). Risks for severe falls and syncope were also elevated in the medication-initiating group.
Implications for Practice:
The study indicates a significant association between the initiation of antihypertensive medications and increased fracture risks among older, frail nursing home residents. Given these findings, clinicians should exercise caution and consider enhanced monitoring and preventive strategies when prescribing these medications to this vulnerable population.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Dave, C. V. et al. (2024). Antihypertensive Medication and Fracture Risk in Older Veterans Health Administration Nursing Home Residents. JAMA Intern Med, Published online April 22, 2024. DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0507.
M-A: Reduced risk of infective endocarditis following dental procedures with antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk individuals
26 Apr, 2024 | 12:07h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of infective endocarditis following invasive dental procedures. Researchers analyzed data from 1,152,345 cases sourced from PubMed, Cochrane-CENTRAL, Scopus, and other databases up to May 2023. The study included various research designs, such as case-control, cohort, and time-trend studies, assessing the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis across different risk groups.
Main Findings:
The meta-analysis revealed that antibiotic prophylaxis significantly lowers the risk of infective endocarditis among individuals at high risk (pooled relative risk, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29-0.57), with consistent findings across studies of good quality. However, the effectiveness of prophylaxis in individuals at moderate or low/unknown risk remains unsupported by sufficient evidence. Time-trend studies provided mixed results, with some indicating no change or an increase in infective endocarditis incidence post-guideline changes in 2007.
Implications for Practice:
The findings support the continued use of antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk individuals undergoing invasive dental procedures, aligning with current guidelines from the American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology. The lack of clear benefits in moderate and low-risk groups suggests a need for further research to optimize prophylaxis guidelines and ensure effective risk stratification in clinical practice.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
RCT: Lack of significant effect of Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir–ritonavir) on symptom alleviation in Covid-19
26 Apr, 2024 | 11:49h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This phase 2–3 randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy of nirmatrelvir in combination with ritonavir for treating mild-to-moderate Covid-19 in adults. Participants, both vaccinated and unvaccinated, were enrolled based on their risk factors for severe Covid-19. The study included 1296 adults who had confirmed Covid-19 with symptom onset within the past 5 days. They were randomly assigned to receive either nirmatrelvir–ritonavir or placebo every 12 hours for 5 days.
Main Findings:
The primary endpoint was the time to sustained alleviation of all targeted Covid-19 signs and symptoms. Results showed that the median time to alleviation was 12 days for the treatment group and 13 days for the placebo group, a difference that was not statistically significant (P=0.60). Hospitalizations and deaths were slightly lower in the treatment group (0.8%) compared to the placebo group (1.6%), but this difference was also not statistically significant. Adverse events were similar across both groups, with dysgeusia and diarrhea being the most common in the treatment group.
Implications for Practice:
The findings indicate that nirmatrelvir–ritonavir treatment does not significantly reduce the time to symptom alleviation for Covid-19 compared to placebo among vaccinated or unvaccinated adults. These results suggest that further research is needed to explore the potential benefits of this treatment in specific subpopulations or in combination with other interventions.
Reference (free full-text):
Pragmatic Cluster-Randomised Trial: Efficacy of a Fixed-Dose Polypill in Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rural Iran
21 Apr, 2024 | 21:05h | UTCStudy Design and Population: The PolyPars Study was structured as a two-arm pragmatic cluster-randomised trial within the larger PARS cohort study. It targeted residents aged over 50 in a district in southern Iran, dividing 91 villages into two groups: one receiving a once-daily polypill (containing two antihypertensives, a statin, and aspirin) alongside non-pharmacological interventions, and the other receiving only the non-pharmacological interventions. The trial included 4,415 participants aged 50-75 years, with the primary endpoint being the first occurrence of major cardiovascular events.
Main Findings: Over a median follow-up of 4.6 years, adherence to the polypill was high at 86%. The intervention arm showed a significant reduction in the incidence of the primary outcome, with only 4.0% (88 participants) experiencing major cardiovascular events compared to 8.0% (176 participants) in the control arm. This translates to a hazard ratio of 0.50, indicating a 50% reduction in risk, and an absolute risk reduction of 4.0%.
Implications for Practice: The study demonstrates the significant potential of fixed-dose combination therapy with the polypill to halve the risk of major cardiovascular diseases in a population-level intervention. This finding supports the polypill as a safe and effective strategy for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases, particularly in settings where access to individual medications and consistent medical supervision might be limited.
Nested Case-Control Study: Increased risk of major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients with concomitant SSRI and oral anticoagulant use
23 Mar, 2024 | 20:48h | UTCStudy Design and Population
This nested case-control study investigated the association between the concomitant use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and oral anticoagulants (OACs) on the risk of major bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation. Conducted within the UK’s Clinical Practice Research Datalink, the study included 42,190 cases of major bleeding matched to 1,156,641 controls based on age, sex, cohort entry date, and follow-up duration. Patients initiating OACs between January 2, 1998, and March 29, 2021, were included, with risk-set sampling utilized for control selection.
Main Findings
The study found that concomitant use of SSRIs and OACs was associated with a 33% increased risk of major bleeding compared to OAC use alone, with the highest risk observed within the first 30 days of concurrent use. The increased risk was consistent across different ages, sexes, and patient histories, including those with chronic kidney disease or previous bleeding events. Notably, the elevated risk of bleeding extended up to 6 months of concomitant use but did not vary significantly with the potency of SSRIs or the type of OAC used (direct OACs or vitamin K antagonists).
Implications for Practice
These findings underscore the need for healthcare professionals to closely monitor patients with atrial fibrillation who are prescribed SSRIs in addition to OACs, particularly during the initial months of treatment. This study highlights the importance of managing bleeding risk factors and suggests reconsidering the necessity and duration of concomitant SSRI and OAC use. Future research should focus on strategies to mitigate this bleeding risk and explore alternative treatments for managing depression in patients requiring anticoagulation.
Reference
RCT: Clarithromycin improves early clinical and inflammatory responses in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia patients
23 Mar, 2024 | 20:25h | UTCStudy Design and Population: The ACCESS trial was a phase 3, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in 18 Greek hospitals, involving adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia who displayed systemic inflammatory response syndrome, had a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 or more, and procalcitonin levels of 0.25 ng/mL or more. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either standard of care with intravenous cephalosporins or β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations plus oral clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily for 7 days) or placebo. The trial aimed to evaluate the impact of clarithromycin on early clinical and inflammatory responses.
Main Findings: Among 278 participants allocated to clarithromycin (n=139) or placebo (n=139), the primary composite endpoint—indicating early clinical response and inflammatory burden reduction within 72 hours—was met by 68% of patients in the clarithromycin group compared to 38% in the placebo group, showcasing a significant difference (29.6%, odds ratio 3.40, p<0.0001). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were slightly lower in the clarithromycin group than in the placebo group, although not statistically significant.
Implications for Practice: The addition of clarithromycin to the standard of care for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia significantly improves early clinical response and reduces inflammatory burden, potentially through modulation of the immune response. These results support the use of clarithromycin alongside β-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, highlighting its role in enhancing patient outcomes by targeting early clinical and inflammatory indicators.
Reference
Prof Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, MD et al. (2024). Clarithromycin for early anti-inflammatory responses in community-acquired pneumonia in Greece (ACCESS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, Volume(Issue), Pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00412-5. Access the study here: Link
Observational Study: Association of antiarrhythmic drug use with increased risk of pacemaker implantation and syncope in new-onset atrial fibrillation patients
23 Mar, 2024 | 20:08h | UTCStudy Design and Population
This observational study utilized data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service to evaluate the impact of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) on the risk of pacemaker implantation or syncope in patients diagnosed with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) between 2013 and 2019. A total of 770,977 new-onset AF cases were identified, with 142,141 patients prescribed AADs within one year of diagnosis. The study compared the risk of these outcomes between AAD users and nonusers.
Main Findings
The study found that the use of AADs was associated with a significantly increased risk of pacemaker implantation or syncope, with adjusted risks being 3.5 times higher for either outcome, 2.0 times higher for syncope alone, and 5.0 times higher for pacemaker implantation. These associations were consistent across various patient subgroups, and propensity score-matched analysis supported these findings. Notably, women were found to be more susceptible to the adverse effects of AADs than men.
Implications for Practice
The findings suggest a need for careful evaluation of the risks associated with AAD use in patients with new-onset AF, particularly regarding the potential for pacemaker implantation or syncope. These results highlight the importance of individualized patient assessment before prescribing AADs to mitigate these risks effectively. Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms behind these associations and to develop strategies to minimize adverse outcomes in this patient population.
Reference
Cohort Study: The impact of rare kidney diseases on kidney failure and survival rates in the UK’s RaDaR cohort
22 Mar, 2024 | 11:29h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This cohort study utilized data from the UK National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases (RaDaR), encompassing 27,285 participants aged 0-96 years with 28 types of rare kidney diseases, recruited from 108 renal care facilities across the UK. The primary outcomes assessed were the cumulative incidence of mortality and kidney failure, compared with those of a general population with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Main Findings: Over a median follow-up of 9.6 years, participants with rare kidney diseases exhibited a significantly higher 5-year cumulative incidence of kidney failure (28%) compared to the broader UK CKD population (1%, p<0.0001). However, they also showed better survival rates, with a standardized mortality ratio of 0.42. There was considerable variability in median ages at kidney failure and death, time from dialysis start to death, and time from diagnosis to reaching specific eGFR thresholds among different rare diseases.
Implications for Practice: This study highlights the distinct trajectory of rare kidney diseases compared to more common forms of CKD, with higher rates of kidney failure but improved survival outcomes. These findings emphasize the over-representation of patients with rare kidney diseases in kidney replacement therapy cohorts and underscore the urgent need for targeted therapeutic interventions. Addressing this unmet need could significantly reduce the demand for long-term kidney replacement therapy, benefiting patients and easing healthcare system burdens.
Reference
Wong K, Pitcher D, Braddon F, Downward L, Steenkamp R, Annear N, et al. (2024). Effects of rare kidney diseases on kidney failure: a longitudinal analysis of the UK National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases (RaDaR) cohort. The Lancet, 395(10223), P1234-P1245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02843-X. Access the study here: Link
M-A: Cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients without diabetes
22 Mar, 2024 | 11:07h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This meta-analysis investigated the cardiovascular (CV) outcomes associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients without diabetes mellitus (DM). By systematically reviewing online databases, the authors identified and included six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in their analysis. These trials compared SGLT2i with placebo/control in a total of 12,984 participants, who were followed for an average duration of 17.7 months. The study population comprised mainly patients with heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease, or myocardial infarction, with a mean age of 64 years, where 72% were men and the mean hemoglobin A1C level was 5.7%.
Main Findings: The use of SGLT2i was associated with a significant reduction in composite CV death or hospitalization for HF, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 0.87, p < 0.0001), primarily due to a decrease in hospitalization for HF (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.81, p < 0.00001). No significant differences were observed in CV death, all-cause death, or major adverse CV events when comparing SGLT2i to placebo. Notably, serious adverse events were lower with the use of empagliflozin compared to placebo.
Implications for Practice: This meta-analysis highlights the significant CV benefits of SGLT2i treatment in reducing CV death or hospitalization for HF in patients without DM, compared with placebo. These findings suggest the potential for broader use of SGLT2i in populations without diabetes to improve cardiovascular outcomes.
Reference: Sahib Singh et al. (2024). Cardiovascular Outcomes With Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin in Patients Without Diabetes. The American Journal of Cardiology, Published: February 29, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.02.039. Access the study here: [Link]
Cohort Study: Elevated autism spectrum disorder risk in children exposed to valproate during pregnancy
21 Mar, 2024 | 13:16h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This cohort study utilized two health care utilization databases in the United States, covering the period from 2000 to 2020, to investigate the association between prenatal exposure to antiseizure medications and the risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children. The study compared children exposed to topiramate, valproate, or lamotrigine during the second half of pregnancy to those unexposed to any antiseizure medication, specifically focusing on a population-based cohort of pregnant women and their offspring.
Main Findings: The cumulative incidence of ASD at 8 years of age was found to be higher in children exposed to these medications compared to the general population. Notably, the incidence was 6.2% for children exposed to topiramate, 10.5% for valproate, and 4.1% for lamotrigine among children born to mothers with epilepsy. However, after adjusting for potential confounders, the increased risk of ASD remained significant only for valproate exposure, with a hazard ratio of 2.67, indicating a substantial risk compared to unexposed children. Topiramate and lamotrigine showed no significant increase in risk after adjustment.
Implications for Practice: The findings underscore the importance of carefully considering the risks and benefits of using antiseizure medications during pregnancy. Specifically, valproate should be used with caution, if at all, given its significant association with an increased risk of ASD in offspring. This study supports the need for targeted counseling and monitoring of pregnant women with epilepsy and highlights the necessity for further research to fully understand the neurodevelopmental impact of prenatal exposure to antiseizure medications.
Reference: Sonia Hernández-Díaz et al. (2024). Cohort Study: Assessing Autism Spectrum Disorder Risk in Children Exposed to Antiseizure Medications During Pregnancy. N Engl J Med, 390(13), 1069-1079. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2309359. Access the study here: [Link]
Systematic Analysis: Global Burden and Trends of Nervous System Disorders, 1990–2021
21 Mar, 2024 | 11:10h | UTCStudy Design and Population
This study, a systematic analysis conducted by the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021, aimed to estimate the global, regional, and national health loss attributable to 37 unique nervous system conditions from 1990 to 2021. The researchers estimated mortality, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), years of life lost (YLLs), and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) across 204 countries. The analysis included morbidity and deaths directly resulting from damage to the central or peripheral nervous system, as well as neurological health loss from conditions where nervous system morbidity is a secondary outcome.
Main Findings
The collective global burden of these nervous system conditions emerged as the leading cause of DALYs in 2021, affecting approximately 3.40 billion individuals (43.1% of the global population) and resulting in 443 million DALYs. Although global DALY counts for these conditions increased by 18.2% from 1990 to 2021, there was a notable decrease in the age-standardised rates of deaths and DALYs by 33.6% and 27.0%, respectively. The conditions contributing most significantly to the age-standardised DALYs were stroke, neonatal encephalopathy, migraine, and Alzheimer’s disease among others.
Implications for Practice
This analysis underscores the critical need for effective prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation strategies for nervous system disorders, which now lead the global disease burden. Highlighting an 18.2% increase in DALY counts over the study period, it calls for heightened public health attention and resource allocation towards these conditions. The findings support the prioritization of nervous system health on the global health agenda and stress the importance of further research into modifiable risk factors and equitable access to care.
Reference
GBD 2021 Nervous System Disorders Collaborators (2024). Systematic Analysis: Global Burden and Trends of Nervous System Disorders, 1990–2021. The Lancet Neurology, Volume(issue), Pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00038-3. Access the study here: Link
Meta-Analysis: Effectiveness of therapist-guided remote vs. in-person cognitive behavioral therapy
20 Mar, 2024 | 19:32h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of therapist-guided remote cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) compared to traditional in-person CBT. The authors conducted a comprehensive search across several databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, up to July 4, 2023. A total of 54 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, encompassing 5463 adult patients presenting with various clinical conditions. The study meticulously assessed the risk of bias and extracted data using a standardized approach, and outcomes were analyzed using a random-effects model.
Main Findings: The primary analysis focused on patient-important outcomes, comparing the effectiveness of remote and in-person CBT across diverse conditions such as anxiety and related disorders, depressive symptoms, insomnia, chronic pain or fatigue syndromes, body image or eating disorders, tinnitus, alcohol use disorder, and mood and anxiety disorders. The meta-analysis, based on moderate-certainty evidence, found little to no difference in effectiveness between remote and in-person CBT (standardized mean difference [SMD] −0.02, 95% confidence interval −0.12 to 0.07), suggesting that both delivery methods are comparably effective across a range of disorders.
Implications for Practice: The findings indicate that therapist-guided remote CBT is nearly as effective as in-person CBT for treating a variety of mental health and somatic disorders. This supports the potential for remote CBT to significantly increase access to evidence-based care, especially in settings where in-person therapy is not feasible or is limited by geographic, economic, or social barriers. Future research should explore optimizing remote CBT delivery methods to further enhance accessibility and efficacy.
Reference: Zandieh, S. et al (2024). Therapist-guided remote versus in-person cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ, 196(10), E327-E340. [Link]
Genetic analysis reveals Lipoprotein(a) is significantly more atherogenic than LDL on a per-particle basis
20 Mar, 2024 | 19:24h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This study utilized genome-wide association studies (GWAS) within the UK Biobank population to examine the atherogenicity of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) compared to low-density lipoprotein (LDL), focusing on their apolipoprotein B (apoB) content. The researchers identified two clusters of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with mass concentrations of Lp(a) and LDL, comprising 107 and 143 variants, respectively. The sample included subjects from the UK Biobank, allowing for a broad and genetically diverse analysis.
Main Findings: The study’s Mendelian randomization approach found that a 50 nmol/L increase in Lp(a)-apoB was associated with a 1.28 times higher odds ratio (OR) for coronary heart disease (CHD) compared to a 1.04 times increase for the same increment in LDL-apoB. Furthermore, a comparison using polygenic scores demonstrated that the hazard ratio (HR) for CHD per 50 nmol/L increase in apoB was significantly higher for the Lp(a) cluster (1.47) than for the LDL cluster (1.04), suggesting that Lp(a) is approximately 6.6 times more atherogenic than LDL on a per-particle basis.
Implications for Practice: These findings highlight the substantial atherogenic potential of Lp(a) compared to LDL, indicating that Lp(a) should be a key focus for drug intervention strategies in populations at risk for CHD. The marked difference in atherogenicity underscores the importance of targeted treatments and monitoring for individuals with elevated Lp(a) levels.
Reference: Björnson, E., Adiels, M., Taskinen, M.-R., Burgess, S., Chapman, M. J., Packard, C. J., & Borén, J. (2024). Lipoprotein(a) Is Markedly More Atherogenic Than LDL: An Apolipoprotein B-Based Genetic Analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 83(3), 385-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.039. Access the study here: Link
Clinical validation of a cell-free DNA test for colorectal cancer screening: sensitivity and specificity analysis
20 Mar, 2024 | 19:16h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This study conducted a clinical validation of a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) blood-based test to screen for colorectal cancer in a cohort of 10,258 individuals, 7,861 of whom met the eligibility criteria and were evaluable. The research aimed to assess the test’s performance by comparing its sensitivity for detecting colorectal cancer and its specificity for identifying advanced neoplasia (including colorectal cancer or advanced precancerous lesions) against the outcomes of screening colonoscopy, a standard procedure.
Main Findings: The cfDNA test demonstrated a sensitivity of 83.1% for detecting colorectal cancer, with stage-specific sensitivities of 87.5% for stages I-III cancers. However, its sensitivity for identifying advanced precancerous lesions was notably lower at 13.2%. On the specificity front, the test showed an 89.6% ability to correctly identify individuals without any advanced colorectal neoplasia and had an overall specificity of 89.9% for those with a negative colonoscopy result, indicating no presence of colorectal cancer, advanced precancerous lesions, or non-advanced precancerous lesions.
Implications for Practice: The cfDNA blood-based test presents a promising tool for colorectal cancer screening, boasting substantial sensitivity for colorectal cancer detection and high specificity for advanced neoplasia. Its non-invasive nature could potentially enhance screening adherence, facilitating earlier cancer detection and possibly reducing colorectal cancer-related mortality. However, the test’s low sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesions suggests a need for further research and development to improve early detection capabilities.
Reference: Chung, D.C. et al. A Cell-free DNA Blood-Based Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages. Access the study here: [Link]
RCT: Quadruple quarter-dose hypertension medication versus monotherapy for ambulatory blood pressure control
20 Mar, 2024 | 18:00h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy of a combination of four ultra-low-dose blood pressure medications (quadpill) compared to standard monotherapy in adults with hypertension. A total of 591 participants, either untreated or currently on monotherapy for hypertension, were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either the quadpill (irbesartan 37.5 mg, amlodipine 1.25 mg, indapamide 0.625 mg, and bisoprolol 2.5 mg) or a monotherapy control (irbesartan 150 mg).
Main Findings: At 12 weeks, the quadpill group demonstrated significantly lower mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) by 7.7 mmHg and 5.3 mmHg, respectively, compared to the monotherapy group, with similar reductions observed during daytime and night-time. Additionally, the rate of blood pressure control (24-hour average BP < 130/80 mmHg) was significantly higher in the quadpill group (77% vs. 50%). The study highlighted the quadpill’s effectiveness in reducing blood pressure variability and enhancing control rates across a 24-hour period.
Implications for Practice: The findings from this study support the superior efficacy of an ultra-low-dose quadruple medication strategy over monotherapy in managing ambulatory blood pressure among hypertensive patients. These results suggest that a quadpill approach could offer a more effective means for clinicians to achieve and maintain blood pressure control in hypertensive patients, potentially improving cardiovascular outcomes.
Reference: Janis M Nolde et al. (2024). Ambulatory blood pressure after 12 weeks of quadruple combination of quarter doses of blood pressure medication vs. standard medication. J Hypertens, 2024 Feb 29. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003683. Access the study here: [Link]
Meta-Analysis: Efficacy of exercise modalities in major depressive disorder treatment
20 Mar, 2024 | 17:54h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This article presents a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the optimal dose and modality of exercise for treating major depressive disorder, comparing its effects to psychotherapy, antidepressants, and control conditions such as usual care or placebo. The review included 218 unique studies encompassing 495 arms with a total of 14,170 participants who met the clinical cutoffs for major depression.
Main Findings: The findings revealed moderate reductions in depression symptoms for several exercise modalities when compared to active controls. Notably, walking or jogging, yoga, and strength training demonstrated the most significant effects. The effectiveness of exercise was found to be proportional to the intensity of the activity prescribed. Among these, yoga and strength training were identified as the most acceptable modalities for participants. However, the overall confidence in these results is low due to the high risk of bias in the included studies, with only one study meeting the criteria for a low risk of bias.
Implications for Practice: The study concludes that exercise, particularly walking or jogging, yoga, and strength training at sufficient intensities, can be an effective treatment for major depressive disorder. These modalities could be recommended alongside traditional treatments such as psychotherapy and antidepressants. Future research should focus on blinding participants and staff to mitigate expectancy effects and improve the reliability of findings. The inclusivity of exercise as a core treatment for depression could significantly impact treatment strategies and patient outcomes.
Reference: Noetel, M., et al. (2024). Effect of exercise for depression: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 384, e075847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-075847. Access the study here: [Link]
Phase 2 RCT: Low-dose aspirin significantly reduces hepatic fat in MASLD patients without cirrhosis
20 Mar, 2024 | 17:48h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was carried out over six months at a single hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. The study included 80 participants aged 18 to 70 years diagnosed with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) but without cirrhosis. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 81 mg of daily aspirin (n=40) or placebo (n=40).
Main Findings: The trial revealed that aspirin significantly reduced the mean absolute change in hepatic fat content by -10.2% compared with placebo, as measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), with a statistically significant difference (P=0.009). Furthermore, aspirin treatment notably decreased relative hepatic fat content, increased the proportion of patients achieving a 30% or greater reduction in hepatic fat, and reduced both absolute and relative hepatic fat content as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). Adverse events were mostly minor, with upper respiratory infections and arthralgias being the most common.
Implications for Practice: These findings suggest that low-dose aspirin may be an effective intervention for reducing liver fat in adults with MASLD without cirrhosis, potentially offering a simple, accessible treatment option. However, the results are preliminary and call for further confirmation in larger, more diverse populations. The study underscores the importance of considering low-dose aspirin as part of management strategies for MASLD, pending further research.
Reference
Simon TG et al. (2024). Randomized Clinical Trial: Low-Dose Aspirin Significantly Reduces Hepatic Fat in MASLD Patients Without Cirrhosis. JAMA, 331(11), 920-929. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.1215. Access the study here: [Link]
Prospective Study: Enhanced detection of colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions with next-generation stool DNA testing
20 Mar, 2024 | 17:41h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This prospective study evaluated the efficacy of a next-generation multitarget stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic adults aged 40 and older. The study encompassed 20,176 participants undergoing screening colonoscopy to determine the test’s sensitivity and specificity in detecting colorectal cancer and advanced neoplasia, including advanced precancerous lesions.
Main Findings:
The next-generation stool DNA test demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.9% for detecting colorectal cancer and a specificity of 90.6% for advanced neoplasia, significantly outperforming the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in sensitivity for both colorectal cancer and advanced precancerous lesions. However, the test showed slightly lower specificity for advanced neoplasia compared to FIT. No adverse events were reported, indicating the test’s safety for screening purposes.
Implications for Practice:
The findings suggest that the next-generation multitarget stool DNA test offers a superior option for colorectal cancer screening, with significantly higher sensitivity for detecting cancer and advanced precancerous lesions than the currently available FIT. This advance in non-invasive screening technology could lead to earlier detection and treatment of colorectal cancer, potentially improving patient outcomes. Further research may focus on optimizing the balance between sensitivity and specificity to enhance the clinical utility of stool DNA testing.
Reference:
Pragmatic Cluster-Randomised Trial: Efficacy of a Fixed-Dose Polypill in Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rural Iran
25 Mar, 2024 | 11:40h | UTCStudy Design and Population: The PolyPars Study was structured as a two-arm pragmatic cluster-randomised trial within the larger PARS cohort study. It targeted residents aged over 50 in a district in southern Iran, dividing 91 villages into two groups: one receiving a once-daily polypill (containing two antihypertensives, a statin, and aspirin) alongside non-pharmacological interventions, and the other receiving only the non-pharmacological interventions. The trial included 4,415 participants aged 50-75 years, with the primary endpoint being the first occurrence of major cardiovascular events.
Main Findings: Over a median follow-up of 4.6 years, adherence to the polypill was high at 86%. The intervention arm showed a significant reduction in the incidence of the primary outcome, with only 4.0% (88 participants) experiencing major cardiovascular events compared to 8.0% (176 participants) in the control arm. This translates to a hazard ratio of 0.50, indicating a 50% reduction in risk, and an absolute risk reduction of 4.0%.
Implications for Practice: The study demonstrates the significant potential of fixed-dose combination therapy with the polypill to halve the risk of major cardiovascular diseases in a population-level intervention. This finding supports the polypill as a safe and effective strategy for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases, particularly in settings where access to individual medications and consistent medical supervision might be limited.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Navigate Complex Conditions with IntelliDoctor
IntelliDoctor is your ally in understanding and managing a wide range of diseases. Our AI-assisted tool provides up-to-date, evidence-based information, helping you to make informed decisions about patient care.
- Comprehensive Disease Insights: Deep dive into condition-specific knowledge.
- Evidence-Based: Access the most current research and guidelines.
- Free Access: Available in all languages, free for a limited time.
Master disease management with IntelliDoctor. Explore now at IntelliDoctor.ai.
Crossover RCT | Using one-size cuff results in major inaccuracy in BP readings across varying arm sizes
11 Aug, 2023 | 15:41h | UTCEffects of Cuff Size on the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Readings: The Cuff(SZ) Randomized Crossover Trial – JAMA Internal Medicine (free for a limited period)
Commentaries:
When it comes to blood pressure cuffs, size matters – MedicalResearch.com
One-size-fits-all blood pressure cuffs ‘strikingly inaccurate,’ study says – CNN
Related:
Commentary on Twitter
Using a regular blood pressure (BP) cuff regardless of individual’s arm size resulted in 3.6 mmHg lower systolic BP when a regular cuff was one size too-large, and 4.8 and 19.5 mmHg higher when a regular cuff was one and two sizes too small. https://t.co/ZKnGfWc9fy
— JAMA Internal Medicine (@JAMAInternalMed) August 7, 2023
Presented at ASRS Meeting | Studies link GLP-1 agonists to progression of diabetic retinopathy
11 Aug, 2023 | 15:38h | UTCStudies link GLP-1 agonists to progression of diabetic retinopathy – MDedge
[News Release] RCT | Semaglutide 2.4 mg reduces cardiovascular risk by 20% in adults with CVD & obesity
9 Aug, 2023 | 15:40h | UTCCommentaries:
SELECT: Semaglutide Cuts CV Events in Adults With Overweight or Obesity – TCTMD
Perspective | Creation and adoption of large language models in medicine
9 Aug, 2023 | 15:38h | UTCCreation and Adoption of Large Language Models in Medicine – JAMA (free for a limited period)
Commentary: Rethinking large language models in medicine – Stanford Medicine
Perspective | An AI-enhanced electronic health record could boost primary care productivity
9 Aug, 2023 | 15:36h | UTCAn AI-Enhanced Electronic Health Record Could Boost Primary Care Productivity – JAMA (free for a limited period)