Cardiac Critical Care
2025 ACC/AHA/ Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
3 Mar, 2025 | 18:02h | UTCIntroduction:
This summary highlights the key points from the 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Clinical Practice Guideline on the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). It covers both ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non–ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS), emphasizing timely diagnosis, reperfusion strategies, risk stratification, and secondary prevention. The primary aim is to help clinicians provide evidence-based and up-to-date care to reduce mortality, complications, and long-term adverse outcomes in patients with ACS.
Key Recommendations:
-
Early and Accurate Diagnosis
- Obtain and interpret a 12-lead ECG within 10 minutes of first medical contact in suspected ACS.
- Use high-sensitivity troponin testing to accelerate ruling in/out myocardial infarction.
-
Reperfusion in STEMI
- Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the preferred strategy if it can be performed within 90 minutes (or 120 minutes for transfers).
- In patients with anticipated long delays, fibrinolytic therapy is recommended if there are no contraindications and the patient presents within 12 hours of symptom onset.
-
Routine Invasive vs. Selective Invasive Strategy in NSTE-ACS
- Patients at intermediate or high ischemic risk benefit from an invasive strategy during hospitalization.
- Low-risk patients may undergo a selective invasive approach, incorporating noninvasive testing to guide the need for angiography.
-
Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Management
- For hemodynamically stable STEMI patients with nonculprit lesions, complete revascularization (either during the index procedure or staged) lowers future events.
- In NSTE-ACS, complete revascularization decisions (PCI vs. CABG) depend on anatomical complexity and comorbidities.
-
Antithrombotic Therapy
- Initiate dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel preferred over clopidogrel for most) for at least 12 months in patients without high bleeding risk.
- To reduce bleeding risk in patients with ACS several strategies are available:
a) in patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding, a proton pump inhibitor is recommended;
b) in patients who have tolerated dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor, transition to ticagrelor monotherapy is recommended ≥1 month after PCI;
c) in patients who require long-term anticoagulation, aspirin discontinuation is recommended 1 to 4 weeks after PCI with continued use of a P2Y12 inhibitor (preferably clopidogrel).
-
Parenteral Anticoagulation
- All ACS patients should receive an anticoagulant (e.g., unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, bivalirudin) depending on the clinical scenario and planned strategy (PCI, CABG, or medical management).
-
Lipid Management
- High-intensity statin therapy is recommended in all ACS patients.
- Add a nonstatin agent (e.g., ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitor) if LDL cholesterol remains ≥70 mg/dL on maximally tolerated statin.
-
Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock
- In acute MI with cardiogenic shock, immediate revascularization of the culprit lesion is indicated.
- Selected patients with STEMI-related cardiogenic shock may benefit from a short-term microaxial flow pump if they fit specific criteria; close attention to vascular complications and renal failure is required.
-
In-Hospital Care and Complications
- Use telemetry for rhythm monitoring in unstable patients and evaluate left ventricular ejection fraction prior to discharge.
- Mechanical complications (e.g., ventricular septal rupture) require rapid surgical consultation; short-term mechanical circulatory support devices may be a bridge to surgery.
-
Secondary Prevention and Discharge
- Refer all patients to a cardiac rehabilitation program to reduce rehospitalizations and improve functional status. A home-based program is acceptable when center-based options are not feasible.
- Repeat lipid panel 4 to 8 weeks postdischarge to confirm adequate LDL-lowering.
- Annual influenza vaccination is recommended to reduce cardiovascular events and mortality.
- Consider low-dose colchicine in certain post-ACS patients to reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic events if there are no contraindications.
- Based on one trial, red blood cell transfusion to maintain hemoglobin of 10 g/dL may be reasonable in patients with ACS and acute or chronic anemia who are not actively bleeding.
Conclusion:
Adherence to these recommendations can significantly improve in-hospital and postdischarge outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndromes. By focusing on rapid identification, prompt reperfusion, tailored antithrombotic therapies, aggressive risk factor modification, and ongoing follow-up (including cardiac rehabilitation), clinicians can lower morbidity, mortality, and readmissions. The guideline also underscores the need to balance bleeding and ischemic risks, use high-intensity lipid-lowering strategies, and provide a structured discharge plan for long-term secondary prevention.
Reference:
Rao SV, O’Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. In Press, Corrected Proof. Available online 27 February 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.009
Review: Type 2 Myocardial Infarction
29 Jan, 2025 | 10:00h | UTCIntroduction: Type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) is defined by an imbalance in myocardial oxygen supply and demand without atherothrombosis, though it may involve non-atherothrombotic coronary pathologies (e.g., coronary embolism, vasospasm, spontaneous dissection). Challenges in diagnosis and treatment arise from its heterogeneous aetiologies (e.g., sepsis, hypoxia, arrhythmias, or coronary emboli) and frequent overlap with underlying coronary artery disease (CAD). No approaches to investigation or treatments have yet been shown to definitively improve outcomes, and most recommendations remain theoretical strategies in need of validation.
Key Recommendations:
- Identify and Correct Underlying Triggers:
- Recognize that Type 2 MI often occurs in the context of acute illness (e.g., sepsis, hypoxia, anemia, or tachyarrhythmias).
- Address precipitating factors (e.g., treat infection, restore blood pressure, correct anemia) to reduce further myocardial ischemia.
- Distinguish from Type 1 MI When Uncertain:
- Use intracoronary imaging (OCT/IVUS) primarily to exclude plaque rupture or thrombosis if clinically indicated, especially when symptoms and ECG changes persist, recognizing that its utility in routine practice for Type 2 MI is not yet proven.
- Carefully re-evaluate patients who remain unstable or have recurrent symptoms after correction of potential triggers, as up to 5% of cases may be reclassified as Type 1 MI.
- Risk Stratification and Etiology-Specific Prognosis:
- Evaluate the likelihood of obstructive coronary artery disease, which is present in ~68% of Type 2 MI cases (e.g., DEMAND-MI study), particularly in older patients or those with risk factors.
- Perform echocardiography to identify left ventricular dysfunction or valvular abnormalities.
- Recognize that patients with Type 2 MI due to hypoxia or anemia have approximately double the 1-year mortality risk compared to those with tachyarrhythmia-triggered events.
- Note that cardiovascular event rates can be similar to those in Type 1 MI, suggesting that future risk is at least as high.
- Consider Secondary Prevention in the Context of Limited Evidence:
- If coronary atherosclerosis is confirmed, single antiplatelet therapy and high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy may be considered; however, there are no dedicated trials validating these approaches exclusively in Type 2 MI.
- For patients with confirmed left ventricular dysfunction and signs of heart failure, adapt guideline-directed medical therapy carefully, paying close attention to hemodynamic stability.
- Monitor Long-Term Outcomes and Address Comorbidities:
- Recognize that patients with Type 2 MI have poor overall prognosis and high rates of non-cardiovascular mortality, yet they also face substantial cardiovascular risk.
- Manage chronic comorbidities aggressively (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia) to minimize recurrent ischemic events.
- Follow up with echocardiographic or other imaging evaluations where indicated, particularly for patients whose clinical course suggests underlying structural disease.
Conclusion:
Type 2 MI presents significant challenges due to its heterogeneous subtypes (e.g., coronary embolism, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, systemic hypoxia) and frequent diagnostic reclassification. While evidence-based guidance remains limited and no proven interventions have definitively improved outcomes, thorough clinical assessment, targeted imaging to rule out Type 1 MI, and individualized management of comorbidities can potentially improve patient care in this complex condition.
Reference:
Chapman AR, Taggart C, Boeddinghaus J, Mills NL, Fox KAA. Type 2 myocardial infarction: challenges in diagnosis and treatment. European Heart Journal. Published 10 December 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae803
RCT: High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Noninferior to Noninvasive Ventilation for Most Acute Respiratory Failure Causes
13 Jan, 2025 | 13:11h | UTCBackground: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) arises from diverse etiologies and can manifest as hypoxemic or hypercapnic events. High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) are common noninvasive respiratory support modalities, but robust comparative data in various ARF subgroups have been limited. Prior research suggests NIV may benefit chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations and acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE), yet for hypoxemic failure (including COVID-19 and immunocompromised populations), HFNO is often favored for its comfort and physiological advantages. The RENOVATE trial was designed to assess whether HFNO is noninferior to NIV for preventing intubation or death among five distinct groups of patients with ARF.
Objective: To determine if HFNO is noninferior to NIV in terms of the composite outcome of endotracheal intubation or death within seven days in patients with ARF, categorized into five subgroups: (1) nonimmunocompromised with hypoxemic ARF, (2) immunocompromised with hypoxemic ARF, (3) COPD exacerbation with respiratory acidosis, (4) ACPE, and (5) hypoxemic COVID-19.
Methods: This multicenter, adaptive, noninferiority randomized clinical trial enrolled 1800 hospitalized adults across 33 Brazilian centers. Patients were stratified by ARF etiology and randomized 1:1 to receive either HFNO or NIV. Treatment protocols allowed HFNO escalation to NIV (particularly for COPD or ACPE) if needed. The primary outcome was defined using a Bayesian hierarchical model with dynamic borrowing across subgroups; noninferiority was met if the posterior probability for an odds ratio (OR) below 1.55 reached ≥0.992. Predefined futility and superiority thresholds guided interim analyses, with a maximum sample size of 2000.
Results: Of 1800 randomized patients, 1766 completed the study (mean age 64 years; 40% women). The primary outcome (intubation or death by day 7) occurred in 39.0% (HFNO) vs 38.1% (NIV). HFNO was noninferior in four subgroups:
- Nonimmunocompromised with hypoxemia: 32.5% vs 33.1% (OR 1.02; posterior probability of noninferiority 0.999).
- COPD exacerbation with respiratory acidosis: 28.6% vs 26.2% (OR 1.05; probability 0.992).
- ACPE: 10.3% vs 21.3% (OR 0.97; probability 0.997).
- Hypoxemic COVID-19: 51.3% vs 47.0% (OR 1.13; probability 0.997).
The immunocompromised subgroup stopped enrollment early for futility; final results there did not confirm noninferiority (57.1% vs 36.4%; OR 1.07; probability 0.989). No significant differences in 28- or 90-day mortality emerged, although mortality rates were generally higher than in some previous trials. Comfort scores favored HFNO, and rates of serious adverse events were similar between groups.
Conclusions: In four of five ARF subgroups, HFNO met predefined noninferiority criteria compared with NIV regarding endotracheal intubation or death at seven days. However, immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic ARF remain an area of uncertainty, as do smaller subgroups (e.g., COPD) under non-borrowing analyses. Clinicians may consider HFNO as an alternative initial approach, recognizing that rescue NIV may still be necessary, particularly in COPD exacerbations.
Implications for Practice: These findings support using HFNO for a broad range of ARF etiologies as a first-line therapy. HFNO’s ease of use, patient comfort, and comparable safety profile may make it especially appealing. Nevertheless, clinicians should remain vigilant in immunocompromised patients and in COPD exacerbations when hypercapnia is pronounced. Potential cost variations between HFNO and NIV may influence real-world adoption, and local resources, staff expertise, and patient tolerance should guide final decisions.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include a large, diverse sample and a robust Bayesian adaptive design that allowed dynamic borrowing across subgroups. This approach increased precision but also introduced heterogeneity concerns. Some patient groups (particularly immunocompromised and COPD) were relatively small, limiting definitive conclusions in those strata. Additionally, early stopping for futility in immunocompromised patients curtailed full enrollment, and the trial compared HFNO only with face-mask NIV (rather than alternatives such as helmet CPAP).
Future Research: Further large-scale studies should refine whether HFNO can supplant NIV in COPD exacerbations and immunocompromised populations. Investigations on cost-effectiveness, patient-centered outcomes (comfort, quality of life), and comparative models (e.g., helmet NIV) are also warranted.
Reference:
• RENOVATE Investigators and the BRICNet Authors. High-Flow Nasal Oxygen vs Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: The RENOVATE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. Published online December 10, 2024. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.26244
• Frat JP, Le Pape S, Thille AW. Editorial: Is High-Flow Oxygen the Standard for All Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure? JAMA. Published online December 10, 2024. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.25906
• Freund Y, Vromant A. Editorial: Reevaluating Respiratory Support in Acute Respiratory Failure—Insights From the RENOVATE Trial and Implications for Practice. JAMA. Published online December 10, 2024. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.25869
RCT: 7-Day Antibiotic Therapy Noninferior to 14-Day for Bloodstream Infections
20 Nov, 2024 | 18:19h | UTCBackground: Bloodstream infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early and appropriate antibiotic therapy is essential, but the optimal duration remains uncertain. Prolonged antibiotic use can lead to adverse events, Clostridioides difficile infection, antimicrobial resistance, and increased healthcare costs.
Objective: To determine whether a 7-day course of antibiotic treatment is noninferior to a 14-day course in hospitalized patients with bloodstream infections regarding 90-day all-cause mortality.
Methods: In this multicenter, noninferiority randomized controlled trial, 3,608 hospitalized patients from 74 hospitals in seven countries were enrolled. Eligible patients had bloodstream infections but were excluded if they had severe immunosuppression, infections requiring prolonged therapy, possible contaminants, or Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Participants were randomized to receive either 7 days (n=1,814) or 14 days (n=1,794) of adequate antibiotic therapy, with antibiotic selection at the clinicians’ discretion. The primary outcome was death from any cause by 90 days post-diagnosis, with a noninferiority margin of 4 percentage points.
Results: At 90 days, mortality was 14.5% in the 7-day group and 16.1% in the 14-day group (difference: –1.6 percentage points; 95.7% CI, –4.0 to 0.8), demonstrating noninferiority of the shorter duration. Noninferiority was confirmed in per-protocol and modified intention-to-treat analyses. Secondary outcomes, including relapse rates, adverse events, and hospital length of stay, were similar between groups. Findings were consistent across subgroups based on infection source, pathogen type, and patient characteristics.
Conclusions: A 7-day antibiotic regimen is noninferior to a 14-day regimen for treating hospitalized patients with bloodstream infections, without increasing mortality or relapse rates.
Implications for Practice: Implementing a 7-day antibiotic course could reduce antibiotic exposure, minimize adverse events, and potentially limit antimicrobial resistance development. Clinicians should consider individual patient factors, such as infection severity and comorbidities, before universally adopting shorter treatment durations.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include a large, diverse patient population and inclusion of critically ill patients, enhancing generalizability. Limitations involve the open-label design and nonadherence to assigned durations in some cases (23.1% in the 7-day group continued antibiotics longer). Exclusion of S. aureus bacteremia limits applicability to that subgroup. The study may not have been powered to detect differences in rare adverse outcomes like C. difficile infection or antimicrobial resistance emergence.
Future Research: Further studies should explore the efficacy of even shorter antibiotic durations, individualized treatment strategies based on patient response, and the long-term impact on antimicrobial resistance and healthcare costs.
RCT: Colchicine Does Not Reduce Cardiovascular Events After Myocardial Infarction
20 Nov, 2024 | 18:12h | UTCBackground: Inflammation is a key contributor to atherosclerosis and adverse cardiovascular events. Previous trials have suggested that anti-inflammatory agents like colchicine may reduce cardiovascular risks in patients with coronary artery disease.
Objective: To evaluate whether colchicine reduces the incidence of major cardiovascular events when initiated soon after a myocardial infarction.
Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, 7,062 patients who experienced a myocardial infarction were assigned to receive colchicine (0.5 mg daily) or placebo, and spironolactone or placebo. The colchicine results are reported here. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization. Median follow-up was 3 years.
Results: A primary outcome event occurred in 9.1% of patients in the colchicine group and 9.3% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.16; P=0.93). Individual components of the primary outcome were similar between groups. Colchicine significantly reduced C-reactive protein levels at 3 months (adjusted mean difference of –1.28 mg/L; 95% CI, –1.81 to –0.75). Diarrhea was more frequent with colchicine (10.2% vs. 6.6%; P<0.001), but serious infections did not differ significantly.
Conclusions: Among patients post-myocardial infarction, colchicine did not reduce the incidence of major cardiovascular events over a median of 3 years compared to placebo.
Implications for Practice: These findings suggest that initiating colchicine after myocardial infarction may not provide additional cardiovascular benefits. Clinicians should weigh the lack of efficacy and potential gastrointestinal side effects when considering colchicine for secondary prevention in this population.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include a large sample size and extended follow-up. Limitations involve a higher-than-expected discontinuation rate and underrepresentation of women and diverse populations. The predominance of STEMI patients may limit applicability to NSTEMI cases.
Future Research: Further studies are needed to identify if specific subgroups might benefit from colchicine or if different dosing strategies could be more effective in reducing cardiovascular events post-myocardial infarction.
RCT: Routine Spironolactone Post-MI Does Not Reduce Cardiovascular Events
20 Nov, 2024 | 18:03h | UTCBackground: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), such as spironolactone, have demonstrated mortality benefits in patients with heart failure following myocardial infarction (MI). However, the efficacy of routine spironolactone use in all patients post-MI, regardless of heart failure status, remains uncertain.
Objective: To evaluate whether routine administration of spironolactone reduces cardiovascular events in patients after MI who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods: In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, 7,062 patients with MI undergoing PCI were randomized to receive spironolactone (25 mg daily) or placebo, and colchicine or placebo. The two primary outcomes were: (1) a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure, assessed as the total number of events; and (2) a composite of the first occurrence of MI, stroke, new or worsening heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Median follow-up was 3 years.
Results: No significant differences were observed between the spironolactone and placebo groups in the primary outcomes. For the first primary outcome, there were 183 events (1.7 per 100 patient-years) in the spironolactone group versus 220 events (2.1 per 100 patient-years) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] adjusted for competing risk, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69–1.21; P=0.51). For the second primary outcome, events occurred in 280 patients (7.9%) in the spironolactone group and 294 patients (8.3%) in the placebo group (HR adjusted for competing risk, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81–1.13; P=0.60). Serious adverse events were similar between groups.
Conclusions: Routine use of spironolactone after MI did not reduce cardiovascular mortality or new or worsening heart failure compared to placebo.
Implications for Practice: These findings suggest that routine prescription of spironolactone for all patients after MI may not be beneficial and should be reconsidered. Clinicians should carefully evaluate the indication for MRAs post-MI, particularly in patients without heart failure, and remain cautious about routine use without clear evidence of benefit.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of the study include its large sample size, multicenter international design, and long follow-up period, enhancing the generalizability of the findings. However, limitations include lower-than-expected event rates, potentially reducing statistical power to detect significant differences. The high rate of discontinuation of the trial regimen and underrepresentation of women and certain racial and ethnic groups may also limit the applicability of the results. Additionally, the possibility of a type II error due to reduced power cannot be excluded.
Future Research: Further studies are warranted to identify specific subgroups of patients who may benefit from spironolactone post-MI and to explore alternative therapies that effectively reduce cardiovascular events after MI.
Meta-Analysis: Moderately Rapid Sodium Correction Linked to Better Outcomes in Severe Hyponatremia
20 Nov, 2024 | 16:10h | UTCBackground: Severe hyponatremia is a critical condition that can lead to hyponatremic encephalopathy, necessitating prompt treatment to prevent neurological damage or death. Traditional guidelines recommend limiting sodium correction rates to prevent osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS). However, emerging evidence suggests that slower correction rates may be associated with increased mortality.
Objective: To evaluate the association between sodium correction rates and mortality among hospitalized adults with severe hyponatremia.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 16 cohort studies published between January 2013 and October 2023, involving 11,811 hospitalized adults with severe hyponatremia (serum sodium <120 mEq/L or <125 mEq/L with severe symptoms). Patients were categorized based on sodium correction rates: rapid (≥8-10 mEq/L per 24 hours), slow (<8 or 6-10 mEq/L per 24 hours), and very slow (<4-6 mEq/L per 24 hours). Primary outcomes were in-hospital and 30-day mortality; secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and incidence of ODS.
Results: Rapid correction was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality compared to slow correction (odds ratio [OR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.82) and very slow correction (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.79), corresponding to 32 and 221 fewer deaths per 1,000 patients, respectively. At 30 days, rapid correction was associated with 61 and 134 fewer deaths per 1,000 patients compared to slow and very slow correction, respectively. Rapid correction also resulted in shorter hospital LOS by 1.20 days (95% CI, 0.51-1.89) compared to slow correction and 3.09 days (95% CI, 1.21-4.94) compared to very slow correction. There was no statistically significant increase in ODS risk with rapid correction.
Conclusions: In hospitalized adults with severe hyponatremia, rapid sodium correction was associated with reduced mortality and shorter hospital stays without a significant increase in ODS risk.
Implications for Practice: These findings suggest that more aggressive sodium correction may benefit patients with severe hyponatremia, challenging current guidelines that recommend slower correction rates to prevent ODS. Clinicians should weigh the potential benefits of rapid correction against the traditionally emphasized risks, although caution is still warranted given the seriousness of ODS.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include a large sample size and inclusion of recent studies reflecting current practices. Limitations involve the observational nature of included studies, potential confounding factors, heterogeneity in correction rate definitions, and possible underreporting of ODS due to its rarity and diagnostic challenges.
Future Research: Randomized controlled trials are needed to establish causality and optimal correction rates, as well as to identify patient subgroups that may benefit most from rapid correction while minimizing ODS risk.
Cohort Study: Late Ventricular Arrhythmias After Primary PCI for STEMI Are Rare but Increase Mortality
5 Nov, 2024 | 15:24h | UTCBackground: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) are critical complications following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). While early VT/VF typically occurs before or shortly after reperfusion, contemporary data on the incidence of late VT/VF post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited. Understanding the risk of late VT/VF is essential for optimizing in-hospital monitoring and discharge timing.
Objective: To assess the risk of late VT and VF after primary PCI in patients with STEMI, identify associated factors, and evaluate their impact on in-hospital mortality.
Methods: This cohort study analyzed data from 174,126 adults with STEMI treated with primary PCI between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Chest Pain–MI Registry. Late VT/VF was defined as events occurring one or more days after PCI. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify factors associated with late VT/VF and its association with in-hospital mortality.
Results: Among the patients, 8.9% experienced VT or VF after primary PCI. Late VT/VF occurred in 2.4% of patients overall and 1.7% of those with uncomplicated STEMI. Late VT/VF associated with cardiac arrest was rare, occurring in 0.4% of all patients and 0.1% of patients with uncomplicated STEMI. Decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was the most significant factor associated with late VT/VF with cardiac arrest (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] for every 5-unit decrease ≤40%: 1.67; 95% CI, 1.54–1.85). Late VT/VF was linked to increased odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR, 6.40; 95% CI, 5.63–7.29).
Conclusions: Late VT/VF after primary PCI for STEMI is infrequent, particularly in patients with uncomplicated presentations. However, when late VT/VF occurs, it is associated with a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality.
Implications for Practice: While vigilant monitoring remains crucial, patients with uncomplicated STEMI may be candidates for earlier discharge through shared decision-making. Identifying high-risk patients for late VT/VF can enable tailored monitoring strategies to improve outcomes.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include a large, contemporary cohort and detailed data on in-hospital VT/VF events. Limitations involve the observational design, potential unmeasured confounders, and the inability to differentiate between VT and VF due to registry definitions.
Future Research: Further studies are warranted to develop precise risk prediction models for late VT/VF and to explore effective out-of-hospital monitoring strategies post-STEMI.
Meta-analysis: Perioperative Colchicine Reduced Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After CABG
18 Sep, 2024 | 13:33h | UTCBackground: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Inflammation is a key factor in the development and progression of CAD, and anti-inflammatory therapies have shown potential in improving cardiovascular outcomes. Colchicine, traditionally used to treat gout, has demonstrated efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with chronic CAD. Previous individual studies have suggested that perioperative colchicine may decrease the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but a comprehensive analysis is needed to confirm these findings.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of perioperative colchicine administration on the incidence of POAF in patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods: A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library to identify RCTs comparing perioperative colchicine administration with standard care in patients undergoing CABG. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies involving isolated CABG patients randomized to receive colchicine or standard care without colchicine. The primary outcome was the incidence of POAF during short-term follow-up.
Results: Five RCTs published between 2014 and 2022 met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 839 patients undergoing isolated CABG. Perioperative colchicine administration was associated with a significant reduction in POAF rates compared to standard care (relative risk [RR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40–0.73; p < 0.01). Other outcomes, such as graft patency, myocardial infarction, or long-term mortality, were not uniformly reported and, therefore, not analyzed.
Conclusions: Perioperative administration of colchicine is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of POAF in patients undergoing CABG surgery.
Implications for Practice: Colchicine may be considered as a prophylactic strategy to reduce POAF in patients undergoing CABG, potentially improving both short- and long-term outcomes. Given the association of POAF with increased perioperative morbidity and long-term adverse events, implementing colchicine could have substantial clinical benefits in this high-risk population.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of this meta-analysis include the exclusive inclusion of randomized controlled trials and the use of rigorous statistical methods, including sensitivity analysis, which confirmed the robustness of the results. Limitations involve the small number of studies (five RCTs), potential variability in colchicine dosing regimens, and the lack of data on other clinically relevant outcomes.
Future Research: Large-scale, multicenter RCTs are warranted to further assess the effects of colchicine on other important outcomes in CABG patients, such as graft patency, myocardial infarction rates, and long-term mortality. Future studies should also evaluate the risk-benefit profile of colchicine in this patient population to establish its full role in clinical practice.
Reference: Kirov H., Caldonazo T., Runkel A., et al. (2024). Colchicine in Patients with Coronary Disease Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery – A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. The American Journal of Cardiology. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.09.003
Review: Prevention and Management of Device-Associated Complications in the Intensive Care Unit – The BMJ
17 Aug, 2024 | 20:04h | UTCIntroduction:
This review article, published by experts from the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, focuses on the complications associated with invasive devices commonly used in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). While these devices are essential for managing critically ill patients, they also pose significant risks, necessitating a thorough understanding of their potential complications and strategies for prevention and management.
Key Points:
1 – Central Venous Catheters (CVCs):
– CVCs are widely used in ICU patients but carry risks like vascular injury, pneumothorax, thrombosis, and infection.
– Use of real-time ultrasound guidance and careful operator technique are crucial for minimizing these risks.
– Prompt removal of unnecessary CVCs is essential to reduce the risk of complications.
2 – Arterial Catheters:
– Commonly used for hemodynamic monitoring, these catheters can lead to complications such as vascular occlusion, nerve injury, and infection.
– Ultrasound guidance is recommended to reduce the risk of complications, and catheters should be discontinued as soon as clinically feasible.
3 – Airway Devices (Endotracheal Tubes and Tracheostomies):
– Complications include laryngeal injury, tracheal stenosis, and tracheomalacia.
– Strategies to reduce these risks include minimizing intubation attempts, ensuring proper tube placement, and managing cuff pressures carefully.
4 – Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO):
– ECMO is associated with significant complications, including bleeding, thromboembolic events, and neurologic injuries.
– Proper cannulation technique and vigilant monitoring are essential to mitigate these risks.
5 – Infection Control:
– Strict adherence to aseptic techniques and the use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings are recommended to prevent device-associated infections.
Conclusion:
This review underscores the importance of judicious use and timely removal of invasive devices in the ICU to minimize complications. Healthcare professionals must remain vigilant and employ best practices to prevent and manage these complications effectively.
Study: Novel Point-of-Care hs-cTnI Test Shows High Diagnostic Accuracy and Predictive Values for Myocardial Infarction – J Am Coll Cardiol
17 Aug, 2024 | 19:00h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This international, multicenter diagnostic study assessed the clinical and analytical performance of the new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI)-SPINCHIP point-of-care (POC) test. The study involved 1,102 adult patients presenting with acute chest discomfort in emergency departments, with myocardial infarction (MI) diagnoses adjudicated by two independent cardiologists.
Main Findings: The hs-cTnI-SPINCHIP test exhibited strong diagnostic accuracy with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.94, similar to established central laboratory assays. The 0/1-hour algorithm of the test identified 51% of patients as low risk for MI with a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%, while it confirmed MI in 27% of patients with a specificity of 90.9% and a positive predictive value of 72.9%. Consistency was observed across different sample types.
Implications for Practice: The SPINCHIP hs-cTnI POC test provides a rapid and accurate option for diagnosing MI in emergency settings, aiding quicker decision-making for ruling out or confirming MI.
New AHA Guidelines for Managing Elevated Blood Pressure in Acute Care Settings – Hypertension
13 Aug, 2024 | 13:13h | UTCIntroduction:
The American Heart Association (AHA) has released a scientific statement focusing on the management of elevated blood pressure (BP) in acute care settings. This guideline addresses the significant variation in practice due to a lack of robust evidence for managing BP in such environments, particularly in emergencies or when elevated BP is asymptomatic.
Key Points:
1 – Classification of Elevated BP: Elevated BP in acute care settings is categorized into asymptomatic elevated BP and hypertensive emergency, the latter requiring immediate treatment due to acute target-organ damage.
2 – Hypertensive Emergency: Immediate treatment is necessary for patients with BP >180/110–120 mm Hg and evidence of new or worsening target-organ damage, typically using intravenous antihypertensive medications in a closely monitored environment.
3 – Asymptomatic Elevated BP: In cases where elevated BP is present without symptoms or target-organ damage, the use of antihypertensive medications should be approached cautiously. Recent studies suggest potential harm from aggressive treatment, highlighting the importance of verifying BP readings and identifying reversible causes before intervention.
4 – Proper BP Measurement: Accurate BP measurement is crucial. The guidelines stress using recently calibrated devices and following correct measurement techniques to avoid unnecessary treatment due to erroneous readings.
5 – PRN Orders: The use of “as needed” (PRN) antihypertensive medications for asymptomatic elevated BP is discouraged due to the risks of overtreatment and variability in BP control, which can lead to adverse outcomes.
6 – Treatment Thresholds: The guidelines recommend a high threshold for initiating or intensifying antihypertensive treatment in asymptomatic patients, emphasizing the need for repeated measurements and assessment of underlying causes.
7 – Post-Discharge Care: It is crucial to maintain prehospital antihypertensive regimens and avoid intensification at discharge unless clearly indicated. Effective care coordination and patient education are vital for successful transitions from hospital to home care.
Conclusion:
These guidelines represent a significant step toward standardizing BP management in acute care settings. By focusing on accurate measurement, cautious treatment of asymptomatic elevated BP, and proper follow-up, clinicians can reduce unnecessary interventions and improve patient outcomes.
Guideline Reference: Bress, A.P., et al. (2024). “The Management of Elevated Blood Pressure in the Acute Care Setting: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association.” Hypertension, 81–e106.
RCT: Intravenous Amino Acids Reduce AKI Incidence in Cardiac Surgery Patients – N Engl J Med
3 Aug, 2024 | 19:12h | UTCStudy Design and Population: In this multinational, double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 3511 adult patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were recruited from 22 centers across three countries. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of either a balanced mixture of amino acids (2 g/kg/day) or a placebo (Ringer’s solution) for up to three days.
Main Findings: The primary outcome, occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI), was significantly lower in the amino acid group (26.9%) compared to the placebo group (31.7%) with a relative risk of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.94; P=0.002). The incidence of severe AKI (stage 3) was also reduced in the amino acid group (1.6% vs. 3.0%; relative risk, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.87). There were no substantial differences between the groups regarding secondary outcomes such as the use and duration of kidney-replacement therapy or all-cause 30-day mortality.
Implications for Practice: The infusion of amino acids in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery appears to reduce the incidence of AKI, indicating a potential protective renal effect. However, this intervention did not significantly impact other secondary outcomes, including mortality and the use of kidney-replacement therapy. These findings suggest that amino acids could be considered as a strategy to mitigate AKI risk in this patient population, although further research is needed to explore long-term benefits and other clinical outcomes.
Meta-Analysis: Effects of extracorporeal CO2 removal on gas exchange and ventilator settings in critically ill adults – Crit Care
27 May, 2024 | 20:28h | UTCSummary: Study Design and Population: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 49 studies (3 RCTs, 46 observational studies) involving 1672 critically ill adults undergoing extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) for respiratory failure between January 2000 and March 2022.
Main Findings: ECCO2R significantly reduced PaCO2, plateau pressure, and tidal volume, while increasing pH across all patient groups. Adverse event rate was 19%. The three RCTs did not show mortality benefits but indicated longer ICU and hospital stays.
Implications for Practice: ECCO2R improves gas exchange and reduces ventilation invasiveness, especially in ARDS and lung transplant patients. However, due to the lack of mortality benefits and increased adverse events, further studies are needed to identify patient groups that could benefit most from ECCO2R.
Reference (link to free full-text):
Guidelines on the use of intravenous albumin in various clinical settings – CHEST
25 May, 2024 | 18:49h | UTCThe International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines provides comprehensive guidelines on the use of intravenous albumin across various clinical settings, including critical care, cardiovascular surgery, kidney replacement therapy, and complications of cirrhosis. The guideline emphasizes that there are few evidence-based indications supporting the routine use of albumin to improve patient outcomes. Key findings include:
1 – Critical Care: Limited recommendations for using albumin in adult, pediatric, and neonatal critical care, primarily advising against its routine use for volume replacement or managing hypoalbuminemia due to low or very low certainty of evidence.
2 – Cardiovascular Surgery: No recommendations for using albumin to prime cardiovascular bypass circuits or for volume replacement due to moderate to very low certainty of evidence.
3 – Kidney Replacement Therapy: Albumin is not suggested for preventing or managing intradialytic hypotension or improving ultrafiltration due to very low certainty of evidence.
4 – Cirrhosis Complications: Some conditional recommendations for using albumin in specific scenarios like large-volume paracentesis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to low certainty of evidence; however, it is generally not suggested for other complications of cirrhosis.
Overall, the guidelines advise a cautious approach to albumin use, highlighting the need for more robust evidence to support its broader application in clinical practice.
Reference (link to free full-text):
Review: Acute and complicated inflammatory pericarditis – Mayo Clin Proc
6 May, 2024 | 18:03h | UTCThe article provides a comprehensive review of current approaches to the diagnosis and management of inflammatory pericardial disease, with a particular focus on acute and complicated cases of pericarditis. Here’s a summary tailored for a medical audience:
Key Points:
1 – Epidemiology and Presentation:
– Acute pericarditis is relatively common, particularly among younger populations.
– It can be effectively managed in most cases but poses a significant risk of recurrence and morbidity if not properly treated.
– Presentations can vary, with chest pain being a predominant symptom, which improves upon leaning forward and worsens in the supine position.
2 – Diagnostic Evaluation:
– Diagnosis hinges on a combination of clinical signs (e.g., chest pain, pericardial rub), ECG changes, imaging findings, and laboratory markers (elevated CRP and white blood cell count).
– Multimodality imaging plays a critical role in diagnosis and management, including echocardiography, CT, and MRI to evaluate pericardial effusion and inflammation.
3 – Management Strategies:
– The treatment landscape has evolved with the introduction of targeted anti-inflammatory therapies and a more systematic approach to care.
– Management includes NSAIDs as first-line therapy, colchicine to reduce recurrence rates, and corticosteroids for severe cases. Recent advancements include the use of interleukin-1 receptor blockers for complicated cases.
– Pericardiectomy may be considered in chronic or recurrent cases that are refractory to medical management.
4 – Future Directions:
– Ongoing research is directed at improving diagnostic accuracy through advanced imaging techniques and refining treatment protocols to minimize recurrence and manage complicated cases effectively.
– The integration of novel biological agents and personalized medicine approaches is anticipated to enhance outcomes for patients with pericardial disease.
This article emphasizes the importance of a protocol-driven approach to the initial care, the use of targeted therapeutics based on individual patient profiles, and the integration of care pathways to manage acute and complicated pericarditis effectively.
Reference (link to free full-text):
Malik, A. A., Lloyd, J. W., Anavekar, N. S., & Luis, S. A. (2024). Acute and Complicated Inflammatory Pericarditis: A Guide to Contemporary Practice. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 99(5), 795-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.01.012
RCT: Efficacy and safety of microaxial flow pump in STEMI-related cardiogenic shock
28 Apr, 2024 | 20:17h | UTCThis randomized clinical trial assessed the impact of a microaxial flow pump (Impella CP) on mortality in 355 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either the microaxial flow pump plus standard care or standard care alone. The primary outcome was mortality at 180 days. Results showed a significant reduction in death rates in the microaxial flow pump group (45.8%) compared to the standard care group (58.5%) with a hazard ratio of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.99; P=0.04). However, the incidence of severe adverse events was notably higher in the microaxial flow pump group, including severe bleeding and device-related complications.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Meta-Analysis: No mortality benefit of early vs. delayed/selective coronary angiography in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without ST-elevation
21 Mar, 2024 | 11:40h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This article presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials comparing early/immediate versus delayed/selective coronary angiography (CAG) in 1512 patients who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) without ST-segment elevation. The population had a mean age of 67 years, with 26% female and 23% having a prior myocardial infarction. Follow-up duration was at least 30 days across included studies.
Main Findings: The analysis revealed no significant difference in the odds of all-cause death between early/immediate and delayed/selective CAG strategies (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% CI 0.91–1.38). Similar results were found for the composite outcome of all-cause death or neurological deficit (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.89–1.36). Subgroup analysis showed no significant effect modification based on age, initial cardiac rhythm, history of coronary artery disease, the presumed ischemic cause of arrest, or time to return of spontaneous circulation. Interestingly, a trend toward increased odds of death was observed in women receiving early CAG compared to men, although this finding approached but did not reach statistical significance.
Implications for Practice: The findings suggest that for OHCA patients without ST-segment elevation, an early/immediate CAG strategy does not confer a mortality benefit over a delayed/selective approach across major subgroups. Notably, the potential for increased mortality risk in women with early CAG warrants further investigation. Clinicians should consider these results when deciding on the timing of CAG in this patient population, keeping in mind the overall lack of mortality benefit and the nuanced differences among subgroups.
Reference: Fardin Hamidi et al. (2023). Early versus delayed coronary angiography in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and no ST-segment elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 113(561–569). Access the study here: [Link]
Review | Cardiorenal syndrome in the hospital
7 Aug, 2023 | 14:36h | UTCCardiorenal Syndrome in the Hospital – Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Commentary on Twitter
The cardiorenal syndrome refers to a group of complex, bidirectional pathophysiological pathways involving dysfunction in both the heart and kidney. This Review focuses on the cardiorenal syndrome encountered in the hospital setting https://t.co/f05vpOPzCx pic.twitter.com/4Is5A2F1km
— CJASN (@CJASN) July 31, 2023
Registry Analysis | Takotsubo syndrome outcomes influenced by trigger type and patient characteristics
3 Aug, 2023 | 13:14h | UTCCommentary: Takotsubo Trigger Type Matters, With Physical Shocks Linked to Worse Outcomes – TCTMD
Case Report | Post-myocardial infarction free-wall rupture: rapid diagnosis and management
2 Aug, 2023 | 13:52h | UTCPost-Myocardial Infarction Free-Wall Rupture: Rapid Diagnosis and Management – JACC: Case Reports
Commentary on Twitter
Learn how to evaluate, diagnose and manage #cvMI wall rupture to improve survival in #JACCCaseReports' latest issue: https://t.co/aGPJ1rZ8eu#CardioTwitter #cvSurg #CathLab pic.twitter.com/bPTtJownNf
— JACC Journals (@JACCJournals) July 31, 2023
Consensus Paper | Diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis in adults
1 Aug, 2023 | 14:34h | UTC
Registry Analysis | Similar 1-year mortality rates post-TAVR in cardiogenic shock patients surviving 30-day mark
31 Jul, 2023 | 13:47h | UTC
Commentary on Twitter
Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with cardiogenic shock https://t.co/Ci1MIWVYuE @escardio #EHJ #ESCYoung @ehj_ed @rladeiraslopes pic.twitter.com/zwvFUT8lKt
— European Society of Cardiology Journals (@ESC_Journals) June 29, 2023
Review | Management of bleeding and hemolysis during percutaneous microaxial flow pump support
28 Jul, 2023 | 14:10h | UTC
Commentary on Twitter
Check out this practical guide for the management of bleeding/hemolysis with microaxial flow pump in #JACCINT's new state-of-the-art review: https://t.co/VSu31BPF5d#CardioTwitter @dirkwestermann @ABeneduceMD @MarioGramegnaMD pic.twitter.com/YuyinvWZ0L
— JACC Journals (@JACCJournals) July 26, 2023
Review | State of shock: contemporary vasopressor and inotrope use in cardiogenic shock
27 Jul, 2023 | 13:11h | UTC