Tech &amp; Innovation

The path forward for ChatGPT in academia – Lumo’s Newsletter

Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge – JAMA

Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature

ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature

Perspective | ChatGPT-assisted diagnosis: is the future suddenly here?

Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance

27 Feb, 2023 | 13:07h | UTC

Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance – Nature Reviews Urology (free for a limited period)

Commentary on Twitter

Artificial Intelligence will not replace academics, but academics who use AI will replace those who do not.
-We should discuss boundaries/ethical issues!@NatRevUrol @OncoAlert @Roei_Golan7 @AkhilMuthigi @ranjithramamd @VincentRK @VPrasadMDMPH #ChatGPT https://t.co/neAtxrRXI8 pic.twitter.com/gOpzbdg1mO

— Yüksel Ürün (@DrYukselUrun) February 26, 2023

Perspective | Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing

ChatGPT: Will It Transform the World of Health Care? – UCSF Department of Medicine

ChatGPT and the future of medical writing (ChatGPT itself wrote this paper)

The path forward for ChatGPT in academia – Lumo’s Newsletter

Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge – JAMA

Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature

ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature

Digital Health Interventions for Adult Patients With Cancer Evaluated in Randomized Controlled Trials: Scoping Review – Journal of Medical Internet Research

Digital health interventions for adult patients with cancer evaluated in randomized controlled trials: scoping review

16 Feb, 2023 | 14:45h | UTC

M-A | Cost-effectiveness of internet interventions compared with treatment as usual for people with mental disorders

16 Feb, 2023 | 14:43h | UTC

Cost-effectiveness of Internet Interventions Compared With Treatment as Usual for People With Mental Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials – Journal of Medical Internet Research

Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models

14 Feb, 2023 | 11:00h | UTC

Summary: The researchers evaluated the performance of ChatGPT, a large language-based AI, on the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE). The USMLE is a set of three standardized tests required for medical licensure in the US. The results showed that ChatGPT performed at or near the passing threshold (60%) on all three exams without specialized training or reinforcement. The AI also demonstrated a high level of concordance and insight in its explanations, suggesting that it may have potential to assist with medical education and potentially, clinical decision-making in the future. This marks a notable milestone in AI maturation and increased confidence in its trust and explainability.

(By ChatGPT, reviewed and edited)

Article: Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models – PLOS Digital Health

News Release: ChatGPT can (almost) pass the US Medical Licensing Exam – PLOS

Commentaries:

Expert reaction to study on ChatGPT almost passing the US Medical Licensing Exam – Science Media Centre

New and surprising evidence that ChatGPT can perform several intricate tasks relevant to handling complex medical and clinical information – News Medical

Commentary from one of the authors on Twitter (thread – click for more)

our work showing that ChatGPT passed the US Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) is published @PLOSDigiHealth!

there's tons of chatter about LLMs in healthcare.

AI is not going to replace doctors anytime soon, but here are the key takeaways from this work:

👉 https://t.co/OQs2Tlfwjx pic.twitter.com/v3UWjScLth

— Morgan Cheatham (@morgancheatham) February 13, 2023

Perspective | ChatGPT-assisted diagnosis: is the future suddenly here?

14 Feb, 2023 | 10:59h | UTC

Summary: The article discusses the potential of ChatGPT, a new AI chatbot, to revolutionize medical diagnosis. It compares ChatGPT’s performance with that of symptom checkers and physicians, finding that it performs better than symptom checkers and is approaching the accuracy of physicians. The article highlights the limitations of the study, including the small sample size and sensitivity of results to the way information is presented. It also acknowledges potential challenges with the use of AI in medical diagnosis, including the need for more rigorous testing, the issue of feeding patient information into an algorithm, and the possibility of AI algorithms being biased. Despite these challenges, the article suggests that the future of computer-assisted diagnosis is here and the healthcare system will need to address these challenges.

(By ChatGPT, reviewed and edited)

Source: ChatGPT-assisted diagnosis: Is the future suddenly here? – STAT

Perspective | Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing

14 Feb, 2023 | 10:58h | UTC

Summary: The article discusses the ethical challenges posed by the use of ChatGPT, an AI chatbot, in medical publishing. The authors note that the impact of generative AI on medical publishing is currently unknown, but it could have substantial ethical implications, including copyright, attribution, plagiarism, and authorship issues. The authors argue that there is a growing need for robust AI author guidelines in scholarly publishing, and that the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers has produced a white paper on AI ethics. They also raise concerns about the potential for ChatGPT to widen existing disparities in knowledge dissemination and scholarly publishing, as well as the potential for the chatbot to produce misleading or inaccurate content. The authors call on The Lancet Digital Health and the Lancet family to initiate discussions around the implications of AI-generated content within scholarly publishing and to create comprehensive guidance.

(By ChatGPT, reviewed and edited)

Article: Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing – The Lancet Digital Health

Development of a machine learning model for sonographic assessment of gestational age

14 Feb, 2023 | 10:30h | UTC

Development of a Machine Learning Model for Sonographic Assessment of Gestational Age – JAMA Network Open

Commentary: AI Models Have Higher Accuracy for Estimating Gestational Age – HealthDay

Video | ChatGPT: will it transform the world of health care?

13 Feb, 2023 | 12:55h | UTC

ChatGPT: Will It Transform the World of Health Care? – UCSF Department of Medicine

ChatGPT and the future of medical writing (ChatGPT itself wrote this paper)

The path forward for ChatGPT in academia – Lumo’s Newsletter

Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge – JAMA

Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature

ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature

AI Improves Nodule Detection on Chest Radiographs in a Health Screening Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial – Radiology

RCT | AI improves nodule detection on chest radiographs in a health screening population

10 Feb, 2023 | 13:55h | UTC

Editorial: AI Nodule Detection on Chest Radiographs Using Randomized Controlled Data: The Effect on Clinical Practice – Radiology

News Release: AI Improves Lung Nodule Detection on Chest X-Rays – RSNA News

Machine learning-based marker for coronary artery disease: derivation and validation in two longitudinal cohorts

8 Feb, 2023 | 12:14h | UTC

Machine learning-based marker for coronary artery disease: derivation and validation in two longitudinal cohorts – The Lancet (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

News Release: Digital marker for coronary artery disease built by researchers at Mount Sinai

Commentary: Machine learning used to generate a new holistic model for coronary artery disease – News Medical

Commentary from the author on Twitter (thread – click for more)

Christmas came early… my first paper of my postdoc is officially published @TheLancet!! https://t.co/pozEyRKkD0
This was a wild journey with the @DoGenetics lab to build a digital marker for heart disease using AI + electronic health records🫀🤖 Here's why:
1/🧵

— Iain S. Forrest, PhD (@IainSForrest) December 21, 2022

Evaluation of a 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel to prevent adverse drug reactions

7 Feb, 2023 | 14:13h | UTC

A 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel to prevent adverse drug reactions: an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised crossover implementation study – The Lancet (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

News Releases:

Matching medication to DNA leads to 30% fewer side effects – University of Liverpool

Genetic analysis can reduce adverse drug reactions by 30 per cent – Karolinska Institutet

Commentary from one of the authors on Twitter

A journey which started in 2016 has led to the publication of the #PREPARE study in @TheLancet today. In this #randomised study, we show that a 12-gene panel can reduce #adverse_effects by 30%. https://t.co/vj7gYzgxyf @CDSS_Liverpool @pandtuol pic.twitter.com/tjgFWDuTQf

— Munir Pirmohamed (@MPUoL) February 3, 2023

ChatGPT and the future of medical writing (ChatGPT itself wrote this paper)

6 Feb, 2023 | 13:31h | UTC

ChatGPT and the Future of Medical Writing – Radiology

Editorials:

ChatGPT Is Shaping the Future of Medical Writing but Still Requires Human Judgment – Radiology

ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models Are Double-edged Swords – Radiology

Commentaries:

AI program ChatGPT now has a published article in Radiology—is it any good? – Health Imaging

Peer-Reviewed Journal Publishes Paper Written Almost Entirely by ChatGPT— It required close editing, human co-author said – MedPage Today (free registration required)

The path forward for ChatGPT in academia – Lumo’s Newsletter

Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge – JAMA

Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature

ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature

ChatGPT: five priorities for research

6 Feb, 2023 | 13:30h | UTC

ChatGPT and the Future of Medical Writing – Radiology

Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge – JAMA

The path forward for ChatGPT in academia – Lumo’s Newsletter

Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature

ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature