Open access
Open access
Powered by Google Translator Translator

Oncology (all articles)

RCT | Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer

3 Apr, 2023 | 13:48h | UTC

Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Endometrial Cancer – New England Journal of Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

News Release: Adding Pembrolizumab to Standard Chemotherapy, Followed by Pembrolizumab Maintenance, Results in Longer PFS in Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer – ESMO

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


RCT | Dostarlimab for primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer

3 Apr, 2023 | 13:46h | UTC

Dostarlimab for Primary Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer – New England Journal of Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentary:

RUBY Trial: Dostarlimab Plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Advanced Endometrial Cancer – The ASCO Post

Dostarlimab Plus Chemotherapy Elicits PFS Benefit in Recurrent Endometrial Cancer – OncLive

 


Cohort Study | Long-term quality of life and functional outcome of patients with rectal cancer following a watch-and-wait approach

3 Apr, 2023 | 13:31h | UTC

Long-term Quality of Life and Functional Outcome of Patients With Rectal Cancer Following a Watch-and-Wait Approach – JAMA Surgery (free for a limited period)

Invited Commentary: Guiding Patients Through a “Watch-and-Wait” Approach for Rectal Cancer—Understanding the Functional Outcomes – JAMA Surgery (free for a limited period)

Related:

Cohort Study | A clinical calculator for rectal cancer can estimate recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy with or without surgery.

Guidelines for the surveillance and survivorship care of patients after curative treatment of colon and rectal cancer.

Study: Assessment of a Watch-and-Wait Strategy for Rectal Cancer in Patients With a Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy

Study suggests the intensity of active surveillance in patients with rectal cancer managed by a watch-and-wait approach could be reduced if they maintain a complete clinical response within the first 3 years

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


RCT | Comparing exemestane dose regimens in early-stage ER+ breast cancer

31 Mar, 2023 | 13:37h | UTC

Efficacy of Alternative Dose Regimens of Exemestane in Postmenopausal Women With Stage 0 to II Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Oncology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentary: Lower-Dose Regimens of Exemestane in Postmenopausal Patients With Stage 0 to II ER-Positive Breast Cancer – The ASCO Post

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


M-A | Impact of axillary lymph node dissection and sentinel lymph node biopsy on upper limb morbidity in breast cancer patients

31 Mar, 2023 | 13:30h | UTC

Impact of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Upper Limb Morbidity in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis – Annals of Surgery

 


Review | Management of immune related endocrinopathies following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer

31 Mar, 2023 | 13:23h | UTC

Diagnostic criteria and management recommendations for immune related endocrinopathies following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer – Endocrine Connections

Related:

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Endocrine Disorders: A Position Statement from the Korean Endocrine Society – Endocrinology and Metabolism

The Diagnosis and Management of Endocrine Side Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors – Deutsches Ärzteblatt International

Spectrum of immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced endocrinopathies in cancer patients: a scoping review of case reports – Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology

 


RCT | Ganitumab added to chemotherapy did not improve outcomes in patients with metastatic Ewing sarcoma

30 Mar, 2023 | 14:16h | UTC

Randomized Phase III Trial of Ganitumab With Interval-Compressed Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma: A Report From the Children’s Oncology Group – Journal of Clinical Oncology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentary: Ganitumab Provides No Benefit in Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma – Cancer Therapy Advisor

 


Study shows a slight breast cancer risk increase with progestogen-only birth control, comparable to combined oral methods

29 Mar, 2023 | 13:35h | UTC

Summary: A UK study and meta-analysis examined breast cancer risk linked to hormonal contraceptives, emphasizing progestagen-only contraceptives in premenopausal women. Utilizing a nested case-control design with the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), a primary care database, the study included 9,498 women under 50 diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1996 and 2017, and 18,171 closely matched controls. The meta-analysis merged CPRD findings with 12 observational studies on progestagen-only preparations.

The results revealed that current or recent use of combined oral contraceptives, oral progestagen-only contraceptives, injectable progestagen, and progestagen intrauterine devices all led to a similar increase in breast cancer risk. The 15-year absolute excess risk associated with five years of oral combined or progestagen-only contraceptive use ranged from 8 per 100,000 users aged 16-20 to 265 per 100,000 users aged 35-39. The study concluded that both contraceptive types were linked to a slight breast cancer risk increase, and these risks must be weighed against the benefits of contraceptive use during childbearing years.

Article: Combined and progestagen-only hormonal contraceptives and breast cancer risk: A UK nested case–control study and meta-analysis – PLOS Medicine

News Release: Study finds similar association of progestogen-only and combined hormonal contraceptives with breast cancer risk – PLOS

Commentary: Expert reaction to study looking at the association between hormonal contraceptive use and breast cancer incidence – Science Media Centre

 


Phase 2b RCT | Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin for patients with previously treated metastatic biliary tract cancer

29 Mar, 2023 | 13:14h | UTC

Treatment With Liposomal Irinotecan Plus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer: The Phase 2b NIFTY Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Oncology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


RCT | Effects of Docetaxel as a radiosensitizer in patients with head and neck cancer, unsuitable for cisplatin-based chemoradiation

29 Mar, 2023 | 13:05h | UTC

Results of Phase III Randomized Trial for Use of Docetaxel as a Radiosensitizer in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer, Unsuitable for Cisplatin-Based Chemoradiation – Journal of Clinical Oncology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Editorial: Good Radiosensitizer Hunting – Journal of Clinical Oncology

Commentaries:

Docetaxel Added to Radiation Provides DFS, OS Benefit in Cisplatin-Ineligible HNSCC – OncLive

Docetaxel as a Radiosensitizer in Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer – The ASCO Post

 


Consensus Paper | Diagnosis and treatment of anticancer drug-induced interstitial lung disease

29 Mar, 2023 | 13:04h | UTC

Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Anticancer Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease – Current Medical Science

 


ChatGPT vs. NCI: analyzing the quality of cancer information on myths and misconceptions

28 Mar, 2023 | 15:00h | UTC

Using ChatGPT to evaluate cancer myths and misconceptions: artificial intelligence and cancer information – JNCI Cancer Spectrum

News Release: Looking for cancer information: Can ChatGPT be counted on? – Huntsman Cancer Institute

Commentary: Report Examines Accuracy of ChatGPT in Providing Information on Common Cancer Myths and Misconceptions – The ASCO Post

 


Consensus Statement | Management of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia

28 Mar, 2023 | 14:37h | UTC

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD), the European College for the Study of Vulval Disease (ECSVD), and the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) Consensus Statement on the Management of Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia – Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

 


Review | Systemic therapy in HR+/HER2- early stage & metastatic breast cancer management

28 Mar, 2023 | 14:34h | UTC

Systemic therapy for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early stage and metastatic breast cancer – CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

 


Expanding Organ Usage: UK study finds organs from patients with a primary brain tumor are a viable option

27 Mar, 2023 | 13:27h | UTC

Summary: A national cohort study in the UK investigated the risk of cancer transmission from deceased donors with primary brain tumors to organ recipients. The study found no cases of brain tumor transmission among 778 transplants from 282 donors with primary brain tumors, including 262 from donors with high-grade tumors. Organ transplant survival was equivalent to that in matched controls, and some organs from donors with high-grade tumors were less likely to be transplanted.

The results suggest that the risk of cancer transmission in transplants from deceased donors with primary brain tumors is lower than previously thought. Furthermore, the study indicated that donors with brain tumors provided good-quality organs with favorable risk markers and excellent transplant outcomes. Some organs from donors with high-grade tumors were underutilized, indicating a possible aversion by transplant clinicians or patients to use these organs.

These findings imply that it may be possible to safely expand organ usage from donors with primary brain tumors without negatively impacting outcomes, potentially benefiting many patients waiting for a transplant. Although this might lead to a slight rise in transplant numbers in the UK, the findings may hold particular significance for nations with stricter guidelines, such as the United States. The study’s findings can help transplant clinicians discuss the risks and benefits of accepting organ offers from such donors.

Article: Organ Transplants From Deceased Donors With Primary Brain Tumors and Risk of Cancer Transmission – JAMA Surgery

 


Outcomes of ST elevation myocardial infarction in patients with cancer: a nationwide study

27 Mar, 2023 | 13:12h | UTC

Outcomes of ST elevation myocardial infarction in patients with cancer: a nationwide study – European Heart Journal – Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes (free for a limited period)

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Review | Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

27 Mar, 2023 | 13:02h | UTC

Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer – Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (free for a limited period)

 


Study reveals overuse of surveillance colonoscopy in older adults with limited life expectancy

23 Mar, 2023 | 13:11h | UTC

Summary: This study investigated the association between estimated life expectancy, surveillance colonoscopy findings, and follow-up recommendations among older adults. The study utilized data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry and included adults over 65 who underwent colonoscopy for surveillance after prior polyps.

Life expectancy was estimated using a validated prediction model and categorized into three groups: less than 5 years, 5 to less than 10 years, and 10 or more years.

Out of the 9,831 adults included in the study, 8% had advanced polyps or CRC. Among the 5,281 patients with available recommendations, 86.9% were advised to return for a future colonoscopy. Surprisingly, 58.1% of older adults with less than 5 years of life expectancy were also recommended to return for future surveillance colonoscopy.

The study concluded that many older adults with limited life expectancy are still recommended for future surveillance colonoscopy. This data could help refine decision-making about pursuing or stopping surveillance colonoscopy in older adults with a history of polyps.

Article: Association of Life Expectancy With Surveillance Colonoscopy Findings and Follow-up Recommendations in Older Adults – JAMA Internal Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

JAMA Patient Page: What Should I Know About Stopping Routine Cancer Screening?

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Guideline | Merkel cell carcinoma

23 Mar, 2023 | 12:48h | UTC

S2k Guideline – Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC, neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin) – Update 2022 – Journal of the German Society of Dermatology

 


Guidelines for Gastric Cancer | An evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach

22 Mar, 2023 | 13:33h | UTC

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach – Journal of Gastric Cancer

 


Guidelines for post polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance

22 Mar, 2023 | 13:31h | UTC

Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 revised edition – Intestinal Research

Related:

Colorectal cancer prevention: colonoscopic surveillance in adults with ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease or adenomas – National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines – Gut

Consensus Statement: U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer now suggests average-risk CRC screening begins at age 45.

USPSTF Statement: Start colorectal cancer screening at 45 years for most patients.

ACG Clinical Guidelines: Start colorectal cancer screening at 45

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps – Journal of Gastroenterology

Meta-analysis: Risk of colorectal cancer and cancer related mortality after detection of low-risk or high-risk adenomas, compared with no adenoma, at index colonoscopy

Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer – Gastroenterology

Endoscopic surveillance after surgical or endoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO) Guideline – Endoscopy

 


RCT | Comparable 5-year relapse-free survival for laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer

22 Mar, 2023 | 13:27h | UTC

Summary: The JLSSG0901 randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the 5-year survival outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer.

The study involved 507 patients from 37 institutes in Japan. The primary endpoint was 5-year relapse-free survival. The results showed that the 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 73.9% and 75.7% for the ODG and LADG groups, respectively, confirming the noninferiority of LADG, and no significant differences were observed in severe postoperative complications between the two groups.

The study concluded that LADG with D2 lymph node dissection, when performed by qualified surgeons, was proven noninferior to ODG, and could become a standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Article: Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopy-Assisted vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: The JLSSG0901 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Surgery (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Related:

Laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – Frontiers in Surgery

Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes of the KLASS-02 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Surgery

Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – World Journal of Surgical Oncology

Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis – Surgery

Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Five-Year Outcomes From the CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Surgery

Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial – Journal of Clinical Oncology

Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic vs Open Total Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The CLASS02 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Oncology

Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial – The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Oncology

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


RCT | Hyperfractionation vs. standard fractionation in IMRT for patients with locally advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

22 Mar, 2023 | 13:12h | UTC

Hyperfractionation compared with standard fractionation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial – The Lancet (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentary: Hyperfractionated vs Standard-Fractionation IMRT in Locally Advanced, Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma – The ASCO Post

 


Suggested guidelines for the treatment of mycosis fungoides in countries with limited resources

21 Mar, 2023 | 13:29h | UTC

Suggested Guidelines for the Treatment of Mycosis Fungoides in Countries with Limited Resources – Dermatology Research and Practice

 


Guidelines for the management of people with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen disease)

21 Mar, 2023 | 13:27h | UTC

British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of people with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen disease) 2022 – British Journal of Dermatology

 


Stay Updated in Your Specialty

Telegram Channels
Free

WhatsApp alerts 10-day free trial

No spam, just news.