Open access
Open access
Powered by Google Translator Translator

Gastrointestinal Surgery (all articles)

Cohort Study | Long-term quality of life and functional outcome of patients with rectal cancer following a watch-and-wait approach

3 Apr, 2023 | 13:31h | UTC

Long-term Quality of Life and Functional Outcome of Patients With Rectal Cancer Following a Watch-and-Wait Approach – JAMA Surgery (free for a limited period)

Invited Commentary: Guiding Patients Through a “Watch-and-Wait” Approach for Rectal Cancer—Understanding the Functional Outcomes – JAMA Surgery (free for a limited period)

Related:

Cohort Study | A clinical calculator for rectal cancer can estimate recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy with or without surgery.

Guidelines for the surveillance and survivorship care of patients after curative treatment of colon and rectal cancer.

Study: Assessment of a Watch-and-Wait Strategy for Rectal Cancer in Patients With a Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy

Study suggests the intensity of active surveillance in patients with rectal cancer managed by a watch-and-wait approach could be reduced if they maintain a complete clinical response within the first 3 years

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Update on the management of acute pancreatitis

30 Mar, 2023 | 14:10h | UTC

Update on the management of acute pancreatitis – Current Opinion in Critical Care

Related:

Intravenous fluid therapy in patients with severe acute pancreatitis admitted to the intensive care unit: a narrative review – Intensive Care Medicine

Aggressive or Moderate Fluid Resuscitation in Acute Pancreatitis – New England Journal of Medicine

Acute Pancreatitis: Diagnosis and Treatment – Drugs

Revised Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association for Acute Pancreatitis – Gut and Liver

Guidelines for the management of patients with severe acute pancreatitis, 2021 – Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine

Evidence-Based Disposition of Acute Pancreatitis – emDocs

2019 WSES guidelines for the management of severe acute pancreatitis – World Journal of Emergency Surgery

American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on Initial Management of Acute Pancreatitis

Pancreatitis – National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

The optimal timing and intervention to reduce mortality for necrotizing pancreatitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis – World Journal of Emergency Surgery

Long-term follow-up of a RCT | Endoscopic versus surgical step-up approach for infected necrotizing pancreatitis.

RCT: Immediate drainage did not improve outcomes compared to postponed intervention in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis.

An Endoscopic Transluminal Approach, Compared With Minimally Invasive Surgery, Reduces Complications and Costs for Patients With Necrotizing Pancreatitis – Gastroenterology

Research: Endoscopic or Surgical Step-up Approach for Infected Necrotising Pancreatitis

Evidence-Based Approach to the Surgical Management of Acute Pancreatitis – The Surgery Journal

 


RCT | Efficacy and safety of colesevelam for the treatment of bile acid diarrhea

30 Mar, 2023 | 14:06h | UTC

Efficacy and safety of colesevelam for the treatment of bile acid diarrhoea: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 4 clinical trial – The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Brief Review | Acute mesenteric ischemia

30 Mar, 2023 | 13:44h | UTC

Acute mesenteric ischaemia – British Journal of Surgery

 


M-A | Aggressive IV hydration may increase mortality risk in severe acute pancreatitis

29 Mar, 2023 | 13:26h | UTC

Summary: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the outcomes of aggressive and non-aggressive intravenous hydration in patients with severe and non-severe acute pancreatitis (AP). The study included nine randomized controlled trials with a total of 953 participants.

The findings revealed that aggressive intravenous hydration significantly increased mortality risk in severe AP cases, and fluid-related complication risk in both severe and non-severe AP cases. However, the study has some limitations, as only one study with 249 participants was judged to have a low risk of bias in all domains, while the remaining eight studies had non-low risk of bias, raising concerns about the reliability of the findings.

Despite these concerns, the findings still suggest that more conservative intravenous fluid resuscitation protocols for AP may be preferable. Further research with more rigorous study designs is needed to provide robust evidence on the effectiveness of different intravenous hydration strategies in treating acute pancreatitis.

Article: Comparison of clinical outcomes between aggressive and non-aggressive intravenous hydration for acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis – Critical Care

 


Perspective | The use of ChatGPT and other large language models in surgical science

28 Mar, 2023 | 15:01h | UTC

The use of ChatGPT and other large language models in surgical science – BJS Open

 


RCT | No reduction in parastomal hernia rate 3 years after stoma construction with prophylactic Mesh

27 Mar, 2023 | 13:07h | UTC

No Reduction in Parastomal Hernia Rate 3 Years After Stoma Construction With Prophylactic Mesh: Three-year Follow-up Results From STOMAMESH—A Multicenter Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial – Annals of Surgery

 


RCT | Topical lidocaine or lidocaine/diltiazem ointment following rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids

27 Mar, 2023 | 13:05h | UTC

Topical Lidocaine or Lidocaine/Diltiazem Ointment Following Rubber Band Ligation of Hemorrhoids: A Prospective Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial – Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

 


Study reveals overuse of surveillance colonoscopy in older adults with limited life expectancy

23 Mar, 2023 | 13:11h | UTC

Summary: This study investigated the association between estimated life expectancy, surveillance colonoscopy findings, and follow-up recommendations among older adults. The study utilized data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry and included adults over 65 who underwent colonoscopy for surveillance after prior polyps.

Life expectancy was estimated using a validated prediction model and categorized into three groups: less than 5 years, 5 to less than 10 years, and 10 or more years.

Out of the 9,831 adults included in the study, 8% had advanced polyps or CRC. Among the 5,281 patients with available recommendations, 86.9% were advised to return for a future colonoscopy. Surprisingly, 58.1% of older adults with less than 5 years of life expectancy were also recommended to return for future surveillance colonoscopy.

The study concluded that many older adults with limited life expectancy are still recommended for future surveillance colonoscopy. This data could help refine decision-making about pursuing or stopping surveillance colonoscopy in older adults with a history of polyps.

Article: Association of Life Expectancy With Surveillance Colonoscopy Findings and Follow-up Recommendations in Older Adults – JAMA Internal Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

JAMA Patient Page: What Should I Know About Stopping Routine Cancer Screening?

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Guidelines for Gastric Cancer | An evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach

22 Mar, 2023 | 13:33h | UTC

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach – Journal of Gastric Cancer

 


Guidelines for post polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance

22 Mar, 2023 | 13:31h | UTC

Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 revised edition – Intestinal Research

Related:

Colorectal cancer prevention: colonoscopic surveillance in adults with ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease or adenomas – National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines – Gut

Consensus Statement: U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer now suggests average-risk CRC screening begins at age 45.

USPSTF Statement: Start colorectal cancer screening at 45 years for most patients.

ACG Clinical Guidelines: Start colorectal cancer screening at 45

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps – Journal of Gastroenterology

Meta-analysis: Risk of colorectal cancer and cancer related mortality after detection of low-risk or high-risk adenomas, compared with no adenoma, at index colonoscopy

Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer – Gastroenterology

Endoscopic surveillance after surgical or endoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO) Guideline – Endoscopy

 


RCT | Comparable 5-year relapse-free survival for laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer

22 Mar, 2023 | 13:27h | UTC

Summary: The JLSSG0901 randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the 5-year survival outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer.

The study involved 507 patients from 37 institutes in Japan. The primary endpoint was 5-year relapse-free survival. The results showed that the 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 73.9% and 75.7% for the ODG and LADG groups, respectively, confirming the noninferiority of LADG, and no significant differences were observed in severe postoperative complications between the two groups.

The study concluded that LADG with D2 lymph node dissection, when performed by qualified surgeons, was proven noninferior to ODG, and could become a standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Article: Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopy-Assisted vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: The JLSSG0901 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Surgery (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Related:

Laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – Frontiers in Surgery

Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes of the KLASS-02 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Surgery

Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – World Journal of Surgical Oncology

Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis – Surgery

Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Five-Year Outcomes From the CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Surgery

Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial – Journal of Clinical Oncology

Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic vs Open Total Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The CLASS02 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Oncology

Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial – The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Oncology

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


M-A | Analgesic effect of erector spinae plane block in adults undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

21 Mar, 2023 | 13:06h | UTC

Analgesic effect of erector spinae plane block in adults undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – BMC Anesthesiology

 


RCT | Intermittent IV ibuprofen reduces morphine consumption and provides pain relief after surgery

20 Mar, 2023 | 13:39h | UTC

Summary: The article describes a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different doses of intravenous ibuprofen (IVIB) in treating acute postoperative pain. The trial involved patients who underwent abdominal or orthopedic surgery and were randomized to placebo, IVIB 400 mg, or IVIB 800 mg. The first dose was given intravenously 30 minutes before surgery ended, followed by IV administration every 6 hours for a total of 8 doses.

The study found that IV administration of ibuprofen 400 mg or 800 mg significantly reduced morphine consumption and relieved pain without increasing the incidence of adverse events.

The study’s strengths were its multicenter, randomized, controlled, and prospective design. However, the extensive list of exclusion criteria suggests that the study was made in a relatively healthy population, making it difficult to extrapolate the safety results for more fragile patients.

Article: Analgesic Efficacy of Intravenous Ibuprofen in the Treatment of Postoperative Acute Pain: A Phase III Multicenter Randomized Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial – Pain Research and Management

 


Review | Choosing the best endoscopic approach for post-bariatric surgical leaks and fistulas

20 Mar, 2023 | 13:23h | UTC

Choosing the best endoscopic approach for post-bariatric surgical leaks and fistulas: Basic principles and recommendations – World Journal of Gastroenterology

Related: Curriculum for bariatric endoscopy and endoscopic treatment of the complications of bariatric surgery: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement – Endoscopy

 


ESGE Position Statement | Curriculum for bariatric endoscopy and endoscopic treatment of the complications of bariatric surgery

17 Mar, 2023 | 13:06h | UTC

Curriculum for bariatric endoscopy and endoscopic treatment of the complications of bariatric surgery: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement – Endoscopy

 


Consensus Paper | Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in gastrointestinal disorders

16 Mar, 2023 | 13:23h | UTC

Asian-Pacific consensus on small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in gastrointestinal disorders: An initiative of the Indian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association – Indian Journal of Gastroenterology

 


Review | Evidence-based approach to diagnosis and management of abdominal tuberculosis

16 Mar, 2023 | 13:17h | UTC

Evidence-based approach to diagnosis and management of abdominal tuberculosis – Indian Journal of Gastroenterology (if the link is paywalled, try this one)

 

Commentary from the author on Twitter

 


Review | Surveillance strategies following curative resection and non-operative approach of rectal cancer: how and how long?

15 Mar, 2023 | 14:59h | UTC

Surveillance strategies following curative resection and non-operative approach of rectal cancer: How and how long? Review of current recommendations – World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

 


M-A | Laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer

15 Mar, 2023 | 14:52h | UTC

Laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – Frontiers in Surgery

Related:

Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes of the KLASS-02 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Surgery

Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – World Journal of Surgical Oncology

Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis – Surgery

Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Five-Year Outcomes From the CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Surgery

Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial – Journal of Clinical Oncology

Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic vs Open Total Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The CLASS02 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Oncology

Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial – The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Oncology

 


Brief Review | Enhanced recovery after emergency laparotomy

13 Mar, 2023 | 14:37h | UTC

Enhanced recovery after emergency laparotomy – British Journal of Surgery

 


Minimum platelet count threshold before invasive procedures in cirrhosis: evolution of the guidelines

13 Mar, 2023 | 14:36h | UTC

Minimum platelet count threshold before invasive procedures in cirrhosis: Evolution of the guidelines – World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

 


Cohort Study | A simple classification of pancreatic duct size and texture predicts the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula

10 Mar, 2023 | 14:10h | UTC

A Simple Classification of Pancreatic Duct Size and Texture Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A classification of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery – Annals of Surgery

Related:

Establishment and external validation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in excluding postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy – BJS Open

M-A | Perioperative interventions to reduce pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Development and external validation of DISPAIR fistula risk score for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula risk after distal pancreatectomy – British Journal of Surgery

Risk factors of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis – Medicine

Systematic Review: Duct‐to‐mucosa vs. other types of pancreaticojejunostomy for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

RCT: Early drain removal is safe in patients with low or intermediate risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Randomized Trial: Oral vs. Enteral Feeding for Patients with Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


RCT | Tranexamic acid did not significantly reduce blood loss in pancreaticoduodenectomy

10 Mar, 2023 | 14:05h | UTC

Tranexamic acid and blood loss in pancreaticoduodenectomy: TAC-PD randomized clinical trial – British Journal of Surgery (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

 


RCT | Transanal vs. laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer

10 Mar, 2023 | 14:03h | UTC

Transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer (Ta-LaTME study): multicentre, randomized, open-label trial – British Journal of Surgery (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

 


Stay Updated in Your Specialty

Telegram Channels
Free

WhatsApp alerts 10-day free trial

No spam, just news.