Open access
Open access
Powered by Google Translator Translator

Randomized Trials

RCT: Vutrisiran Reduces Mortality and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Transthyretin Amyloidosis Cardiomyopathy

6 Sep, 2024 | 21:57h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This double-blind, randomized clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of vutrisiran in 655 patients with transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Participants were randomly assigned to receive either vutrisiran (25 mg) or placebo every 12 weeks for up to 36 months. The study population included patients both with and without baseline tafamidis treatment.

Main Findings: Vutrisiran treatment significantly reduced the risk of death from any cause and recurrent cardiovascular events compared to placebo (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.56–0.93, p=0.01). In monotherapy patients (no tafamidis), the hazard ratio was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.49–0.93, p=0.02). Vutrisiran also preserved physical function, showing less decline in the 6-minute walk test distance (mean difference: 26.5 meters, p<0.001) and quality of life (mean KCCQ-OS difference: 5.8 points, p<0.001). Adverse events were comparable between groups.

Implications for Practice: Vutrisiran offers a promising treatment option for reducing mortality, cardiovascular events, and functional decline in ATTR-CM patients. Its favorable safety profile supports its potential use in long-term management.

Reference: Fontana M. et al. (2024). Vutrisiran in Patients with Transthyretin Amyloidosis with Cardiomyopathy. New England Journal of Medicine, Published August 30, 2024. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2409134

 


RCT: No Difference in Postoperative Complications Between Continuation and Discontinuation of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors Before Major Surgery – JAMA

31 Aug, 2024 | 19:12h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This multicenter randomized clinical trial included 2,222 patients who had been treated with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) for at least 3 months and were scheduled for major noncardiac surgery at 40 hospitals in France between January 2018 and April 2023. The participants were randomly assigned to either continue RASIs until the day of surgery or to discontinue them 48 hours before surgery.

Main Findings: The trial found no significant difference in the primary outcome—a composite of all-cause mortality and major postoperative complications within 28 days—between the continuation and discontinuation groups (22% in both groups, RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.87-1.19). However, the continuation group experienced a higher incidence of intraoperative hypotension (54% vs. 41%, RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.19-1.44).

Implications for Practice: Continuation of RASIs before major noncardiac surgery does not increase the risk of postoperative mortality or major complications, but it does elevate the risk of intraoperative hypotension. Clinicians should weigh these risks when deciding whether to continue or discontinue RASIs before surgery.

Reference: Legrand M, Falcone J, Cholley B, et al. (2024). Continuation vs Discontinuation of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors Before Major Noncardiac Surgery: The Stop-or-Not Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.17123

 


Clinical Trial Follow-Up: Continued Imatinib Significantly Extends Survival and Delays Resistance in Advanced GIST – The Lancet Oncology

25 Aug, 2024 | 11:55h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This exploratory long-term follow-up of the BFR14 open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial involved patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) across 17 cancer centers in France. The trial included patients aged 18 years or older with stable disease after 1, 3, or 5 years of treatment with imatinib. Participants were randomized to either continue or discontinue imatinib until disease progression, with primary endpoint analysis focused on progression-free survival (PFS).

Main Findings: Imatinib continuation significantly extended PFS compared to discontinuation, with median PFS ranging from 27.8 to over 67.0 months in the continuation group versus 6.1 to 12.0 months in the interruption group, depending on the duration of prior treatment (p-values <0.002). Additionally, continuing imatinib delayed resistance and improved overall survival, particularly notable after 3 years of treatment, with a median overall survival of 134.0 months compared to 104.0 months in the discontinuation group (HR 0.40, p=0.0096).

Implications for Practice: These findings strongly discourage the interruption of imatinib in GIST patients who are stable or responding to treatment, as it leads to worse long-term outcomes, including quicker disease progression and increased resistance to the therapy.

Reference: Blay JY et al. (2024). Discontinuation versus continuation of imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (BFR14): exploratory long-term follow-up of an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00318-8

 


RCT: Cold Snare EMR Reduces Major Adverse Events but Increases Residual Adenoma in Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps – Gastroenterology

25 Aug, 2024 | 11:45h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This multicentric randomized controlled trial (RCT) involved 19 centers in Germany and included 363 patients with 396 large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (≥20 mm). Participants were randomly assigned to undergo either cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or the traditional hot snare EMR. The study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of cold versus hot snare EMR.

Main Findings: Cold snare EMR significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse events (AEs), with a major AE rate of 1.0% compared to 7.9% in the hot snare group. This included significant reductions in perforation and postendoscopic bleeding rates. However, cold snare EMR was associated with a higher rate of residual adenoma at follow-up, with 23.7% of cases compared to 13.8% in the hot snare group. The increased rate of residual adenoma was particularly noted in larger lesions (≥4 cm) and those with high-grade dysplasia.

Implications for Practice: Cold snare EMR offers a safer alternative to hot snare EMR for resecting large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps, particularly in terms of reducing major AEs. However, the higher rate of residual adenoma indicates that cold snare EMR should be used selectively, especially for smaller polyps or less likely to have advanced histology. Further research is needed to refine lesion selection criteria and to explore technical modifications that could improve the efficacy of cold snare EMR.

Reference: Steinbrück, I., et al. (2024). Cold Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Resection of Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: Randomized Controlled German CHRONICLE Trial. Gastroenterology, 167(4), 764–777. http://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.05.013

 


Phase 2b Trial: Nicardipine Implants Show Promise in Reducing Vasospasm After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage – JAMA Neurology

25 Aug, 2024 | 11:29h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This single-masked, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involved 41 patients with World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade 3 or 4 aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) from six neurovascular centers in Germany and Austria. The patients were randomized to either receive localized nicardipine release implants during microsurgical aneurysm repair plus standard care or standard care alone.

Main Findings: The incidence of moderate to severe angiographic vasospasm (aVS) between days 7 and 9 after aSAH was significantly lower in the implant group (20%) compared to the control group (58%; P = .02). Additionally, fewer patients in the implant group required vasospasm rescue therapy (10% vs. 58%; P = .002). However, at 52 weeks, no significant difference was observed in favorable outcomes between the groups (84% in the implant group vs. 67% in the control group; P = .27).

Implications for Practice: Nicardipine implants show promise in reducing vasospasm-related complications following aSAH, suggesting a potential benefit for early postoperative management. However, their impact on long-term clinical outcomes requires further investigation in larger phase 3 trials to determine the overall benefit and cost-effectiveness of this intervention.

Reference: Wessels L et al. (2024). Localized Nicardipine Release Implants for Prevention of Vasospasm After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurology. http://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2564

 


RCT: : Belzutifan Improves Progression-Free Survival and Objective Response Compared to Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma – N Engl J Med

24 Aug, 2024 | 16:48h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This phase 3, multicenter, open-label trial included 746 participants with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who had previously undergone immune checkpoint and antiangiogenic therapies. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either belzutifan (120 mg daily) or everolimus (10 mg daily) until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred.

Main Findings: The median progression-free survival was identical at 5.6 months for both groups. However, at 18 months, a significantly higher percentage of participants in the belzutifan group (24.0%) remained progression-free compared to the everolimus group (8.3%, P=0.002). Belzutifan also led to a significantly higher objective response rate (21.9% vs. 3.5%, P<0.001). Median overall survival was similar between the groups, with no significant difference (21.4 months vs. 18.1 months, P=0.20).

Implications for Practice: Belzutifan offers a substantial benefit in progression-free survival and objective response rate over everolimus in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma post previous therapies. It was well-tolerated, with safety comparable to everolimus, suggesting its potential as a preferred treatment option in this patient population.

Reference: Choueiri TK, Powles T, Peltola K, et al. (2024). Belzutifan versus Everolimus for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med, 391(8), 710-721. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2313906. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2313906

 


RCT: Chelation Fails to Reduce Cardiovascular Events in Post-MI Patients with Diabetes – JAMA

18 Aug, 2024 | 19:11h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This double-masked, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial (RCT) included 959 participants aged 50 or older with diabetes and a history of myocardial infarction (MI) from 88 sites in the US and Canada. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 40 weekly infusions of an EDTA-based chelation solution or a placebo infusion. The median follow-up period was 48 months.

Main Findings: The trial found no significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with EDTA-based chelation compared to placebo. The primary endpoint, a composite of all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina, occurred in 35.6% of the chelation group and 35.7% of the placebo group (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76-1.16; P = .53). However, chelation did reduce median blood lead levels by 61%, from 9.0 μg/L at baseline to 3.5 μg/L by the 40th infusion (P < .001).

Implications for Practice: Despite the significant reduction in blood lead levels, EDTA-based chelation did not reduce cardiovascular events in this high-risk population. These findings suggest that while chelation therapy may lower lead levels, it does not translate into cardiovascular benefits for patients with diabetes and a history of MI, challenging its use in this context.

Reference: Lamas, G. A., Anstrom, K. J., Navas-Acien, A., et al. (2024). Edetate Disodium–Based Chelation for Patients With a Previous Myocardial Infarction and Diabetes: TACT2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.11463.

 


RCT: Belantamab Mafodotin Combination Improves Progression-Free Survival in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Compared to Daratumumab-Based Therapy – N Engl J Med

18 Aug, 2024 | 19:03h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This phase 3, open-label, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BVd) versus daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) in 494 patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after at least one prior therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to the BVd group (243) or the DVd group (251) and were followed for a median of 28.2 months.

Main Findings: The BVd regimen significantly improved median progression-free survival (36.6 months vs. 13.4 months; HR, 0.41; P<0.001) compared to the DVd regimen. Overall survival at 18 months was also higher in the BVd group (84% vs. 73%). The BVd group showed a higher rate of complete response or better plus MRD-negative status (25% vs. 10%). However, the BVd regimen was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events (95% vs. 78%), particularly ocular events.

Implications for Practice: BVd therapy offers a significant progression-free survival advantage over DVd in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, though it is associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events, particularly ocular toxicity. These findings suggest BVd as a potent treatment option but highlight the need for careful monitoring and management of side effects, particularly eye-related complications.

Reference: Hungria, V., Robak, P., Hus, M., Zherebtsova, V., Ward, C., Ho, P. J., & Ribas de Almeida, A. C., et al. (2024). Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. New England Journal of Medicine, 391(5), 393-407. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2405090.

 


Randomized Noninferiority Trial: Oral Vonoprazan Noninferior to IV Proton Pump Inhibitors in Preventing Rebleeding of High-Risk Peptic Ulcers – Gastroenterology

18 Aug, 2024 | 18:32h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial was conducted in Thailand across six centers, including both university and community hospitals. A total of 194 patients with high-risk peptic ulcer (PU) bleeding who had achieved successful endoscopic hemostasis were randomized to receive either vonoprazan or intravenous proton pump inhibitors (PPI). The study aimed to compare the efficacy of vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, with that of high-dose PPIs in preventing rebleeding.

Main Findings: The trial found that the 30-day rebleeding rate in the vonoprazan group was 7.1%, compared to 10.4% in the PPI group. This demonstrated noninferiority of vonoprazan within a 10% margin (risk difference: -3.3%, 95% CI: -11.2 to 4.7; P < .001). The 3-day and 7-day rebleeding rates were also noninferior. Secondary outcomes, including mortality rates, the need for rescue therapy, blood transfusion requirements, and length of hospital stay, were comparable between the two groups. Adverse events were similar in both groups.

Implications for Practice: Vonoprazan presents a viable alternative to intravenous PPIs for preventing rebleeding in patients with high-risk PU after endoscopic hemostasis. The availability of vonoprazan in oral form could potentially reduce hospital stays. However, further studies in multiethnic populations are needed to confirm these findings and assess the cost-effectiveness of vonoprazan in this setting.

Reference: Geeratragool T, Kaosombatwattana U, Boonchote A, et al. (2024). Comparison of Vonoprazan Versus Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor for Prevention of High-Risk Peptic Ulcers Rebleeding After Successful Endoscopic Hemostasis: A Multicenter Randomized Noninferiority Trial. Gastroenterology, -(-), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.03.036.

 


RCT: Atezolizumab with Chemotherapy Extends Progression-Free Survival in dMMR Advanced Endometrial Cancer – Lancet Oncol

18 Aug, 2024 | 18:27h | UTC

Study Design and Population: The AtTEnd trial is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study conducted in 89 hospitals across 11 countries. It enrolled 551 patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma or carcinosarcoma, all of whom had not received prior systemic chemotherapy for recurrence.

Main Findings: The addition of atezolizumab to chemotherapy was associated with an improvement in progression-free survival, particularly in patients with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors. In the overall population, progression-free survival and overall survival also showed positive trends.

Implications for Practice: The study suggests that atezolizumab may offer benefits when added to standard chemotherapy in patients with dMMR advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma, warranting further investigation as a potential first-line treatment option.

Reference: Colombo, N. et al. (2024). Atezolizumab and chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (AtTEnd): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology, 24(8), 334-346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00334-6.

 


Non-Inferiority Trial: Burr-Hole Drainage Without Irrigation Results in Higher Reoperation Rate in Chronic Subdural Hematoma – The Lancet

18 Aug, 2024 | 18:17h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This Finnish, nationwide, multicentre, randomised, controlled non-inferiority trial (FINISH) evaluated whether subdural irrigation during burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural haematoma could be omitted without compromising outcomes. The trial enrolled 589 adults (165 women, 424 men) requiring burr-hole drainage, randomly assigned to receive drainage with or without irrigation.

Main Findings: The study found a 6.0 percentage point higher reoperation rate within 6 months in the non-irrigation group (18.3%) compared to the irrigation group (12.6%). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes, including the proportion of patients with an unfavorable functional outcome (13.1% vs. 12.6%) or mortality (6.1% vs. 7.1%). Adverse events were comparable between the groups.

Implications for Practice: The trial results suggest that omitting subdural irrigation during burr-hole drainage increases the risk of reoperation, without improving functional outcomes or reducing mortality. The findings support the continued use of subdural irrigation in this procedure.

Reference: Raj, R., Tommiska, P., Koivisto, T., Leinonen, V., Danner, N., & Posti, J. P., et al. (2024). Burr-hole drainage with or without irrigation for chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): A Finnish, nationwide, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet, 403(10446), 2798-2806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00686-X.

 


RCT: Methotrexate Shows Modest Pain Reduction in Knee Osteoarthritis, More Research Needed – Ann Intern Med

18 Aug, 2024 | 18:01h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the effects of oral methotrexate on 207 participants with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) who had persistent knee pain despite prior treatments. Conducted across 15 musculoskeletal clinics in the UK from June 2014 to October 2017, participants were randomly assigned to receive either methotrexate or placebo over a 12-month period.

Main Findings: At 6 months, methotrexate resulted in a modest reduction in knee pain, with a statistically significant difference of 0.79 points on the NRS compared to placebo (95% CI, 0.08 to 1.51; P = 0.030). Small but statistically significant improvements were also noted in knee stiffness and function. However, the clinical significance of these findings remains uncertain, and potential side effects of methotrexate warrant caution.

Implications for Practice: While methotrexate may offer some symptomatic relief for patients with knee osteoarthritis who do not respond to standard treatments, the modest reduction in pain and improvement in function observed in this study may not justify its routine use given the potential for significant side effects. The small magnitude of benefit suggests that methotrexate should be considered cautiously and only in select patients. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings and to better understand the risk-benefit profile of methotrexate in this population before broader clinical adoption.

Reference: Kingsbury, S. R., Tharmanathan, P., Keding, A., Watt, F. E., Scott, D. L., Roddy, E., Birrell, F., & Conaghan, P. G. (2024). Pain Reduction With Oral Methotrexate in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. DOI: 10.7326/M24-0303.

 


RCT: Twice-Yearly Lenacapavir Prevents HIV Infections More Effectively Than Daily F/TAF in Women – N Engl J Med

18 Aug, 2024 | 13:56h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This phase 3, double-blind, randomized controlled trial included 5,338 adolescent girls and young women in South Africa and Uganda. Participants were assigned to receive either twice-yearly subcutaneous lenacapavir, daily oral emtricitabine–tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF), or daily oral emtricitabine–tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) as an active control, with corresponding placebos.

Main Findings: Lenacapavir demonstrated superior efficacy in HIV prevention, with zero infections observed among its recipients. In contrast, the F/TAF group experienced 39 HIV infections (2.02 per 100 person-years), while the F/TDF group had 16 infections (1.69 per 100 person-years). HIV incidence was significantly lower with lenacapavir compared to background incidence and F/TDF, while no significant difference was observed between F/TAF and F/TDF.

Implications for Practice: Twice-yearly lenacapavir could be a more effective and potentially easier-to-adopt HIV prevention strategy than daily oral F/TAF in cisgender women, though considerations of injection-site reactions are necessary. This approach could improve adherence and outcomes in populations with low persistence in daily PrEP use.

Reference: Bekker, L.-G., Das, M., Abdool Karim, Q., Ahmed, K., Batting, J., Brumskine, W., Gill, K., et al. (2024). Twice-yearly lenacapavir or daily F/TAF for HIV prevention in cisgender women. New England Journal of Medicine, 391(7), 648-659. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2407001.

 


RCT: Routine Protamine Administration Enhances Hemostasis and Reduces Vascular Complications in TAVI – JAMA Cardiol

17 Aug, 2024 | 19:09h | UTC

Study Design and Population: The ACE-PROTAVI trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted at three Australian hospitals. It involved 410 patients (median age 81 years) undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of routine protamine administration versus placebo.

Main Findings: Patients receiving protamine showed a higher rate of successful hemostasis (97.9% vs. 91.6%) and a significantly shorter time to hemostasis (median 181 vs. 279 seconds). Protamine administration also led to a reduced risk of composite vascular complications (5.2% vs. 12.8%), primarily due to fewer minor vascular events. No adverse events were associated with protamine.

Implications for Practice: Routine protamine administration after TAVI improves hemostasis, reduces minor vascular complications, and shortens procedural and postprocedural recovery times, suggesting it should be considered in standard TAVI protocols.

Reference: Vriesendorp, P. A., Nanayakkara, S., Heuts, S., et al. (2024). Routine Protamine Administration for Bleeding in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: The ACE-PROTAVI Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiology. Published online August 14, 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2454.

 


RCT: Osimertinib Significantly Extends Progression-Free Survival in Unresectable Stage III EGFR-Mutated NSCLC After Chemoradiotherapy – N Engl J Med

17 Aug, 2024 | 16:30h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 216 patients with unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who showed no disease progression during or after chemoradiotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either osimertinib (143 patients) or a placebo (73 patients) until disease progression.

Main Findings: The study found that osimertinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared to placebo, with a median PFS of 39.1 months versus 5.6 months, respectively. The hazard ratio for disease progression or death was 0.16, indicating a substantial reduction in risk with osimertinib. At 12 months, 74% of patients in the osimertinib group were alive and progression-free, compared to 22% in the placebo group. Interim overall survival data suggested a modest difference favoring osimertinib, though it was not statistically significant.

Implications for Practice: Osimertinib offers a significant survival benefit as a consolidation therapy following chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The findings support the use of osimertinib in this setting, despite an increased incidence of adverse events, highlighting its role in improving long-term outcomes.

Reference: Lu, S., Kato, T., Dong, X., Ahn, M.J., Quang, L.V., Soparattanapaisarn, N., Inoue, T., et al. (2024). Osimertinib after chemoradiotherapy in stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC. New England Journal of Medicine, 391(7), 585-597. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2402614.

 


RCT: Dietary Acid Reduction with Fruits and Vegetables Slows CKD Progression and Lowers CVD Risk in Hypertensive Patients – Am J Med

17 Aug, 2024 | 15:49h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This five-year randomized control trial included 153 hypertensive patients with macroalbuminuria and normal kidney function. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a diet rich in base-producing fruits and vegetables, oral sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), or Usual Care. The primary objective was to assess the effects of dietary acid reduction on chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.

Main Findings: The study found that both fruits and vegetables and NaHCO3 slowed CKD progression compared to Usual Care, with significantly higher estimated glomerular filtration rates in the intervention groups. However, only the fruits and vegetables group showed significant reductions in systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and body mass index, leading to greater improvements in CVD risk indices.

Implications for Practice: The results support using fruits and vegetables as a foundational treatment for hypertension to reduce CKD progression and lower CVD risk, potentially with reduced reliance on pharmacological interventions.

Reference: Goraya, N., Madias, N. E., Simoni, J., Kahlon, M., Aksan, N., & Wesson, D. E. (2024). Kidney and Cardiovascular Protection Using Dietary Acid Reduction in Primary Hypertension: A Five-Year, Interventional, Randomized, Control Trial. The American Journal of Medicine, 000(000), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.06.006.

 


Randomized Phase 2 Trial: Extended-Release Ketamine Tablets Reduce Depression Scores in Treatment-Resistant Depression Without Significant Adverse Effects – Nat Med

14 Aug, 2024 | 13:30h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This phase 2 multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of extended-release ketamine tablets (R-107) in adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). A total of 231 patients underwent an initial open-label phase where they received 120 mg of R-107 daily for 5 days. Responders, defined by a ≥50% reduction in Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores, were randomized to receive one of four doses of R-107 (30, 60, 120, or 180 mg) or placebo twice weekly for 12 weeks.

Main Findings: The primary endpoint, change in MADRS score at week 13, showed a significant reduction of 6.1 points in the 180 mg R-107 group compared to placebo (P = 0.019). This dose also had the lowest relapse rate (42.9%) compared to 70.6% for placebo. Secondary outcomes, including response and remission rates, were generally higher for active treatment arms but reached statistical significance only in the 120 mg dose group for treatment response. The treatment was well-tolerated, with no significant increases in blood pressure or sedation.

Implications for Practice: Extended-release ketamine tablets could be a promising treatment for TRD, offering significant symptom improvement with minimal adverse effects, particularly at higher doses. The favorable safety profile and potential for at-home administration make this formulation a convenient option for wider use, though further research is needed to confirm these findings in broader populations.

Reference: Glue, P. et al. (2024). Extended-release ketamine tablets for treatment-resistant depression: A randomized placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Nature Medicine, 30(7), 2004–2009. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03063-x.

 


RCT: Bisoprolol Does Not Reduce COPD Exacerbations in High-Risk Patients – JAMA

14 Aug, 2024 | 12:31h | UTC

Study Design and Population: The Bisoprolol in COPD Study (BICS) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted across 76 sites in the UK, including both primary and secondary care clinics. The study enrolled 515 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who had moderate to severe airflow obstruction and a history of at least two exacerbations in the past year. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either bisoprolol (n=261) or placebo (n=258) and were followed for one year.

Main Findings: The primary outcome, the number of COPD exacerbations requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids, antibiotics, or both, did not differ significantly between the bisoprolol group (mean exacerbations, 2.03 per year) and the placebo group (mean exacerbations, 2.01 per year). The adjusted incidence rate ratio was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.84-1.13; P = .72), indicating no significant reduction in exacerbations with bisoprolol. Additionally, the rates of serious adverse events were similar between the two groups.

Implications for Practice: The findings suggest that bisoprolol does not reduce exacerbations in COPD patients at high risk and should not be recommended for this purpose. This study underscores the need for continued research into effective interventions for preventing COPD exacerbations in high-risk populations.

Reference: Devereux, G. et al. (2024). Bisoprolol in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease at High Risk of Exacerbation: The BICS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 332(6), 462-470. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.8771.

 


RCT: Nemolizumab Plus Topical Therapy Improves Skin Clearance, Itch, and Sleep in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis – The Lancet

11 Aug, 2024 | 12:58h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This study reports on two identical 48-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials (ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2) involving 1,728 adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and pruritus unresponsive to topical corticosteroids. Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive nemolizumab (an IL-31 receptor antagonist) or placebo, alongside background topical corticosteroids (TCS) and/or calcineurin inhibitors (TCI).

Main Findings: At week 16, nemolizumab significantly improved primary outcomes compared to placebo, with a higher proportion achieving clear or almost clear skin (IGA success) and a 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75). Nemolizumab also showed significant early and sustained improvements in itch and sleep. The safety profile was comparable between groups, with treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in about half of the participants.

Implications for Practice: Nemolizumab, in combination with TCS-TCI, demonstrated robust efficacy in reducing inflammation, itch, and sleep disturbances in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. If approved, it could provide an important addition to current treatment options, particularly for patients inadequately managed by existing therapies.

Reference: Silverberg JI, Wollenberg A, Reich A, et al. (2024). Nemolizumab with concomitant topical therapy in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2): results from two replicate, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet, 404(10451), 445-460. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01203-0.

 


RCT: Blinatumomab Improves Overall Survival in MRD-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients – N Engl J Med

11 Aug, 2024 | 12:53h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This phase 3 randomized clinical trial included 488 adults aged 30 to 70 with BCR::ABL1-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) who achieved measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission after initial chemotherapy. The study compared the outcomes of patients receiving four cycles of blinatumomab alongside consolidation chemotherapy versus those receiving consolidation chemotherapy alone.

Main Findings: At a median follow-up of 43 months, the blinatumomab group demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival (85% vs. 68% at 3 years) compared to the chemotherapy-only group, with a hazard ratio for death of 0.41 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.73; P = 0.002). The 3-year relapse-free survival was also higher in the blinatumomab group (80% vs. 64%), with a hazard ratio for relapse or death of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.87). However, a higher incidence of neuropsychiatric events was noted in the blinatumomab group.

Implications for Practice: The addition of blinatumomab to consolidation chemotherapy significantly enhances overall and relapse-free survival in adult patients with MRD-negative BCP-ALL, suggesting its potential as a standard treatment approach for this population. Clinicians should monitor for neuropsychiatric side effects associated with blinatumomab use.

Reference: Litzow MR et al. (2024). Blinatumomab for MRD-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 391(4), 320-333. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312948.

 


Phase 3 RCT: Butantan-DV Dengue Vaccine is Safe and Shows 67.3% Efficacy Over 3.7 Years in Participants Aged 2–59 Years – Lancet Infect Dis

10 Aug, 2024 | 20:23h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial conducted in Brazil evaluated the efficacy and safety of the Butantan-dengue vaccine (Butantan-DV) in 16,235 healthy participants aged 2–59 years. Participants, who had not previously received a dengue vaccine, were randomly assigned to receive either a single dose of Butantan-DV or a placebo and were followed up for an average of 3.7 years.

Main Findings: The study found that Butantan-DV demonstrated 67.3% efficacy against virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) caused by any dengue virus serotype, with no cases of VCD caused by DENV-3 or DENV-4. The proportions of serious adverse events were similar between the vaccine and placebo groups, indicating that the vaccine was generally well tolerated.

Implications for Practice: The results support the potential of the Butantan-DV vaccine as an effective intervention for preventing symptomatic dengue, particularly from DENV-1 and DENV-2, across a broad age range regardless of dengue serostatus. Continued development and monitoring are warranted to confirm long-term efficacy and safety.

Reference: Nogueira, M. L., et al. (2024). Efficacy and safety of Butantan-DV in participants aged 2–59 years through an extended follow-up: results from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3, multicentre trial in Brazil. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00376-1.

 


RCT: Dapagliflozin Does Not Improve Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Organ Dysfunction – JAMA

10 Aug, 2024 | 19:58h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted across 22 ICUs in Brazil evaluated the effect of adding dapagliflozin to standard care in 507 critically ill patients with at least one acute organ dysfunction (respiratory, cardiovascular, or kidney). The study took place between November 2022 and September 2023, with participants randomly assigned to either 10 mg of dapagliflozin plus standard care or standard care alone for up to 14 days or until ICU discharge.

Main Findings: The primary outcome, a hierarchical composite of hospital mortality, initiation of kidney replacement therapy, and ICU length of stay, showed no significant difference between the dapagliflozin and control groups (win ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.13; P = .89). Secondary outcomes also did not demonstrate significant benefits, although dapagliflozin had a slightly higher probability of reducing the need for kidney replacement therapy.

Implications for Practice: The addition of dapagliflozin to standard care in critically ill patients with acute organ dysfunction did not improve overall clinical outcomes. Although the study did not find significant benefits, the wide confidence intervals suggest that further research could be warranted to explore potential effects more definitively.

Reference: Tavares, C. A. M., Azevedo, L. C. P., Rea-Neto, Á., et al. (2024). Dapagliflozin for Critically Ill Patients With Acute Organ Dysfunction: The DEFENDER Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 332(5), 401-411. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.10510.

 


RCT: Tirzepatide Significantly Improves MASH Resolution Without Worsening Fibrosis Over 52 Weeks – N Engl J Med

10 Aug, 2024 | 19:53h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide in 190 participants with biopsy-confirmed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and moderate to severe liver fibrosis (stage F2 or F3). Participants were assigned to receive subcutaneous tirzepatide (5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg) or placebo weekly for 52 weeks.

Main Findings: Tirzepatide significantly improved MASH resolution without worsening fibrosis compared to placebo. Resolution rates were 44% for 5 mg, 56% for 10 mg, and 62% for 15 mg, versus 10% for placebo. Improvement in fibrosis stage without worsening MASH was also higher in tirzepatide groups (51-55%) than in the placebo group (30%). The most common adverse events were mild to moderate gastrointestinal symptoms.

Implications for Practice: Tirzepatide shows promise as a treatment for MASH with moderate to severe fibrosis, significantly improving disease resolution without worsening fibrosis. However, further research with larger and longer trials is needed to confirm these findings and evaluate long-term safety.

Reference: Loomba, R., Hartman, M. L., Lawitz, E. J., et al. (2024). Tirzepatide for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis with Liver Fibrosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 391(4), 299-310. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2401943.

 


Phase 2 Trial: Survodutide Improves MASH Without Worsening Fibrosis, But Increases GI Side Effects – N Engl J Med

10 Aug, 2024 | 19:47h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This 48-week, phase 2 randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of survodutide, a dual agonist of the glucagon and GLP-1 receptors, in 293 adults with biopsy-confirmed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and fibrosis (F1-F3 stages). Participants were randomized to receive weekly injections of survodutide (2.4, 4.8, or 6.0 mg) or placebo.

Main Findings: Survodutide significantly improved MASH without worsening fibrosis compared to placebo, with 47% to 62% of participants in the survodutide groups achieving histologic improvement versus 14% in the placebo group. A reduction in liver fat content by at least 30% was observed in 57% to 67% of participants receiving survodutide, compared to 14% in the placebo group. However, adverse events such as nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting were more common with survodutide.

Implications for Practice: The findings suggest that survodutide could be a promising treatment for MASH, with potential benefits for liver histology and fat content. However, the increased gastrointestinal side effects warrant careful consideration in future phase 3 trials to better evaluate the drug’s safety profile and long-term efficacy.

Reference: Sanyal AJ, Bedossa P, Fraessdorf M, et al. (2024). A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Survodutide in MASH and Fibrosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 391(4), 311-319. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2401755.

 


Randomized Trials: Tirzepatide Reduces Apnea-Hypopnea Index and Body Weight in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Obesity – N Engl J Med

10 Aug, 2024 | 19:38h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This study comprises two phase 3, double-blind, randomized trials involving adults with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and obesity. Participants were either using or not using positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy at baseline and received tirzepatide or placebo over 52 weeks.

Main Findings: Tirzepatide significantly reduced the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) by 20-24 events per hour compared to placebo and also lowered body weight, hypoxic burden, and systolic blood pressure.

Implications for Practice: Tirzepatide offers a promising treatment for reducing OSA severity and associated obesity-related complications, but further research is needed to confirm long-term benefits.

Reference: Malhotra, A. et al. (2024). Tirzepatide for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Obesity. New England Journal of Medicine. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2404881.

 


Stay Updated in Your Specialty

Telegram Channels
Free

WhatsApp alerts 10-day free trial

No spam, just news.