Randomized Trials
Clinical Trial Follow-up: Empagliflozin Continues to Reduce Cardiorenal Risks Post-Discontinuation in CKD Patients
3 Nov, 2024 | 13:08h | UTCBackground: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression leads to end-stage kidney disease, adversely affecting quality of life, increasing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and imposing high economic costs. Previous trials, including the EMPA-KIDNEY trial, demonstrated that empagliflozin, a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, provides cardiorenal benefits in CKD patients at risk of progression. The persistence of these benefits after discontinuation of the drug remains uncertain.
Objective: To assess how the effects of empagliflozin on kidney disease progression and cardiovascular outcomes evolve after discontinuation in patients with CKD.
Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 6,609 patients with CKD were assigned to receive empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo and followed for a median of 2 years during the active trial period. Eligible patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 20 and less than 45 ml/min/1.73 m², or between 45 and less than 90 ml/min/1.73 m² with a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of at least 200 mg/g. After the active trial, 4,891 surviving patients consented to a 2-year post-trial follow-up without the trial drug, during which local practitioners could prescribe open-label SGLT2 inhibitors. The primary composite outcome was kidney disease progression or cardiovascular death from the start of the active trial to the end of the post-trial period.
Results: During the combined active and post-trial periods, a primary outcome event occurred in 26.2% of patients in the empagliflozin group and 30.3% in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72–0.87). During the post-trial period alone, the HR was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.76–0.99), indicating continued benefit after drug discontinuation. The risk of kidney disease progression was 23.5% in the empagliflozin group versus 27.1% in the placebo group (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72–0.87). Cardiovascular death occurred in 3.8% and 4.9% of patients, respectively (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59–0.95). No significant effect was observed on death from noncardiovascular causes (5.3% in both groups).
Conclusions: In patients with CKD at risk for progression, empagliflozin continued to confer cardiorenal benefits for up to 12 months after discontinuation. These findings suggest that short-term treatment with empagliflozin has lasting effects on kidney and cardiovascular outcomes.
Implications for Practice: Empagliflozin should be considered for a broad range of CKD patients to slow disease progression and reduce cardiovascular risk, with benefits extending beyond active treatment. Clinicians should initiate empagliflozin therapy in eligible CKD patients to maximize long-term cardiorenal protection.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the large sample size, broad eligibility criteria, and high follow-up rates. Limitations involve the exclusion of certain regions during post-trial follow-up and reliance on local eGFR measurements during this period.
Future Research: Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms behind the sustained benefits of empagliflozin after discontinuation and to explore the long-term effects of extended treatment durations.
RCT: No Significant Difference Between Intraosseous and Intravenous Vascular Access in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes
3 Nov, 2024 | 12:58h | UTCBackground: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major global health concern, resulting in high mortality rates despite advancements in emergency care. In Denmark alone, approximately 5,000 cases occur annually, with a 30-day survival rate of only about 14%. Rapid vascular access during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is crucial for administering medications like epinephrine, as recommended by international guidelines. Both intraosseous (IO) and intravenous (IV) routes are routinely used, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. Current guidelines favor IV access for initial attempts, yet this recommendation is based on very low-certainty evidence, highlighting the need for well-designed clinical trials.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of initial intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access on sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in adults experiencing nontraumatic OHCA.
Methods: This randomized, parallel-group superiority trial was conducted across all five regions of Denmark, covering 5.9 million inhabitants. Adults aged 18 years or older with nontraumatic OHCA requiring vascular access during CPR were randomized to receive either initial IO or IV access. The IO group was further randomized to humeral or tibial access for a secondary comparison. The primary outcome was sustained ROSC, defined as no need for chest compressions for at least 20 minutes. Key secondary outcomes included 30-day survival and survival with favorable neurologic outcome (modified Rankin scale score of 0–3). Procedural outcomes such as success rates of vascular access within two attempts, time to successful access, and time to first epinephrine administration were also assessed.
Results: Among 1,479 patients included in the primary analysis (731 in the IO group and 748 in the IV group), successful vascular access within two attempts was achieved in 92% of the IO group versus 80% of the IV group. Despite the higher success rate with IO access, the time to first successful access and time to first epinephrine dose were similar between groups. Sustained ROSC occurred in 30% of patients in the IO group and 29% in the IV group (risk ratio [RR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90–1.24; P=0.49). At 30 days, survival rates were 12% in the IO group and 10% in the IV group (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.87–1.56), with favorable neurologic outcomes observed in 9% and 8% of patients, respectively (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.83–1.62). No significant differences were found in procedural times, adverse events, or quality-of-life measures among survivors.
Conclusions: In adults with nontraumatic OHCA, initial intraosseous vascular access did not result in a significant difference in sustained ROSC compared to intravenous access. Both methods yielded comparable survival rates and neurologic outcomes at 30 days, suggesting that the choice of vascular access route may not critically impact immediate resuscitation success.
Implications for Practice: These findings indicate that emergency medical services can opt for either intraosseous or intravenous vascular access during resuscitation based on provider expertise, patient anatomy, and situational considerations without adversely affecting patient outcomes. Emphasizing flexibility in vascular access approach may facilitate quicker access and streamline resuscitation efforts in the prehospital setting.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the randomized design, large sample size, and nationwide implementation, enhancing generalizability. Limitations involve potential crossover between groups, lack of blinding among clinicians, and the study being underpowered to detect small differences in long-term outcomes.
Future Research: Further studies are needed to assess long-term survival and neurologic outcomes, and to explore whether specific patient subgroups may benefit more from one vascular access method over the other during cardiac arrest resuscitation.
Reference: Vallentin MF, Granfeldt A, Klitgaard TL, et al. Intraosseous or Intravenous Vascular Access for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. New England Journal of Medicine. 2024 Oct 31; DOI: http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2407616
RCT: Transcatheter Tricuspid-Valve Replacement Improves Symptoms and Quality of Life in Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation
3 Nov, 2024 | 12:37h | UTCBackground: Severe tricuspid regurgitation is associated with debilitating symptoms and increased mortality. Surgical intervention is infrequently performed due to high operative risks and late patient presentation, leading to poor outcomes. Transcatheter tricuspid-valve replacement offers a less invasive alternative versus surgical intervention, but data on its efficacy are limited.
Objective: To compare the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter tricuspid-valve replacement plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in patients with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation.
Methods: In this international, multicenter randomized controlled trial, 400 patients with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation despite optimal medical therapy were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive transcatheter tricuspid-valve replacement plus medical therapy (valve-replacement group, n=267) or medical therapy alone (control group, n=133). The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of death from any cause, implantation of a right ventricular assist device or heart transplantation, postindex tricuspid-valve intervention, hospitalization for heart failure, and improvements in the KCCQ-OS score by at least 10 points, NYHA functional class by at least one class, and 6-minute walk distance by at least 30 meters.
Results: At one year, the win ratio favoring valve replacement was 2.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56 to 2.62; P<0.001), indicating superiority over medical therapy alone. Patients in the valve-replacement group had significant improvements in quality of life, with 66.4% achieving an increase of at least 10 points in the KCCQ-OS score compared to 36.5% in the control group. Improvement of at least one NYHA class was observed in 78.9% of the valve-replacement group versus 24.0% of the control group. Reduction of tricuspid regurgitation to mild or less was achieved in 95.2% of patients in the valve-replacement group, compared to 2.3% in the control group. Severe bleeding occurred more frequently in the valve-replacement group (15.4% vs. 5.3%; P=0.003), as did new permanent pacemaker implantation (17.8% vs. 2.3%; P<0.001).
Conclusions: Transcatheter tricuspid-valve replacement significantly improved clinical outcomes, symptoms, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation compared to medical therapy alone, despite higher risks of severe bleeding and pacemaker implantation.
Implications for Practice: Transcatheter tricuspid-valve replacement offers a promising therapeutic option for patients with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation who are at high surgical risk. Clinicians should consider this intervention to improve patient symptoms and quality of life, while carefully weighing the procedural risks, particularly bleeding and arrhythmias requiring pacemaker implantation.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of the study include its randomized controlled design and comprehensive evaluation of both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Limitations involve the smaller control group due to the 2:1 randomization and a one-year follow-up period that may not capture long-term benefits or risks.
Future Research: Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to assess the durability of transcatheter tricuspid-valve replacement, its long-term impact on survival and hospitalization rates, and strategies to minimize procedural complications.
RCT: Total Hip Replacement Superior to Resistance Training for Severe Hip Osteoarthritis
3 Nov, 2024 | 01:23h | UTCBackground: Severe hip osteoarthritis (OA) is often treated with total hip replacement (THR), yet randomized trials comparing THR with nonsurgical interventions like resistance training (RT) are lacking. While exercise is recommended for hip OA, its efficacy relative to surgery remains unclear.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of THR with RT in patients aged 50 years or older with severe hip OA and an indication for surgery.
Methods: In a multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 109 patients were assigned to undergo THR (n=53) or participate in a 12-week supervised RT program (n=56). The primary outcome was the change in patient-reported hip pain and function from baseline to 6 months, measured by the Oxford Hip Score (OHS; range 0–48, higher scores indicate less pain and better function). Secondary outcomes included measures of pain, function, quality of life, physical activity, and functional performance. Safety was also assessed.
Results: At 6 months, the mean improvement in OHS was 15.9 points in the THR group and 4.5 points in the RT group (between-group difference: 11.4 points; 95% CI, 8.9 to 14.0; P<0.001). Significant improvements favoring THR were also observed in all secondary patient-reported outcomes. Serious adverse events occurred in 12% of patients in the THR group and 9% in the RT group; most were known complications of THR. At 6 months, 9% of patients assigned to THR had not undergone surgery, and 21% of those assigned to RT had undergone THR.
Conclusions: In patients aged 50 years or older with severe hip OA and an indication for surgery, THR resulted in clinically important, superior reductions in hip pain and improvements in function compared to RT at 6 months.
Implications for Practice: These findings support the use of THR over RT for patients with severe hip OA who are surgical candidates, affirming current clinical recommendations. However, RT may still be considered as an initial treatment option for some patients, especially those preferring to delay surgery.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the randomized controlled design and multicenter approach. Limitations involve lack of blinding, potential selection bias due to low enrollment (14% of eligible patients), and crossovers between treatment groups, which may underestimate the true treatment effects.
Future Research: Further studies should investigate long-term outcomes, optimal timing of THR, and factors influencing patient choice and response to RT versus surgery.
RCT: Vitamin K2 Reduces Nocturnal Leg Cramps in Older Adults
28 Oct, 2024 | 18:59h | UTCBackground Nocturnal leg cramps (NLCs) affect 50% to 60% of adults, causing significant discomfort, sleep disturbances, and reduced quality of life. Current treatments lack robust evidence for efficacy and safety, with quinine no longer recommended due to severe adverse effects. Vitamin K2 has shown promise in reducing muscle cramps in dialysis patients, suggesting potential benefits for managing NLCs.
Objective To evaluate whether vitamin K2 supplementation reduces the frequency, duration, and severity of nocturnal leg cramps in older adults compared with placebo.
Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted in China from September 2022 to December 2023, 199 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 years or older with at least two episodes of NLCs over a two-week screening period were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive daily oral vitamin K2 (menaquinone-7, 180 μg) or placebo for eight weeks. The primary outcome was the mean number of NLCs per week. Secondary outcomes included cramp duration and severity, measured on a 1 to 10 analog scale.
Results Of the 199 participants (mean age 72.3 ± 5.5 years; 54.3% female), 103 received vitamin K2 and 96 received placebo. Baseline weekly cramp frequency was similar between groups (vitamin K2: 2.60 ± 0.81; placebo: 2.71 ± 0.80). Over eight weeks, the vitamin K2 group experienced a significant reduction in mean weekly cramps to 0.96 ± 1.41, while the placebo group increased to 3.63 ± 2.20 (between-group difference: −2.67; 95% CI, −2.86 to −2.49; P < .001). The vitamin K2 group also showed greater reductions in cramp severity (mean decrease of 2.55 ± 2.12 points vs 1.24 ± 1.16 points in placebo) and duration (mean decrease of 0.90 ± 0.88 minutes vs 0.32 ± 0.78 minutes in placebo). No adverse events related to vitamin K2 were reported.
Conclusions Vitamin K2 supplementation significantly reduced the frequency, severity, and duration of nocturnal leg cramps in older adults, demonstrating both efficacy and safety.
Implications for Practice Vitamin K2 may offer an effective and safe therapeutic option for managing NLCs in older individuals, addressing a significant unmet clinical need in primary care.
Study Strengths and Limitations Strengths include the randomized, double-blind design and focus on an older population; limitations involve the relatively mild symptoms of participants and lack of assessment of quality of life or sleep improvements.
Future Research Further studies should assess the impact of vitamin K2 on sleep quality and quality of life in patients with more severe NLCs and explore the underlying mechanisms of its muscle-relaxing effects.
RCT: Early DOACs Safe and Non-Inferior to Delayed Initiation Post-Stroke with Atrial Fibrillation
28 Oct, 2024 | 17:52h | UTCBackground: Atrial fibrillation increases ischaemic stroke risk, and patients are prone to recurrence. Prompt anticoagulation post-stroke is critical, but optimal timing is unclear due to bleeding concerns. Guidelines often delay DOAC initiation without strong evidence.
Objective: To determine if early DOAC initiation (≤4 days) is non-inferior to delayed initiation (7–14 days) in preventing recurrent ischaemic events without increasing intracranial haemorrhage risk in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation.
Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, phase 4 randomised controlled trial at 100 UK hospitals, 3,621 adults with atrial fibrillation and acute ischaemic stroke were randomised to early or delayed DOAC initiation. Eligibility required physician uncertainty about timing. Participants and clinicians were unmasked; outcomes were adjudicated by a masked committee. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischaemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, unclassifiable stroke, or systemic embolism within 90 days.
Results: Among 3,621 patients (mean age 78.5; 45% female), the primary outcome occurred in 59 patients (3.3%) in both early and delayed groups (adjusted risk difference 0.0%, 95% CI –1.1 to 1.2%). Upper confidence limit below the 2% non-inferiority margin (p=0.0003) confirmed non-inferiority. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage rates were similar (0.6% early vs 0.7% delayed; p=0.78). No significant differences in mortality or heterogeneity across subgroups.
Conclusions: Early DOAC initiation within 4 days is non-inferior to delayed initiation in preventing recurrent events without increasing intracranial haemorrhage risk. Findings challenge guidelines advising delayed anticoagulation and support early initiation regardless of stroke severity.
Implications for Practice: Clinicians should consider starting DOACs within 4 days post-stroke in atrial fibrillation patients. Early initiation is safe and effective, potentially improving outcomes and suggesting guidelines may need revision.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include large sample size and masked outcome adjudication. Limitations include exclusion of patients with very severe strokes and low event rates, potentially limiting detection of rare adverse events.
Future Research: Further studies should explore optimal DOAC timing within 4 days and assess safety in patients with severe strokes or extensive haemorrhagic transformation.
RCT: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (GCSF) Enhances 90-Day Survival and Reduces Complications in Severe Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis
20 Oct, 2024 | 17:23h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This randomized trial evaluated 126 patients with severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (SAH) eligible for steroid treatment, with discriminant function scores between 32 and 90. Patients were randomized into three groups: prednisolone alone, GCSF alone, and combined GCSF plus prednisolone (GPred). Prednisolone was administered at 40 mg/day, while GCSF was given at 150-300 mcg/d for 7 days, then every third day for up to 12 doses over a month.
Main Findings: The GPred group showed significantly higher 90-day survival (88.1%) compared to prednisolone alone (64.3%, P = 0.03) and GCSF alone (78.6%). The 28-day survival was similar across groups. The GPred group also had more steroid responders by day 7 and showed greater improvements in discriminant function and MELDNa scores. Additionally, patients in the GPred group had significantly lower rates of infections, acute kidney injury, hepatic encephalopathy, and rehospitalizations.
Implications for Practice: Adding GCSF to prednisolone improves survival and reduces the risk of infections and complications in patients with severe alcohol-associated hepatitis. This combination therapy could be considered for improving outcomes in steroid-eligible patients with SAH.
RCT: Low-Dose Amitriptyline Effective as Second-Line Treatment for Irritable Bowel Syndrome
20 Oct, 2024 | 15:56h | UTCBackground: Most patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are managed in primary care. When first-line therapies—such as dietary changes and antispasmodic drugs—are ineffective, the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends considering low-dose tricyclic antidepressants as second-line treatment. However, their effectiveness in primary care is uncertain, and they are infrequently prescribed in this setting.
Objective: To determine whether titrated low-dose amitriptyline is effective as a second-line treatment for IBS in primary care.
Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (ATLANTIS) conducted at 55 general practices in England, 463 adults aged 18 years or older with Rome IV IBS and ongoing symptoms despite first-line therapies were randomized 1:1 to receive low-dose oral amitriptyline (10 mg once daily) or placebo for 6 months. Dose titration over 3 weeks up to 30 mg once daily was allowed according to symptoms and tolerability. The primary outcome was the IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included subjective global assessment (SGA) of relief of IBS symptoms, adequate relief for at least 50% of weeks, and adverse events.
Results: Among 463 participants (mean age 48.5 years; 68% female), low-dose amitriptyline was superior to placebo at 6 months, with a significant mean difference in IBS-SSS score between groups (–27.0; 95% CI, –46.9 to –7.1; P = .0079). More participants reported relief of IBS symptoms with amitriptyline compared to placebo (61% vs 45%; odds ratio [OR] 1.78; 95% CI, 1.19–2.66; P = .0050). Adequate relief of IBS symptoms for at least 50% of weeks was higher with amitriptyline (41% vs 30%; OR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.20–2.03; P = .0008). Adverse events were more frequent with amitriptyline, mainly related to anticholinergic effects such as dry mouth (54%) and drowsiness (53%), but most were mild. Withdrawals due to adverse events were slightly higher with amitriptyline (13% vs 9%).
Conclusions: Low-dose amitriptyline was superior to placebo as a second-line treatment for IBS in primary care and was safe and well tolerated.
Implications for Practice: General practitioners should consider prescribing low-dose amitriptyline to patients with IBS whose symptoms do not improve with first-line therapies, providing appropriate support for patient-led dose titration.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the large sample size, primary care setting, and extended treatment duration. Limitations involve underrepresentation of patients with IBS with constipation, potential unblinding due to side effects, and a predominantly White participant population.
Future Research: Further trials assessing amitriptyline as a first-line therapy for IBS in primary care and studies on long-term outcomes are recommended.
Reference: Ford AC, Wright-Hughes A, Alderson SL, et al. Amitriptyline at Low-Dose and Titrated for Irritable Bowel Syndrome as Second-Line Treatment in Primary Care (ATLANTIS): a Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial. Lancet. 2023; DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01523-4
RCT: Five-Fraction SBRT Noninferior to Conventional Radiotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer
20 Oct, 2024 | 15:46h | UTCBackground: Prostate cancer poses a significant global health challenge, with radiotherapy being a common curative treatment for localized disease. Hypofractionation, delivering higher doses per session over fewer treatments, has potential benefits in efficacy and convenience. While moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy is established, the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivering radiation in just five fractions remains uncertain.
Objective: To assess whether five-fraction SBRT is noninferior to conventionally or moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy regarding freedom from biochemical or clinical failure in patients with low-to-intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer.
Methods: In this phase 3, international, open-label randomized controlled trial (PACE-B), 874 men with stage T1–T2 prostate cancer, Gleason score ≤3+4, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤20 ng/mL were randomized 1:1 to receive SBRT (36.25 Gy in 5 fractions over 1–2 weeks) or control radiotherapy (78 Gy in 39 fractions over 7.5 weeks or 62 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks). Androgen-deprivation therapy was not permitted. The primary endpoint was freedom from biochemical or clinical failure.
Results: Between August 2012 and January 2018, 874 patients were randomized (433 to SBRT and 441 to control radiotherapy) at 38 centers. Median age was 69.8 years, median PSA was 8.0 ng/mL, and 91.6% had intermediate-risk disease. At a median follow-up of 74.0 months, the 5-year incidence of freedom from biochemical or clinical failure was 95.8% in the SBRT group and 94.6% in the control group (unadjusted HR 0.73; 90% CI, 0.48 to 1.12; P=0.004 for noninferiority). Cumulative incidence of late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 2 or higher genitourinary toxic effects at 5 years was higher with SBRT (26.9% vs. 18.3%; P<0.001), while gastrointestinal toxic effects were similar between groups (10.7% vs. 10.2%; P=0.94). Overall survival did not differ significantly (HR for death, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.90 to 2.20).
Conclusions: Five-fraction SBRT was noninferior to conventional or moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in terms of biochemical or clinical failure in patients with low-to-intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer. SBRT may be an effective treatment option but is associated with a higher incidence of medium-term genitourinary toxic effects.
Implications for Practice: SBRT offers equivalent oncologic efficacy with the convenience of fewer treatment sessions, potentially reducing patient burden and healthcare resource utilization. Clinicians should consider SBRT for eligible patients but must inform them about the increased medium-term risk of genitourinary toxic effects.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include a large sample size, multicenter design, standardized radiotherapy protocols, and exclusion of hormonal therapy, minimizing confounding factors. Limitations involve the applicability of findings only to patients similar to those in the trial; some may now opt for active surveillance, and results may not extend to higher-risk populations.
Future Research: Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes of SBRT, its role in higher-risk patients, and strategies to mitigate genitourinary toxic effects.
RCT: Milk Elimination Diet Comparable to Four-Food Elimination in Pediatric EoE
20 Oct, 2024 | 15:04h | UTCBackground: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated condition characterized by eosinophil infiltration of the esophageal mucosa, leading to symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and dysphagia in children. While elimination of six common food allergens is effective, this approach is highly restrictive and may adversely affect quality of life (QoL). Less restrictive diets could potentially balance efficacy with improved QoL.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of a one-food elimination diet excluding milk (1FED) versus a four-food elimination diet excluding milk, egg, wheat, and soy (4FED) in treating pediatric EoE.
Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, nonblinded trial conducted at ten sites in the United States, 63 children aged 6 to 17 years with histologically active and symptomatic EoE were randomized 1:1 to either 1FED (n = 38) or 4FED (n = 25) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was symptom improvement measured by the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score (PEESS). Secondary endpoints included the proportion achieving histologic remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field), changes in histologic features (histology scoring system), endoscopic severity (endoscopic reference score), transcriptome profiling (EoE diagnostic panel), QoL scores, and predictors of remission.
Results: Out of 63 participants, 51 completed the study (1FED, n = 34; 4FED, n = 17). The 4FED group showed a greater improvement in mean PEESS scores compared to the 1FED group (−25.0 vs. −14.5; P = .04). However, histologic remission rates were similar between 4FED and 1FED (41% vs. 44%; P = 1.00). Changes in the histology scoring system (−0.25 vs. −0.29; P = .77), endoscopic reference score (−1.10 vs. −0.58; P = .47), and QoL scores were comparable between groups. The withdrawal rate was higher in the 4FED group compared to the 1FED group (32% vs. 11%; P = .0496).
Conclusions: While the 4FED moderately improved symptoms more than the 1FED, both diets resulted in similar histologic, endoscopic, QoL, and transcriptomic outcomes. Given its comparable effectiveness, better tolerability, and simplicity, the 1FED is a reasonable first-choice therapy for pediatric EoE.
Implications for Practice: Eliminating cow’s milk alone may be preferable as initial dietary therapy for children with EoE due to its simplicity and similar efficacy compared to more restrictive diets. Clinicians should consider starting with a milk elimination diet before progressing to more restrictive elimination diets if necessary.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of the study include its randomized, multicenter design; standardized treatment instructions; and use of validated symptom and QoL instruments. Limitations include early termination due to low enrollment, a higher withdrawal rate in the 4FED group, nonblinded interventions, and potential bias from participant expectations.
Future Research: Further large-scale, randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and to identify biomarkers that predict response to dietary therapy in pediatric EoE.
RCT: More Frequent Screening with Pressure-Supported SBTs Delayed Extubation in Mechanically Ventilated Adults
13 Oct, 2024 | 13:15h | UTCBackground: Prompt liberation from mechanical ventilation is crucial to reduce complications associated with prolonged ventilator use. The optimal frequency of weaning readiness screening and the most effective spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) technique are not well established.
Objective: To evaluate whether the frequency of screening for weaning readiness (once-daily vs more frequent) and the SBT technique used (pressure-supported vs T-piece) affect the time to successful extubation in adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.
Methods: In a multicenter randomized clinical trial with a 2×2 factorial design, 797 critically ill adults who had been mechanically ventilated for at least 24 hours were enrolled. Participants were randomized to either once-daily or more frequent screening for weaning readiness and to undergo either pressure-supported SBTs (pressure support >0 to ≤8 cm H₂O with PEEP >0 to ≤5 cm H₂O) or T-piece SBTs, each lasting 30–120 minutes. The primary outcome was the time to successful extubation, defined as the time from starting unsupported spontaneous breathing that was sustained for at least 48 hours post-extubation.
Results: Among the 797 patients (mean age 62.4 years; 59.2% male), there was no significant difference in time to successful extubation when comparing screening frequencies (hazard ratio [HR] 0.88; 95% CI, 0.76–1.03; P = .12) or SBT techniques (HR 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91–1.23; P = .45) individually. However, a significant interaction between screening frequency and SBT technique was identified (P = .009). Specifically, in patients undergoing pressure-supported SBTs, more frequent screening *delayed* time to successful extubation compared to once-daily screening (HR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50–0.96; P = .02). Conversely, when T-piece SBTs were used, the frequency of screening did not significantly affect extubation time. The median time to successful extubation was shortest in the once-daily screening with pressure-supported SBT group (2.0 days) and longest in the more frequent screening with pressure-supported SBT group (3.9 days).
Conclusions: More frequent screening combined with pressure-supported SBTs resulted in a *longer* time to successful extubation, suggesting this combination may delay weaning from mechanical ventilation. Once-daily screening with pressure-supported SBTs showed a trend toward faster extubation compared to other strategies, although this was not statistically significant.
Implications for Practice: Clinicians should be cautious about combining more frequent screening with pressure-supported SBTs, as this may unintentionally prolong mechanical ventilation. Adopting once-daily screening with pressure-supported SBTs might facilitate earlier extubation.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of the study include its large sample size, multicenter design, and high adherence to the intervention protocols. Limitations involve the unexpected significant interaction between interventions, which may limit the generalizability of the results.
Future Research: Additional studies are warranted to confirm the interaction between screening frequency and SBT technique and to explore the mechanisms underlying the delayed extubation with more frequent screening and pressure-supported SBTs.
RCT: Liberal Transfusion Strategy Reduced Unfavorable Neurological Outcomes in Acute Brain Injury
12 Oct, 2024 | 11:01h | UTCBackground: Patients with acute brain injury frequently develop anemia, and the optimal hemoglobin threshold for red blood cell transfusion in this population remains uncertain. Previous studies have shown conflicting results regarding the benefits of liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies on neurological outcomes.
Objective: To determine whether a liberal transfusion strategy (hemoglobin threshold <9 g/dL) reduces the occurrence of unfavorable neurological outcomes at 180 days compared to a restrictive strategy (hemoglobin threshold <7 g/dL) in patients with acute brain injury.
Methods: The TRAIN trial, a multicenter, phase 3, randomized clinical trial, was conducted across 72 ICUs in 22 countries. It included patients with traumatic brain injury, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, or intracerebral hemorrhage, who had hemoglobin levels below 9 g/dL within the first 10 days post-injury. Participants were randomized to a liberal strategy (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin <9 g/dL) or a restrictive strategy (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin <7 g/dL), with primary outcomes measured by the occurrence of an unfavorable neurological outcome, defined by a Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score of 1-5 at 180 days.
Results: Among 820 patients who completed the trial (mean age 51 years; 45.9% women), 806 had data on the primary outcome (393 liberal, 413 restrictive). The liberal group received a median of 2 units of blood (IQR, 1–3), while the restrictive group received a median of 0 units (IQR, 0–1), with an absolute mean difference of 1.0 unit (95% CI, 0.87–1.12 units). At 180 days, 62.6% of patients in the liberal group had an unfavorable neurological outcome compared to 72.6% in the restrictive group (absolute difference –10.0%; 95% CI, –16.5% to –3.6%; adjusted relative risk 0.86; P = .002). The effect was consistent across prespecified subgroups. Cerebral ischemic events were lower in the liberal group (8.8% vs 13.5%; relative risk 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44–0.97). No significant differences were observed in 28-day survival or other secondary outcomes.
Conclusions: In patients with acute brain injury and anemia, a liberal transfusion strategy resulted in a lower rate of unfavorable neurological outcomes at 180 days compared to a restrictive strategy.
Implications for Practice: A liberal transfusion threshold of 9 g/dL may improve neurological outcomes in patients with acute brain injury by reducing cerebral ischemic events. Clinicians should consider adopting a higher hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in this population, weighing the benefits against potential risks associated with transfusions, such as infection or lung injury.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the large, multicenter international design and blinding of outcome assessors. Limitations involve the open-label nature, potential detection bias in assessing cerebral ischemic events, lack of standardized neuroprognostication, and incomplete assessment of concomitant interventions.
Future Research: Further studies are needed to confirm these findings in specific subgroups of acute brain injury, to explore optimal transfusion strategies, and to assess long-term outcomes and potential risks associated with liberal transfusion thresholds.
Aspirin vs. Clopidogrel Monotherapy After PCI: 1-Year Follow-Up of the STOPDAPT-3 Trial
6 Oct, 2024 | 16:51h | UTCBackground: Following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES), patients are typically managed with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Recent evidence suggests that monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor may reduce bleeding risks compared to aspirin monotherapy, but no prior trials have directly compared these regimens beyond one month of DAPT. The STOPDAPT-3 trial aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes of aspirin versus clopidogrel monotherapy following a short duration of DAPT.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of aspirin monotherapy with clopidogrel monotherapy from 1 month to 1 year after PCI with DES, focusing on cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes.
Methods: The STOPDAPT-3 trial was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted in Japan. A total of 6002 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or high bleeding risk (HBR) were randomized to either a 1-month DAPT regimen followed by aspirin monotherapy (aspirin group, n=2920) or 1-month prasugrel monotherapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (clopidogrel group, n=2913). The primary endpoints were a composite of cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke) and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5).
Results: At the 1-year follow-up, both the aspirin and clopidogrel groups had comparable cardiovascular outcomes (4.5% incidence in both groups; HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.77–1.30, P=0.97). Bleeding rates were also similar between groups (aspirin: 2.0%; clopidogrel: 1.9%; HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.69–1.52, P=0.92). No significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes, including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or revascularization. Additionally, adherence to the assigned monotherapy at 1 year was high in both groups (87.5% for aspirin; 87.2% for clopidogrel).
Conclusions: Aspirin monotherapy, compared to clopidogrel monotherapy, resulted in similar cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes during the 1-year follow-up after PCI with DES. Both therapies appear equally effective and safe for use following short-duration DAPT.
Implications for Practice: These findings suggest that either aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy could be safely used following a short course of DAPT, with similar clinical outcomes. In regions where more potent P2Y12 inhibitors are not widely used, aspirin monotherapy remains a cost-effective and safe alternative.
Study Strengths and Limitations: The study’s strengths include a large sample size and a well-structured, multicenter design. Limitations include the lack of randomization after 1 month and the high prescription of proton pump inhibitors, which may have affected bleeding outcomes. Additionally, the follow-up period of 1 year may be too short to detect long-term differences.
Future Research: Longer-term studies are needed to confirm the findings, particularly regarding cardiovascular outcomes beyond 1 year. Further research is also required to evaluate the impact of aspirin versus more potent P2Y12 inhibitors in diverse populations and clinical settings.
RCT: Early Surgical AVR Improved Outcomes in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
6 Oct, 2024 | 16:29h | UTCBackground: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is a prevalent valvular heart disease requiring intervention in symptomatic patients. The optimal timing for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) in truly asymptomatic patients with severe AS and normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function remains uncertain and is under investigation.
Objective: To determine whether early surgical AVR improves clinical outcomes compared to conservative management with watchful waiting in asymptomatic patients with severe AS and normal LV ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50%).
Methods: The AVATAR trial was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial involving 157 low-risk, asymptomatic patients (mean age 67 years, 57% men) with severe AS and normal LVEF. Patients were randomized to early surgical AVR (n=78) or conservative treatment (n=79). All participants had negative exercise stress tests to confirm asymptomatic status. The primary composite endpoint included all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned hospitalization for heart failure (HF). Secondary outcomes encompassed individual components of the primary endpoint, cardiovascular death, serious adverse events, and procedural metrics.
Results: Over a median follow-up of 63 months, the primary composite endpoint occurred in 23.1% of the early surgery group versus 46.8% of the conservative group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24–0.73; P=0.002). All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the early surgery group (16.7% vs. 34.2%; HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23–0.85; P=0.012). Unplanned HF hospitalizations were also reduced (4.0% vs. 17.0%; HR 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06–0.73; P=0.007). There were no significant differences in stroke rates between the groups. Serious adverse events occurred less frequently in the early surgery group (26.4% vs. 49.4%; P=0.013). Sudden cardiac death was less common in the early surgery group, though not statistically significant (5.1% vs. 11.4%; P=0.17).
Conclusions: Early surgical AVR in asymptomatic patients with severe AS and normal LVEF significantly improved clinical outcomes, including reductions in all-cause mortality and HF hospitalizations, compared to conservative management.
Implications for Practice: These findings support considering early surgical AVR in truly asymptomatic patients with severe AS and normal LV function to reduce the risk of adverse events and improve long-term outcomes. Clinicians should weigh the benefits of early intervention against surgical risks, emphasizing careful patient selection and monitoring.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of the study include its randomized design, extended follow-up period, and strict inclusion of truly asymptomatic patients confirmed by negative exercise testing. Limitations involve a smaller sample size than initially projected, potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on follow-up and healthcare access, and early termination of enrollment, which may affect the generalizability of the results.
Future Research: Further large-scale randomized trials are needed to validate these findings and explore the role of early intervention strategies, including transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), in asymptomatic patients with severe AS.
RCT: H. pylori Screening Added to Fecal Immunochemical Testing Did Not Reduce Gastric Cancer Incidence or Mortality
4 Oct, 2024 | 11:00h | UTCBackground: Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, particularly in East Asia. Helicobacter pylori infection is a well-established risk factor for gastric cancer development. While eradication therapy may prevent gastric cancer, the effectiveness of community-based H. pylori screening on gastric cancer incidence and mortality remains uncertain.
Objective: To determine whether adding H. pylori stool antigen (HPSA) testing to fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening reduces gastric cancer incidence and mortality compared to FIT screening alone.
Methods: In a pragmatic randomized clinical trial conducted in Changhua County, Taiwan (2014–2018), 152,503 residents aged 50 to 69 years eligible for biennial FIT screening were randomized to receive an invitation for HPSA testing plus FIT (n = 63,508) or FIT alone (n = 88,995). Participants in the HPSA + FIT group with positive HPSA results were offered antibiotic eradication therapy. Primary outcomes were gastric cancer incidence and mortality, assessed via national cancer and death registries.
Results: Participation rates were higher in the HPSA + FIT group (49.6%) than in the FIT-alone group (35.7%). In the HPSA + FIT group, 38.5% tested positive for HPSA, and 71.4% of these received antibiotic treatment, achieving a 91.9% eradication rate. Over a median follow-up of approximately 5 years, gastric cancer incidence did not differ significantly between the HPSA + FIT and FIT-alone groups (0.032% vs 0.037%; mean difference –0.005%; 95% CI, –0.013% to 0.003%; P = .23). Gastric cancer mortality rates were also similar (0.015% vs 0.013%; mean difference 0.002%; 95% CI, –0.004% to 0.007%; P = .57). Adjusted analyses accounting for participation rates, follow-up duration, and baseline characteristics showed a lower gastric cancer incidence in the HPSA + FIT group (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63–0.98; P = .04), but no difference in mortality (RR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.73–1.40; P = .91). Adverse effects from antibiotics were mild, with abdominal pain or diarrhea occurring in 2.1%.
Conclusions: An invitation to HPSA testing combined with FIT did not significantly reduce gastric cancer incidence or mortality compared to FIT alone over a median follow-up of about 5 years. Adjusted analyses suggest a potential reduction in gastric cancer incidence but not mortality when accounting for participation rates and follow-up duration.
Implications for Practice: Adding H. pylori screening to existing FIT programs may not significantly reduce gastric cancer incidence or mortality in the short term, possibly due to low participation rates, incomplete eradication, and limited follow-up. Clinicians should consider these factors when implementing community-based H. pylori screening and weigh the benefits against resource utilization and patient adherence.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include a large sample size and integration of HPSA testing into an existing FIT screening infrastructure. Limitations encompass differences in participation rates and baseline characteristics between groups, a relatively short follow-up period, and only 71.4% of HPSA-positive participants receiving eradication therapy, which may have reduced the ability to detect significant effects.
Future Research: Longer-term studies with higher participation and eradication rates are needed to assess the long-term benefits of H. pylori screening on gastric cancer incidence and mortality. Research should explore strategies to improve screening uptake and treatment adherence.
RCT: Telehealth-Delivered Early Palliative Care Equivalent to In-Person Care in Advanced Lung Cancer
26 Sep, 2024 | 15:06h | UTCBackground: Patients with advanced lung cancer often face a high symptom burden and decreased quality of life (QOL), but access to early palliative care, which can improve these outcomes, remains limited. While telehealth has become increasingly utilized due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is unclear whether virtual palliative care is as effective as in-person care.
Objective: To compare the effect of early palliative care delivered via secure video vs in-person visits on the quality of life of patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods: This multisite, randomized comparative effectiveness trial enrolled 1250 adults with advanced NSCLC from 22 cancer centers in the US between June 2018 and May 2023. Participants were randomized to receive either early palliative care via video visits or in person every four weeks. The primary outcome was QOL measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included caregiver participation in palliative care visits and patient and caregiver satisfaction with care, mood symptoms, coping, and prognostic understanding.
Results: By week 24, patients in both groups reported equivalent QOL scores, with the video visit group scoring a mean of 99.7 compared to 97.7 in the in-person group (difference of 2.0 points, 90% CI, 0.1-3.9; P = .04 for equivalence). Both groups experienced similar improvements in QOL from baseline (mean increase of 8.4 points for video visits and 6.9 points for in-person care). Caregiver participation in palliative care visits was lower in the video visit group (36.6% vs 49.7%; P < .001). No significant differences were found between the groups in caregiver QOL, patient or caregiver satisfaction with care, mood symptoms, or coping strategies.
Conclusions: Early palliative care delivered via telehealth was equivalent to in-person visits in improving QOL for patients with advanced NSCLC. This underscores the potential of telehealth to increase access to essential palliative care services for this population without compromising care quality.
Implications for Practice: Telehealth can provide a feasible alternative to in-person palliative care, especially for patients with advanced lung cancer who face barriers to in-person visits, such as transportation challenges. However, strategies to enhance caregiver involvement in virtual visits may need to be developed.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the large, multisite randomized design and the use of validated outcome measures. Limitations involve the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact, which caused some intervention contamination due to unavoidable video visits in the in-person group. Additionally, caregiver participation was lower than expected, potentially limiting the generalizability of results regarding caregiver outcomes.
Future Research: Further studies should explore the long-term impact of telehealth on palliative care outcomes and investigate ways to enhance caregiver involvement in virtual care.
RCT: MRI-Guided Biopsy Reduces Overdiagnosis of Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer
26 Sep, 2024 | 12:22h | UTCBackground: Overdiagnosis of clinically insignificant prostate cancer is a significant issue in population-based screening programs, primarily when prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is followed by systematic biopsy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsies, which avoid systematic biopsies in men with negative MRI results, have shown potential in reducing unnecessary cancer diagnoses. However, long-term data are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of this approach.
Objective: To evaluate whether MRI-targeted biopsies, when combined with PSA screening, can reduce the detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer without compromising the identification of clinically significant or advanced disease.
Methods: This population-based, randomized trial in Sweden (GÖTEBORG-2) enrolled 13,153 men aged 50-60 years who underwent PSA screening. Men with PSA levels ≥3 ng/mL were randomized into two groups: (1) MRI-targeted biopsy only in cases with suspicious lesions, or (2) systematic biopsy in all cases with PSA elevation. Screening occurred every 2, 4, or 8 years depending on PSA levels, with follow-up for up to four years. The primary outcome was the detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer, and secondary outcomes included clinically significant and advanced or high-risk prostate cancer.
Results: After a median follow-up of 3.9 years, the detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer was significantly lower in the MRI-targeted biopsy group (2.8%) compared to the systematic biopsy group (4.5%), with a relative risk (RR) of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.32-0.57; P < 0.001). The relative risk of detecting clinically significant cancer was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.66-1.07), indicating no significant difference between the two groups. Advanced or high-risk cancers were detected in 15 men in the MRI group and 23 men in the systematic group (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.34-1.24). Severe adverse events occurred in five patients (three in the systematic biopsy group, two in the MRI-targeted biopsy group).
Conclusions: Omitting biopsies in men with negative MRI results substantially reduced the diagnosis of clinically insignificant prostate cancer without increasing the risk of missing clinically significant or advanced cancers. MRI-targeted biopsy strategies can effectively limit overdiagnosis while maintaining safety in screening programs.
Implications for Practice: MRI-targeted biopsies offer a promising strategy to reduce unnecessary cancer diagnoses and avoid overtreatment in prostate cancer screening. Clinicians should consider integrating MRI into prostate cancer screening algorithms, especially in cases with elevated PSA but no MRI-detected lesions. This approach may also decrease biopsy-related complications and patient anxiety.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of this trial include its population-based design, large sample size, and thorough follow-up. Limitations include its single-center setting in Sweden, which may limit generalizability to more diverse populations, and a modest participation rate of 50%.
Future Research: Further studies should assess the cost-effectiveness of widespread MRI use in prostate cancer screening and explore its utility in diverse populations. Investigations into novel biomarkers that could further refine patient selection for MRI-targeted biopsy are also warranted.
Phase 2 RCT: Ponsegromab Shows Promise for the Treatment of Cancer Cachexia
23 Sep, 2024 | 21:48h | UTCBackground: Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by weight loss, muscle wasting, and reduced quality of life. Elevated levels of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), a cytokine, have been associated with cachexia. Ponsegromab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits GDF-15, has shown potential in reversing cachexia in early studies by improving weight, appetite, and physical activity. This phase 2, randomized, double-blind trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ponsegromab in patients with cancer cachexia and elevated GDF-15 levels.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of ponsegromab on body weight, cachexia symptoms, appetite, physical activity, and safety in cancer cachexia patients with elevated GDF-15 levels.
Methods: In this 12-week study, 187 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, or colorectal cancer and elevated GDF-15 levels (≥1500 pg/mL) were randomized into four groups: ponsegromab 100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, or placebo, administered subcutaneously every four weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in body weight from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcomes included appetite and cachexia symptoms, physical activity measured via digital devices, and safety. The trial also included exploratory endpoints like changes in skeletal muscle mass.
Results:
At 12 weeks, patients treated with ponsegromab showed significant weight gain compared to placebo. The median weight gain differences were 1.22 kg in the 100-mg group, 1.92 kg in the 200-mg group, and 2.81 kg in the 400-mg group. Significant improvements in appetite and cachexia symptoms were observed in the 400-mg group compared to placebo. Physical activity, measured by nonsedentary time, also increased by 72 minutes per day in the 400-mg group. Adverse events were reported by 70% of ponsegromab patients and 80% of placebo patients. Serious adverse events occurred at similar rates across groups, but none were deemed related to treatment. No significant safety concerns were identified.
Conclusions: Ponsegromab effectively increased body weight and improved cachexia symptoms in patients with cancer cachexia and elevated GDF-15 levels, supporting GDF-15’s role as a key driver of cachexia. The findings suggest that ponsegromab may be a promising therapeutic option for managing cancer cachexia, with a favorable safety profile.
Implications for Practice: Ponsegromab could represent a targeted therapy for cancer cachexia, addressing weight loss, appetite, and physical function. Clinicians may consider its use for patients with advanced cancers experiencing cachexia, particularly those with elevated GDF-15 levels.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of the study include its randomized, double-blind design and the use of objective measures such as digital physical activity tracking. Limitations include the relatively short trial duration, and missing physical activity data for some patients. Additionally, the efficacy of ponsegromab across different baseline levels of GDF-15 requires further investigation.
Future Research: Larger and longer-term trials are necessary to confirm the therapeutic benefit of ponsegromab in cancer cachexia. Future research should explore its impact on survival and assess whether GDF-15 inhibition benefits other conditions associated with elevated GDF-15, such as heart failure and chronic kidney disease.
RCT: PACAP Monoclonal Antibody Lu AG09222 Reduced Migraine Days in Patients with Refractory Migraine
20 Sep, 2024 | 17:56h | UTCBackground: Migraine affects approximately 1 billion people worldwide and is a leading cause of disability. While calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP)-targeted therapies have advanced migraine prevention, many patients do not achieve sufficient benefit. Pituitary adenylate cyclase–activating polypeptide (PACAP) is implicated in migraine pathogenesis, and blocking its signaling may offer a new therapeutic target.
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of Lu AG09222, a monoclonal antibody against PACAP, for migraine prevention in adults who failed two to four prior preventive treatments.
Methods: In a phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (HOPE), 237 adults aged 18–65 years with migraine (mean baseline of 16.7 migraine days per month) were randomized 2:1:2 to receive a single intravenous infusion of 750 mg Lu AG09222, 100 mg Lu AG09222, or placebo. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in migraine days per month over weeks 1–4 in the 750 mg Lu AG09222 group compared to placebo. Secondary endpoints included the proportion achieving ≥50% reduction in migraine days per month and change in headache days per month.
Results: Of 237 participants, 97 received 750 mg Lu AG09222, 46 received 100 mg, and 94 received placebo. Over weeks 1–4, the 750 mg Lu AG09222 group had a mean reduction of 6.2 migraine days per month versus 4.2 days in the placebo group (difference –2.0 days; 95% CI, –3.8 to –0.3; P=0.02). A ≥50% reduction in migraine days per month was achieved by 32% in the 750 mg group versus 27% with placebo. The most common adverse events in the 750 mg group compared to placebo were COVID-19 (7% vs 3%), nasopharyngitis (7% vs 4%), and fatigue (5% vs 1%).
Conclusions: A single intravenous infusion of 750 mg Lu AG09222 significantly reduced migraine frequency over 4 weeks compared to placebo in patients with migraine refractory to prior preventive treatments.
Implications for Practice: Lu AG09222, by targeting PACAP signaling, may provide a novel preventive therapy for patients who have not responded to existing treatments, including CGRP antagonists.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Limitations encompass the short trial duration, small sample size, single-dose administration, predominantly White and European study population, and exclusion of patients with significant cardiovascular disease.
Future Research: Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the sustained efficacy and safety of Lu AG09222, optimal dosing strategies, and its effectiveness in diverse patient populations.
Phase 2 RCT: Axatilimab Demonstrates Efficacy in Refractory Chronic GVHD by Targeting CSF1R-Dependent Macrophages
19 Sep, 2024 | 16:05h | UTCBackground: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a significant long-term complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, affecting approximately half of recipients and leading to substantial morbidity and mortality. Standard therapies often fail to induce durable responses in patients with refractory or recurrent disease. CSF1R-dependent monocytes and macrophages are key mediators of chronic GVHD, contributing to inflammation and fibrosis. Axatilimab, a CSF1R-blocking antibody, has shown promising activity in early studies.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of axatilimab at three different doses in patients with recurrent or refractory chronic GVHD.
Methods: In this phase 2, multinational, randomized study (AGAVE-201), 241 patients aged ≥2 years with active chronic GVHD after at least two prior systemic therapies were randomized 1:1:1 to receive intravenous axatilimab at 0.3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n=80), 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n=81), or 3 mg/kg every 4 weeks (n=80). Randomization was stratified by chronic GVHD severity and prior use of FDA-approved therapies (ibrutinib, ruxolitinib, or belumosudil). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (complete or partial response) within the first six cycles. The key secondary endpoint was a patient-reported reduction in symptom burden, defined as a decrease of more than 5 points on the modified Lee Symptom Scale (range 0–100).
Results: The overall response rate was 74% (95% CI, 63%–83%) in the 0.3 mg/kg group, 67% (95% CI, 55%–77%) in the 1 mg/kg group, and 50% (95% CI, 39%–61%) in the 3 mg/kg group, exceeding the predefined efficacy threshold in all groups. A clinically meaningful reduction in symptom burden was reported in 60%, 69%, and 41% of patients in the respective dose groups. Median time to response was less than 2 months across all groups. Organ-specific responses were observed in all affected organs, including skin, lungs, joints, and fascia.
The most common adverse events were dose-dependent transient laboratory abnormalities related to CSF1R blockade, such as elevations in liver enzymes and creatine kinase, which were not associated with clinical symptoms or end-organ damage. Periorbital edema occurred more frequently at higher doses. Adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred in 6% of patients in the 0.3 mg/kg group, 22% in the 1 mg/kg group, and 18% in the 3 mg/kg group. Serious infections were reported but were not dose-dependent.
Conclusions: Axatilimab demonstrated significant efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated recurrent or refractory chronic GVHD, with the highest response rates and best tolerability observed at the lowest dose tested (0.3 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Targeting CSF1R-dependent monocytes and macrophages may represent a novel therapeutic strategy in chronic GVHD.
Implications for Practice: Axatilimab offers a potential new treatment option for patients with chronic GVHD refractory to standard therapies, including those who have failed prior FDA-approved treatments. Clinicians should consider axatilimab as a therapeutic option while monitoring for transient laboratory abnormalities associated with CSF1R blockade. The lower dose appears to provide optimal efficacy with fewer adverse events.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the randomized, multinational design and inclusion of patients with severe, refractory chronic GVHD who had received multiple prior therapies. Limitations include the lack of a comparator group, which may introduce outcome-reporting bias, and the small sizes of subgroups, limiting the generalizability of certain findings.
Future Research: Further studies are needed to confirm these results, assess long-term outcomes, and explore axatilimab in earlier lines of therapy and in combination with other treatments. Investigations into the use of axatilimab in other autoimmune diseases characterized by CSF1R-driven macrophage-mediated inflammation and fibrosis are also warranted.
RCT: Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Improved Overall Survival in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
18 Sep, 2024 | 16:08h | UTCBackground: Early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. The phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 trial previously demonstrated that adding pembrolizumab to chemotherapy improved pathological complete response rates and event-free survival in this population.
Objective: To determine whether neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab improves overall survival compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with early-stage TNBC.
Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial (KEYNOTE-522), 1174 patients with previously untreated stage II or III TNBC were randomized 2:1 to receive neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin, followed by doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide or epirubicin–cyclophosphamide) or placebo plus the same chemotherapy regimen. After surgery, patients received adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for up to nine cycles. The primary endpoints were pathological complete response and event-free survival; overall survival was a key secondary endpoint.
Results: After a median follow-up of 75.1 months, the estimated 5-year overall survival was 86.6% in the pembrolizumab–chemotherapy group versus 81.7% in the placebo–chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for death, 0.66; P=0.002). The 5-year event-free survival was 81.2% versus 72.2%, respectively (hazard ratio for event or death, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51–0.83). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 77.1% of patients receiving pembrolizumab–chemotherapy and 73.3% receiving placebo–chemotherapy. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 34.1% and 20.1% of patients, respectively.
Conclusions: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with early-stage TNBC.
Implications for Practice: The addition of pembrolizumab to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab, should be considered a new standard of care for patients with high-risk, early-stage TNBC, offering a significant survival benefit.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the large, international, randomized design, the use of a placebo control, and long-term follow-up. Limitations include the inability to isolate the effects of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant pembrolizumab and the exclusion of adjuvant capecitabine from the treatment protocol.
Future Research: Further studies should focus on identifying biomarkers predictive of response to pembrolizumab, optimizing the sequencing and duration of immunotherapy, and evaluating the addition of other agents to improve outcomes in early-stage TNBC.
RCT: Perioperative Durvalumab Plus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Improved Survival in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
18 Sep, 2024 | 15:22h | UTCBackground: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is the standard treatment for cisplatin-eligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Despite this approach, approximately 50% of patients experience recurrence within 3 years. Combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy may enhance outcomes, and durvalumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, has shown promise when added to chemotherapy in previous studies.
Objective: To evaluate whether perioperative durvalumab combined with neoadjuvant gemcitabine–cisplatin improves event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in cisplatin-eligible patients with operable MIBC.
Methods: In the phase 3, open-label, randomized NIAGARA trial, 1063 cisplatin-eligible patients with MIBC (clinical stage T2-T4aN0-1M0) were randomized 1:1 to receive either perioperative durvalumab plus neoadjuvant gemcitabine–cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy and adjuvant durvalumab (durvalumab group, n=533) or neoadjuvant gemcitabine–cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy alone (comparison group, n=530). The primary endpoints were EFS and pathological complete response (pCR). The key secondary endpoint was OS.
Results: At a median follow-up of 42.3 months, the estimated EFS at 24 months was 67.8% (95% CI, 63.6–71.7) in the durvalumab group versus 59.8% (95% CI, 55.4–64.0) in the comparison group (hazard ratio [HR] for progression, recurrence, not undergoing cystectomy, or death, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56–0.82; P<0.001). The estimated OS at 24 months was 82.2% (95% CI, 78.7–85.2) in the durvalumab group versus 75.2% (95% CI, 71.3–78.8) in the comparison group (HR for death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59–0.93; P=0.01). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 40.6% of patients in the durvalumab group and 40.9% in the comparison group. Radical cystectomy was performed in 88.0% of patients in the durvalumab group and 83.2% in the comparison group.
Conclusions: Perioperative durvalumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved event-free and overall survival compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in cisplatin-eligible patients with operable MIBC.
Implications for Practice: Adding perioperative durvalumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may represent a new option for cisplatin-eligible patients with MIBC, offering improved survival outcomes without increasing significant adverse events or delaying surgery.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the large sample size and randomized, phase 3 design. Limitations encompass the open-label design and inability to isolate the effects of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant durvalumab. Additionally, the trial was conducted before the widespread use of adjuvant nivolumab, potentially affecting the generalizability of the results.
Future Research: Further studies are needed to delineate the relative contributions of neoadjuvant and adjuvant durvalumab and to explore biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA to guide treatment decisions.
RCT: Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Shows Sustained 10-Year Survival Benefit in Advanced Melanoma
18 Sep, 2024 | 15:06h | UTCBackground: Advanced melanoma historically had a poor prognosis, with median survival under 12 months before 2011. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors like nivolumab (anti–PD-1) and ipilimumab (anti–CTLA-4) has significantly improved outcomes. Previous results from the CheckMate 067 trial showed longer overall survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone compared to ipilimumab alone. As patients now live beyond 7.5 years, longer-term data are needed to address new clinical questions about survival and disease progression.
Objective: To assess the final 10-year outcomes of overall survival, melanoma-specific survival, and response durability in patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab monotherapy, or ipilimumab monotherapy.
Methods: In the phase 3 CheckMate 067 trial, 945 patients with untreated, unresectable stage III or IV melanoma were randomized 1:1:1 to receive:
- Nivolumab plus ipilimumab: Nivolumab (1 mg/kg) and ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) every 3 weeks for four doses, then nivolumab (3 mg/kg) every 2 weeks.
- Nivolumab monotherapy: Nivolumab (3 mg/kg) every 2 weeks plus placebo.
- Ipilimumab monotherapy: Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) every 3 weeks for four doses plus placebo.
Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Randomization was stratified by BRAF mutation status, metastasis stage, and PD-L1 expression. Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival; secondary endpoints included objective response rates and subgroup analyses.
Results: After 10 years, median overall survival was:
- 71.9 months with nivolumab plus ipilimumab,
- 36.9 months with nivolumab,
- 19.9 months with ipilimumab.
Hazard ratios for death were 0.53 (95% CI, 0.44–0.65; P<0.001) for nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs. ipilimumab, and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.52–0.76; P<0.001) for nivolumab vs. ipilimumab. Ten-year overall survival rates were 43% with combination therapy, 37% with nivolumab, and 19% with ipilimumab. Median melanoma-specific survival was not reached (>120 months) with combination therapy (37% alive at study end), 49.4 months with nivolumab, and 21.9 months with ipilimumab. Among patients alive and progression-free at 3 years, 10-year melanoma-specific survival was 96% with combination therapy, 97% with nivolumab, and 88% with ipilimumab. No new safety signals were observed over the extended follow-up.
Conclusions: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated a sustained 10-year survival benefit over ipilimumab monotherapy in advanced melanoma. Nivolumab monotherapy also improved survival compared to ipilimumab, though the combination provided the greatest benefit.
Implications for Practice: These 10-year results support nivolumab plus ipilimumab as a preferred first-line treatment for advanced melanoma, offering potential for long-term survival and possible cure. Clinicians should balance improved efficacy against higher adverse event rates with combination therapy and monitor patients accordingly.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the large, randomized, multicenter design and extended follow-up, providing robust survival data. Limitations include the trial not being powered for formal comparison between combination and monotherapy, and potential confounding from subsequent therapies on long-term outcomes.
Future Research: Further studies should aim to identify biomarkers predicting long-term response, optimize patient selection for combination therapy, and develop treatments for patients unresponsive to current immune checkpoint inhibitors.
RCT: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Reduced Incontinence and Sexual Dysfunction vs. Prostatectomy in Localized Prostate Cancer
18 Sep, 2024 | 10:51h | UTCBackground: Men with localized prostate cancer have several treatment options, including prostatectomy and radiotherapy. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are crucial in guiding treatment decisions due to potential impacts on quality of life. However, randomized data comparing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with prostatectomy are lacking.
Objective: To compare patient-reported urinary, bowel, and sexual outcomes at 2 years following SBRT versus prostatectomy in men with low- to intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer.
Methods: In the phase 3 PACE-A randomized controlled trial conducted in the UK from 2012 to 2022, 123 men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) low- to intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer were randomized 1:1 to receive either SBRT (36.25 Gy in five fractions) or prostatectomy. Androgen deprivation therapy was not permitted. The co-primary outcomes were the number of absorbent urinary pads used daily and the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC-26) bowel domain score at 2 years. Secondary outcomes included clinician-reported toxicity and sexual function.
Results: Among 110 men who received treatment (median age 65.5 years; median PSA 7.9 ng/ml; 92% intermediate-risk), 50 underwent prostatectomy and 60 received SBRT. At 2 years, 50% of prostatectomy patients reported using one or more urinary pads daily compared to 6.5% of SBRT patients (p < 0.001; difference 43%, 95% CI 25%–62%). Bowel domain scores were better for prostatectomy (median 100) than for SBRT (median 87.5; p < 0.001; mean difference 8.9, 95% CI 4.2–13.7). Sexual function scores were worse for prostatectomy (median 18) compared to SBRT (median 62.5; p < 0.001). Clinician-reported genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were low in both groups.
Conclusions: SBRT was associated with significantly less urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction but slightly worse bowel function compared to prostatectomy at 2 years in men with localized prostate cancer.
Implications for Practice: These findings provide preliminary evidence to inform treatment decisions for men with low- to intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer. SBRT may offer advantages in reducing urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction, which are significant considerations for patients. Clinicians should also discuss the potential for increased bowel symptoms with SBRT.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the randomized design, use of contemporary treatment modalities, and comprehensive assessment of PROs. Limitations involve the small sample size due to slow recruitment, differential dropout rates, and incomplete PRO responses at the 2-year mark.
Future Research: Larger-scale randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings, assess long-term outcomes beyond 2 years, and evaluate the impact on disease control and quality of life.
RCT: Twice-Yearly Depemokimab Reduced Exacerbations in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma
17 Sep, 2024 | 22:39h | UTCBackground: Severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype often leads to frequent exacerbations despite treatment with medium- or high-dose inhaled glucocorticoids and additional controllers. Interleukin-5 is pivotal in eosinophil growth and survival, contributing to airway inflammation. Existing biologic therapies targeting interleukin-5 require frequent dosing intervals. Depemokimab is an ultra-long-acting anti–interleukin-5 biologic with enhanced binding affinity, potentially allowing effective dosing every six months.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of twice-yearly depemokimab in reducing exacerbations in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.
Methods: Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3A trials (SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2) were conducted. Patients aged ≥12 years with severe asthma and an eosinophilic phenotype (blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/μL in the previous 12 months or ≥150 cells/μL at screening) and at least two exacerbations in the prior year despite medium- or high-dose inhaled glucocorticoids plus another controller were enrolled. Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive depemokimab 100 mg or placebo subcutaneously at weeks 0 and 26, alongside standard care. The primary endpoint was the annualized rate of exacerbations over 52 weeks. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, prebronchodilator FEV₁, and asthma symptom scores at 52 weeks.
Results: A total of 792 patients were randomized, with 762 included in the full analysis set (502 depemokimab, 260 placebo). In SWIFT-1, depemokimab significantly reduced the annualized exacerbation rate compared to placebo (0.46 vs 1.11; rate ratio 0.42; 95% CI, 0.30–0.59; P < .001). Similar results were observed in SWIFT-2 (0.56 vs 1.08; rate ratio 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36–0.73; P < .001). No significant between-group differences were found in change from baseline in SGRQ scores. The incidence of adverse events was similar between groups in both trials.
Conclusions: Twice-yearly administration of depemokimab significantly reduced the annualized rate of exacerbations in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.
Implications for Practice: Depemokimab administered every six months may offer an effective treatment option for reducing exacerbations in severe eosinophilic asthma, potentially enhancing patient adherence and reducing treatment burden associated with more frequent dosing schedules.
Study Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include large, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled design and replicate trials confirming efficacy. Limitations involve the lack of significant improvement in quality-of-life measures, low exacerbation rates in the placebo group, potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trial conduct and outcomes, and limited data on certain subpopulations.
Future Research: Further studies are needed to assess long-term safety and efficacy, effects on quality-of-life measures, and the role of depemokimab in broader asthma populations, including those with varying eosinophil counts and biomarker profiles.