Open access
Open access
Powered by Google Translator Translator

Gynecology & Obstetrics (all articles)

M-A | The risk of long-term cardiometabolic disease in women with premature or early menopause

11 Apr, 2023 | 13:59h | UTC

The risk of long-term cardiometabolic disease in women with premature or early menopause: A systematic review and meta-analysis – Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

 


RCT | Maternal RSVpreF vaccination protects infants from severe RSV illness

10 Apr, 2023 | 13:56h | UTC

Bivalent Prefusion F Vaccine in Pregnancy to Prevent RSV Illness in Infants – New England Journal of Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentary: Vaccination during pregnancy could prevent RSV illness in infants – Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Cohort Study | Long-term mortality in individuals diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy or postpartum

10 Apr, 2023 | 13:48h | UTC

Long-term Mortality in Individuals Diagnosed With Cancer During Pregnancy or Postpartum – JAMA Oncology (free for a limited period)

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Review | Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women

10 Apr, 2023 | 13:27h | UTC

Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women: Prevention and Treatment – Deutsches Ärzteblatt International

 


SR | Insufficient evidence on skin-sparing mastectomy efficacy and safety for breast cancer

6 Apr, 2023 | 13:04h | UTC

Skin‐sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer – Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Summary: Is skin-sparing mastectomy an effective and safe surgical procedure for the treatment of breast cancer? – Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

 


Cohort Study | Maternal cardiac arrest: occurrence, survival, and influencing factors

6 Apr, 2023 | 12:59h | UTC

Cardiac Arrest During Delivery Hospitalization: A Cohort Study – Annals of Internal Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentaries:

Cardiac Arrest During Delivery Hospitalization – American College of Cardiology

Cardiac Arrest During Childbirth Is Rare, But Some Women Face Higher Risks – HealthDay

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


SR | Induction of labor at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia

6 Apr, 2023 | 12:55h | UTC

Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia – Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Summary: Induction of labour at or near the end of pregnancy for babies suspected of being very large (macrosomia) – Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

 


WHO Report | 1 in 6 people globally affected by infertility

5 Apr, 2023 | 13:47h | UTC

News Release: 1 in 6 people globally affected by infertility – World Health Organization

Report: Infertility Prevalence Estimates, 1990–2021 – World Health Organization

Key facts: Infertility – World Health Organization

Commentaries:

Infertility affects a ‘staggering’ 1 in 6 people worldwide, WHO says – CNN

One in six people worldwide affected by infertility, WHO reports – The Guardian

 

Commentary on Twitter (thread – click for more)

 


ACC/AHA blood pressure categories | Systematic review of adverse pregnancy outcomes in early pregnancy

6 Apr, 2023 | 12:53h | UTC

American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure categories—a systematic review of the relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes in the first half of pregnancy – American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


M-A | Impact of antihypertensive therapy on maternal & neonatal outcomes in mild-moderate pregnancy hypertension

6 Apr, 2023 | 12:51h | UTC

The impact of antihypertensive treatment of mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – Clinical Cardiology

 


Cohort Study | Pregnancy glucose intolerance, even below diabetes criteria, linked to increased risk of type 2 diabetes

5 Apr, 2023 | 13:42h | UTC

Glucose intolerance in pregnancy and risk of early-onset type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study – The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

 


Review | Comprehensive care of women with genetic predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer

5 Apr, 2023 | 13:32h | UTC

Comprehensive Care of Women With Genetic Predisposition to Breast and Ovarian Cancer – Mayo Clinic Proceedings

 


M-A | Vaginal swab outperforms urine for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis

5 Apr, 2023 | 13:23h | UTC

Vaginal Swab vs Urine for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis: A Meta-Analysis – Annals of Family Medicine

 


Consensus Paper | Definition and criteria for diagnosing cesarean scar disorder

5 Apr, 2023 | 12:51h | UTC

Definition and Criteria for Diagnosing Cesarean Scar Disorder – JAMA Network Open

 


M-A | Evolution and refinement of magnetically guided sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer

4 Apr, 2023 | 13:30h | UTC

Evolution and refinement of magnetically guided sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer: meta-analysis – British Journal of Surgery

 


SR | Adding ultrasound to mammography increases breast cancer detection, but increases false-positives and biopsies

3 Apr, 2023 | 13:55h | UTC

Summary: The systematic review examined the effectiveness and safety of combining mammography with breast ultrasonography versus mammography alone for breast cancer screening in women at average risk. The research included one randomized controlled trial, two prospective cohort studies, and five retrospective cohort studies, involving a total of 209,207 women.

High certainty evidence from one trial indicated that combining mammography with ultrasonography led to the detection of more breast cancer cases than mammography alone (5 vs. 3 per 1000 women). However, this combination also led to a higher number of false-positive results and biopsies. For every 1000 women screened with the combined approach, 37 more received a false-positive result, and 27 more women underwent a biopsy.

Secondary analysis of the trial data revealed that in women with dense breasts, the combined screening detected more cancer cases than mammography alone, while cohort studies for women with non-dense breasts showed no statistically significant difference between the two screening methods.

The included studies did not analyze whether the higher number of detected cancers with the combined screening method resulted in lower mortality rates compared to mammography alone. Further research, including randomized controlled trials or prospective cohort studies with longer observation periods, is needed to assess the impact of the two screening interventions on morbidity and mortality.

Article: Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk – Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Summary: Mammography followed by ultrasonography compared to mammography alone for breast cancer screening in women at average risk of breast cancer – Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

 


Review | Dysfunctional labor and delivery: adverse effects on offspring

3 Apr, 2023 | 13:36h | UTC

Dysfunctional labor and delivery: adverse effects on offspring – American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology (free for a limited period)

 


Glomerular diseases in pregnancy: pragmatic recommendations for clinical management

3 Apr, 2023 | 13:29h | UTC

Glomerular diseases in pregnancy: pragmatic recommendations for clinical management – Kidney International

 


Perspective | Should case management be considered a component of obstetrical interventions for pregnancies at risk of preterm birth?

3 Apr, 2023 | 13:18h | UTC

Should case management be considered a component of obstetrical interventions for pregnancies at risk of preterm birth? – American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


RCT | Early postpartum IUD placement noninferior vs. placement at 6-8 weeks for complete expulsion, but not for partial expulsion

31 Mar, 2023 | 13:48h | UTC

Early vs Interval Postpartum Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

News Release: Study: Risk of IUD Expulsion in Early Postpartum Placement – UC San Diego Health

Commentary: IUD Placement at Two to Four Weeks Postpartum Noninferior – HealthDay

Related:

SR | Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant and IUD for contraception.

Placement of an intrauterine device within 48 hours after early medical abortion – a randomized controlled trial – American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


M-A | Impact of axillary lymph node dissection and sentinel lymph node biopsy on upper limb morbidity in breast cancer patients

31 Mar, 2023 | 13:30h | UTC

Impact of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Upper Limb Morbidity in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis – Annals of Surgery

 


Study shows a slight breast cancer risk increase with progestogen-only birth control, comparable to combined oral methods

29 Mar, 2023 | 13:35h | UTC

Summary: A UK study and meta-analysis examined breast cancer risk linked to hormonal contraceptives, emphasizing progestagen-only contraceptives in premenopausal women. Utilizing a nested case-control design with the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), a primary care database, the study included 9,498 women under 50 diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1996 and 2017, and 18,171 closely matched controls. The meta-analysis merged CPRD findings with 12 observational studies on progestagen-only preparations.

The results revealed that current or recent use of combined oral contraceptives, oral progestagen-only contraceptives, injectable progestagen, and progestagen intrauterine devices all led to a similar increase in breast cancer risk. The 15-year absolute excess risk associated with five years of oral combined or progestagen-only contraceptive use ranged from 8 per 100,000 users aged 16-20 to 265 per 100,000 users aged 35-39. The study concluded that both contraceptive types were linked to a slight breast cancer risk increase, and these risks must be weighed against the benefits of contraceptive use during childbearing years.

Article: Combined and progestagen-only hormonal contraceptives and breast cancer risk: A UK nested case–control study and meta-analysis – PLOS Medicine

News Release: Study finds similar association of progestogen-only and combined hormonal contraceptives with breast cancer risk – PLOS

Commentary: Expert reaction to study looking at the association between hormonal contraceptive use and breast cancer incidence – Science Media Centre

 


SR | Effect of antenatal corticosteroid administration-to-birth interval on maternal and newborn outcomes

29 Mar, 2023 | 13:22h | UTC

Effect of antenatal corticosteroid administration-to-birth interval on maternal and newborn outcomes: a systematic review – eClinicalMedicine

 


FIGO Good Practice Recommendations on the use of progesterone in the management of recurrent first-trimester miscarriage

29 Mar, 2023 | 13:20h | UTC

FIGO Good Practice Recommendations on the use of progesterone in the management of recurrent first-trimester miscarriage – International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

 


Consensus Statement | Management of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia

28 Mar, 2023 | 14:37h | UTC

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD), the European College for the Study of Vulval Disease (ECSVD), and the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) Consensus Statement on the Management of Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia – Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

 


Stay Updated in Your Specialty

Telegram Channels
Free

WhatsApp alerts 10-day free trial

No spam, just news.