Cardiology (all articles)
RCT: Beta-Blocker Interruption Post-Myocardial Infarction Increases Cardiovascular Events Without Improving Quality of Life – N Engl J Med
31 Aug, 2024 | 19:04h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This multicenter, open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial included 3,698 patients across 49 sites in France. Participants had a history of myocardial infarction, a left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 40%, and had not experienced a cardiovascular event in the past six months. The study compared outcomes between patients who either interrupted or continued long-term beta-blocker therapy, with a minimum follow-up of one year.
Main Findings: Interruption of beta-blocker treatment resulted in a higher incidence of adverse cardiovascular events (23.8%) compared to continuation (21.1%), with a hazard ratio of 1.16 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.33). The difference did not meet the criteria for noninferiority (P=0.44). Additionally, there was no significant improvement in quality of life among patients who discontinued beta-blockers.
Implications for Practice: The findings suggest that in patients with a history of myocardial infarction and stable cardiovascular health, continuing beta-blocker therapy is preferable to interruption. Discontinuation may increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes without offering quality of life benefits, supporting the ongoing use of beta-blockers in this population.
RCT: Chelation Fails to Reduce Cardiovascular Events in Post-MI Patients with Diabetes – JAMA
18 Aug, 2024 | 19:11h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This double-masked, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial (RCT) included 959 participants aged 50 or older with diabetes and a history of myocardial infarction (MI) from 88 sites in the US and Canada. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 40 weekly infusions of an EDTA-based chelation solution or a placebo infusion. The median follow-up period was 48 months.
Main Findings: The trial found no significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with EDTA-based chelation compared to placebo. The primary endpoint, a composite of all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina, occurred in 35.6% of the chelation group and 35.7% of the placebo group (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76-1.16; P = .53). However, chelation did reduce median blood lead levels by 61%, from 9.0 μg/L at baseline to 3.5 μg/L by the 40th infusion (P < .001).
Implications for Practice: Despite the significant reduction in blood lead levels, EDTA-based chelation did not reduce cardiovascular events in this high-risk population. These findings suggest that while chelation therapy may lower lead levels, it does not translate into cardiovascular benefits for patients with diabetes and a history of MI, challenging its use in this context.
Cohort Study: Long-Term Multivitamin Use Not Linked to Reduced Mortality in Over 390,000 US Adults
18 Aug, 2024 | 15:07h | UTCtudy Design and Population: This cohort study examined the association between daily multivitamin (MV) use and mortality risk using data from three large prospective cohorts in the United States. The study included 390,124 generally healthy adults with no prior history of cancer or major chronic diseases. Participants were followed for up to 27 years, with baseline MV use assessed between 1993 and 2001 and follow-up assessments from 1998 to 2004.
Main Findings: Daily MV use was not associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality. In fact, the study found a 4% higher risk of mortality among daily MV users compared to nonusers during the first half of the follow-up period (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07), although this risk was not significant in the second half. The findings were consistent across major causes of death, including heart disease, cancer, and cerebrovascular diseases.
Implications for Practice: These findings suggest that long-term MV use does not confer a mortality benefit among generally healthy adults. Healthcare providers may need to reconsider recommending MVs for longevity purposes, as the evidence does not support their efficacy in reducing mortality risk.
Review: Prevention and Management of Device-Associated Complications in the Intensive Care Unit – The BMJ
17 Aug, 2024 | 20:04h | UTCIntroduction:
This review article, published by experts from the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, focuses on the complications associated with invasive devices commonly used in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). While these devices are essential for managing critically ill patients, they also pose significant risks, necessitating a thorough understanding of their potential complications and strategies for prevention and management.
Key Points:
1 – Central Venous Catheters (CVCs):
– CVCs are widely used in ICU patients but carry risks like vascular injury, pneumothorax, thrombosis, and infection.
– Use of real-time ultrasound guidance and careful operator technique are crucial for minimizing these risks.
– Prompt removal of unnecessary CVCs is essential to reduce the risk of complications.
2 – Arterial Catheters:
– Commonly used for hemodynamic monitoring, these catheters can lead to complications such as vascular occlusion, nerve injury, and infection.
– Ultrasound guidance is recommended to reduce the risk of complications, and catheters should be discontinued as soon as clinically feasible.
3 – Airway Devices (Endotracheal Tubes and Tracheostomies):
– Complications include laryngeal injury, tracheal stenosis, and tracheomalacia.
– Strategies to reduce these risks include minimizing intubation attempts, ensuring proper tube placement, and managing cuff pressures carefully.
4 – Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO):
– ECMO is associated with significant complications, including bleeding, thromboembolic events, and neurologic injuries.
– Proper cannulation technique and vigilant monitoring are essential to mitigate these risks.
5 – Infection Control:
– Strict adherence to aseptic techniques and the use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings are recommended to prevent device-associated infections.
Conclusion:
This review underscores the importance of judicious use and timely removal of invasive devices in the ICU to minimize complications. Healthcare professionals must remain vigilant and employ best practices to prevent and manage these complications effectively.
RCT: Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion Trends Toward Lower Primary Graft Dysfunction in Heart Transplantation – The Lancet
17 Aug, 2024 | 19:38h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) compared to static cold storage (SCS) in preserving donor hearts for transplantation. Conducted across 15 transplant centers in eight European countries, the study enrolled 229 adult heart transplant candidates between November 2020 and May 2023. The trial included 204 patients who received a transplant and met the study’s inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Main Findings: The primary composite endpoint, including cardiac-related death, graft dysfunction, and rejection within 30 days post-transplant, occurred in 19% of patients in the HOPE group compared to 30% in the SCS group, reflecting a 44% risk reduction (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32–0.99, p=0.059). Notably, primary graft dysfunction was significantly lower in the HOPE group (11% vs. 28%, RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20–0.73). The incidence of major adverse cardiac transplant events was also reduced with HOPE (18% vs. 32%, RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34–0.92).
Implications for Practice: HOPE showed a potential clinical benefit by reducing the incidence of primary graft dysfunction and major adverse cardiac events after heart transplantation. Although the primary endpoint was not statistically significant, the observed risk reductions suggest that HOPE could improve outcomes in heart transplantation. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and optimize donor heart preservation strategies.
Meta-Analysis: 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Reduces Major Bleeding Without Increasing Stent Thrombosis After PCI with DES – Am J Cardiol
17 Aug, 2024 | 19:29h | UTCMain Findings: The analysis found that 1-month DAPT significantly reduced the risk of major bleeding (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97, p = 0.03) compared to >1-month DAPT. Additionally, there was no significant difference in stent thrombosis rates between the groups (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.81-1.44, p = 0.60). Secondary outcomes, including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events were also similar between the groups.
Implications for Practice: The findings support the use of 1-month DAPT followed by aspirin or a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor as a safer alternative to longer-term DAPT in patients undergoing PCI with DES. This strategy may help reduce bleeding risks without increasing the likelihood of thrombotic events, making it a viable option for routine clinical practice, particularly in patients at high risk for bleeding.
RCT: Routine Protamine Administration Enhances Hemostasis and Reduces Vascular Complications in TAVI – JAMA Cardiol
17 Aug, 2024 | 19:09h | UTCStudy Design and Population: The ACE-PROTAVI trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted at three Australian hospitals. It involved 410 patients (median age 81 years) undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of routine protamine administration versus placebo.
Main Findings: Patients receiving protamine showed a higher rate of successful hemostasis (97.9% vs. 91.6%) and a significantly shorter time to hemostasis (median 181 vs. 279 seconds). Protamine administration also led to a reduced risk of composite vascular complications (5.2% vs. 12.8%), primarily due to fewer minor vascular events. No adverse events were associated with protamine.
Implications for Practice: Routine protamine administration after TAVI improves hemostasis, reduces minor vascular complications, and shortens procedural and postprocedural recovery times, suggesting it should be considered in standard TAVI protocols.
Study: Novel Point-of-Care hs-cTnI Test Shows High Diagnostic Accuracy and Predictive Values for Myocardial Infarction – J Am Coll Cardiol
17 Aug, 2024 | 19:00h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This international, multicenter diagnostic study assessed the clinical and analytical performance of the new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI)-SPINCHIP point-of-care (POC) test. The study involved 1,102 adult patients presenting with acute chest discomfort in emergency departments, with myocardial infarction (MI) diagnoses adjudicated by two independent cardiologists.
Main Findings: The hs-cTnI-SPINCHIP test exhibited strong diagnostic accuracy with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.94, similar to established central laboratory assays. The 0/1-hour algorithm of the test identified 51% of patients as low risk for MI with a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%, while it confirmed MI in 27% of patients with a specificity of 90.9% and a positive predictive value of 72.9%. Consistency was observed across different sample types.
Implications for Practice: The SPINCHIP hs-cTnI POC test provides a rapid and accurate option for diagnosing MI in emergency settings, aiding quicker decision-making for ruling out or confirming MI.
Meta-Analysis: Renal Denervation Modestly Reduces Blood Pressure in Uncontrolled Hypertension – J Am Heart Assoc
17 Aug, 2024 | 16:14h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This updated meta-analysis evaluated 15 randomized clinical trials, encompassing 2,581 patients, to assess the efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. The trials included both patients on antihypertensive medications (ON-Med) and those off medications (OFF-Med), with comparisons made between RDN and sham or standard therapy.
Main Findings: RDN led to a modest but statistically significant reduction in blood pressure across both ON-Med and OFF-Med groups. In the OFF-Med group, 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP was reduced by 3.7 mm Hg (95% CI, -5.41 to -2.00). In the ON-Med group, the reduction was 2.23 mm Hg (95% CI, -3.56 to -0.90). Sham-controlled trials reinforced these findings, showing consistent BP reductions, thus validating the effect of RDN. However, the degree of BP reduction is modest and may be clinically limited.
Implications for Practice: While RDN appears to have a favorable safety profile and provides consistent BP reductions, the modest nature of these reductions suggests that its clinical utility may be more limited. Further research is needed to identify which patient populations might benefit the most from RDN and to optimize procedural techniques for greater efficacy.
RCT: Dietary Acid Reduction with Fruits and Vegetables Slows CKD Progression and Lowers CVD Risk in Hypertensive Patients – Am J Med
17 Aug, 2024 | 15:49h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This five-year randomized control trial included 153 hypertensive patients with macroalbuminuria and normal kidney function. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a diet rich in base-producing fruits and vegetables, oral sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), or Usual Care. The primary objective was to assess the effects of dietary acid reduction on chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
Main Findings: The study found that both fruits and vegetables and NaHCO3 slowed CKD progression compared to Usual Care, with significantly higher estimated glomerular filtration rates in the intervention groups. However, only the fruits and vegetables group showed significant reductions in systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and body mass index, leading to greater improvements in CVD risk indices.
Implications for Practice: The results support using fruits and vegetables as a foundational treatment for hypertension to reduce CKD progression and lower CVD risk, potentially with reduced reliance on pharmacological interventions.
2024 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Clinical Assessment, Management, and Trajectory of Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure – J Am Coll Cardiol
14 Aug, 2024 | 12:47h | UTCIntroduction: The American College of Cardiology (ACC) has released a focused update on the 2019 Expert Consensus Decision Pathway (ECDP) for the management of patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF). This update reflects new evidence and aligns with the latest ACC/AHA/HFSA heart failure guidelines.
Key Points:
1 – SGLT Inhibitors in Hospitalization:
– The update emphasizes the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors during hospitalization for heart failure, regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). These medications should be initiated early, provided the patient is hemodynamically stable and there are no contraindications such as type 1 diabetes or severe kidney dysfunction.
2 – Triage and Admission Criteria:
– Patients with a new diagnosis of HF with rapidly progressing symptoms, severe congestion, or higher disease complexity should generally be admitted from the emergency department (ED). Some low-risk patients may be managed in an observation unit or via Hospital at Home (HaH) programs.
3 – Daily Trajectory Review:
– The clinical trajectory of hospitalized HF patients should be reviewed daily to monitor for effective decongestion and the need for initiation of guideline-directed neurohormonal therapies. Adjustments should be made based on patient response.
4 – Neurohormonal Therapy Optimization:
– Strategies for optimizing neurohormonal therapies, including beta-blockers, angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs)/angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRAs), are updated. Therapy should be personalized based on patient tolerance, hemodynamics, and kidney function.
5 – Decongestion Strategies:
– The update provides enhanced guidance on diuretic therapy, including the use of dual nephron blockade and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors like acetazolamide for patients not responding adequately to loop diuretics.
6 – Palliative Care Integration:
– The role of palliative care has been highlighted, particularly for patients with worsening HF or those not responding to standard treatments. Early referral to palliative care can improve advance directive completion rates and reduce readmissions.
7 – Discharge and Follow-Up:
– Detailed discharge planning is crucial, including providing patients and caregivers with comprehensive information on medications, follow-up appointments, and the importance of adhering to the prescribed regimen. Telehealth may be utilized for post-discharge follow-up.
Conclusion: This focused update to the ACC ECDP provides essential guidance for the clinical management of patients hospitalized with heart failure. It emphasizes the early initiation of SGLT inhibitors, careful daily trajectory reviews, optimization of neurohormonal therapies, and the integration of palliative care. These updates aim to improve patient outcomes by addressing both short-term and long-term management strategies.
2024 Update to the ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Heart Failure – J Am Coll Cardiol
14 Aug, 2024 | 12:26h | UTCIntroduction:
The American Heart Association (AHA) and American College of Cardiology (ACC) have released the 2024 update to the 2020 clinical performance and quality measures for adults with heart failure. This update aligns with the latest 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure and introduces new performance and quality measures to improve patient care.
Key Points:
1 – Performance Measures (PM):
– PM-1: Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) at Discharge – Initiate optimal GDMT in hospitalized heart failure patients before discharge.
– PM-2: Blood Pressure Control in HFpEF – Ensure optimal blood pressure control in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
– PM-3: SGLT2 Inhibitor Use in HFrEF – Prescribe sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
2 – Quality Measures (QM):
– QM-1: SGLT2 Inhibitor in HFmrEF or HFpEF – Recommend SGLT2 inhibitors for patients with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction.
– QM-2: Social Determinants of Health – Screen and document actions addressing social determinants of health for heart failure patients.
– QM-3: Pregnancy Counseling – Provide patient-centered counseling on contraception and pregnancy risks for individuals with cardiomyopathy.
– QM-4: Continuation of GDMT in HFimpEF – Continue GDMT in patients with heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF).
– QM-5: Optimization of GDMT before TEER – Optimize GDMT before performing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for chronic secondary severe mitral regurgitation.
– QM-6: Monoclonal Protein Screening for Cardiac Amyloidosis – Ensure monoclonal protein screening in patients undergoing bone scintigraphy for suspected transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.
3 – Emphasis on Multidisciplinary Care: The guidelines highlight the importance of addressing cardiovascular disease risks, social determinants of health, and providing comprehensive patient education, particularly concerning reproductive health in women with cardiomyopathy.
4 – Exclusions: The measures exclude patients after heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device placement and allow for patient-specific exclusions when treatment is not appropriate based on clinical evidence or patient preference.
5 – No Retired Measures: The update did not retire any measures from the 2020 set, reflecting their continued relevance.
Conclusion:
The 2024 update introduces critical new performance and quality measures that reflect the latest evidence in heart failure management. These measures aim to improve patient outcomes by emphasizing guideline-directed therapies, multidisciplinary care, and consideration of social and health determinants.
Guideline Reference:
RCT: Bisoprolol Does Not Reduce COPD Exacerbations in High-Risk Patients – JAMA
14 Aug, 2024 | 12:31h | UTCStudy Design and Population: The Bisoprolol in COPD Study (BICS) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted across 76 sites in the UK, including both primary and secondary care clinics. The study enrolled 515 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who had moderate to severe airflow obstruction and a history of at least two exacerbations in the past year. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either bisoprolol (n=261) or placebo (n=258) and were followed for one year.
Main Findings: The primary outcome, the number of COPD exacerbations requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids, antibiotics, or both, did not differ significantly between the bisoprolol group (mean exacerbations, 2.03 per year) and the placebo group (mean exacerbations, 2.01 per year). The adjusted incidence rate ratio was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.84-1.13; P = .72), indicating no significant reduction in exacerbations with bisoprolol. Additionally, the rates of serious adverse events were similar between the two groups.
Implications for Practice: The findings suggest that bisoprolol does not reduce exacerbations in COPD patients at high risk and should not be recommended for this purpose. This study underscores the need for continued research into effective interventions for preventing COPD exacerbations in high-risk populations.
New AHA Guidelines for Managing Elevated Blood Pressure in Acute Care Settings – Hypertension
13 Aug, 2024 | 13:13h | UTCIntroduction:
The American Heart Association (AHA) has released a scientific statement focusing on the management of elevated blood pressure (BP) in acute care settings. This guideline addresses the significant variation in practice due to a lack of robust evidence for managing BP in such environments, particularly in emergencies or when elevated BP is asymptomatic.
Key Points:
1 – Classification of Elevated BP: Elevated BP in acute care settings is categorized into asymptomatic elevated BP and hypertensive emergency, the latter requiring immediate treatment due to acute target-organ damage.
2 – Hypertensive Emergency: Immediate treatment is necessary for patients with BP >180/110–120 mm Hg and evidence of new or worsening target-organ damage, typically using intravenous antihypertensive medications in a closely monitored environment.
3 – Asymptomatic Elevated BP: In cases where elevated BP is present without symptoms or target-organ damage, the use of antihypertensive medications should be approached cautiously. Recent studies suggest potential harm from aggressive treatment, highlighting the importance of verifying BP readings and identifying reversible causes before intervention.
4 – Proper BP Measurement: Accurate BP measurement is crucial. The guidelines stress using recently calibrated devices and following correct measurement techniques to avoid unnecessary treatment due to erroneous readings.
5 – PRN Orders: The use of “as needed” (PRN) antihypertensive medications for asymptomatic elevated BP is discouraged due to the risks of overtreatment and variability in BP control, which can lead to adverse outcomes.
6 – Treatment Thresholds: The guidelines recommend a high threshold for initiating or intensifying antihypertensive treatment in asymptomatic patients, emphasizing the need for repeated measurements and assessment of underlying causes.
7 – Post-Discharge Care: It is crucial to maintain prehospital antihypertensive regimens and avoid intensification at discharge unless clearly indicated. Effective care coordination and patient education are vital for successful transitions from hospital to home care.
Conclusion:
These guidelines represent a significant step toward standardizing BP management in acute care settings. By focusing on accurate measurement, cautious treatment of asymptomatic elevated BP, and proper follow-up, clinicians can reduce unnecessary interventions and improve patient outcomes.
Guideline Reference: Bress, A.P., et al. (2024). “The Management of Elevated Blood Pressure in the Acute Care Setting: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association.” Hypertension, 81–e106.
Cluster RCT: AI-ECG Shows Potential to Reduce Door-to-Balloon Time and Cardiac Deaths in STEMI Patients – NEJM AI
10 Aug, 2024 | 21:57h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This open-label, cluster randomized controlled trial assessed the impact of AI-powered electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) on reducing treatment delays for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The study involved 43,234 patients, with an average age of 60 years, at Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan. Patients were randomized 1:1 into an intervention group (AI-ECG-assisted STEMI detection) or a control group receiving standard care.
Main Findings: AI-ECG significantly reduced the median door-to-balloon time for emergency department patients (82.0 vs. 96.0 minutes, P=0.002) and the ECG-to-balloon time across all settings (78.0 vs. 83.6 minutes, P=0.011). While the AI-ECG intervention did not significantly affect all-cause mortality or new-onset heart failure, it led to a notable reduction in cardiac death rates (85 vs. 116 cases; odds ratio, 0.73; P=0.029).
Implications for Practice: AI-ECG can expedite the critical time to treatment for STEMI patients, potentially reducing cardiac death. Although overall mortality remained unchanged, the reduction in cardiac deaths suggests that AI-ECG could be a valuable tool in emergency and inpatient settings to improve outcomes for STEMI patients.
Consensus Recommendations: Cardiovascular Risks in People With Narcolepsy – J Am Hear Assoc
10 Aug, 2024 | 21:48h | UTCIntroduction: The Journal of the American Heart Association recently published a consensus guideline by a panel of sleep and cardiology experts to address the heightened cardiovascular risks in individuals with narcolepsy. Given the increased prevalence of hypertension and cardiometabolic comorbidities in this population, the panel developed recommendations aimed at mitigating these risks.
Key Points:
1 – Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Narcolepsy:
– Individuals with narcolepsy, both Type 1 (NT1) and Type 2 (NT2), exhibit higher rates of cardiovascular and cardiometabolic diseases, such as hypertension, obesity, and diabetes, compared to the general population.
– The association of narcolepsy with conditions like obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and restless legs syndrome further elevates cardiovascular risk.
2 – Monitoring and Early Detection:
– Clinicians should annually monitor blood pressure, weight, and waist circumference in patients with narcolepsy, even in the absence of existing cardiovascular disease.
– Screening for lipid levels and hemoglobin A1c is recommended, especially in patients with risk factors like hypertension, obesity, and diabetes.
3 – Lifestyle and Therapeutic Interventions:
– Patients should be educated about the link between narcolepsy and cardiovascular disease. Emphasis should be placed on maintaining optimal sleep duration, regular exercise, healthy eating, and reducing sodium intake.
– The American Heart Association’s “Life’s Essential 8” guidelines should be followed to enhance overall cardiovascular health.
4 – Medication Management:
– Narcolepsy medications, particularly stimulants and sodium oxybate, can increase cardiovascular risk. Clinicians should consider the patient’s cardiovascular profile when prescribing these treatments and explore alternatives with lower cardiovascular impact if necessary.
5 – Sodium Reduction:
– High sodium intake, from both diet and certain narcolepsy medications, is associated with increased blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. Patients should be advised to reduce sodium intake, and clinicians should consider prescribing lower-sodium alternatives when possible.
Conclusion: These expert consensus recommendations underscore the importance of proactive cardiovascular risk management in patients with narcolepsy. By implementing these guidelines, clinicians can help mitigate the long-term cardiovascular risks associated with this chronic sleep disorder.
Retrospective Study: Automated Multiorgan CT Markers Predict Diabetes and Cardiometabolic Comorbidities – Radiology
10 Aug, 2024 | 21:36h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This retrospective study analyzed data from 32,166 Korean adults (mean age, 45 years) who underwent health screenings, including fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT scans, between 2012 and 2015. The study aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of automated CT-derived markers, such as visceral and subcutaneous fat, muscle area, bone density, liver fat, and aortic calcification, for diabetes and associated cardiometabolic conditions.
Main Findings: Visceral fat index showed the highest predictive performance for both prevalent and incident diabetes, with an AUC of 0.70 for men and 0.82 for women in cross-sectional analyses. Combining visceral fat, muscle area, liver fat, and aortic calcification improved prediction, yielding a C-index of 0.69 for men and 0.83 for women. Additionally, the study found that these CT markers were effective in identifying metabolic syndrome, fatty liver, coronary artery calcium scores >100, sarcopenia, and osteoporosis, with AUCs ranging from 0.80 to 0.95.
Implications for Practice: Automated CT-derived markers can effectively predict diabetes and multiple cardiometabolic comorbidities, surpassing traditional anthropometric measures. These findings suggest that integrating such automated assessments into routine clinical practice could enhance risk stratification and preventive care, particularly through opportunistic screening during routine CT scans.
Erythritol Ingestion Increases Platelet Reactivity and Thrombosis Potential in Healthy Adults – Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
10 Aug, 2024 | 21:11h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This interventional study evaluated the effects of erythritol versus glucose on platelet reactivity and thrombosis potential in 20 healthy volunteers, with 10 participants in each group. Researchers measured erythritol plasma levels and assessed platelet function through aggregometry and granule marker analysis both before and after ingestion of 30 g of erythritol or glucose.
Main Findings: Erythritol ingestion resulted in a more than 1000-fold increase in plasma erythritol concentration and significantly enhanced stimulus-dependent platelet aggregation and release of serotonin and CXCL4, markers of platelet activation. In contrast, glucose ingestion did not significantly alter platelet reactivity or granule marker release, highlighting erythritol’s unique pro-thrombotic effects.
Implications for Practice: These findings raise concerns regarding the safety of erythritol as a non-nutritive sweetener, particularly its potential to enhance thrombosis risk. The results suggest a need to reevaluate erythritol’s safety status and consider its impact on cardiovascular health in regulatory guidelines.
RCT: Intravenous Amino Acids Reduce AKI Incidence in Cardiac Surgery Patients – N Engl J Med
3 Aug, 2024 | 19:12h | UTCStudy Design and Population: In this multinational, double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 3511 adult patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were recruited from 22 centers across three countries. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of either a balanced mixture of amino acids (2 g/kg/day) or a placebo (Ringer’s solution) for up to three days.
Main Findings: The primary outcome, occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI), was significantly lower in the amino acid group (26.9%) compared to the placebo group (31.7%) with a relative risk of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.94; P=0.002). The incidence of severe AKI (stage 3) was also reduced in the amino acid group (1.6% vs. 3.0%; relative risk, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.87). There were no substantial differences between the groups regarding secondary outcomes such as the use and duration of kidney-replacement therapy or all-cause 30-day mortality.
Implications for Practice: The infusion of amino acids in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery appears to reduce the incidence of AKI, indicating a potential protective renal effect. However, this intervention did not significantly impact other secondary outcomes, including mortality and the use of kidney-replacement therapy. These findings suggest that amino acids could be considered as a strategy to mitigate AKI risk in this patient population, although further research is needed to explore long-term benefits and other clinical outcomes.
Meta-Analysis: Effects of extracorporeal CO2 removal on gas exchange and ventilator settings in critically ill adults – Crit Care
27 May, 2024 | 20:28h | UTCSummary: Study Design and Population: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 49 studies (3 RCTs, 46 observational studies) involving 1672 critically ill adults undergoing extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) for respiratory failure between January 2000 and March 2022.
Main Findings: ECCO2R significantly reduced PaCO2, plateau pressure, and tidal volume, while increasing pH across all patient groups. Adverse event rate was 19%. The three RCTs did not show mortality benefits but indicated longer ICU and hospital stays.
Implications for Practice: ECCO2R improves gas exchange and reduces ventilation invasiveness, especially in ARDS and lung transplant patients. However, due to the lack of mortality benefits and increased adverse events, further studies are needed to identify patient groups that could benefit most from ECCO2R.
Reference (link to free full-text):
Randomized Clinical Trial: Aficamten improves peak oxygen uptake in symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy – N Engl J Med
27 May, 2024 | 20:24h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This phase 3, double-blind trial randomized 282 adults with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) to receive aficamten or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in peak oxygen uptake, with secondary outcomes including changes in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score and New York Heart Association functional class.
Main Findings: Aficamten significantly increased peak oxygen uptake by 1.7 ml/kg/min (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.4; P<0.001) compared to placebo. Improvements were also seen in all secondary outcomes. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups.
Implications for Practice: Aficamten shows promise in improving exercise capacity and symptoms in patients with obstructive HCM, potentially offering a new therapeutic option. Further research may confirm its long-term benefits and safety.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Subgroup Analysis Insights: Apixaban vs. aspirin in subclinical atrial fibrillation based on CHA2DS2-VASc score – J Am Coll Cardiol
27 May, 2024 | 20:21h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This study is a subgroup analysis of the ARTESiA trial, which compared the efficacy and safety of apixaban versus aspirin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation (SCAF). The analysis focused on 4,012 patients categorized by their baseline CHA2DS2-VASc scores: <4 (39.4%), 4 (33.6%), and >4 (27.0%).
Main Findings: For patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score >4, apixaban significantly reduced the stroke/SE rate to 0.98%/year compared to 2.25%/year with aspirin, preventing 1.28 strokes/SE per 100 patient-years while causing 0.68 major bleeds. In patients with scores <4, the stroke/SE prevention was minimal (0.12 strokes/SE per 100 patient-years) with a similar rate of major bleeds. Patients with a score of 4 had intermediate results, with a moderate reduction in stroke/SE (0.32 per 100 patient-years) and a comparable risk of major bleeding.
Implications for Practice: The study suggests that for patients with SCAF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score >4, the benefits of apixaban in preventing stroke/SE outweigh the risks of major bleeding. For those with scores <4, aspirin might be a safer option. Patients with a score of 4 fall into an intermediate category, where individual patient preferences should guide the treatment decision.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Single-Arm Study: Evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with high-risk symptomatic native aortic regurgitation – The Lancet
25 May, 2024 | 19:45h | UTCThis article discusses the ALIGN-AR study, a prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial conducted across 20 US sites. The study enrolled 180 high-risk patients suffering from moderate-to-severe or severe symptomatic aortic regurgitation, who were treated with the Trilogy transcatheter heart valve. The average age of participants was 75.5 years, with a roughly equal gender distribution among the 180 participants. The primary safety endpoint of the study was assessed against a prespecified performance goal of 40.5%, with results showing a 27% event rate, which was considered non-inferior (p<0.0001). Additionally, the primary efficacy endpoint, 1-year all-cause mortality, was 7.8%, significantly below the performance goal of 25%, also demonstrating non-inferiority (p<0.0001). The study reported a 95% technical success rate with adverse events such as new pacemaker implantation occurring in 24% of the patients. These findings suggest that the Trilogy transcatheter heart valve is a viable and effective option for high-risk patients, achieving favorable short-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes. Further follow-up is necessary to determine long-term results and effects on left ventricular remodeling.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
RCT: Ponatinib shows superior MRD-negative complete remission rates compared to Imatinib in newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia – JAMA
25 May, 2024 | 19:03h | UTCThis global phase 3 randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy and safety of ponatinib versus imatinib in adults with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). The study, conducted across 77 sites, enrolled 245 patients who were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either ponatinib (30 mg/d) or imatinib (600 mg/d) alongside reduced-intensity chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of the trial was minimal residual disease–negative (MRD-negative) complete remission, assessed at the end of cycle 3. Results showed that ponatinib achieved a significantly higher MRD-negative complete remission rate of 34.4% compared to 16.7% with imatinib. Additionally, the safety profile between the two drugs was comparable, with arterial occlusive events being rare and similar across groups. These findings suggest ponatinib as a potentially preferable frontline therapy in this patient population due to its superior efficacy in achieving MRD-negative status without compromising safety.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Guidelines on the use of intravenous albumin in various clinical settings – CHEST
25 May, 2024 | 18:49h | UTCThe International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines provides comprehensive guidelines on the use of intravenous albumin across various clinical settings, including critical care, cardiovascular surgery, kidney replacement therapy, and complications of cirrhosis. The guideline emphasizes that there are few evidence-based indications supporting the routine use of albumin to improve patient outcomes. Key findings include:
1 – Critical Care: Limited recommendations for using albumin in adult, pediatric, and neonatal critical care, primarily advising against its routine use for volume replacement or managing hypoalbuminemia due to low or very low certainty of evidence.
2 – Cardiovascular Surgery: No recommendations for using albumin to prime cardiovascular bypass circuits or for volume replacement due to moderate to very low certainty of evidence.
3 – Kidney Replacement Therapy: Albumin is not suggested for preventing or managing intradialytic hypotension or improving ultrafiltration due to very low certainty of evidence.
4 – Cirrhosis Complications: Some conditional recommendations for using albumin in specific scenarios like large-volume paracentesis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to low certainty of evidence; however, it is generally not suggested for other complications of cirrhosis.
Overall, the guidelines advise a cautious approach to albumin use, highlighting the need for more robust evidence to support its broader application in clinical practice.
Reference (link to free full-text):