ChatGPT et al? Not so fast, say journal editors

ChatGPT et al? Not So Fast, Say Journal Editors – TCTMD

Related:

AI-Generated Medical Advice—GPT and Beyond – JAMA (free for a limited period)

Chat GPT will change Medicine – Vinay Prasad’s Observations and Thoughts

The use of ChatGPT and other large language models in surgical science – BJS Open

ChatGPT vs. NCI: analyzing the quality of cancer information on myths and misconceptions

ChatGPT has many uses. Experts explore what this means for healthcare and medical research – The Conversation

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & ChatGPT: De-Tether the Physician – Journal of Medical Systems (if the link is paywalled, try this one)

Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? – Critical Care

Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance

Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models

Perspective | ChatGPT-assisted diagnosis: is the future suddenly here?

Perspective | Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing

ChatGPT: Will It Transform the World of Health Care? – UCSF Department of Medicine

ChatGPT and the future of medical writing (ChatGPT itself wrote this paper)

ChatGPT: five priorities for research – Nature

The path forward for ChatGPT in academia – Lumo’s Newsletter

Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge – JAMA

ChatGPT is fun, but not an author – Science

Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature

ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature

Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists