GI Surgery – Endoscopy | Page 2 of 5 | Links Medicus Content Curation & Alerts in Medicine

Complications of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: recognition, assessment and management

7 Feb, 2023 | 13:41h | UTC

Complications of diagnostic upper Gastrointestinal endoscopy: common and rare – recognition, assessment and management – BMJ Open Gastroenterology

Review | Prevention and management of minor complications in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

7 Feb, 2023 | 13:39h | UTC

Prevention and management of minor complications in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy – BMJ Open Gastroenterology

ACG Guideline | Management of patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding

6 Feb, 2023 | 13:43h | UTC

Management of Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: An Updated ACG Guideline

Diagnosis and management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Endoscopy

Randomized Trial: Efficacy and Safety of Early vs. Elective Colonoscopy for Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

[Abstract Only] Systematic Review: Early Colonoscopy Does Not Improve Outcomes of Patients with Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Diagnosis and management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology – Gut

RCT | Disposable elevator cap duodenoscopes reduce microbial contamination during ERCP

30 Jan, 2023 | 00:49h | UTC

Effect of Disposable Elevator Cap Duodenoscopes on Persistent Microbial Contamination and Technical Performance of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: The ICECAP Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Internal Medicine

Commentary: Disposable elevator cap duodenoscopes may reduce contamination in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography – the ICECAP trial – JAMA Internal Medicine

Commentary on Twitter

In this RCT of 520 ERCP patients, disposable elevator cap duodenoscopes reduced persistent contamination (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16–0.75), with no differences in performance (technical success 94.6% vs. 90.7%, P=.13) or safety outcomes. https://t.co/km87WyxsvR

— JAMA Internal Medicine (@JAMAInternalMed) January 26, 2023

Cohort Study | Prevalence of colorectal neoplasia 10 or more years after a negative screening colonoscopy in 120 000 repeated screening colonoscopies

23 Jan, 2023 | 13:36h | UTC

Prevalence of Colorectal Neoplasia 10 or More Years After a Negative Screening Colonoscopy in 120 000 Repeated Screening Colonoscopies – JAMA Internal Medicine

Commentaries:

Prevalence of Colorectal Cancers Low 10 Years Following Negative Screening Test – HCP Live

Risk for Advanced Neoplasm Low 10+ Years After Negative Colonoscopy – HealthDay

Commentary on Twitter

Large registry-based study finds strong potential for risk-adapted #colorectalcancer screening, suggests extension of screening endoscopy intervals beyond 10 years may be warranted particularly in asymptomatic female and younger participants. https://t.co/fChg6DRyPw @DKFZ

— JAMA Internal Medicine (@JAMAInternalMed) January 17, 2023

ACG Clinical Guideline | Diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions

18 Jan, 2023 | 14:39h | UTC

ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions – The American Journal of Gastroenterology

RCT | Reduced adenoma miss rate with 9-minute vs. 6-minute withdrawal times for screening colonoscopy

18 Jan, 2023 | 14:13h | UTC

Reduced Adenoma Miss Rate With 9-Minute vs 6-Minute Withdrawal Times for Screening Colonoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Tandem Trial – The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Commentary: Longer withdrawal time reduces miss rates in screening colonoscopy – MDedge

Commentary on Twitter

? #RapidRCTinAJG, accelerating the time from RCT to publication

Reduced Adenoma Miss Rate With 9-Minute vs 6-Minute Withdrawal Times for Screening Colonoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Tandem Trial by Zhao, et al.

? https://t.co/SSIktB0Aoc @JasmohanBajaj @MLongMD #RedJournal pic.twitter.com/OwJhzeKYPA

— AJG – The American Journal of Gastroenterology (@AmJGastro) January 5, 2023

A comprehensive systematic review of colorectal cancer screening clinical practices guidelines and consensus statements.

16 Dec, 2022 | 13:09h | UTC

A comprehensive systematic review of colorectal cancer screening clinical practices guidelines and consensus statements – British Journal of Cancer

Guideline Summary | Evaluation and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

5 Dec, 2022 | 00:18h | UTC

Evaluation and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A brief look at the updated guidelines – Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

Original Guideline: ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease – American Journal of Gastroenterology

Related Guidelines:

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2021 – Journal of Gastroenterology

ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux.

Guideline on Screening for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Patients with Chronic GERD

NICE Guideline: Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease and Dyspepsia in Adults

NICE Guideline: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Children and Young People

M-A | Is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after clearance of common bile duct stones by ERCP superior?

23 Nov, 2022 | 13:44h | UTC

Is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after clearance of common bile duct stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography superior?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – Medicine

NICE Guideline Update | Colonoscopic surveillance in adults with inflammatory bowel disease or adenomas.

10 Nov, 2022 | 14:16h | UTC

Colorectal cancer prevention: colonoscopic surveillance in adults with ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease or adenomas – National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines – Gut

Consensus Statement: U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer now suggests average-risk CRC screening begins at age 45.

USPSTF Statement: Start colorectal cancer screening at 45 years for most patients.

ACG Clinical Guidelines: Start colorectal cancer screening at 45

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps – Journal of Gastroenterology

Meta-analysis: Risk of colorectal cancer and cancer related mortality after detection of low-risk or high-risk adenomas, compared with no adenoma, at index colonoscopy

Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer – Gastroenterology

Endoscopic surveillance after surgical or endoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO) Guideline – Endoscopy

Cross-sectional Study | Factors associated with lesion detection in colonoscopy among different indications.

9 Nov, 2022 | 12:08h | UTC

Factors associated with lesion detection in colonoscopy among different indications – UEG Journal

Cohort Study | Mental health morbidities and time to cancer diagnosis among adults with colon cancer in England.

3 Nov, 2022 | 13:55h | UTC

Mental Health Morbidities and Time to Cancer Diagnosis Among Adults With Colon Cancer in England – JAMA Network Open

Invited Commentary: The Interface Between Colon Cancer and Mental Health Morbidities – JAMA Network Open

ESGE Position Statement | Expected value of artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

25 Oct, 2022 | 13:20h | UTC

Expected value of artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement – Endoscopy

Review | Update on the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

20 Oct, 2022 | 12:29h | UTC

Update on the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding – BMJ Medicine

Review | New endoscopic tools in inflammatory bowel disease.

18 Oct, 2022 | 12:40h | UTC

New endoscopic tools in inflammatory bowel disease – UEG Journal

15-year benefits of sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a pooled analysis of randomized trials.

13 Oct, 2022 | 13:48h | UTC

15-Year Benefits of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials – Annals of Internal Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

News Release: One sigmoidoscopy significantly reduces long-term CRC incidence in both men and women – American College of Physicians

RCT | Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death.

RCT: One-time flexible sigmoidoscopy screening is associated with long-term reduction in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.

ACP Guideline: Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic Average-Risk Adults

BMJ Guideline: Colorectal Cancer Screening with Fecal Immunochemical Testing, Sigmoidoscopy or Colonoscopy

Current and future colorectal cancer screening strategies – Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (if the link is paywalled, try this one in PMC)

Consensus Statement: U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer now suggests average-risk CRC screening begins at age 45.

USPSTF Statement: Start colorectal cancer screening at 45 years for most patients.

ACG Clinical Guidelines: Start colorectal cancer screening at 45

Commentary on Twitter

A pooled analysis evaluating 15-yr effect of sigmoidoscopies found that receiving 1 #sigmoidoscopy significantly reduces long-term incidence of CRC in men and women: https://t.co/QXj5VRMHeo pic.twitter.com/s82sOJmBzr

— Annals of Int Med (@AnnalsofIM) October 11, 2022

RCT | Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death.

11 Oct, 2022 | 13:42h | UTC

Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death – New England Journal of Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentaries:

In gold-standard trial, invitation to colonoscopy reduced cancer incidence but not death – STAT

New study examines the effectiveness of colonoscopies – CNN

Podcast | Upper and lower GI bleed diagnosis and management.

4 Oct, 2022 | 14:33h | UTC

Upper and Lower GI Bleed Diagnosis and Management – The Curbsiders

Cohort Study | Adenoma detection rate after a positive FIT is linked to the risk of interval postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer.

4 Oct, 2022 | 14:31h | UTC

Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test–Based Screening: A Population-Based Cohort Study – Annals of Internal Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentaries:

Colonoscopies in FIT-positive persons requires much higher ADR than primary colonoscopy – American College of Physicians – American College of Physicians

Adenoma Detection Rate Tied to CRC Risk After Positive FIT – HealthDay

Commentary on Twitter

New from @ErasmusMC: endoscopists performing colonoscopy in FIT-based screening programs should aim for higher ADRs compared w/ programs that use colonoscopy as primary screening intervention: https://t.co/Fob1gxXF1i pic.twitter.com/y6qoAkOrT9

— Annals of Int Med (@AnnalsofIM) September 30, 2022

WGO Guideline—Endoscope disinfection update.

29 Sep, 2022 | 13:31h | UTC

WGO Guideline—Endoscope Disinfection Update – Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

RCT | Cold snare vs. forceps polypectomy on the rates of complete resection of small polyps.

27 Sep, 2022 | 13:06h | UTC

Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Cold Snare and Forceps Polypectomy Among Small POLYPs in Rates of Complete Resection: The TINYPOLYP Trial – The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Long-term follow-up of a RCT | Endoscopic versus surgical step-up approach for infected necrotizing pancreatitis.

14 Sep, 2022 | 13:13h | UTC

Endoscopic Versus Surgical Step-Up Approach for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis (ExTENSION): Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Trial – Gastroenterology

Commentary on Twitter

Long term follow-up #TENSION trial ??, today @AGA_Gastro: Endoscopic step-up approach not superior to surgical step-up approach in pts with infected necrotizing #pancreatitis. With endoscopy: ⬇️ pancreaticocutaneous fistulas and ⬇️ re-interventions. https://t.co/WKP7Pwb3vG pic.twitter.com/CGgd3jiTxm

— Marc Besselink (@MarcBesselink) May 18, 2022

Under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License