Open access
Open access
Powered by Google Translator Translator

Statistical significance and its critics: practicing damaging science, or damaging scientific practice?

8 Aug, 2022 | 11:35h | UTC

Statistical significance and its critics: practicing damaging science, or damaging scientific practice? – Synthese

Related:

Bayesian interpretation of p values in clinical trials – BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine

Scientists rise up against statistical significance – Nature

It’s time to talk about ditching statistical significance – Nature

PulmCrit- .050 shades of grey in p-value cutoffs

Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations – European Journal of Epidemiology

What a nerdy debate about p-values shows about science — and how to fix it – VOX

Big names in statistics want to shake up much-maligned P value – Nature News

‘One-size-fits-all’ threshold for P values under fire – Nature News

Statisticians issue warning over misuse of P values – Nature News

Understanding common misconceptions about p-values – The 20% Statistician

The clinician’s guide to p values, confidence intervals, and magnitude of effects – Eye (if the link is paywalled, try this one)

 


Stay Updated in Your Specialty

Telegram Channels
Free

WhatsApp alerts 10-day free trial

No spam, just news.