Scientists Rise Up Against Statistical Significance

Scientists rise up against statistical significance – Nature (free)

Editorial: It’s time to talk about ditching statistical significance – Nature (free)

Related: What a nerdy debate about p-values shows about science — and how to fix it – VOX (free) AND Big names in statistics want to shake up much-maligned P value – Nature News (free) AND ‘One-size-fits-all’ threshold for P values under fire – Nature News (free) AND Statisticians issue warning over misuse of P values – Nature News (free) AND Understanding common misconceptions about p-values – The 20% Statistician (free) AND PulmCrit- .050 shades of grey in p-value cutoffs (free) AND Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations – European Journal of Epidemiology(free)

Related Commentary on Twitter

"We are not calling for a ban on P values. . . Rather, and in line with many others over the decades, we are calling for a stop to the use of P values in the conventional, dichotomous way." https://t.co/kDjFRzJR90

— Eric Michael Johnson (@ericmjohnson) March 20, 2019