RCT: Reteplase More Likely to Achieve Excellent Functional Outcome Than Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke – N Engl J Med

Study Design and Population: This randomized clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of reteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The study involved 1,412 patients who presented within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either intravenous reteplase or intravenous alteplase.

Main Findings: The primary efficacy outcome, an excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1) at 90 days, was achieved in 79.5% of the reteplase group compared to 70.4% of the alteplase group (risk ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.21; P<0.001 for noninferiority and P=0.002 for superiority). The primary safety outcome, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours, was similar between groups (2.4% for reteplase vs. 2.0% for alteplase; risk ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.54 to 2.75). However, reteplase was associated with a higher incidence of any intracranial hemorrhage at 90 days (7.7% vs. 4.9%; risk ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.00 to 2.51) and more adverse events (91.6% vs. 82.4%; risk ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.20).

Implications for Practice: Reteplase shows superior efficacy in achieving excellent functional outcomes compared to alteplase in acute ischemic stroke, making it a viable alternative thrombolytic agent. However, the higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage and adverse events necessitates careful patient selection and monitoring. Further research may be needed to refine dosage and administration protocols to mitigate these risks.

Reference: Li, S., Gu, H-Q., Li, H., Wang, X., Jin, A., Guo, S., Lu, G., et al. (2024). Reteplase versus Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke. New England Journal of Medicine, 390(24), 2264-2273. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2400314.