RCT: Liberal vs. Restrictive Transfusion Strategy Shows No Significant Difference in Neurologic Outcomes for Traumatic Brain Injury Patients – N Engl J Med

Study Design and Population: This randomized clinical trial evaluated the effects of liberal versus restrictive red cell transfusion strategies in 742 adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and anemia. Participants were randomized to either a liberal transfusion strategy (initiated at hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL) or a restrictive strategy (initiated at hemoglobin ≤7 g/dL). The primary outcome was an unfavorable neurologic outcome at 6 months, assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended.

Main Findings: The study found that 68.4% of patients in the liberal-strategy group and 73.5% in the restrictive-strategy group experienced an unfavorable outcome (adjusted absolute difference of 5.4 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.9 to 13.7). No significant difference in mortality or depression was observed between the two groups. Although some functional independence and quality of life measures were better in the liberal group among survivors, venous thromboembolic events and acute respiratory distress syndrome rates were comparable.

Implications for Practice: The findings indicate that a liberal transfusion strategy does not significantly improve neurologic outcomes at 6 months in critically ill TBI patients compared to a restrictive strategy. Clinicians may consider maintaining a restrictive transfusion strategy, given the similar outcomes and potential for fewer transfusions. Further research is needed to explore specific subgroups that might benefit from different transfusion strategies.

Reference: Turgeon AF, Fergusson DA, Clayton L, et al. (2024). Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion Strategy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. New England Journal of Medicine, 390(24), 1234-1245. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2404360.