Long-term consequences of the misuse of ivermectin data.

Long-term consequences of the misuse of ivermectin data – The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Related:

Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid ‘miracle’ drug.

Fraudulent ivermectin studies open up new battleground between science and misinformation.

The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable.

Ivermectin: Cochrane’s most talked about review so far, ever. Why?

Flawed ivermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies.

Systematic review: no evidence to support the use of Ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID-19.

Why was a major study on ivermectin for covid-19 just retracted?

RCT: Ivermectin does not prevent hospitalizations in patients with COVID-19.

Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – “IVM did not reduce all-cause mortality, length of stay or viral clearance in RCTs in COVID-19 patients with mostly mild disease”.

Ivermectin is the new hydroxychloroquine, take 2 – “Ivermectin shouldn’t be used to treat COVID-19 outside of the context of a well-designed clinical trial”.

Therapeutics and COVID-19 | WHO guideline update advises Ivermectin should only be used to treat COVID-19 within clinical trials

RCT: Ivermectin does not improve time to resolution of symptoms among adults with mild COVID-19

Commentary on Twitter

Ivermectin's data for Covid, checkered with inconsistencies, small/low quality clinical trials, and fraud, have long-term consequences for the drug's established and essential useshttps://t.co/NG6vpej8GP @TheLancetInfDis pic.twitter.com/Oz0FxUJetK

— Eric Topol (@EricTopol) October 18, 2021