Open access
Open access
Powered by Google Translator Translator

Daily Archives: May 1, 2024

USPSTF Guideline: Biennial screening mammography recommended for women aged 40-74 to reduce breast cancer morbidity and mortality

1 May, 2024 | 21:45h | UTC

Study Design and Population:

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) performed a systematic review and collaborated on modeling studies to evaluate the effectiveness of various mammography-based breast cancer screening strategies. This assessment included factors such as age of initiation and cessation of screening, screening intervals, modalities, and the use of supplemental imaging. The population studied consisted of cisgender women and all other persons assigned female at birth who are 40 years or older and at average risk of breast cancer.

 

Main Findings:

The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that biennial screening mammography for women aged 40 to 74 years provides a moderate net benefit in reducing the incidence of and progression to advanced breast cancer, as well as in decreasing breast cancer morbidity and mortality. However, the evidence is insufficient to assess the benefits and harms of mammography screening in women aged 75 and older, as well as the use of supplemental screening with ultrasound or MRI in women with dense breasts.

 

Implications for Practice:

Based on these findings, the USPSTF recommends biennial screening mammography for women aged 40 to 74 years. This recommendation aims to optimize breast cancer outcomes while considering the balance of benefits and harms of screening. There is a need for further research to clarify the benefits and risks associated with mammography in women older than 75 and for those with dense breasts considering supplemental screening.

 

Commentary on X (thread – click for more)

 

Reference (link to free full-text):

Screening for Breast Cancer US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. Published online April 30, 2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.5534

 


RCT: Radiation therapy alone superior to chemoradiation in low-grade localized endometrial cancer recurrences

1 May, 2024 | 21:41h | UTC

This randomized clinical trial assessed the effectiveness of radiation therapy alone versus concurrent chemoradiation in treating localized recurrences of endometrial cancer. Conducted from February 2008 to August 2020, the study involved 165 patients who were randomized to receive either radiation therapy alone or chemoradiation with weekly cisplatin. Findings indicate that radiation therapy alone resulted in longer progression-free survival (PFS) compared to chemoradiation, with a median PFS not reached for radiation alone versus 73 months for chemoradiation. Additionally, radiation therapy demonstrated lower rates of acute toxicity. The study concluded that for patients with low-grade and primarily vaginal recurrences, radiation therapy alone is the preferable treatment option, offering excellent outcomes without the added toxicity of chemotherapy.

 

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Ann H. Klopp et al. (Year). Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin for Local Recurrences of Endometrial Cancer: Results From an NRG Oncology/GOG Prospective Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.01279

 


AUA/ASCO/SUO Updated guidelines for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer

1 May, 2024 | 21:40h | UTC

The 2024 update to the muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) guidelines provides a risk-assessed framework for the treatment of this high-risk patient group, which constitutes about 25% of all bladder cancer diagnoses. These guidelines, revised through the AUA amendment process, integrate new research findings from May 2020 to November 2023, involving a rigorous review of 3739 abstracts and 46 full-text articles. Key updates include refined protocols for neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, radical cystectomy, and multi-modal bladder-preserving therapies. Recommendations are categorized based on evidence strength, ranging from high to low, and are supplemented by clinical principles and expert opinions in areas lacking robust data. This structured approach aims to enhance clinical outcomes by updating practitioners on optimal management strategies and emphasizing the need for ongoing research to refine these recommendations.

 

Reference (link to free full-text):

Holzbeierlein et al. (2024). Treatment of Non-Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/ASCO/SUO GUIDELINE (2017; Amended 2020, 2024). Journal of Urology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003981

 


RCT: Aspirin fails to improve invasive disease-free survival in breast cancer patients

1 May, 2024 | 21:37h | UTC

This randomized clinical trial assessed the efficacy of daily aspirin (300 mg) as adjuvant therapy in reducing breast cancer recurrence among 3020 participants with high-risk nonmetastatic breast cancer across the United States and Canada. The study, which followed participants for a median of 33.8 months, found no significant benefit of aspirin on invasive disease-free survival or overall survival, with the hazard ratio for disease-free survival being 1.27 (95% CI, 0.99-1.63; P = .06) and for overall survival 1.19 (95% CI, 0.82-1.72). Given these findings, aspirin is not recommended as an adjuvant treatment for breast cancer, challenging earlier observational data that suggested a potential survival benefit in breast cancer survivors. The trial was concluded early due to the lack of observed benefits, with adverse event rates being similar in both the aspirin and placebo groups.

 

Commentary on X:

 

Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):

Wendy Y. Chen et al. (2024). Aspirin vs Placebo as Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: The Alliance A011502 Randomized Trial. JAMA, Published online April 29, 2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.4840

 


Stay Updated in Your Specialty

Telegram Channels
Free

WhatsApp alerts 10-day free trial

No spam, just news.